If she's partially weapons trained, who is fully weapons trained?

Anyone who's actually handled a gun.

>>28846946
>old and gay
no one cares man

File: 1454799631155675.gif (2MB, 390x357px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x357px

>>28846946
>I miss England

Go and fucking stay go please. I shouldn't have to worry while getting my morning coffee that Senator Armstrong will attack me for being a law abiding citizen.

>>28846946
No problem bitch, just go back to your muzzie rape gangs and butter knife purchase restrictions. Darwin would have had something to say about your attempt to disarm this man as well....

>>28846946
>shoes and blues

lady, that a fucking cop

>>28846946
>I could have disarmed this dude and fired all rounds easily. There are people with better strength/skills wandering around
wew lad, didn't know life was a fucking movie. If she really believes that, would be fun to see all the rounds fired into her if she actually tries that.

>>28846946
Why do shitlibs hate cops?

Assuming she tried, what would happen? Would she get shot even if she didn't get it out?

>>28847460
she'd get arrested for trying to steal a cop's gun

>>28847460

She'd immediately receive an elbow to the face and get arrested while screaming that he can't do this to her.

>>28846946
That's a man, baby!

>>28847446
Same reason statists worship cops. Indoctrination into a political mindset without questioning. The result of highly biased, sensationalist garbage coming from the media. Shits fucked up and stuff. Why the hell do you think Trump and Boynee have such a cult like following?

File: Armstrong-profile-shot-0.png (563KB, 867x766px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 867x766px

>>28847123
>implying the Senator would infringe on your second amendment rights

>>28847460
the gun wouldn't come out and she would be arrested.
Or at least get hit in the face with a police baton.

File: 1454904717712.jpg (361KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 1600x900px

>>28847759
>he would make firearm and weapon ownership compulsory
>tfw he isn't real

>>28846946
Definitely one of the less-convincing traps I've seen.

>>28848176
Trump is Senator Armstrong you dolt

>>28847503
Disturbing as it is, she's not. Besides being a clueless twat, her claim to fame is that she was a teenage unwed mother who launched a website for other teenage unwed mothers.

So, she's pretty much a professional attention whore with a penchant for making really bad life decisions.

File: 1401422419376.jpg (27KB, 699x471px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 699x471px

>>28846946
>Only the police should have guns!
>Why does this cop have a gun?
Which is it liberals?

>>28851742
STOP RAPING ME!!!

>>28847460
>she
Isn't that a tranny?

>>28851742
Honestly I just dont want weaboos and social degenerates to have guns.

Actually you should be able to prove you're not a virgin before you can buy a gun.

>>28850983

Kek

>>28851923
By some standards I meet the definition of a weeaboo under loosest terms and I am a responsible firearm owner. The two are not connected

>>28851923
Fascinating! What other ideas do you have for restricting Second Amendment rights? Senator Feinstein would probably love to pick your brain, you should drop her an email.

>>28851926
Why isn't she in the kitchen?

>>28851926
Those are drill bits...

>>28846946
what i find interesting about that picture, is if she was in Manhattan when she took it considering new york laws being the shit tier that they are, means that dude is either a police officer, or some sort of private armed security, since open carry is illegal in new york unless you are a police officer, or otherwise a authorized armed security gaurd.

Shall Not Be Infringed

>>28846946
That little strap of the holster over the backstrap if the pistol makes it difficult for someone to take it out from behind; strap must be pushed forward before tge gun is removed. A Lib-dyke trying to wrestle a gun away from a 'cop' could be charged with attempted murder or any number of felonies. A shame she didn't learn any real lessons during her 'training'.

>>28846946
>Manhattan
>open carry
WHAT?

>>28852885
Noshit

>>28852885
No they aren't.
They're high capacity baby seeking assault bayonets capable of killing fifteen thousand people in one minute.

Source: am partially weapons trained.

>>28853063
It's a cop, ya dindu.

Tfw she touches the gun and gets savagely beaten with the asp baton.

>Hopefully theyll aim for her face, it can only get better.

>>28850983
If only her mom had been fully trained in the use of birth control.

>>28847460
>hey someone is grabbing my gun
>elbow to her face
>draw weapon and yell get on the ground if she isn't already
>told to put hands above head
>roughed up for not following directions because she refused to stop her now broken and bleeding nose
>read rights

>>28853656
>holding her now broken and bleeding nose
fixed

>>28852808
We don't let felons, people convicted of a violent crime, parolees, or people sectioned under the mental care act, etc to own guns.

Isn't that a form of gun restriction? Who fights for their second amendment rights? Shouldn't anyone be able to own a gun? My 3 year old neighbor def needs a new AR.

If the argument for restricting guns is so black and white, why do we have laws that ban them for some people but not all?

>>28852540
Name one mass shooter that wasn't either a weaboo or virgin. You really shouldn't be allowed to own a firearm since you have a mental disorder.

>>28853688
>being a virgin is a mental disorder
Tone it down man

>>28853742
talking about weabooism but ok

>>28847446
>hurr fucking pigs shooting innocents all the time
>durr only the professionals like police should be allowed to have guns

If you are asking from these...people...to make any sense, Ive got sum bad nuwz.

