Not sure but I know I wouldn't pick viking, most likely to die meaninglesslyu in some retarded battle because vikings can not into strategy or tactics. The only battles they ever won were the ones where they outnumbered their opponents 7:1, and they still took heavy losses. Vikings were the niggers of Europe.
>not wanting to be a fair skinned white muscled monstrosity feared by your opponents for your complete lack of fear for death >not wanting a high test ginger to bear your beautiful Scandinavian children and tend to your wounds >not wanting to operate in the name of your God just for the thrill of battle and the loot that comes after >not wanting to be a Viking Holy shit /k/ I had you all figured out wrong
best armor by far. tempered steel full plate armor is waaayyy better than just chainmail or bronze. most technologically advanced weapons made from superior quality tempered steel. trained in both battlefield combat AND individual dueling.
knight vs spartan, spartan has a spear, a shield that's shit for individual combat, and a breastplate and helmet. Crushed easily by a poleaxe to the face, whereas his spear won't do much to the knight's armor. Viking was the ancient equivalent of today's somali pirates. Kinda scary if you're a bunch of farmers on the coastline, but a guy who spends most of his time farming and then once a year grabs a spear and shield and if he's lucky a helmet would get fucked vs a fully armored and armed knight. Roman was at least a professional soldier (after a certain point in history), but same issues as previous guys. Armor is shit-tier compared to full plate, weapons are shit at killing the knight in full plate.
>>28462832 >Regular life would still be more enjoyable as a normal Roman legionnaire in all likelihood.
As a noble knight, you have pages & servants for everything. You spend you time either slacking off, enjoying life, learning shit (fighting, politics,...) or ruling your little stretch of land. Only shit would be having to grovel before your lord and most likely ending up in a bullshit arranged marriage. Life was pretty ok, even if you were not the first born son.
As a legionnaire, you work your fucking ass off during your tour of duty, until maybe you live long enough to be granted some godforsaken piece of land which you can then start to fucking farm. You can only hope that the winters are not harsh and that your harvest will be good enough to provide for you.
>>28462909 Scandinavians are pretty wealthy now days. And the women are hot. Because their ancestors went to other places, fought their men, stole their gold, and brought back the hottest babes they could find That's how you set your country up for future success. Too bad modern Scandinavians are poons
>>28462959 >implying that the meme about "omg a peasant with a crossbow could just hard-counter a knight in full armor!!!" stop playing video games that have a rock-paper-scissors structure. Crossbows came into popular use in europe in the 12th century. 400 years later they were still using full plate armor. Why? Because it was still pretty resistant to crossbows. Unless you are so autistic as to think they kept making shitty armor for hundreds of years, armor that cost more than a house, when it was useless against the most common ranged weapon of the time.
>Pillage and pirate the New World for keks and profit >Sail around the world, go to new and interesting places, meet new and fascinating people, and kill them and steal their shit for Queen and Country >get knighted >Keep having more adventures until death
>>28462748 Legatus obviously >clean running water >dem baths >bitches love my scutum >throwing my denarii around at the circus maximus like it's going out of style >use my praemia to build a grotto to have parties with my legate friends and their harems Based.
>re:vikings It's worth noting while Vikings saw Western Europe as a bunch of scared moneybags that you shake and loot falls out, you could just as easily head out East and make a living as basically just a tradesman. Both were popular at the time, we just remember them for going a-viking out west because they tended to conquer and settle there. "MUH VALHALLA" is also overplayed.
>>28463111 >quiet life farming >winter was hard this year, food running low, family starving >lord calls for a raid >sit on longship for days in the open, freezing your blonde nuts off >so cold >such wet >much water >arrive at destination >kill some peasants >take some shitty gold and items you might be able to trade >get back on longship >repeat shitty journey except this time, more wounded and tired and hungry >get home, one child died while gone, rest of family is starving. >shit-tier loot isn't worth as much as hoped >buy some food >go back to quiet life farming
>>28463139 And that's if you didn't die in battle, because the lord of whatever place you keep raiding decided to either teach his people to defend themselves, or hired some mercenaries to kill you, because you keep trying to raid his land for shit to steal.
