post em' if ya got em
I've actually got that homosexuality: legitimate deathstyle comic right now if anyone wants to see that. I've dumped it here before. It's good fun.
But I've also got a couple asay stuff that's just hilariously confusing but anti gay?
I like how he just assumes the reader is gonna be as anti gay as him so he doesn't feel the need to make strong points. Like just hey look at this gay, disgusting amiright?
>/pol/s all muhstaterights now
>but forget back when antigay repubs wanted a ban on gay marriage at the federal level
Leaving it up to the states was actually working out. Before the Supreme Court made their decision there were only 13 states that still banned gay marriage. It was slow but it was working. I'm glad the SC sped things up, though
His face and everything is just straight copied from one to the other except his eyebrows are a little different?
and that's about all i got on asay on gays
oh hah wait one more
haha fuck you no it's chuck asay
he's really bad at making his point and he doesn't like gays or abortion
I love how when women rape they label it "dating" and "affairs" as it they are somehow not rape. We really need to do something about the women raping their students, it is getting fucking out of hand. But sadly feminism dictates what you can and can not say about rape and feminism doesn't care when women rape boys.
I personally enjoy how in a thread not at all about lesbians/feminism and really just about making fun of extremist antigay fucks there's always that one forcing his weird antilesbian/feminism shit.
Like damn I'm pretty sure there could be a thread all about flowers and you'd come in all
WELL LESBIANS BEAT UP AND RAPE FLOWERS
Just go make a thread about it and leave it there while I shitpost more politicking cartoons.
>I love how when women rape they label it "dating" and "affairs" as it they are somehow not rape.
dude this comic is by a male, it's just some weird confused argument against homosexuality
His whole shit is like this. Just google asay comics. You can kinda tell there's a point? Maybe?
Ultimately he just assumes you already hate gays as much as he does so he figures he can just draw a gay man and it'll make you rage as much as he does.
This is how hate the sin people see themselves. Just this happy middle ground and we're just too extreme with our same sex fuckery.
It's an edit I just found funny. This is the original. Back when obama said he was now pro gay and that whole "opinions evolve" thing.
Oh lord, this is actually real. "Homosexuality: Legitimate, Alternate Death-Style" by Dick Hafer. Dick Hafer. So cute.
You can read the whole thing online. Whenever I try to link it, my post gets flagged as spam, though.
Look again. The lady is high as balls and not paying any attention to her children. Moustache man is visibly less happy. Over in the gay marriage channel, the gay man is paying attention to his baby and actively playing with it. The moustached husband is visibly happier, and the children are no different. Clearly, Asay is saying that just because you can spit out a kid doesn't mean you recognize the responsibilities of parenthood, and natural reproduction is not an inherent right.
It's a subtle and caring message.
Nothing trumpfags just gotta push their shit where it don't belong like always.
this is amazing to me because it was almost 40 years ago or more when published and look how close we are to being this mans nightmare
Oh nah chill it's from the onion. It's satire making fun of political cartoons.
>right to teach in public schools
any competent person should be allowed to have a job
>spousal and medical benefits
>custody and adoption rights
like straight people have?
faggots aren't allowed to be patriots?
that actually is pretty funny then
Poe's law applies here since i was unaware of the source of the comic
Ben "Frag the Fags" Garrison up in this shit
This is how you get aids
Honestly I do like that gays made themselves super flamer and swishy and shit cause even when they strawman you into being a can of worms you still look like a really fun bunch of worms.
>saliva contains germs and substances not normally found in the rectum
is this the complaint?
I mean, if you think gays are inherently abominable and bad then it follows that those things would be. It only seems so ridiculous because there isn't anything wrong with gay people and therefore no good reason for them not to have those things. Mentally replace "gays" with "rapists" or something like that.
It's true. Ben "Pulled a KA-BAR at the Gay Bar" Garrison is basically pol incarnate.
Wish he did more gay shit cause it'd be hilarious but I'm think the reason he doesn't is cause he's a maybe a bit of a closet homo (again like pol). At least going by such a boner he has for trump. In a purely sexual way.
>defending Ben "Unload a Mag in Every Fag" Garrison
Lol, reminds of this band poster my friend made.
Why do you support "Zyklon Ben" Garrison? ;_;
It should be meaningless
we apparently can't divorce marriage from christianity despite the fact that marriage exists in basically every culture known, so it shouldn't have anything to do with the government
some more work by Ben "Niggas Gonna Panic When They See This White Germanic" Garrison
The problem is that marriage creates units that are socially beneficial and economically driven, so it's in a government's best interest to streamline contracts based on it and incentivize long-term unions. The problem isn't government involvement. It's religious parasitism. As you said, marriage is older than any religion practiced on the planet, by many thousands of years, and yet Abrahamic religions try to claim sole sovereignty on the matter.
