Why do LGBT warriors hate repressed homos so much?
A politician gets caught on the down low and LGBT activists go out of their way to ruin his life. A religious leader gets caught and they go out their way to ruin his life.
Famous celebrity, family member, that one guy from college etc.
Why are you so obsessed with using our sexuality against us?
too much generalization.
generally because you see it as negative, must be repressed, those who flaunt it are bad, etc.
if an lgbt group attacks them though, that's gonna be because they want to delegitimize whatever they were doing first and foremost.
When LGBT was established there was also established a way to correctly be gay, because it was now something more than just sex it is now an identity.
When someone decides to opt out of that but then get caught they are like a foreign substance in a body being attacked by the white blood cells, the blitzkriegers of the LGBT. If it shown that it is foremost sexuality and not identity people will be harder to control and the easiest people to control is when they want to be controlled.
As such with LGBT also came 'in the closet' or 'closeted' because it meant 'not living in a way so that we can control you'.
And what do the white blood cells do to the foreign substance to protect the body? It obliterates it. Then the idea that there is a closet can keep on being pushed onto people so that you can have fresh blood that also believes it needs to be controlled.
>was also established a way to correctly be gay
Exactly. Since you were denying the norm, and being such a pervert divergent, it means the right way to be gay is: Apologetic, with self-guilty,conservative, and believing you are better than "them".
If they are PRACTICING homosexuality on the down low and publicly against it, yes, it's hypocritical. That's the definition of hypocrisy.
If you're a regular average Joe and you want to be closeted, go ahead. But if you're a public figure who speaks out against homosexuality or supports policies against it all while trying to lead a "secret" gay life, then you deserve to be exposed for the piece of shit hypocrite you are.
>Fucking guys in your own house but living an otherwise a normal life is not the same as being openly gay.
You fucking moron - reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?
I don't care where they are fucking them or if they are open or not - if they are public figures speaking out AGAINST homosexuality while secretly practicing it, they deserve to be exposed. Take your self-loathing faggotry elsewhere.
Being closeted or not has literally nothing to do with it. If you go around saying that homosexuality is bad and sinful, and are caught engaging in it yourself, you are hypocritical.
Since when is exposing hypocrisy mean-spirited? I would venture to say it's far more mean-spirited to publicly decry a group of people while you yourself are one in the same.
Like I said before, if a gay person wants to be closeted, I have no problem with that. But if that SAME gay person has a public persona which is anti-gay, fuck them. They should be called out.
Left and right, they both use gays as tools. Only LGBT people actually care about LGBT - and I'm fine with that. I'm currently using my "gay card" against our leftists because I'm scared of migrant flow to Europe and the overall communist atmosphere. Also gives a chance to finally make homosexuality something that's not part of certain agenda. I know that Sweden Democrats don't really care about me but I do not care.
Now if someone doesn't like gays I'm fine with that. Just don't break law. The witch hunt either way ridiculous.
Faggots aren't people for a start.
All this thread has proven is that faggots believe that ruining peoples lives is appropriate if that person is gay and doesn't like other gays.
That to me means all faggots want to see me dead and now I think the same of them.
Fuck all queers.
1)are openly against homosexuality and hide their own homosexuality, aka hypocrit
2)are not giving a comment on their sexuality thus making his supporters think you are straight since it is the norm in order to keep as many supporters as possible, since if you came out as gay you would lose support aka sociopath
3)Are religious and thus go around preaching about your fairy tales but are a hypocrite since you only choose to follow what profits you
If you are too afraid to say you are gay then you have issues or the people around you have, if you are trying to manipulate people by pretending to be straight it is even worse
You tried, Anon, but the bait wasn't quite right. Better luck next time.
>This is conclusive proof that faggots are disgusting, mean spirited people and should be persecuted.
So, I live a normal day to day life but fuck guys in the privacy of my home. I do not fuck guys in public but I am openly gay, so were does that fall into your demented little theory? because I only have sex in the privacy of my home does that mean i am exempt from being disgusting and mean spirited?
As far as mean spirited goes, you need to look at your OWN posts.
One moment you're talking about LGBT in the army, next you're talking about activists, make up your fucking mind son, those are not the same thing.
If someone keeps their sexuality a secret and then fucks over people with that same sexuality and says they hate it, they deserve whatever the fuck they get for being a huge fucking hypocrite. Additionally, why wouldn't lgbt activists expose this dude? He's lying to the public, and when it comes out that the anti-gay whatever was actually gay, it's positive press for gay people. Aka the entire point of activism, you goddamn full retard.
Why are you whining now then that the left and gays bully you ;^)
Seems like an overly hypocritical thing to do, oh just like the OP you have forgotten the concept of hypocrisy and why it is bad
You lost the war, gay marriage is legal everywhere but shitholes ;^)
No one has mentioned its probably the anti-gay closet fags who helped spread aids and other diseases even furthrr, too. All their wives/beards they use to hide not only married to someone living a lie, but being infected by them too. That's pretty sad.
