WA fags, write to your representatives NOW.
This bill effectively bans ALL semi-automatic long guns with a detachable magazine, even grandpa's trusty old BAR and 10/22s.
If it has a detachable magazine and ONE or more of the following:
>Pistol OR thumb hole grip
The usual bullshit.
The next one is the kicker (Exact text):
>A shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned, but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel
IE: any goddamn fore-end
>A semiautomatic pistol, or a semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle with a fixed magazine, that has the capacity to accept more than ten rounds of ammunition
A semiautomatic shotgun that has one or more of the following:
>A pistol grip or thumbhole stock;
>Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the nontrigger hand;
>A folding or telescoping stock;
>A fixed magazine capacity in excess of five rounds; or an ability to accept a detachable magazine;
>A shotgun with a revolving cylinder;
There is a silver lining though, .22 cal magazines have been exempted, though the rifle hasn't...
Worse, any semi-auto rifle with a detachable magazine and pic relate is evil.
Seems as though, the democrat represented states might be able to really dominate this as well. Coming from a straight repub district. I also am not as concerned but still writing in about this because its really really poorly written washing state does have based state constitution.
Washington west coast LibKucks BTFO
No more guns for you Liberals!
Embrace the diversity and enrichment!
Post your face when you are not a west coast LibKuck.
>your face whenever you remember whatever shithole state your from
You would think, but the only challenge in court to this is a case from city of seattle where they passed a law banning the carrying of certain knives in the city, it was challenged twice in court before being defeated by state supreme court
>making fun of people losing their gun rights no matter the place
>not being able to realize this will spread to another states in few years
>not realizing this will be the norm to the whole country in less than 20 years
That's how they win, divide and conquer.
Check out this SUPER DOUBLE ILLEGAL firearm!
Every gun in Washington would have to look like a god damn Papoose.
Listen to what >>28521990 said. Anti-gunners have given up gun control at a federal level and are now working on state-level gun control.
First Bloomberg and his cronies bused people into Washington state to get UBC passed. Yes, you read that correctly, anti-gunners literally paid people from out of state to come and pass out propaganda and help sway votes. I think Bloomberg gave about $40m in funding to anti-gun groups to help push their agenda, all for a state he had nothing to do with. Now he's doing the same thing with Nevada. Because of his funding, anti-gun groups were able to bus in people from surrounding states to do the ground work for gun control. They got enough petitions to get a UBC bill up for vote in Nevada, and he, along with other anti-gunners, are dumping money into the state to make sure it passes.
Once Nevada is done, they'll move over to the next state. Then the next state. Don't think for a second that it will end with UBC. Once a state has UBC, they'll focus on AWBs and registries. Then after that, they'll focus on confiscation.
>but that can't happen in my state!
Tell that to California, a state that was once a solid red state. Anti-gunners are spreading out more every year. They want to escape the shitty places they live, but then aim to turn their new homes into the same shithole that they left.
From what I've read this has to go through the state legislature which is mostly republican, and individual towns/ordinances cannot have gun laws different than the states. Its not gonna pass but you should really still write your reps so they know people actually like freedom.
I suggest you read Locke and/or similar material and educate yourself on the ideas that this civilization was founded upon.
You cannot lose rights. Rights do not belong to the state, they belong to individuals. You can surrender your rights to the state, which is what we do to a limited extent when the social contract is formed. We give up some freedom to obtain the (debatable) benefits of having a government. The rights enumerated in the constitution aren't privileges being granted to you by the government, they are putting the government on notice that the people have not surrendered these rights and it has no business meddling with them.
The state may attempt to undermine your rights through legislation, but you cannot lose them to the state without willing submission on your part. The red coats who marched on Lexington and Concord were agents of the state who had been granted legal authority to seize and destroy the weapons there. The state tried to usurp their right to keep and bear arms, but the colonist who met them there opted not to surrender essential freedom to the state even if it meant dying.
What he did in WA was what exactly happened here in Oregon. Except he got people to vote out a pro-gun legislator in Hillboro, and that's all it took for us to get fucked.