>this is amazing to me because it was almost 40 years ago or more when published and look how close we are to being this mans nightmare
Too bad ol' Dicky isn't still alive to experience existential dread. Between him and Jack Chick, I don't know which is worse.
Kind of like how faggots just assume everyone will be as gay as they are so they don't have to make strong points?
>hurr durr, let's shit on every tradition that's been developed for good reasons over thousands of years!
>PRIDE PAHRADE!!!! IN YOUR FACE IN YOUR FACE IN YOUR FACE!!! WHY YOU SO MAD? WHY SO ANNOYED? WHY SO INTOLERANT?!
>HURR DURR, ANYONE WHO DOESN'T AGREE WITH ME AND SUCK MY METAPHORICAL EGO DICK IS A HOMOPHOBE AND A BIGOT!!!!
>it's old so it's good
Lol fucking traditionalists crack me up. Let's bleed you out when you're sick and marry you to that girl across the street cause her dad's gonna give us a goat if you do.
Just realized ms brighteyes here just appears out of thin air while they're walking along. Lil hafer just pointed him out assuming he was perverted based on nothing. What if he'd been wrong and that was just a nicely dressed mailman with a perm?
I put my leather chastity cup on one ball at a time like any other citizen.
>this is disgusting
>what else can you tell us
just like my "straight" pol baby that comes in here all the time
It's true. I only got a job to pay for fucking and I fuck my way to my job.
Wait no that's my car, shit
really thought it was longer ago just based on the art style
hate when comics push their fetish into the material
nope, no argument that's just exactly how we all are
I'm actually curious about bathhouses too. Do they even exist still?
I wish I could have seen this guy as he did the research for all this.
what the hell else do you expect on the tv of some gay bar? football?
>curl your hair
ok nah this shit wasn't used in the 80s
>snitches bitching that they got propositioned in the park
what a bunch of teases
That banker from atlanta went real far out of his way for some dick
Will continue later, maybe, gotta go prepare some food and other disgusting acts.
next page, can't post cause duplicates, posting fanart in place
but I like how he's more disgusting by the saliva on ass than the possibility of shit on tongue
How do you answer in the 80s when some guy comes up asking if you rub bodily waste on yourself sexually?
I'm guessing he either made the stat up or it took place late 70s/early 80s. Tried looking up but couldn't find any published study with those figures.
Blood just jumps out from your veins into some science looking glass where a dr determines if there's some AIDs bugs swimming in it with a micro glass thingy.
Nah not at all.
There's not much visual anti lesbian propaganda. The only kind I'm familiar with is in books. Old timey books would right lesbian wank stuff with the overall moral always being "and then the dikeyer one died or went crazy from being such a dike while the nicer less dikey one was saved by a man, the end"
It's been 30 years and all his fears are met. Hospitals are in ruins from all the AIDs, gay marriage is legal, lesbians are in our cartoons.
I assume he's worried cause he's currently fucking brighteyes and maybe catching that ARC
Bullshit some this guy caught aids from his wife just from kissing.
I swear my mother caught syphalis from her ex husband in the 80s and he'd told her that she must've been the cheating one, but he'd forgive her. Even though she knew she never went out and he was fucking around often.
You just know this guy was a closet homo, not fucking his wife of 30 years, got AIDs and blamed it on her and the lie just got into the news.
This is actually kind of sad to think about living back then. No one really aware of what AIDs was or how it transmitted, believing it to be a plight on gays, and refusing them basic courtesy and life saving treatments.
Is this for real? I can't tell anymore when a /pol/tard is being ironic or being moronic.
Plus side tho is that pol is always wrong and this really hasn't become the worst disease possible and it's generally stable or in the decline.
I'm always curious about why democrats were more open to homos than republicans. I can make some theories but I'd really like to see some historical shit on it.
Ya know I don't really hear many bad things about jimmy carter from either side for a president.
I swear I'm calling my gay marriage after party a sodomy banquet
When I visit DC I wanna know all the gay politics and which bushes I can get a quickie out of. Tour guides are slacking
Btw gotta go eat that disgusting chili I just made. brb to finish the last of it.
Don't get the anger. If he believes there's no discrimination against gays than an anti-discrimination bill does nothing good or bad so why this butthurt?
>This is how liberty dies, with a couple homos swapping disease
I mean if you're gonna suck dick what's stopping you from lying about pedos.
This is my response from now on when they ask why gays and lesbians have higher rates of abuse in whatever skewed stats.
