>>5509896 A privilege is an advantage, but an advantage is not necessarily a privilege. Privileges are distinguished by the fact that they can be taken away. My 6'7" height is an advantage in getting bp, my lawful ability to drive is a privilege that can be revoked. Get it?
>>5510017 Spot pretending like the privilege conversation is not 99% female dominated. Stop pretending that those women who complain about privilege are not super privileged. It is important point out the group with the largest unchecked privileges and that would be women.
>>5509896 No, it exists. But the internet created this ridiculous notion that privilege is somehow associated with skincolor/gender/sexual orientation.
Sure, being a white cis male has it's advantage. But it's no where near the amount of privilege you get from money. Besides, everyone has some sort of privilege that another group may not have.
But really, real privilege comes from your socioeconomic class, how much you make, the car you drive, the neighborhood you live in, the school your kids go to, the way you dress, the way you talk, etc.
identity politics is used by the upperclass to divide the lowerclass. The left is a circular firing squad controlled by corporations like puppets. All it takes is to send an agent provocateur to whatever faggot protest you make and have them whine about racism, or misogyny or feminism or some other ism then the whole thing collapses.
Anyone who complains about immigration is branded a racist by the left, the left does the bidding of capitalism by accusing the lower class natives of racism so the capitalist can replace them with low payed immigrants.
Then as a reward for your service the capitalist will feed you a scrap, all girl ghost busters, nigger james bond, etc Then the liberal will hand over their money to the capitalist to continue the cycle of the the commodification of culture under the false belief that more niggers or women or faggots on tv or movies is somehow progress.
the unions have been destroyed, the identity politics has subverted the workers rights, the factories have all been moved to the third world. The NSA can spy on you whenever they want, obama cries about gun violence and then kills hundreds of brown children in the middle east with drone strikes. Corporations have all the control, we live in a plutocracy. The immigrants will keep flooding because politicians are tools of the elite who have no care for the destruction of tier country over making money. If you speak out you're a racist.
The wars will never end, the water is running out, it was unusually warm this winter dont you think.
Music is terrible, movies are terrible, reality tv still exists.
Mentally ill men dressed as women want you to use the right newspeak, i mean pronouns.
Hillary clinton is a corrupt neoliberal corporate war hawk scum and people will vote for her because she has vagina.
THIS IS THE WAY THE WORLD ENDS THIS IS THE WAY THE WORLD ENDS THIS IS THE WAY THE WORLD ENDS THIS IS THE WAY THE WORLD ENDS THIS IS THE WAY THE WORLD ENDS
>>5516833 lol if you think there is hope. Thats when they build the giant rich people gated communnites guarded by weaponized drones as you and i and the rest of the unwashed masses die in a hellfire of niggers, sjw's, facists, terrorists,and global warming
>>5510077 In the real world, nobody cares about the definitions the leftists try to impose. The only one remotely successful is the word racism, which is massively misused by the left on purpose, and this misuse is starting to have legal consequences.
>>5520406 That's cause racism is like, an actual thing. It's 99% better now then it was 40 years ago, to the point where I think a black guy has a pretty high chance of getting the same quality of life as a white dude. But stuff like, thin privilege or male privilege is bs and everyone knows it.
>>5521895 Well, they obviously are. They live longer because they don't have to work the hard and dangerous jobs (those are taken by men, who then provide for the women, even in case of divorce), because they don't have to go to the army (which is hell on earth, basically like a year in prison), and don't have such high suicide and addiction rates (because they don't have to cope with such a hard life). I noticed that discrepancy in life expectancy between men and women is much lesser in first world countries.
>>5526264 Women can not be the superior sex. No one will deny that men are the stronger sex. Physically men grow larger, have more muscle etc. So then we must consider mental capability of women versus men.
Men are responsible for nearly every invention. Every advancement to mankind has been brought by men. Men create the best art and the best literature. Even things that are called womanly like sewing and cooking men do better than women, seeing as the most celebrated designers in fashion are male and the best chiefs are male.
Thinking about it I can not think of a single thing that women are able to do better than men. Which is where female privilege comes into play. Look at the world around you, ever nail in your house was hammered in by a man. The food in your fridge was grown, harvested and shipped by men. The power you use is supplied by men. Men create this world and it is female privilege that allows women to be part of it. Its so unearned it is crazy.
>>5526488 For pretty much all of history, women have been expected to basically be stay at home mothers. It's only really in the last few decades that the idea of women contributing in a way other than giving birth and raising children, or taking care of their familieis has even been acceptable. For most of human history it has been very difficult for women to be able to be politicians, engineers, inventors, etc. Men have had a massive head start, for thousands of years they've been the only ones really permitted to be artists, writers, architects, and so on. Of course women aren't immediately going to catch up with all of that the moment they are granted equal opportunity. The only valid comparison you can make between men and women is to compare the achievements of each gender since equality of opportunity between genders was achieved. And naturally there is some dispute about when exactly that happened, some would even argue that it hasn't even been achieved yet.
> Look at the world around you, ever nail in your house was hammered in by a man. The food in your fridge was grown, harvested and shipped by men. The power you use is supplied by men This here is blatantly false. There are women in the farming, construction, transportation, and power industries. They may be a minority, but it's not like women are totally absent from those occupations. Pretty much every industry these days involves women somewhere along the way, even in "male-dominated" occupations.