>>28463125 Oh we have a white christ believer here huh...... *unsheathes my twin bearded axes* well, let's see how much of a believer you really are! *jumps into the air* TOO VALLHALLAAAAA *spins around and slashes your guts open* not so much of a believer now, huh????? *grabs your gold and throws it up* it's time to finish this little charade *holds my axes above my head* SMELL YOUR SOUP !!!!!!! *blindly runs forwards through your heavily defended outpost* heh...... easy......
>>28462924 >As a noble knight, you have pages & servants for everything. You spend you time either slacking off, enjoying life, learning shit (fighting, politics,...) or ruling your little stretch of land.
not all knights had vast tracts of land. some were quite poor.
The quality of life in the most civilized parts of the Roman Empire was better than the quality of life in the most civilized parts of Feudal Europe (remember, that's your only option as a Knight).
>>28463210 >Heh, yeah, I'll bet that's what my friends are doing right now >man I wish I hadn't taken that spear to the gut >And that I wasn't sitting here dying in the mud > I hope Olaf doesn't fuck my wife and daughter after I die >I don't like Olaf
>>28462924 Different anon, but >sanitation >hospitals >roman citizenship >decent pay >relatively low mortality during service due to reputation >no peasants that want to wreck your shit >no nobles that want to assassinate you
>>28463006 I love sailing but back then people would take prison over being pressed into service on a ship. Have fun shitting yourself to death while your teeth fall out and blackbeard rapes you to death.
the "knight" class in early Rome was the Equites, the Triarii were just the vets.
remember that to get to Triarii, you had to have been a Principe, and to be a Principe, you had to have been a Hastatus, and if you were a modest person, you had to be a Velite before you could even afford to fight with the Hastatii.
Equites were people who had the money to own horses and could take those horses with them to battle so they didn't need to rise through the ranks. They also only participated by preventing flanking actions and chasing down routing enemies.
anyway, Rome all the way. You won't be fighting for petty plunder and the guttural paganism to justify your barbarie, you won't be fighting for bumbling lords and kings of shithouse kingdoms that will fizzle out and never matter at all, you won't be fighting for a shitty city full of boy molesters and helots, you will be fighting to stablish and defend the most significant, defining nation in human history, you will be fighting for the eagle banner that gave us law, order, diplomacy, engineering, military might and the vision to use it, the splendor of humanity's potential finally unfolding, and that everyone would lag behind for almost thousand years.
Viking- basically have to be from Noble Birth and therefore treated really well. Have the best weapons, fight numerous different enemies, see the world (they made it to North America and tons went to Asia and the middle east to trade.)
Why NOT the others?
Spartan- Spartans were nothing like the chiseled rock hard men in the movies. They were described as thin and clean shaven. NO BATTLE BEARDS. Fight mainly other Greeks, stay mainly in Greece. That, and have to live a shitty life from age 7, until you finally "become Spartan enough." I'm also not really into the idea of being Athens', then Rome's sacrificial lamb at various point in history.
Knight- I just hate that time period. I also don't want to risk being sent on a Crusade, inna sandbox, wearing all that fancy armor. I'd also be forced to be a Christfag.
Roman Soldier- I don't feel like being sent to die to Barbarians up north, or Ancient Kebab to the Southeast. Nor do I want to be stoned to death if I fuck up, subject to being dragged into civil wars, numerous religious conversions, being used as cheap labor, or living to see the day that Brenus, Attila, or any of the numerous people who BTFO the Romans. I.e. my chance of survival as a roman soldier is way less while in the line of duty.
>>28462846 >>28462849 Like literally any group of people anywhere ever all they needed was leadership. With proper leadership a bunch of sheep fuckers from central Italy can give birth to an empire, cattle herders from southern africa can beat breech loading riflemen and a bunch of liquored up hillbillies can beat the british empire.
>>28462748 Honestly I'd go with viking because it's the loosest definition. With the other three I'm in some class or have some job, as a vikingI could be a merchant and still technically be a viking. I'd much rather sail down Mexico way and trade their gold with Iceland or something rather than beat up Guals or various kinds of peasants.
>>28463514 >Roman Soldier- I don't feel like being sent to die to Barbarians up north, or Ancient Kebab to the Southeast. Nor do I want to be stoned to death if I fuck up, subject to being dragged into civil wars, numerous religious conversions, being used as cheap labor, or living to see the day that Brenus, Attila, or any of the numerous people who BTFO the Romans. I.e. my chance of survival as a roman soldier is way less while in the line of duty.
you only serve for a few years and once you're done you win free lands and status. Unless you pick the literal worst possible moment you will likely never be in a real battle.