>>28853688
>>28851923
Fuck you man, you don't get to decide who gets to have a gun based on your retarded criteria.

I'm glad idiots like you are too stupid to influence the law.

Can somebody explain to me how you actually remove a pistol from various levels of holsters?

I imagine this one would require you to push the top flap forward before pulling the pistol up.

I am not weapons trained.

File: killallinbread.gif (3MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x281px

>>28854020
I am still raging about the guy losing his CC license because his dad told authorities he had no friends. And I'm yuropoor noguns for crying out loud.

>>28851926
This is bait, I hope

>>28852885
Wow you're good. Are you weapons trained?

>>28846946
I really want yo know where she is pulling this weapons training from. Out her ass or did she take a class on how to spray mace?

>>28848176
IRL Armstrong is Trump.

>>28852885
Weapons trained

>>28847777
fucking checked

File: 1326904623515.jpg (10KB, 284x178px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 284x178px

>>28847777
quads don't lie

>>28854043
Get a load of this non-weapons trained faggot lol.

File: 33pcs-Magnetic-Bit-font-b-Set-b-font-font-b-Screwdriver-b-font-Holder-font-b.jpg (165KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1000x1000px

>>28852885
>drill bits
>bullets
Why is it difficult for people to identify the removable heads for a screwdriver?
Another household item for some reason considered uncommon knowledge.

>>28854050
>guy losing his CC license because his dad told authorities he had no friends
huh?

>>28846946
those who choose to be anon, those who choose to be

>>28854020
No idiot is too stupid to influence the law.

Take for example, most of our government.

>>28847759

PLAYED COLLEGE BALL

>>28854414
That's what he meant you fucking autist

File: image.jpg (117KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1200x1200px

>>28852885
>>28853097
>>28854414

I'm really hopings you /k/omrades know those are screwdriver bits, drill bits pic related.

>>28853688
>We don't let felons, people convicted of a violent crime, parolees, or people sectioned under the mental care act, etc to own guns

They've lost their rights, on a case by case basis, after due process of law.

You're advocating taking rights away from whole groups of people that you don't like. Basing restrictive legislation on your emotions is a really stupid idea.

>>28855271
They're used in drills too, ya dingus. Unless you consider a classic Black n Decker an electric screwdriver.

>>28855248
At some cushy ivy league school!

I'm a Tenth Level Time-Traveling Miculek-Surpassing Master Gunslinger if she's "partially-trained"

>>28853688
>You really shouldn't be allowed to own a firearm since you have a mental disorder.

I don't think weeabooism or virginity is listed in the DSM-5. You're gonna need to provide some citations supporting your conclusions. You should probably also list your professional qualifications to make such a judgement.

>>28851926
Hahaha dumb bitch

>>28852885
>being this weapons trained

>>28855588
They attach to a power drill, but the bits themselves do no drilling.
Dingus.

>>28855271
Those are actually masonry bits for putting holes in stone/concrete, not normal drill bits

>>28847259
>Britcunt spergs out
>Tackles gun owner
>Really just wraps her arm around his neck, hardly moving him at all
>She reaches for his holster, manages to unsnap it
>Guy goes red alert, her head is on his right shoulder because her partial weapons training didn't teach her that other people have arms too
>He punches her in the face
>Just absolutely decimates her face, blood and snot go flying
>She starts screaming MANIAC!!! RAPE!!!!
>She has london accent so no one understands her
>The police arrive, she runs at them
>The mace her, she vomits on them
>They beat her mercilessly
>Plan well executed

>>28851923
>Well son, I was going to get you your first .22 for your birthday, but the law says otherwise
>Son, this is Esmirelda. Since your 10 now I figured you could use a whole hour
>Make me proud

>>28854414
Idk man. I guess all women can't identify tools.

File: 71bI50UKqUL._SL1500_.jpg (132KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1500x1500px

>>28855588
>They're used in drills too, ya dingus
If modified to fit in an automatic drill, these would by your logic be considered drill bits.

>>28847123

If you think that's bad you should google her name and see the shit on the net for her.

>>28856166
Kek

>>28855576
>implying constitutional rights should be taken away from citizens in any form

So if you get convicted of a crime you aren't given constitutional rights like due process if you ever are accused of a crime again?

Do you see this contradiction? If you re taking away constitutional rights for some people but not others; isn't that what you are arguing against?

I wonder if anyone pointed out to her that the guys a cop.

>>28854043
Level 2 you have to hit the trigger guard button while pulling the gun out.
Level 3 thumb under the "top slide" lever while hitting the trigger guard button while pulling gun out.

>>28855733

>he's never had to use a screwdriver to drill a hole

faggot

>>28853632

maximum kek

>>28847446

Everyone who's not retarded hates cops. Sorry fuzz.

>>28853742

There's a limit, of course.

If you're still a virgin by the time you're old enough to post on 4chan without a ban, there's something wrong with you and you probably shouldn't be trusted with guns.