I wish Oregon Firearms Federation (OFF) had more funding, Kevin Starrett is a good man who's pretty much fighting by himself in Salem.
Hope you WA guys prevail.
This is the state of modern America. You explain the political philosophy that the nation was founded on, that our founding fathers bled and died for, and you get accused of posturing.
Gerrymandering isn't even necessary.
It's just population differences.
That said, living in snohomish fucking sucks, it's almost a red county but the proximity to seattle fucks it over.
>YOU CANT REBEL AGAINST THE SYSTEM, ITS THE CURRENT YEAR
This is Amercia. A country literally founded on the idea that freedom and liberty is worth dying for. That if your hand is forced you will play the ace you've been hiding up your sleeve since December 15, 1791.
And if you don't want. Fine.
Shut the fuck up and move aside for those of us who will. And maybe, after we die using our second amendment to defend it, or the others, just maybe, you'll still have the first to tell other 'not to bother'.
This is your daily reminder that Reynolds vs Sims back in the 60's guaranteed that LA would rule California, Seattle would rule Washington, Portland would rule Oregon, Chicago would rule Illinois, and NYC would rule New York.
Oh, and that you can't vote Republican because they can't shut up about 'social issues.'
I don't think the barrel shroud counts handguards, I'm pretty sure it only counts things mounted directly to the barrel.
The language isn't very well constructed, but isn't this something from the national AWB meant to get things marketed as shrouds and fake supressors covering parts of the barrel not usually covered?
Interestingly enough the race was between Chuck Riley and Bruce Starr was odd. Initially, Bruce Starr had clearly won the election. However, all of a sudden 100 votes for Chuck Riley had suddenly been "found" and he had beat Bruce out by just 100 votes.
The fact that these votes were "found" and allowed Chuck Riley to win was very wierd.
ILLEGAL FOREGRIP DETECTED
20 years in the iso-cubes, lawbreaker!
Read the Wiki entry. They tried. It simply fell flat, and now we are stuck with a New Normal. You know. Kind of like until 1968 anybody anywhere could mail order guns with no background checks. Now instead of the whole cake, we are left with guarding crumbs -- and losing them one by one.
No, disassembly was easy. It was putting the bastard back together that prompted me to buy a book on the subject. If you're going to troll, do it right.
>go shoot the bill sponsor
That's not what I'm advocating.
No one is here is saying "LET'S GO SHOOT POLITICIANS WHO DISAGREE WITH US."
That's literally Soviet Union levels of tyranny.
What I'm saying is that the idea of an actual rebellion is not stupid or silly, but is a legitimate option even in 2016.
And if the government continues to erode our rights as they are doing. And if democracy doesn't work. And our first amendment fails us.
Then it is proper and just to us the second.
Right now it's not proper and just to start a rebellion. And it's also completely immoral and wrong to shoot random politicians. You're not arguing the point, you're just ignoring it by saying 'lolokay tough guy'.
There *is* a middle ground, you know. Except instead of just doing it once to vent, you need to start doing it every. Fucking. Year.
I have not advocated any action in this thread. I have merely summarized the political philosophy that built this nation. Why have you guys gotten so defensive?
Submission and compliance with the state is a perfectly valid course of action. Most people choose this as it represents less risk to life and limb. Your attitude and those of anons making similar statements reflect this.
you act as if no one knows about the founding fathers, EVERYONE KNOWS. its not possible no matter how hard you fucking want it to, rebel against the state. king county controls the state we cant stop that, as phil has already stated. you can spout your rebellion bullshit all you want but its never going to happen. when the founding fathers did it everyone was equally armed try anything now and youll be killed or jailed faster than you can say molon labe11!.
i understand your frustration as i am angry too but there is nothing we can do.
The same every rebellion starts.
Get a group of people who are pissed off about the erosion of our unablible rights. Talk about it. Then protest.
And if the protesting fail. Start the actual rebelling.
There's a really cool example you could check out. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War
Sure the tactics will need some updating, but its a very good model.