Auxiliaries weren't Romans, they were recruited from foreigners, peregrinii and conquered nations. They made a bulk of the manpower but were not the principal fighting force.
and there were very, very few moments in Roman history in which all legions were commited, or all fronts were under hostilities. You could be posted in a comfy colony in the coast of Hispania or North Africa instead of being cold as fuck and dealing with Germanic faggots. And if you were, you'd rekt them in literally every battle, because historically the only defeats Rome suffered in it's expansion to northern Europe were ambushes like Teutoburg. Rome could have reached Scandinavia itself if it had been economical.
>>28463709 Literally why do you think that? Unlike the other two choices a viking is just the colloquial word used for an entire culture of people.
You can go wherever the fuck you want, you're not beholden to a lord as you would be as a knight, or the Roman government that effectively controlled the entire Mediterranean, or some shit kicking little greek city-state.
I am one by blood but I'm not choosing it because of the warfare aspect. I'm choosing it because of the sunstone navigation, long boats, exploration, and seeing cities like Istanbul and Kiev during the 900s. Also Ibn Fadlans journey to Viking lands.
>>28463199 what, you really believe the meme of vikings singing and drinking and running around partying and just killing everything in sight in this magical fantasy warrior society?
You realize "viking" was a job, right? Not a people? A 'viking' was a raider. That's it. A pirate, bandit, raider, etc. It's not like scandinavia was just an entire vast land full of drunk bearded guys with horns and swords and singing about valhalla. They were mostly farmers and traders, like everyone else in europe.
>>28463709 Nigga, Norway is beautiful. The fuck are you talking about?
And "land quality" matters very little when you make a living trading things that are not grown. I could live in a really nice forest by the foot of a mountain, and go on trips to trade every year or so, when I ran out of money or got bored. And the richer I got, the more potential for awesomeness I'd get. The most successful vikings basically had their own fleets.
It would literally be the ancient equivelant of being a rich fuck in modern times who just wakes up one morning and says "I think today i'll take a trip to the Bahamas."
Or the ancient equivalent of being a PMC/Merchant Marine who gets paid really well, despite being at an "entry level position."
>>28462780 Good choice but you're doing I wrong. People are still being knighted today and OP didn't specify a time period.
Time to move to Eengluhnd to take advantage of TVR and shepherds pie while people call me Sir what-the-fuck-ever of whichever part of bongland is least gay. Maybe I'll hang out with Jeremy clarkson to talk about guns and his hair in the 80s
>>28463745 >Norse seafarers, speaking the Old Norse language, who raided and traded from their Scandinavian homelands across wide areas of northern and central Europe, as well as European Russia, during the late 8th to late 11th centuries. >raided AND traded
>>28463467 I know the system of early republican military service. But since it seemed like in general people were ignoring cavalry, figured I'd still with that rather than light cavalry that aren't really comparable to knights.
>>28463745 >You realize "viking" was a job, right?
>Vikings (Norwegian and Danish: Vikinger; Swedish and Nynorsk: Vikingar; Icelandic: Víkingar), from Old Norse víkingr, were Germanic Norse seafarers, speaking the Old Norse language, who raided and traded from their Scandinavian homelands across wide areas of northern and central Europe, as well as European Russia, during the late 8th to late 11th centuries.
>The term is also commonly extended in modern English and other vernaculars to the inhabitants of Viking home communities during what has become known as the Viking Age.
I've sailed the Channel and North Sea more than enough to never want to do it without modern thermals or at least a kettle so Vikings out.
Knight would be an alright gig depending on the era but I'm not socially savvy enough for the bulk of the action which is court shit and horseriding which would be totally new to me. As far as weapons and to an extent language go this would be the easiest transition for me so I'd be wise to take it.
Roman soldier and Spartan are both too far removed from my life for me to ever really properly integrate. I'd like to go Spartan but fuck it I'll be a knight.