>>28858016
this to be honest

>>28857713
Massive dindu confirmed

>>28858106
>>28858016
>if you haven't fucked EVERY high school BITTTCHHHHHHH by the time ur a freshmen, ur a PUSSSYY BITCH NIGGHAA and SHOULDNT OWN GUNS
Confirmed for owning at least one snapback

>>28858601
> thinking is necessary to misrepresent a crap argument that hard in order to argue against it
Confirmed for spending too much time on the Internet

>>28858647
>not realizing how quite literally your argument goes against the US consistution in its rights to own firearms and the absolute right to it
But fuck it bro right bro, times are a changin bro, time to change that silly amendment huh bro, by using a scale that is completely inaccurate to the ownership of firearms and can't back it up with SOLID evidence
Confirmed for spending too little time on the internet and possibly a mad britcuck and commie bastard

>>28858016
What if you're a normal person that just happens to be ugly?

>>28853143
Save it, toots. Let me know when you're fully weapon trained.

>>28858016
but i'm Catholic

File: 1452825001516.jpg (319KB, 1132x1730px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1132x1730px

>>28854072
Lol

>>28856128
Fucking kekaroo

>>28846946
>I could have disarmed this dude and fired all rounds easily.
Given that the dude is obviously from the NYPD and thus carrying an NYPD Glock, even if she disarmed him, I doubt she would find shooting any of the rounds to be easy.

>>28858016
So buying a prostitute has what to do with firearm rights?

>>28853688
>Name one mass shooter that wasn't either a weaboo or virgin.
Monroe Phillips.

>>28856166
Would the requirement that one be verifiably not a virgin actually require the government to provide a person for you to prove it upon? There's no other way they could know for sure.

>>28846946
Easily disarm and fire all rounds?

>triple retention duty holster
>twelve pound trigger pull

Yeah, okay.

>>28857320
>So if you get convicted of a crime you aren't given constitutional rights like due process if you ever are accused of a crime again?

Are you a Yuro, by chance? You don't seem to have a firm grasp on how our Constitution functions.

Anybody accused of a crime in the US receives due process. If found guilty, the penalty may include temporary or permanent loss of some rights. If that same person is accused of another crime, they receive due process. Forfeiting some rights for misbehavior doesn't mean you forfeit all rights.

The key thing is, forfeiture of rights is decided on a case by case basis with all due process. The anon I was replying to wants to arbitrarily deprive a particular group of their rights simply on the basis that they have a hobby that he doesn't like. He also wants to deprive virgins of their rights, which is exactly contrary to the meaning of the Constitution.

File: 543455.jpg (16KB, 248x303px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 248x303px

/>>28861874
No, I'm American, I own guns. Do you understand the constitution?

Why are you trying to equate federal/state law as the same level as the constitution? Our government passed laws that under federal law prohibits felons or violent criminal offenders from owning a gun which would be considered a breach of their constitutional second amendment right. This law was held up by our supreme court which is basically an at time interpretation of the constitution. But we as a majority of society deem these to be reasonable laws that breach the constitutional right of a minority of citizens.

My point is that if we as a society prohibit constitutional rights to some citizens, what is to stop us reinterpreting to ban other groups from having guns? So the argument that the second amendment gives you rights to own a firearm is cannot be infringed as a US citizen, then why do we prohibit it from some citizens. Which means that the second amendment isn't so black and white since we choose who we do and who can't own guns already.

So if you're a weaboo or virgin you don't get more or less constitutional rights ideally but in reality, society says that you do. This can change and it should since you are a cultural degenerate.

> If found guilty, the penalty may include temporary or permanent loss of some rights
You're not supposed to lose constitutional rights due to federal laws by the definition of the constitution but we as a society deem it necessary in certain instances. We do this by enforcing or not enforcing laws that have been written.

>He also wants to deprive virgins of their rights
Being a virgin doesn't mean you have rights other than the fact you are a citizen of the US protected by the constitution. Just like felons (in an ideal case)

So now do we understand federal vs constitutional?

>>28864269
>This can change and it should since you are a cultural degenerate.

>muh degeneracy

I bet it's freezing in your moms basement this time of year, eh?

>>28864301
Doing just fine in the house that I own. You?

File: Chew And Smile.gif (2MB, 333x194px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 333x194px

>>28864359
>Doing just fine in the house that I own.

Sure you are.

>>28864371
What ever you need to tell yourself that it's ok to be you.

File: 200% German.png (699KB, 680x606px) Image search: [Google]

699KB, 680x606px

>>28855619

TRY UNIVERSITY OF AUSCHWITZ

>>28864438

Timestamp with the deed.

>>28864269
His point is that there needs to be due process before the revocation of a right, you would need to prove in court that someone was either a weeaboo or a virgin to strip them of their right to bear arms. This would also necessitate the creation of a legal definition of "weeaboo" because that's not even a thing as of now.

Additionally your virgin requirement would be immediately overturned for violating the 1st amendment rights of a wide range of clerics of a wide range of faiths.