Armed civil disobedience works. Ask Cliven Bundy.
You don't need to hurt anyone, but you *are* going to have off your ass and get in your enemies' faces.
>A shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned
Partially or completely encircled the barrel, so you can hold it with your off hand and not be burned by the barrel.
Even at the time of the founding it was known that it is impossible to safeguard liberty without periodic revolution. The status quo is a reflection of how ineffective idle threats and posturing are in reigning in the government. They know that people have a strong aversion to risking their comfort and livelihood to engage in open revolt, so they whittle away at freedom slowly over time.
>you'll be killed or jailed
I would gladly die trying to protect my liberties and freedoms then have to explain to my children 40 years down the road what it was like when we were free.
And don't talk as if The State is an all powerful entity. At the end of the day they need people to enforce their things. And people don't like getting shot.
If an actual, just rebellion started people would desert as police and military. They would join. Not all of course, but a good number.
There was clearly a lack of understanding of the nature of rights in this thread.
I suggest you refresh your familiarity with the war. There was no equality of arms or resources.
The problem with people like yourself is that you deny the feasibility of revolution out of lack of willingness to sacrifice, but mask it with vague statements like it isn't 1776 anymore. That is fine. You are not require to defend your freedom, but don't play games and beat around the bush. You don't want to risk losing your comfortable life for the chance that there could be something better because reaching that place is not guaranteed and comes and the cost of your life. OK, move on then and feel free to ignore those who see things differently.
We used to have everything except full auto. Now we have universal background checks, the aft is denying sbr "manufacturing" because of the state constitutions wording, and now this. All within the past few years
Why can't I? Why am unable to apply to founding principles of this country to the country currently?
I understand the weapons have changed.
The battlefield has changed.
But its still the government vs the people. The people that allow the government to operate.
And the government can't kill everyone, who wants to rule a nation of corpses?
No one will make you fight for your freedoms, no one will tell you to stop using your first amendment, but do you have to use ad hominem agaisnt people who ARE willing to die for their freedom and your freedom?
Go find a million gun owners willing to put their life on the line and come back. Don't get me wrong if push comes to shove i'll shove back but when is the time? Also gratuitous watchlist thread.
I appreciate how you guys are so willing to engage in thoughtful discussion and don't just keep posting "tough guy" and "go shoot someone". It really gives me hope for the future and speaks volumes about the quality of the education system.
It's literally that simple: they can't arrest that many people at once, they'll just tear-gas the crowd.
At which point most of the cops will die from multiple salvos of supersonic lead.
Then we can hang congress for treason as the framers of the constitution intended.
>I understand the weapons have changed.
>The battlefield has changed.
you can stop here because this alone will crush your rebellion. look i hate gun laws as much as you but your not getting a million people to march anywhere. it wont happen
you must not be very educated if you think 2016 is anything like 1776
the blacks were the poorest, most marginalized group in the 60's, with less ability to communicate, freely travel, or organize and they STILL stood up for their rights.
Why are you too much of a coward?
>It's literally that simple: they can't arrest that many people at once, they'll just tear-gas the crowd.
>At which point most of the cops will die from multiple salvos of supersonic lead.
>Then we can hang congress for treason as the framers of the constitution intended.
this will never happen, as much as you want it to. claim im whatever you want and that im uneducated or dont care about my rights
>stopped right there
That's not how you have a meaning discussion.
If you hate the laws.
Write your local reps.
Then write the next level up. And so on.
If that fails. Protest. Use your first amendment. Write petitions. March. So the government that people want change.
can it be justified to use the second. No matter what you think the odds are you must fight for your freedoms and liberties. Just accepting it won't help. It won't do anything but let the government continue to erode your rights.
Would you rather die fighting for what you say you belive in? Or live in silence inside a husk of a democracy surrounded by the hushed whispers of freedoms past?
The lawmakers have removed all effective means of legally dealing with their bullshit.
The only means left are illegal.
Occupy. Big Money out of Government.