>>28463467 >You won't be fighting for petty plunder and the guttural paganism to justify your barbarie, you won't be fighting for bumbling lords You must not be very familiar with how things after the Martian reforms worked. Your general was your lord and most of tour pay came from conquest.
>>28462843 More like >not wanting to be an unwashed heathen >not wanting to have some warlord gather you up for a viking so he can become rich >not wanting to get your shit pushed in by literally everyone that wasn't a fucking monastery you outnumbered 10 to 1 >not wanting some plain peasant girl to rub some shit in your wound she thinks will cure you and if you survive the fever getting to do it all over again >not wanting to charge head first into battle like a lunatic because "lel Heil Odin XDDDDD" only to bleed out waiting for your valkyrie to arrive >not wanting to be the contrarian weeb
Daily reminder Thor got his own tree cut down in his own town by some fucking monk who was tired of his shit and all the brave viking warriors just sat around watching (probably jerked off later to how hard they just got cucked)
Knight. You'd have good personal wealth, which may not necessarily apply to any of the others depending on the period of time you enter into their cadre's, respect and official rank above that of disposable welp, access to higher education, better training than the general soldiers of your own kingdom. Just better everything.
It's not even remotely close outside of your own personal preference. Oh, and the likelihood of being white as a Knight is much, much greater than the odds of being white as any other. Romans/Spartans give you good odds of being a slave. Vikings = definitely white, but they're literally trailer trash next to Knights.
>>28463514 >being a tree worshipping faggot who believes that after he is killed a winged beautiful women will whisk him away to an endless feast/battle until the end of time where an army of giants will rek all of our combined shit and burn the world is much more dignified then being a Christian >t. Odinnist
>>28463939 Depending on the era it could be. After the Waring States era they had almost 300 years of doing fuck-all but manage property and walk around with your sword to look intimidating while you live off of the stipend the Shogun gives you.
>>28462748 Assuming it means a Knight, not a Man-at-Arms, I'd pick the Knight, because that means I would be landed gentry with significant standing in feudal society and plenty of serfs to do most of the dying for me.
>>28462748 Viking, absolutely. Already do like half the shit they do anyway, I do a lot of woodworking, I sail and live by the ocean, and I live in a cold part of the world, that and the religious festivals would be lit as fuck.
>>28463709 >and still live in shitty Viking lands As a viking you can be a fisherman i Norway, a farmer in Denmark, a warrior in Normandy, a settler in America or an imperial guard in the largest city on earth to date defending whats left of the Roman empire against ancient kebab. All other options are clearly defined but vikings gives you the option to be what ever the fuck you want.
>without many if not all the commodities of their southern European equivalents? Vikings traded with people all over the world, you can build your own shit and you can also live in Constantinople.
>>28462748 Living off the work of the peasantry and such, being a knight would be a pretty comfortable life, at least until I finally do fight and end up shot in the eye by some faggot with a longbow yards away.
>>28462748 Spartans were goatpoor, vikings too that's why they became basically pirates, knights were noblemen trained from birth like the Spartans except not poor, Roman soldiers were pretty meh and subject to probably the worst war conditions compared to all of the above save for Spartans when the Persians came to fuck their shit up.
Knight easily. It would just suck having to wear all that armor.
Significant and lasting changes to the English language occurred because of the Danelaw period of British history. Our grammar and syntax owe a lot to the Vikings who decided England was way better than Norway.
>>28463467 Principes just had more money/age than hastati. You could very easily avoid being called up until you were in your mid 20s or early thirties and muster straight into the Principes.
Or spend your first few summers serving without an actual war, hunting down"bandits" you outnumber more than two to one with no real danger to you, and then be a Principe by the time an actual opponent rolls around.
Principe/hastati was about maturity and life experience tempering the fire and stupidity of youth, not actual veterancy. That, and having a line of men who could afford more armor.
>>28463514 >viking >best weapons They'd do just about anything to get their hands on frankish swords.
Expect the land you're given to be mediocre to shitty, and on the frontier so it's dangerous, and to have to reenlist.
>>28463667 it was considered low class to kill a nobleman on the battlefield. Not it wasn't. The low death toll was a result of armor being so effective that it was simply easier ot knock a man out than kill him.