File: 1455065320622.gif (3MB, 267x199px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 267x199px

>>28864359
>Lives in America think he owns his house.
What a cute notion. We don't own shit here man. get your head out of your ass. The government can come and take you guns, your house and your rights away with little to no reasons or recourse. The USA Government is worse than the fucking Nazis. Argue other wise while I ignore you.

>>28864552
You're missing the entire point of the post though.

ANYONES rights can be revoked if society deems it necessary and that the second amendment doesn't protect your gun rights regardless of whether you're a weaboo, virgin or non-degenerate since we as a society do it to certain citizens already.

Using federal laws is not a valid argument for violating or protecting constitutions rights which the person before him was trying to argue.

>>28864620
>implying that things can never be taken from you by anyone or anything

This is already a fucktarded notion

File: robertleeswagger.jpg (7KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 300x168px

>>28864620
Yup, the US government steals more from it's citizens through bullshit legislation than the whole of what burglars steal.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/23/cops-took-more-stuff-from-people-than-burglars-did-last-year/

>>28852885
oh wow, i just noticed that upon further inspection. your're right, how do i graduate from partial weapons training to being fully weapons trained like you?

>>28864759
>washingtonpost
"So you know it must be true hurr hurr"

This is like the enquirer, except it is for feeding libtards their daily required dose of stupidity.

File: Cowboy Action Shooting.webm (2MB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x404px

>>28864770
1) Go to Thunder Ranch
2) ????
3) Become Jerry Miculek

File: bankshatehim.jpg (74KB, 540x523px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 540x523px

>>28864888
Use this guide to earn a living while there

>>28856128
she isn't british. she visited there twice on holiday. she lives in new york, moved from washington state, and writes unwed teen mommy books/blogs.

>>28865243
She should have fucking stayed there

>>28864692
the amendments simply state the rights you have - they do not protect them from anything apart from government interference, and towards that further end, due process can temporarily (emphasis on temporarily) prevent their exercise. part of the same law that allowed their removal also mandated a restoration procedure.

the argument for the ability and legality of civil right forfeiture was when the person practicing those rights directly used them to break the law, and further, to infringe upon the rights of others.

civil right forfeiture differs from state to state, but encompasses enfranchisement (which in the 14th amendment's 2nd section allows an exception due to rebellion or other crimes), jury exclusion (which is a lifetime ban, and the supreme court has not determined that the right to sit on a jury is a fundamental right like free speech is), and the right to be armed (felons are prohibited persons in us code 18 title 922g).

the legality of the last one, the right to be armed, has been challenged dozens of times, and always upheld under the general argument that a convicted felon, unless directly pardoned and has their rights restored by due process, is serving the public good by being denied arms because they are risk for re-offense (debatable) and the interest of public safety is meant to err on the side of caution.

happily that same decision to limit the right to bear arms to convicted felons also guaranteed a process to restore those rights by due process - namely a pardon or rights restoration order from the state.

>>28865269
stayed in WA?

>>28865367
London you fucking twit

>>28846946
I only wish she had tried it. One less worthless liberal britcuck walking the earth.

>>28851926
No way, this must be bait. Please be bait.

File: 1455082583196.jpg (77KB, 480x690px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 480x690px

>>28846946

>>28865403
calm your tits, nigger. i stalked her for a few weeks and her life is 4 parts rekt, 4 parts teen mommy liberal, 1 part slut, 1 part whore. i think you're really really mad now for no good reason.

>>28865363
The US code that prohibits felons from owning firearms is a federal law. Every other point you made about constitutional right forfeiture is EXPLICITLY STATED IN CONSTITUTION ITSELF.


There is difference.

>>28865269
Not from the UK but couldn't we just leave her in the arctic or something? Why does it have to be near people.

>>28856522
takes pretty good photos on instagram I guess otherwise no other redeeming qualities from a no guns brit bitch

>>28846946
>I miss england
Then fuck off and go back to your rainy little socialist island fucktard

>>28866640
You better watch your tone buy, she is partially weapons trained.

>>28846946
that girl from buzzfeed that become reaction face. also does anybody have one?

>>28851923
You sound like a gun grabber
Why don't you grab my dick son

>>28853688
That marine with the caranaco?
That other marine
The Moncton guy
Pol pot

>>28858016
>>28858106
Entrusans

>>28856080
Still considered drill bits m8

File: image.png (452KB, 712x480px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 712x480px

>>28855588
>>28855733
>>28856271
>>28857560

Do you even drill bro?

>>28846946
Good luck with the 12 lbs trigger, xr.

>>28865921
Maybe drop her in Somalia, let her try to spread her gun control bullshit there

>>28851926
>She probably stole some workers drill bits

Poor guy. ;~;7

>>28867491

Glocks have a 5.5 lb trigger though

>>28867728
Not NYPD issue glocks. That's most likely NYPD. See baton and holster as well as outfit.

>>28867746
any specific reason for this?
i understand you wouldnt want these 'trigger happy racists' walking the streets with a hair trigger but still

>>28851926
There's probably some poor bugger wondering where his drill bits went

>>28864888
Isn't Thunder Ranch Tiger McKee?

