What kind of gun owner is /k/?
Is there any english info on this thing? All I can find is in czech or some shit, the gun looks super fucking cool and impractical.
Competitor (IDPA, USPSA, NSSF Rimfire, CMP Rimfire Sporter)
I love how I'm able to work on other people's guns all day, build and assemble AR-15s, custom cerakote guns, and do a lot of custom work for handguns... yet I can't build my own AR or buy my own handgun.
No dude I said they should ADD to 100, so it should be any of those three things.
I'm not trying to say you guys don't belong, I'm just saying that competitive, CCW, and professional shooters probably have more real life experience with guns and therefore a higher power level.
God how I'd make sweet love to that silky smooth GILF ass.
No, it wouldn't. The minute someone marked something OTHER than one of those things (even in addition to) those 4 alone wouldn't add up to 100%, because at least one other thing would be counted.
Yeah I'm not sure what exactly people are doing. maybe too many options? They just like to polish and post pictures of their guns on chinese cartoon imageboards?
Well, to be fair, it's possible to overrepresent, but not to underrepresent.
If everyone did one of those things, it's impossible for it to be under 100%.
If not everyone did any of those things, but at least as many people did two or more of them, then it's possible for it to be over 100% but not everyone does it.
100% doesn't prove that everyone does one of those things, but way under 100% does prove that /k/ has a low power level.
Hey now, some of us are still in college and just hunt and plink until we're able to go innaArmy.
>yfw I'll have 2 B.A.s before I enlist
All the officers are going to think I'm an uneducated fuck.
Holy shit, a useful user made poll on /k/. This was bretty well done OP, bravo. Actually enjoyed looking at the numbers and getting a feel for how /k/ views themselves with regards to guns.
This is why I hate political cartoonists. So many of them are one-sided retards with no tact. Most of what they publish is tasteless, dishonest bullshit filled with logical fallacies.
In this case it's false equivalency. I bet that the same idiot who drew this cartoon thinks it's dumb to compare guns to cars.
In that case, it's just as retarded to compare personal firearms to bombs. A gun uses small internal combustion to propel projectiles in one direction at a single target at a time; a bomb uses a explosive charge to cause damage with a concussive blast wave and flying shrapnel, damaging a large area all at once. Two completely different categories, and bombs are far deadlier.
I try to laugh at their stupidity, but then I realize there are people out there who actually believe this hogwash.