If the dumb ass had bad armor and the lance went through his chest, fuck him. He was the enemy, and you did not fucking care. >>28463679 >You could be posted in a comfy colony in the coast of Hispania So regular route marches to keep you in shape, and local iberians mounting guerilla attacks that you're extremely unlikely to survive because they're extremely good man to man, and coordinated?
It took 200 years to pacify iberia. Soldiers fucking dreaded being stationed there, it was seen as a death sentence.
>or North Africa instead of being cold as fuck and dealing with Germanic faggots Enjoy your camel riding nomad savages who come out of the sands to murder you for literally no reason. And no plunder, ever. The thing that makes you rich.
>>28464405 >A Knight by definition is nobility. No, they're not, and those that are are often lower nobles of NO importance at all.
The man who went on to be regent of England started off with no horse, a damaged chain shirt, and almost no friends.
When he was six and people tried to use him as a hostage to get dad to surrender a castle, his response amounted to >I'll just knock the wife up again, go ahead. >next one'll turn out better anyway >FAGGOTS
>>28464453 >Some lord owns you and you have to do everything he says. Uh... no. You do what he says wehn he says "we're going to war" or "KILL THAT NIGGER" Beyond that, you eat his food, sleep in his home, and flirt with his wife.
Or you don't have any lord, and literally TRAVEL EUROPE ON HORSEBACK getting in fights, going to tournaments and fighting (and partying like a fucking machine), fucking random women because you make bikers look like pussies and have a fucking horse, and generally do whatever you please while relying on a VERY effective good ol' boy system for food, shelter, and resupply.
>>28464804 >How hard can it be? I am not him but i am 6.1 so i would be fairly big by the standards of the time so just that would be a big advantage. You'd get absolutely raped.
Literally. vikings were known for rape. Of everyone. Male and female.
>>28469376 Correct. Aprtans famously preferred the pylos, which is a simple skullcap.
Easier to see, hear, and breathe, and it's manly, because you can't hide any fear in your face, meaning you instead have to simply control yourself.
Welcome to Greece. Everyone's a sodomite, but they're fucking men.
>>28463049 >It's worth noting while Vikings saw Western Europe as a bunch of scared moneybags that you shake and loot falls out, you could just as easily head out East and make a living as basically just a tradesman.
Yeah I read a book about Vikings and it said they were prolific merchants and traders all thru central and eastern europe, from russia all down thru the black sea and into the balkans and turkey.
>>28470394 >Being a knight automatically means you have a lord. And yet William Marshall- the most successful knight in Europe, and one of four men who really embody the archetypal knight- traveled lordless for quite some time, with fellow knights.
And "turning about Europe"(attending the tourney circuit) like this as a knight-errant with no master was considered an extremely common way to spend a the first year-or few-of your career as a young knight.
>>28470422 to elaborate >has a lord >makes no money >quits and gets a new boss >he fucking dies >ransomed >hits tourney circuit >wildly successful >returns to courtly life nearly 20 years later The man went on to be regent of all of England, and unhorsed Richard the fucking lionheart in battle. Real battle.
He spent much of his life happily masterless, and made his repuation that way.
>>28470452 Or rather, returns ot having a real master 20 years later. His "master" in the intern was his junior, with the child being there to learn EVERYTHING from him, with William in charge for a full 12 fucking years. Even after, he has more skill at everything, was more respected, and could do as he pleased the vast majority of the time.
I'd like to pick viking because I'm intrigued by the privateering/mercenary aspects along with lightning raids, but knight would have to be it due to having the comfiest life as well as high social status.
Roman: >spend most of my time walking and carrying 30+ kg of camping supplies with a shitty harness (because camping backbacks and other camping shit are not invented yet). >spend the remaining time manning a quard post while bored to death
Knight: >have to endure the most depressing and boring religion in history - christianity
Spartan: >have to endure the hellishly hot climate >the most boring landscape >uptight faggots who have no idea what to do with women >rampart square head culture
Viking: >get mauled by a bear >get mauled by an auroch >get mauled by an elk >freeze to death in winter campaigns because camping equipment is shit >die of overheating in summer because you have to wear most of your warm clothes (you need smth to keep you warm during night, and you already have other essential shit in your sack) >if you twist or break anything, it will heal for a long time and will keep aching till you die (because northern climates will hinder any healing process)
Would still probably choose to be a viking, because I already know how to survive in northern climate.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.