>>28864269
>So the argument that the second amendment gives you rights to own a firearm is cannot be infringed as a US citizen, then why do we prohibit it from some citizens

Because those citizens have proven, through their actions, that they are not capable of responsibly exercising their rights. The part that you seem to be having difficulty with is the case by case basis.

People aren't randomly assigned to the group, their own actions put them there. They are aware of this fact before engaging in whatever activity qualifies them for inclusion in the group. These people are voluntarily giving up rights in order to have greater latitude for misbehavior.

>>28846946
Given the flashlight baton thing, I'm pretty sure he's armed security, not just some dude OCing like I usually am. Though I only do it because I can't CC yet.

>>28867758
NY politicians and police brass are scared of guns and think that it will reduce chances of a bad shoot. All it really does is fuck their aim. Not that many NYPD shoot more than their required qualifying requirements once a year.

>>28859858
That would only apply for men, you just need an OB/GYN to see if a woman is a virgin or not.

>>28864269
So now virginity is cultural degeneracy? That means, by your standards, that everybody is born into a state of cultural degeneracy. I guess the best way to deal with that is to pressure kids into having sex as early as possible. What could possibly go wrong?

>>28847759
Most based villain in the entire series and he's basically only in it for the last 30 minutes. It's a goddamned crime.

>>28867792
>need an OB/GYN to see if a woman is a virgin or not.

And a subpoena to access the patient records. I guess we should probably set up a whole system of courts to handle this issue. Call it sex court.

That way, people have a proper venue to prove that they're not cultural degenerates, and we might as well come up with a list of penalties for offenders. I figure dragon dildoes will be a good start.

>>28851926
Okay that has to be fake. There is no way.

>>28867792
The presence of a hymen in a female does not indicate virgin status. Same goes for the lack there of. It can be lost when riding horses(not like that dirty zoophiliacs) or bicycles. Some women are born without a hymen.

>>28867777

And what you seem to not fucking get is that the constitution is supposed to exist as rights that CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY AS A US CITIZEN REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU DO UNLESS EXPLICITLY STATED IN THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF. FEDERAL LAWS ARE NOT TO SUPERSEDE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BUT WE AS A SOCIETY DO IT ANYWAYS.

So if constitutional rights can be encroached upon by federal laws because society decides to enforce unconstitutional laws what's to stop them from taking gun rights away from whoever the fuck they please in the future. If you are complacent about taking away constitutional rights away from a certain subset of people in society what is to stop that group encompassing more people which might include you?

And you cant use the "I didn't break the law so I get to keep my rights" argument because the entire fucking point of the constitution is that even if you fucking kill someone you still have fucking constitutional rights except in the case of voting because it is stated in the constitution itself.

Why is this concept so fucking hard for you? Like how are you this fucking dense?

File: operator.jpg (24KB, 460x288px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 460x288px

>>28846946

>>28867808
If you're a virgin by the age of 25 you honestly shouldn't be allowed to own a gun amongst other things

File: increase_the_memes.png (1MB, 989x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 989x1334px

>>28867850
>best villan
No

>>28868111
So that rules out everyone on this site.

>>28858016
Yea you can go fuck yourself. I'm twenty six and still a virgin. Why? Because I decided that it's all bullshit between false rape charges, stds, pregnancy/abortion, prositution being illegal, child support, statutory rape charges, emotional baggage, rejection, and anxiety issues Remember you can't lose if you don't play the game.

>>28846946
>born in Bremerton WA
>ohfuckthatswhereilive.scared
>lives in london
For fucks sake, that was close. For a second I thought she still lived here. Glad she doesn't, but that would explain a whole lot as to why she's retarded

File: 1437514243525.gif (2MB, 245x207px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x207px

>>28868503

>>28868578
Jesus Christ, of course she's from Brompton. Fuck that cess pit, worst town on the Peninsula.

File: 1387488142980.png (2MB, 1786x1030px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1786x1030px

>>28868503
>Remember you can't lose if you don't play the game.

Not playing the game is equal to forfeiting, i.e. losing.

File: harrison.jpg (9KB, 303x276px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 303x276px

>>28868503
if you don't play the game you'll never win

>>28868631
but you'll for ever remain in a quantum state where you haven't lost, but also you have won

>>28868503
This TBQHFAM. Sometimes I just wish I'd never bothered, it's too damn much hassle.

>>28868616
Wow I'm blown away by your critical thinking skills. To forfeit is to start playing a game then quit where as not playing at all means non participation. Your subjective definitions are invalid

File: pettycrocker-734x1024.jpg (131KB, 734x1024px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 734x1024px

>>28854063

File: Bakunin_not_sure.png (36KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 600x600px

>>28868643
is this some kind of Schrödingers virgin shit?

File: consider-the-following.jpg (25KB, 300x301px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 300x301px

>>28868503
>>28868644
ever thought of fucking a man?

>>28868666

Satan is not as sharp as he used to be

File: FB_IMG_1454722944872.jpg (5KB, 200x139px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 200x139px

>>28851923
>be gay
>mfw 3% of the US population is gay/bi
>some of that is women
>some of that is gross guys
>some of that is underage


Wow, guess I should just go fuck any of them so I can own a gun.