They got hit with COINTELPRO and left to infight themselves into obscurity and punchline status.
My stated goal is to hang congress for treason.
Corrupt that, CIA.
Just got a message back from local senator:
Thank you for your message. First, I want you to know that I will not support House Bill 2354 or any other legislation that could infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.
Second, HB 2354 is like any House bill in that it must clear several hurdles before it could be considered here in the Senate. That means receiving a public (committee) hearing, then committee approval, then "yes" votes from at least 50 members of the 98-member House of Representatives.
Finally, even if the bill makes it before the full House, the 50 Democrats who constitute the House majority include several from rural districts. Their constituents may not view this issue the same way as the representative who filed HB 2354 - a big-city Democrat who just happens to be running for statewide office (lieutenant governor) later this year.
In the meantime, I will keep an eye out for any similar pieces of legislation from members of the Senate minority - and oppose those as well.
Senator Randi Becker
2nd Legislative District
>is currently majority replublican congress/sentate
>stated goal is to hang congress
stealth liberal confirmed.
>First, I want you to know that I will not support House Bill 2354 or any other legislation that could infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.
Rock on, Rock on you magnificent bastard
It doesn't matter. People on here will laugh and point. And then mock us for why we didn't do anything. They are exihibiting the same attitude antigunners have
>it never happened to me, so its not in my mind to consider the possibility
I shouldn't be happy, but I am.
I'm so sick of you WAfags never shutting the fuck up about muh PNW xD and garbage hipster beer.
Different time, different context, guns are looked at differently back then compared to today. Our society and population are much different than 1776. In other words, if you think you can send a message to the population about your heroic stand, it'll only be twisted by the media and government that so many people take for gospel.
If you want people outside of progun circle to support and take up the cause with us, you need to play the game the liberals play so well. Influence through media, school, culture, and actually raise and correct people's perception of guns. This shit takes time and all the current legislation doesn't give us much time.
>you mad that outside of king county wa is the goat state?
Not the fuck anymore
>mfw I live in NY
>mfw we were okay with the Clinton era bans before the """" SAFE"""" act passed illegally
>mfw everybody made their guns full freedom since everything is an assault weapon now anyway
unfortunately. Seattle is the only city that I've ever actually liked...
I've gone on a ton of hikes in WA, I'd really like to check out some abandoned buildings or something like that, any good places to explore?
>the people elect representatives
>representatives make laws that don't agree with you
>"kill the politicians for taking my freedom away, how dare people be allowed freedom to vote for things I don't like"
God Damn you people are stupid
These laws are stupid, the law makers are stupid, but ultimately the people are stupid. Educate the people to be more intelligent, to elect representatives that aren't stupid.
Democracy works and makes laws you don't like? Your response to the political system working is to write on forums about how people need to ready their guns to shoot people who disagree with them? Yeah, you shouldn't be surprised when your side loses
>Elected officials destroy your rights
>HOW DARE YOU WANT TO TAKE ARMS! ITS DEMOCRACY HAPPENING WHEN YOUR RIGHTS ARE STRIPPED FROM YOU!
You need to be lynched alongside those "elected officials".
First of all.
I said it's time to hop on the Congress Rope Day train when we reach a tipping point. Where so many of our rights are eroded its obscene.
Secondly like the other Anon said. Laws should not, and can not infringed on our unablible rights. If they do, then that is grounds for Congress Rope Day.
pictography of islams in Bern Swissland
You guys don't seem very upset about the complete lack of separation of church and state. Why aren't you storming the capital, telling them to stop getting children to pledge allegiance under god?
The American PEOPLE vote continuously for people who destroy their rights. They obviously like it, just like you hate freedom of differing opinions
But of course it's actually the ominous blob (the gubments) that are trying to enslave you.
Confirmed for not reading Constitution and Bill of Rights.
There is legal separation of church and state. No unablible right to not have Christ shoved down your throat.
If Congress said "New law starting tomorrow everyone must be Christian." Then I would take up arms.