>are you saying correlation equals causation
that's the entire comic in jest
The part I find most humorous is that the anti-gay stuff is based in real criticism of gays while the pro-gay stuff is all fantasy and myth.
Monogamous loving gays? Ha ha ha ha. That shit is funny.
oh nah sorry that's just all I've got. There's no more available online than this, at least none that I've found though I've looked often.
I'm tempted to buy the book just so I can scan it and fully dump it someday.
sexually oriented murders
Idk the source of that stat but it likely comes that they'll define a sexually oriented murder as anything kind of lewd. Like a bite mark on the victim or some semen somewhere. If it's a guy murdered they just assume the murderer was both a guy and gay in that sexual murder.
The thing I see coming out of this 'can of worms' in reality, is that polygamy will guaranteed become legal practice in the next decade or so (maybe sooner).
There's no good argument against it that are not based on the same type of preconceptions used against same sex marriage.
There's one very good argument against it: it's indefensible as a contract. The parties are too numerous that they couldn't be maintained cleanly, and terms could not cheaply be standardized. There's also the rather thorny issue of potential (and consistent as far as American history goes) economic exploitation of one member by the others.
Oh man. I forgot drawing that but I recognize the pre-pen pressure lines.
I remember when /co/ story-timed that whole booklet. What a wild fucking ride. Think it was the same guy who used to dump Chick tracts for the hilarity.
I for one welcome the return of the fascists and the communists. The only productive homosexual is the one shot and buried, feeding the worms and the soil, or the ones toiling in the labor camps.
We were given freedom and we didn't know what to do with it. We are not responsible adults. We belong in the underworld.
There's little reason for marriages to keep existing as they currently are. The government has no business in keeping an eye on all marriages. Not like that.
Hopefully, marriage will be downgraded into something a lot more simpler, losing all monetary benefits of all kinds and instead just becoming something that turns one into "family" in the eyes of whatever cares about that.
This is also important since straight marriages are broken right now. Marriage needs to be reworked to fit into a society that now allows women to work freely and shit.
On marriage one thing I think ought be required is a counseling before you get your certificate and a counseling before divorce. Then a few months after that counseling, after you've had a chance to think things over, you can marry or divorce.
And not a kind of counseling that decides whether you can do it or not but just one that lays out some facts on marriage. Some facts on what commitment means. Presenting questions they ought to work out like what does it mean to cheat to you? What are your career goals? How many children do you want if any? How do you deal with your family or parents getting sick? What home are you hoping for? You've now got power of attorney do you understand what that means and what your partner wants?
I feel like divorce rates wouldn't be so bad if you took away the spontaneity of marriage and also the ignorance of how much work it really is.
>anal play with the tongue is gross!
I mean, I can understand, some people just don't like that kind of stuff-
>because saliva in mah anus
If you look at any comics/cartoons from that period, they all had that style. Today we have noodle arms, back then it was the whole School House Rock/sketchy look, I'm not sure who started it, probably Schultz.
I heard that in reality, Gays still tend to be the group most vulnerable to AIDS. Might have to do with anal sex, theres no part of the human body filled with more open blood areas than the human ass.
Whats really scary about the origin of Aids is when you realize how darker the real explanation is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWd4KblpDsc
>completely accurate drawings of various types of hideous degenerate
>gross caricature of Jew for no reason?
Why do they always have to ruin their point with this insane antisemite shit? Can we maybe get something done here instead?
>Can it be cured?
I can only guess the answer is gonna be "With Jesus".
the guy actually bothered to waste his precious time making a whole book expressing his clearly irrational and uninformed views on homosexuality?
I haven't even seen lesbians protrayed there yet. The guy has got to be closeted.
>TFW when homo male
>Agree with this shit because it actually has good counter-points against the status-quo today and actually seems to be logical when it comes to slippery slope
This is the kind of shit which makes people hate LGBT in general.
You won't stop at rights, you'll go for a complete renewal of society to benefit you.
I miss when discrimination meant rights and not feelings.
I know this is an old-as-fuck post, but in my high school there were several male teachers who fucked girls, and one was an open secret. I don't know of any female teachers like this. i think the issue isn't that female teachers are more likely to do it, it's that male students are far more likely to brag about banging the hot teacher than female students are, so evidence-backed proof comes out on social media and such.
It's supposed to imply that the criteria used to choose who gets marriage rights and who doesn't are messed up (or at least were at the time of the comic's creation).
People whine about "muh pure hetero marriage" but turn a blind eye to all of the cases like those seen in the first two panels.
I'm surprised this needed explaining. Seemed pretty obvious desu.