>>5526574 Women have never been oppressed. They have always been a protected class. They have had time to create and invent but they have had everything given to them so they had no need to change anything. When you look at inventions women have created you will see white out and chocolate chip cookies, this is the extent of women's hardships and needing to overcome. You can say that women weren't given the opportunity but then you have to consider black male slaves invented more than their white female masters. Do you think those black slaves had an education? Do you think they were just given the opportunity to invent? No, the need for innovation comes from hardship, something women know little about.
And even if you only look at new technology in the last 5 years, it is men who are still dominating.
>This here is blatantly false. There are women in the farming, construction, transportation, and power industries. They may be a minority, but it's not like women are totally absent from those occupations. Pretty much every industry these days involves women somewhere along the way, even in "male-dominated" occupations.
lol that is pretty cute. I take it you have never been to a construction site, they are devoid of women. When was the last time you saw a woman on the side of the road fixing the street? If you did see a woman was she shoveling or was she holding the stop sign? The truth is, 99.99% of homes, roads, infrastructure etc is build by men. Don't try and say a single woman who picked up a hammer made a meaningful contribution.
>>5527293 >Women have never been oppressed. They have always been a protected class. Being a protected class does not mean one isn't oppressed. They were denied the political power and rights granted to men of the same social class. They are privileged in the same way children or valuable property is privileged.
>They have had time to create and invent but they have had everything given to them so they had no need to change anything. They had time, but not the opportunity. They basically lived in a gilded cage - they were provided for, but didn't even have the choice of providing for themselves even if they wanted to. They had a high standard of living, but very little meaningful freedom.
>You can say that women weren't given the opportunity but then you have to consider black male slaves invented more than their white female masters. Do you think those black slaves had an education? Do you think they were just given the opportunity to invent? I'd like to see a source on that claim. Were slaves allowed to patent their inventions? If not, how do we know what they invented?
>lol that is pretty cute. I take it you have never been to a construction site, they are devoid of women. When was the last time you saw a woman on the side of the road fixing the street? If you did see a woman was she shoveling or was she holding the stop sign? The truth is, 99.99% of homes, roads, infrastructure etc is build by men. Don't try and say a single woman who picked up a hammer made a meaningful contribution. I'm not sure of the exact ratio of women in the construction industry, but I'm pretty sure more than 1 in a 1000 construction projects involve women in some extent. If you're going to make an extraordinary claim like that, you're going to have to provide a source to back it up.
>>5527293 >>5527415 Furthermore, even if 999 out of 1000 construction projects involve no women working at the construction site, there's still almost certain to be women somewhere along the line that converts natural resources into finished houses. There's the factory workers who make tools, nails and screws and heavy equipment, and the truck drivers who deliver supplies to the construction site. Of course, they don't make a particular contribution BECAUSE they are women, but the same is pretty much true of men. Pretty much any major project requires a large number of contributors, who in most cases may be of either gender.
>>5526488 >Look at the world around you, ever nail in your house was hammered in by a man. The food in your fridge was grown, harvested and shipped by men. The power you use is supplied by men. Look at your ugly face in the mirror. Some sorry bitch carried it for nine months and then pretended to love it for 18 years after only to have you turn out to be a huge cunt. Now that's called hardship.
>>5516206 the problem with that is the biggest demographic that "privilege" appeals to is white, college-educated females from upper-middle class neighborhoods, and they will never acknowledge this as the true privilege because it would mean that they have it.
>>5516611 This is the true redpill. Finally someone who sees both sides of the problem
>>5533428 Sure, but phrasing it that way makes it sound like one takes pride in offending people, that being able to offend people is the part that matters. I mean, I agree with freedom of speech but I think phrasing it in those terms is a poor way or arguing in favor of it.
>>5544194 hillary is a slimy bitch who will throw /lgbt/ under the bus as soon as it's more convenient for her to. at worst, trump will leave gay marriage up to the states. that said, you shouldn't vote for either because both are neocon warhawks
I met someone on grindr once who turned out to be a SJW, when he got over to my apartment I intentionally hurt him during sex, like slapped him around really hard, pulled his hair and bit him and stuff It was great, that's all you liberals are good for, hatefucks
>>5557068 Hormones, fine. Sex changes, no. Because children's minds are still developing, they don't fully understand gender vs gender roles, and they can't fully grasp the consequences of transitioning and then it turning out to be a phase children who might be trans should not go through anything permanent. They should be encouraged to explore and through years of therapy and support find out if it is really who they are but the risk is too much.
>>5516833 >the corporations are going to automate our jobs and fire us, to save money >then we will will collect ei for a while >then switch to welfare >slowly or health will deteriorate from our lower class life style, making us unable to find work in this new extremely competitive post automation job market >??? >hurrah capitalism subverted
>>5562800 Technically, the law of diminishing marginal utility implies that overall we'd all be better off overall with de facto equality. Sure, some people would lose wealth/power/status etc, but everyone would have a decent amount, rather than some people having virtually none and others having more than they know what to do with.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.