>>28868700
Nope never crossed my mind, my life is motivated by other pursuits other than love and sex.

>>28868503
yes, you're a virgin because you decided against it. it was totally voluntary, you just turn down pussy left and right because you'd rather not take the unlikely risk of preventable consequences

seriously, i'm kinda alarmed that there are apparently all these virgins on a weapons forum - you can't even use the gun god gave you

>>28868755
>alarmed at a person's personal choices

>>28868782
>choice

>>28868811
>implying it's not

Jerk off, not horny anymore. Wow, no need to go get the clap and accused of rape.

>>28868755
Good job projecting anon

>>28868503
If you're to scared to talk to women, you're too fucking incompetent to own a gun, end of story you fucking mong.

I originally said virgins shouldn't own guns to see the response on this board and you're actually just as pathetic as I would have hoped. Not because you're a virgin but because your way of justifying it is so fucking delusional its unreal, especially on a board about guns.

>>28868842
Jesus, you should just kill yourself.

Millions have sex every day and a fraction get STDs. An minute fraction get accused of rape.

Maybe you should just go gay. Experience the joy of a blowjob.

>>28868923
I am gay tho, women are fucking awful.

>>28868915
Never said I was scared of talking to women. I just have better uses of my time such as shit posting, reloading, and target practice

>>28868666
The evolutionary game starts when you're born. Some would argue that it starts when you're conceived. It really doesn't matter, you can't choose not to play.

>>28868842
The clap isn't that bad, I once got it in my mouth.


And I never drank Jagermeister again

>>28869124
Only weak people declare there is no choice

>>28868700
I did. Tried it, wasn't really any better. Right now I'm in this nebulous place where it's like... Male, female, whatever. I'm only mildly interested anyway.

>>28869270
Of course there is a choice, I never claimed otherwise. But I could never respect a man, who given the choice between winning and losing, chooses to lose.

>>28858016
The fack that I am still a virgin at 24 bares no relivance to my ability to safely own and operate firearms.

>>28868038
>Why is this concept so fucking hard for you? Like how are you this fucking dense?

Because you weren't expressing yourself very clearly. Also, muddying the waters with feels about virgins and cultural degenerates.

So your stand is that all people should have all rights all the time. If you'd articulated a little more clearly we wouldn't have wasted all of this time. I see no reason to argue with your position.

Monitoring this thread, makes me feel good that I lost my virginity at age 16.

>>28869319
Winning and losing are relatives terms that are subjectively defined. Your definition of winning maybe crushing pussy where as mine is enjoying life in other ways

>>28868038
Not the other guy, but I agree with him. The Constitution acts like a social contract for Americans. By living in our country, you agree to abide by the rules. "Your rights end where another's rights begin." Etc.

Why allow someone who was convicted of shooting someone else to legally own another another firearm? What's your solution to that?

>>28868111
So, you're advocating solving cultural degeneracy by pressuring kids into having sex as soon as possible.

File: image.png (3KB, 279x237px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 279x237px

>>28868616
This picture, every fucking time

>>28869403
Not the guy you're replying to, but it seems like you swear that you have no time to have sex. All you need is an hour or two. In the time that you masturbated these past three weeks you could have lost it. While I agree that it's nothing special, it's still fun and rewarding. So tell me why you have to justify your insecurities on a Nepalese cave painting exposé?

>>28869403
This whole argument essentially boils down to: "What is the purpose of life?", and therefore there is no objective truth, I agree.

But from a scientific point of view, procreation is the sole purpose of all organisms. Also, having sex doesn't mean you can't enjoy other things, like outdoorsmanship, firearms, gaming, et cetera.

>>28869401
Black cherry doesn't count fagit

>>28869464
Black cherry?

>>28869445
You're assuming wrong friend. I just view "playing the game" and sex much like most people view stamp collecting.

>>28867789
>Not that many NYPD shoot more than their required qualifying requirements once a year.
Let's be honest here, if your Glock had a 12 pound trigger, would you?

>>28869608
Well, if that's really how you feel, I guess there's no way to force you or pressure you to be "normal". Have you at least ever kissed a woman?

>>28869458
I agree I could enjoy sex and all that, however, I just view sex like most people view quilt making

File: 1.jpg (38KB, 767x662px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 767x662px

>>28869422
>social contract

Where the fuck in the constitution is this implied? Infringing on others peoples rights? The constitution is a contract between citizens and their government, not between citizens. There isn't a single fucking mention in the constitution about violent crime and whether state/federal law allows the removal of constitutional rights for it.

The entire point is that when people cry about their second amendment right to own firearms its completely infuckingvalid because we already have LAWS in place that infringe that right for criminals UNCONSTITUTIONALLY YET WE AS A SOCIETY ARE OK WITH IT AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T AFFECT US PERSONALLY WHICH IS COMPLETELY CONTRADICTORY.