If Congress said "New Law, it is illegal to be Buddhist." I would take up arms.
Not a second sooner.
>You guys don't seem very upset about the complete lack of separation of church and state. Why aren't you storming the capital, telling them to stop getting children to pledge allegiance under god?
Hey liberal faggot. Most schools don't even do the pledge of allegiance thanks to cocksuckers like you. I like how being triggered over the word "god" is more important than the second amendment to cucks like you.
>OH MY GOD! NATIONALISM! THE UTTERANCE OF THE WORD GOD! SOMEBODY STOP THESE NAZIS!
I'm glad you would also be indifferent to "god" being changed to "Allah", just like every other freedom loving american
Freedom is sham
What's the fucking point of separation of church and state when nobody can get elected unless they're Christian?
What's the point of the 2nd amendment when citizens keep voting for technically constitutional laws that just keep limiting gun freedom?
What's the point of freedom of speech when someone loses their job for calling someone a nigger online?,
Democracy is a cancer.
>implying Allaha isn't just the Arabic word for God
And again. We literally don't have a separation of church and state. That's not a legal thing we have.
Please point out where it say that.
>What's the fucking point of separation of church and state when nobody can get elected unless they're Christian?
Don't like it, get out of a country that is majority Christan, asshole. Lets see you go to Israel and tell them to start electing non-jews into political office.
>IF YOU DOND FEAR GODD YOU MUSD GO!!
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion
>one nation, under Vishnu
I don't see a problem with it. It's just a word. I'm glad you support the change for our constitutional rights to remain intact
>don't like it, leave
Don't like people voting representatives that make silly laws about firearms? Leave. The majority disagree with you
I'm quite comfortable. You're the one acting like a pink haired tumblr pleb crying about the utterance of the word "god" in a pledge that is largely not even used anymore in public schools. Go fuck your fedora elsewhere, antifa faggot.
I'm quite comfortable. You're the one acting like a pink haired tumblr pleb crying about not being allowed particular toys that largely have no practical use beyond causing plenty of unnecessary deaths and ijuries. Go fuck your fedora elsewhere, republican fatty
>because I don't care about a religion
feel free to enjoy your religion, please don't let me or anyone ever take your right to it. please just don';t tell me your way is the highway
I always hear you faggots talking about how you're gearing up to start shooting politicians or whatever and you never actually do anything.
I swear you militia types are the biggest fucking blowhards north of the equator.
>please just don';t tell me your way is the highway
Dirty filth detected.
so you are telling me that every day I stood to say the pledge of allegiance in high school last year was not real? or my 12 year old brother was lying to me when he says that he has to do the flag salute every morning?
No, your right. /k/ is clearly for liberal antigun niggers like yourself.
>so you are telling me that every day I stood to say the pledge of allegiance in high school last year was not real?
You're not actually legally obligated to say the pledge of allegiance.
>the country doesn't have to be christian.
No it should be an Atheist Utopia like the other Atheist Utopias that proceeded it.
Why do you have to make shit up?
>12 year old brother was lying to me when he says that he has to do the flag salute every morning?
Never has Saluting a flag been a part of public school tradition. Saluting a flag is a military protocol. Stop pretending you atheist faggots are under religious persecution.
don't you know, the only amendment /k/ cares about is the second. they pretty much care nothing about the actual constitution besides having their "Funs", if they did they would be more respectful of the Establishment clause.
not only that, it had to be legislated into the flag code. congress, making passing laws about religion. a gross violation of the first amendment.
E Pluribus Unum!
You can't even compare the two meaningfully.
Britain had a pretty loose hold on the US at the time of the revolution and incompetent military leadership.
The rebels had the support of foreign nations, too.
The US government knows _everything_ about you. It has a hugely powerful grip on the country and, in terms of offensive technology available, far outclasses its populace in a way that was simply not the case in the revolutionary period.
The only argument I've _ever_ heard from 2A militia types is "the military will defect in droves", and y'know what, that's not only not a certainty, it's one I'd not be willing to risk my life on.