Closetfags are just the other side of the coin when it comes to stereotypical shrill she gays. Both are highly irrational, deal with intense self hatred, speak in absolutes and exaggerations, and refuse to admit new information.
Chill gays who are just being themselves and don't need to resort to extremist thinking to get through the day are the best kind.
>he can't imagine his life in a world where gays aren't accepted and gay marriage is everywhere and has to delude himself stuff are gonna regress
I think people that is what we call denial, the person is so desperately attached to his right win ideals that he can't survive without them existing on top somehow even in the future
That's because the world you described isn't real. It's made up. Fags aren't even "accepted" it's just illegal to say anything bad about them in 90% of the countries where they are """""accepted""""""".
you can't read the text in your photo. This one's better
The whole "world" I believe you are trying to say?
Please - give me an example of a country that literally throws people in jail just for "saying bad things about fags" - direct threats of violence don't count, as those are illegal to say to anyone.
I'm not repressed at all.
I just happen to be a very not-flamboyant human being.
I don't have a lisp, I don't wear tight neo fashion clothes, I don't put one foot in front of the other... I just do.
I don't really identify with any group.
>All this thread has proven is that faggots believe that ruining peoples lives is appropriate if that person is gay and doesn't like other gays.
I'm sorry, how is calling people out for being hypocrites "ruining people's lives"? If anything, the people you rush defend are the ones who are ruining the lives of other gay people, by spreading lies and negative stereotypes against gays? People aren't automatically liked by the gay community for being gay. If they are anti-gay, they CANNOT be an ally of the gay community, whether they're gay or straight.
Keep telling yourself that.
If it was illegal to say anything bad about gays, you'd be in prison by now. Just saying.
If you tell someone to "look it up" rather than providing the source yourself, you automatically lose all arguments forever.
Literally no one is saying that everyone who is gay has to act on it, if that's what you're implying. And most gays don't have a problem with gays who choose to stay closeted. What we do have a problem is those who condemn homosexuality while engaging in it. You're free not to engage in homosexuality, if that's what you want - but you are a hypocrite if you tell people that being gay is wrong and yet engage in homosexual behavior. That's the definition of hypocrisy .
>The point is that faggots use sexuality as a weapon against other people who try and not give in to the mental deviancy.
>use sexuality as a weapon
Very much like you are doing with this thread?
I don't really know. I think it's quite harmful to immediately consider every closeted person to be evil. Some of them just wish to keep their sexual orientation to themselves and I don't think there's much wrong with that.
Well it depends. Are they just against gay culture, or do they say homosexuality is a disgusting act and should be outlawed.
There are many gay people who consider gay culture to be absolutely awful. That wasn't the point here. The point was that if your public opinion of homosexuality is strictly negative, but you are still doing gay things, you're an absolute full-blown hypocrite.
>the behavior of people who do things that they tell other people not to do : behavior that does not agree with what someone claims to believe or feel
>Hypocrisy is defined as saying or feeling one thing and doing another.
a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
>The practice of engaging in the same behaviour or activity for which one criticises another.
>It is the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticizes another.
>ethics professor Adam D. Galinsky, defined moral hypocrisy as “a situation in which individuals do not follow their own expressed moral rules and principles.”
>the practice of professing standards, beliefs, etc, contrary to one's real character or actual behaviour, esp the pretence of virtue and piety
>behavior in which someone claims to have certain moral principles or beliefs but behaves in a way that shows they are not sincere
>the practice or an instance of stating or pretending to hold beliefs or principles that one does not actually live by; insincerity.
That implies morality is subjective. True morality is not subjective.
What are you even saying? Where do those definitions say being hypocritical IS about acting superior? Because it's not. Being hypocritical means telling other people that [x] is bad, but doing [x] anyway. Whether you act like you're superior for not doing [x] is irrelevant.
I think OP is just your typical /pol/ anti-gay dude. He came here thinking he had a point, when it was discovered to be completely idiotic he pretended he was just trolling and baiting people
Am I about right OP?
>times will get harder as technology exponentially evolves
Best way to spot a retard, politics and human nature haven't change a bit ever since rome, the only fucking difference is that people now have more slack to be "good" because technology provides food, water, medicine, entertainment and knowledge.
Politics were and will always be a fucking waste of time, only technology advances humankind.
Seems like it.
I hoped he will make an intelligent point and turn it around pointing out the hypocritical liberal media that never admits its faults or puts on the galows their own when they overstep their boundaries and lynch innocent people.
But nope, hes just some underage idiot.
>this fucking thread
Are you all fucking retarded? Replying to bait over and over again.
But you would know. So somebody does know.
Unless the devil hasnt put the gay in you yet.
Just like the falling tree thing, does it make a sound if nobodies around to hear it?
I think the captcha has its own opinion about this discussion.
>Well as far as society is concerned the tree makes no sound when it falls and the society isn't around to hear it.
Yes, but we're really talking about how people react. If something happens but people don't know about it, they won't react - which is the whole point they're trying to make.