I swear to fuck you fucking rednecks are retarded. I'm as liberal as they come and I still have to explain the constitution to you dipshits

File: 1.jpg (158KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1500x1500px

>>28869400
>hurr durr I don't get what you're saying after saying the same thing for 3 posts that should be common knowledge and could be deduced by a 5 year old on their own

Honestly just give up

>>28869946
...Shall not be deprived of life, LIBERTY, or PROPERTY without due process of law. You go to court, court deems you not responsible enough to handle firearms, car, alcohol, whatever. You have the right to defend against it, and have a legal advocate assist, but thats the way it works. Should white collar criminals be deprived of 2nd amendment rights? No. Should Tyrone after doing 5 years for robbing that liquor store? Probably. At least for a few years to determine whether he's done being a fucking ape.

>>28857713
Never been bothered once. Maybe you just have that mass shooter vibe?

>>28870000
Considering that I'm not the only anon responding to you about your lack of clarity, you might want to reexamine how you choose to communicate.

Or you could just post more greentext, rage caps, and generic reaction images.

File: 1451774864521.jpg (117KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 720x960px

>>28864620
Sure bro. Whatever you say bro

>>28870033
Again everything you are saying does not apply to the constitution.

Even depriving someone of their property doesn't imply that it you should never be able to buy property, even more so that the right to possess that property (arms) is actually explicitly protected in the constitution.

>>28870085
Ok ill give it to you on the rage text and images but it doesn't invalidate my original argument.

But arguing long enough against essentially a brick wall makes you want to smash your fucking head through it

>>28870140
We are talking about the US constitution right?

>>28868719
But you aren't a person?

>>28869628
Being honest no, I've definitely had interest, however, have never had any reciprocation.

>>28870203
Are you trying to say that a federal law should be able to override a constitutional right?

>>28870244
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

I am saying that there are other amendments to the constitution.

>>28870230
Then what am I senpai?

>>28870303
Are you trying to say that an implied constitutional law overrides an explicit constitutional law?

And being convicted of a crime removes constitutional rights?

>>28870426
There is no override. They are not in conflict. Suspension of your constitutionally protected rights is allowed through the Fifth Amendment and the Due Process clause. The Court has already interpreted this in this exact way.

Right of Assembly for instance is also often abridged in this context.

>>28870732
In no way shape or form does due process imply that the government can remove constitutional rights.

So if I'm convicted of littering could I have all my constitutional rights removed if it was a federal law that was passed? Would that be constitutional?

>>28871091
>So if I'm convicted of littering could I have all my constitutional rights removed if it was a federal law that was passed?
Yes.
>Would that be constitutional?
I can't imagine you'd have a hard time arguing an Eighth Amendment challenge against any revocation of rights for a violation, let alone revocation of one's rights to Due Process for just about any crime.

>>28871339
Well would a felon have a hard time arguing with the 8th for 2nd amendment rights?

Since under the constitution a violent crime is the same thing as littering or speeding?

>>28869613
Yeah, I would if it was an isued gun for a job that could not be modifed. But I like guns so I wouldn't fit in in NYPD.

Apparently most don't carry off duty and some barely clean their guns. So yeah the environment of NYPD doesn't foster a love of guns to begin with.

>>28870184
Not saying your argument is invalid. Hell, we might even be arguing different tangents of the same side of the argument. What I'm saying is that your position isn't as clear as you think it is.

File: article-2605888-1D24295700000578-152_634x498.jpg (52KB, 634x498px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 634x498px

>>28866884

This?

>>28869946
>Due process.
It seems YOU Mr. Liberal need to actually READ the constitution.
The first ten ammendments outline what your basic rights are and further in the Const tells how those rights can be taken away. For example the 4a explains how you cant just have your house and person randomly searched....but if there is a warrant it can be....or like with TSA if you go to a place to be searched in order to gain entry. Such is, if you give up or lose your right, you no longer have them.

>>28853688
>We don't let felons, people convicted of a violent crime, parolees, or people sectioned under the mental care act, etc to own guns.

That's called due process homie.

Telling someone they can't own a firearm because they like animu or butt sex isn't due process.

Lrn2civics.

>>28865562
Dude, you said something stupid as fuck and it got pointed out with multiple, better informed posts.

You're anonymous, you don't need to double down on it, you can just let it go.

>>28846946
This dumb cunt lives in brooklyn, I've seen her on the G train a while back

>>28858016
Had a fiance, was saving myself for her. Bitch cheated and since then kinda gave up on the whole thing. 21 here, go fuck yourself. A natural right is a natural right, and my right to my life, to defend myself, and fight is mine and if you want it, come and fucking take it.

Getting pussy's not a right, nor even a privilege. So get fucked you gun grabbing cunt

>>28870347
Clearly a kangaroo or some shit

>>28868616
What's wrong with the right bitch's face?

>>28868915
I don't like you.

>>28870101
I'm still trying to figure out how the fuck he managed to fit himself in the table like that.

>>28846946

>come to america
>bitch about how much better your old country is

Go fucking back then. My wife is half Vietnamese and her mom was born there. Never says anything about how great it was in Vietnam, loves America and considers herself lucky to be here.