>the blacks were the poorest, most marginalized group in the 60's
Do you not understand the technological gap between "average citizen with semi-auto rifle" and "government agent" these days?
It's not the fucking '60s any more.
I hate when these reddit fucks come on about hypothetical military situations as if they have the first inclination of wartime.
In a domestic civil war:
>there is no green zone/true safe zone aside for the elite
>in modern times there are few outward differences from rebels/civilians
>symmetrical engagements are rare but costly
>heavy weaponry use is limited due to the cost to innocents/valuable infrastructure
>GDP is severely impinged as heavy infrastructure is sabotaged and exports dwindle
>combined with the logistical strain and additional checks further hindering the flood of supplies to hungry civilians
>combined with the fact that after Katrina the military did a study that declared in a SHTF scenario the best option is to let the situation 'sort itself' for a time....an unspecified time
Eat shit fucko and stay pleb
>its not a lie!
No one would be forcing your little faggot brother. When my school recited the pledge all the faggy non conformist edgelords simply walked outside. Sorry patriotism is so wrong for you. Try Europe next time.
>oh no better call him a heathen because he disagrees with me while accepting my viewpoint
>being a heretic and blasphemer
and what happens when the second amendment guys want to take away the first amendment? get into a firefight and execute small dicked christians who are so unamerican that they changed our national motto to please god?
Libertarians, constitutionalist, the militias, the sovereigns, they're all such an intelligent bunch. How else could they be so consistent with their beliefs?
Remember that time a bird watching station was commandeered by a constitutionalist group trying to set up a religion tolerant camp that invites people from all over to join them and fight against the government tyranny and disregard for the first amendment and what the forefathers founded this country about?
Stop triggering me.
as in WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH?
>wen u need more dakka on capitol hill
>talking shit on Christ.
nigga we bout to scrap
You WA fags need to start calling these politicians out on accepting Bloomberg/anti-gun group bribes and start digging around to see what else these lawmakers are connected to, then contact those businesses and shit to raise a stink.
Seriously. Any state governor pushing anti-gun shit is taking bribes in the millions in the form of board member positions that pay out hundreds of thousands a year, or a straight up suitcase of money. Call them on that shit. Tell them the people need to see what kind of business connection the WA politicians have with the gun bans, even pull a freedom of information request to the anti-gun groups in the area to see if large chunks of money moved during the time these politicians started to push this shit.
I always thought WA was super pro-gun and pro-bill of rights? What the fuck happened to the state? It was even a place I was looking to move to back in the late 90's.
>I always thought WA was super pro-gun and pro-bill of rights? What the fuck happened to the state?
Seattle is absurdly anti-gun and essentially dictates what happens in the rest of the state. Even the other major cities aren't anywhere near as bad as that cesspool. I was going to Washington State when Sandy Hook happened, went into class the following morning and heard a bunch of students yelling about how if the teachers had been armed, it would never have happened. Even my liberal friends here are pro-gun.
Seattle's like someone cut out a chunk of the worst part of California and just dropped it into the state and then declared it to be in charge.
>thread about wa losing gun rights
>libtards derail the thread because the pledge of allegiance (which is voluntary) says "under god"
>they actually think that violates establishment clause and are actually getting butthurt over it
political threads are banned because libtards are such butthurt illiterate retards who can't help but turn threads into utter shit.
think about that: political threads are banned because libtards can't help but shitpost gun rights threads into the ground. All because /k/ cannot into hiding poor bait.
>hurr durr libtard because athiest
This is a point that people need to call the politicians on then. It should be horseshit that a single city dictate what happens to the rest of the state.
Delaware's crime is 98% Wilmington/New Castle but our politicians try pushing gun laws based on these cities. Its also a hive of drugs, gangs, and dealers since lots of what is moved to the upper East Coast is moved through there first, then distributed.
God I hate thugs as much as I hate these bullshit progressives who ignore statistics
See, pic related is how to defeat retarded shitposters intent on crashing and burning threads. It's not worth the time to entertain the sort of logical fallacies and retardation that demonstrate a textbook example of Poe's Law. These posts were clearly not genuine, and were meant to elicit a reaction out of us, rather than support any sort of intelligent point. Therefore, it is best to simply ignore them. Once /k/ masters this feature, thread quality will go up.
The second amendment ensures individual freedom. If someone is killing members or your community over freedom of speech issues (eg. Charlie Hebdo, draw a Muhammed cartoon day etc) then you are able to legally defend yourself. Same thing with government censorship or persecution. It is the last resort and individual has to protect their rights. Obviously armed revolution isn't something to be taken lightly but you aren't actually raising any articulate points contradicting what other anons have been saying.
It's like you have bought in to the socialist propaganda about the omnipotence of the state so much that you truly believe the corrupt, ever expanding system is unassailable.
guess what faggot, people were getting their rights trampled on in 1776 by the most powerful empire in the world and they created a fucking superpower. The founding fathers knew what people like you can't seem to grasp: governments NEED to be restricted so that the people can be free to prosper.
literally one man could bring down a large section of power to the eastern seaboard if they are smart enough. All you really need to do is blow out a few substations on a really hot day and a large majority of the eastern seaboard would overload. http://modernsurvivalblog.com/systemic-risk/9-electric-power-grid-substations-will-bring-it-all-down/ now those are specific substaions to bring it all down but if you do research on substations you can make a reasonable guess on which they are.
>>not being able to realize this will spread to another states in few years
>>not realizing this will be the norm to the whole country in less than 20 years
>implying the whole country is voting for liberals that want this nonsense
Just the faggot states
The sad part is there are actual people in this thread and on this board that won't call their politicians, won't tell their friends and family about this to generate noise in hopes to prevent this shit.
$20 says most people will tolerate it when it happens. The PNW is the new CA. CA itself will likely become red again once Brown is out of office anyway.
Democrats were always shit. Stop voting for them. Stop it. Want to keep your guns? Don't vote Democrat.
>The founding fathers knew what people like you can't seem to grasp: governments NEED to be restricted so that the people can be free to prosper.
>The Establishment Clause is a limitation placed upon the United States Congress preventing it from passing legislation respecting an establishment of religion.
>"in god we trust" is legislation respecting an establishment of religion
right, i'm the guy who doesn't understand that government needs to be limited.
I haven't voted Democrat in over 15 years now. They literally destroy cities and states to give corporations a leg up and end up on boards of directors positions after they get out of politics and ensure the other Democrats that stood aside for them get chairman positions.
They aren't even bothering to fucking hide it anymore. I mean, Delaware's Governor Markell is using a state email address of alan.jackson to more than likely conduct illicit business and refuses to acknowledge FOIA requests on it.
He was a forerunner in accepting these fucking Syrian migrants, so its possible that fucking asshole is accepting millions in ISIS oil money bribes.
This is irritating, I joined the army to protect our freedoms, but I'm watching them get flushed down the drain from within.
>Live in South Philadelphia
>Making great money, saving for a chunk of land
>Always wanted to move to the PNW
>This shit starts happening when I'm more or less a year or 2 away from having 100k in my savings
Please tell me it won't pass
goddamn it, fight. if it gets railroaded through its your only option nobody's going to do anything until someone proves it can be done start off with nonlethal psyops prove to the senators that they aren't untouchable first its a smoke bomb on a trip wire at there front door or a thermite charge on the hood of there car.
So could those people. And you know what? They did die and get imprisoned. You know what ELSE happened? They won.
They had a cause and they believed in it so dearly they would die for it. Even if they knew they may die before they saw the change they wanted, at least they died for some progress towards the goal than living the rest of their natural lives pussy-whipped. What about you, anon? What does freedom mean to you? Are you okay with being our nation's fuccboi if it means you get to shitpost another day on the interwebs?
Fuckin' Communist Californian transplants shitting up Washington state. They're spreading like a fucking cancer. An ignorant cancer that votes out everything American, then moves to another state to do the same.