Can't tell you how many times I've run into someone from Europe that brags about how much smarter/better their country is than America. I've never met someone who moved here from Asia that had anything but nice things to say about America.

Conclusion: Europeans are ungrateful shits, give all their naturalization slots to various Asian nationalities that will actually appreciate the opportunity to live here. As a bonus California will probably become even more overrun by them and might actually become a better place somehow.

>>28876659
Only Asian I ever heard complain about America used to own the restaurant next to us.

>Brack people awrays want use bafroom
>They come in, I very busy, bug me for water
>I try make money, I work to feed my daughter, they want free food, free water, free bafroom
>Even if I give free food, they steal
>Why steal all my soy sauce?
>Soy sauce one dorrar a bottle
>One bottle rast for a year
>Buy soy sauce with food stamps, still free
>Brack people no good for American businessman Anon
>I hope porice kill all bracks, rive and work in peace

I miss that magnificent bastard

>>28873422
Due process deals with federal and state laws, not constitutional laws. Yes there is clauses that remove certain rights but those are in the constitution themselves. Saying that you lose the right to vote (disenfranchisement) due to "rebelion or other crime" (Reynolds v Sims) which is stated in the constitution still abides by the constitution.

Extrapolating this idea of removing constitutional rights because of a crime is not constitutional; such as in the case in the case of denying second amendment rights to felons. There is nothing in the constitution that allowed this other than the fact that it could be implied by the 5th amendment (due process) which is a shaky interpretation at best. But we do it anyways as a society and as a society we are OK with it because we don't like felons. What's to say we dont like weaboos in the future?

>TSA
So when the TSA takes items that are not TSA complaint without a warrant, is that allowed under the 4th amendment?


>>28875523
If we change the federal law to exclude weaboos from owning guns, you are accused and convicted and your guns removed, is this not due process? Due process deals with how a law is enforced, not the content of the law itself. And since we unconstitutionally do not allow felons to own guns, it could be said we could do the same to weaboos.

>>28877043
Jesus are you still on this? Draft the legislation and see if a congressman will sponsor it already.

>>28877043
Advanced autism

>>28877214
I just wanted to gauge how this board actually thinks

>>28877479
nice meme weeb

>>28877591
This board thinks that a dragon dildo spiked on the bayonet of a mosin nagant being shoved up a traps ass is a healthy form of sexual expression. What exactly were you expecting?

>>28876457
I don't even know man

>>28877631
Nah that's only slavboos

>>28877043
>So when the TSA takes items that are not TSA complaint without a warrant, is that allowed under the 4th amendment?

Yes, because they're not kicking down your door and ransacking your bathroom for shampoo bottles larger than 3 ounces. TSA restrictions on personal property are in effect in clearly marked areas, which nobody is forcing you to enter. Don't like the rules? Stay out of airports. Problem solved.

>>28877631
>This board thinks that a dragon dildo spiked on the bayonet of a mosin nagant being shoved up a traps ass is a healthy form of sexual expression.

Consenting adults, etc., etc. Personally, I don't see the attraction. I don't like asparagus, either.

>>28876659
Oooooooooooooor Vietnam is a shithole. If I was living in a shithole like that, then a slightly less shithole of a place (America) would be a more attractive home.

File: 1430857516673.png (430KB, 352x515px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 352x515px

>>28851923
God I hate neo-cons

File: 1436762771704s.jpg (2KB, 124x120px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 124x120px

>>28868503
By not playing you also never win.

>>28865457
>Smith & Wesson Sigma
it just keeps popping up in black people's hands for some reason

>>28876063
Shieeet boi. I'll be a pitbull so I can bite nutz.

>>28846946
>look her up

SHE WROTE A BOOK ABOUT BEING 'A BREEDER'

what the fuck?

Wait is it one of those 'im an expert on this despite have no expereince' cuz that face she can't breed unless its a court ordered sentence on some poor soul.

>>28878635
There are more than one way to win

File: one-senior-citizen-has-an-interesting-point-on-why-the-elderly-should-be-able-to-join-the-army-6-photos-1[1].gif (625KB, 376x282px) Image search: [Google]

625KB, 376x282px

>>28868503
Honestly I know where this annon is coming form. I was still a virgin when I got into collecting guns, and I didn't lose the v chip until I was in my mid 20's.

My reasoning though was not that I wasn't afraid of talking to women or anything... It was just that I didn't find any of the girls in my area to be attractive / or interesting enough to pursue. Eventually I did find a woman that did fit what I was looking for and went on to fuck her brains out for a number of years.

Being a virgin at times is by choice either having standards (like myself) or seeing the bigger picture (like annon), and has no correlation to owning firearms.

>Having said that... annon some free advice, just wear a rubber and be sure not to find a gold digger and you'll be ok

>>28846946
Colin Firth in drag

>>28879646
She's living proof that guys will stick their dick just about anywhere that isn't actively defended.

>>28880950
Colin Firth would look so much better than... whatever that is in the OP.

>>28868915

Guns don't judge me

>>28881304
They do.