MILITIA ACTIVITY, SAME AS LAST YEAR'S BUNDY RANCH
/k/OMRADES JOIN UP!
MOVE TO OREGON AND AID THE MILITIA! THEY NEED ALL THE HELP THEY CAN GET!
Lmao at that cheap ass optic. Those things are like 40 bucks, if even that, and are made for airsoft guns. I tried using it on my .22 and the fuckin thing wouldn't hold zero for shit. Hell, if it weren't for the trigger guard of the AR and the realism of the backplate of that Glock, I would believe this pic is just an airsofter altogether.
Reminder to read this:
Apart from the usual Tea Party AR's does anyone know what other ordinance the Republicans are using to terrorize civilians? Do they have explosives?
This, play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Conservitards are all the same, they think it's okay to brutally govern when they're in power and defy the government when they're not.
Does /k/ think the Republicans going to engage in more armed insurgency? If so, can we drone them like foreign armed insurgents?
What the fuck are you even talking about?
Quit spreading disinformation, FWC
Well, maybe we should just register Republicans. I mean, I know this is a small group of Republicans, and not all Republicans engage in armed insurrection, but why not err on the side of safety?
I mean, say you had 10 grapes, and you knew 2 of them were Republican. Wouldn't it make sense to just Drone them all?
That's an expensive waste of resources, they should be put into camps where they can either accept reeducation or be worked to death. If they elect Trump I hope Obama takes this course of action for the good of the nation because it would demonstrate that Republicans can't be trusted.
>donald trump shows up
>tells the militia men the time is not right
>he'll take care of the BLM when elected
>all go home
>Trump diffuses the standoff while Barry can do nothing
Don't worry Militiamen! I'll get rid of the Wildlife Refuge and replace it with something TERRIFIC!
>that ship's already sailed
How long have you guys been saying that again?
Yet he still retains strong support.
>"n-nobody could actually like this guy"
>"After this, surely he'll lose support"
>"How could this still be happening"
>too fucking stupid to know when someone agrees with him
See what I mean? The ship has sailed. Trump will be the nominee
White people march and then occupy a building as a protest of what looks like an actual miscarriage of justice.
Black people go lootin 4 trayvon and attacking people and businesses because police slapped D'quan "baby stomper" Johnson's cuffs on too hard.
>black lives matter!
Yurocuck here, how likely is it either Trump or Bernie will touch the poop and comment on this subject?
The fact that the founder of the Oathkeepers recommended against the standoff is going to be pretty shitty for them. No doubt the media will be using that to say these guys are the most extreme of the extremists.
Heavily armed white people forcibly occupy a government building in protest of a straightforward application of a reasonable law.
>cops: Ok everyone, let's stay calm and talk about this.
Black people march in the street because black kids get shot for no reason and the people responsible aren't punished in the slightest.
>cops: Bring in the armored personnel carriers!
mostly because these white people are out in the woods and black people are usually in a city promoting riots... did you even read your post? It's not about racism it's about location.
epic cosplay senpai
>he doesnt understand the 2nd amendment
So if a white guy gets shot by police and before any sort of trial occurs or facts come out these guys "feel" it was wrong so they go out and riot. Would that be okay?
Oh right, you just hate conservative people. And you hate that they know how and when to take a stand on something with a chance of actually leveraging the unlimited resourced government into standing down.
>storm federal buildings
>just stroll in and sit down
Meanwhile you probably think in Ferguson they were just peacefully occupying convenience stores. And that was done over literally nothing.
>So if a white guy gets shot by police and before any sort of trial occurs or facts come out these guys "feel" it was wrong so they go out and riot. Would that be okay?
No, of course not. It's not ok when anyone "goes out and riots."
>Oh right, you just hate conservative people.
No, I hate stupid people.
Food and supplies are being delivered out to the Facility by local residents. If you wish to donate supplies you can do so on site, they are allowing free access to the area.
Source: phone call with one of Cliven's sons
This is not an invitation to debate your opinion, I am only putting relevant information out as I get it.
>Supporting these nutjobs
Newsflash: if you want to keep owning guns you need to fight these people. If you don't then we'll just have to assume that all civilian gun owners can't be trusted to obey the rule of law and the democratically elected government. Forget being butthurt about not being allowed assault rifles, we'll take the lot.
Have you ever even read the constitution?
They're coming on way too strong.
okay britbong noguns cuck.
>first they came for the standard capacity mags
>then they came from the removable mags
>finally they came for the semi autos...
>and when they came for me, there was no one to help
>I hate stupid people.
Yet you let yourself believe that black riots based on feelings about a shooting still under investigation are just a peaceful march and is a more worthy cause than government overreach.
Yes, " well regulated Militia" sounds like the Army and the Police, not these nutjobs.
You forgot: then things were pretty great when angry nutjobs couldn't murder people in seconds.
actually if you reread the question and the poll, it indicates that white people are by far the most NOT okay with the muslim 'ban'. So if anything white people are the most tolerant in this situation.
But yeah it's not even a ban or internment, it's just closing our borders.
As it should be. Those who refuse to live by society's rules should get none of it's benefits and protections.
Society has the right to defend itself against those who seek to tear it apart to impose their will on the majority.
so you just assume any kind of reform will have to be through bloodshed and total destabilization of the country... that has... plenty of local government in cities and states...
Anon are you fucking 15 years old and playing fallout as you post this shit?
no anon, now you are the one making wishes.
It literally says 'shall not be infringed'
A 'well-regulated' militia literally means anyone from age 16-50 should be able to supply their own arms and munitions. By 1800s logic everyone should have a howitzer and personal battleship.
>democratically elected government
I guess so. In a way anyway.
It's a republic, we have absolutely no say in what is passed. If it was a democracy we would probably not even be a country anymore.
Where the fuck did I say? I think you're the edgelord here due to your immature preoccupation with violence.
Reform will properly take place using the proper channels in place.
If those who seek to use violence continue to do so to rip apart society then they will rightfully be met with the proper defensive measures from the rest of civilized society. This includes violence on them should they refuse to listen to reason.
You cannot attack someone and expect no consequences.
He doesn't understand what well regulated means
>INB4 ATF raid them and shoot every canine in a 20 mile radius
Assuming they can afford it, they can still have those.
The idea is that if you have enough money for something that effective that is a bit beyond actually defending yourself, you have too much to lose to use it treasonously.
So, they shot some deer and uncle Shlomo didn't get paid for it. That's not poaching
>Shoot a deer
>"HEY YOU NEED A LICENSE TO DO THAT< THOSE DEER BELONG TO THE STATE!"
>Deer runs onto the road and totals your car
>"Oh no the state isn't responsible for those damages, we don't control the deer"
So using the second amendment as intended, to protect against an abusive government, makes gun owners look bad?
You should turn in your guns now, or give them to a true patriot who actually believes in the second amendment, and the liberty our founding fathers believed in.
Anyone who thinks that this makes gun owners look bad, and anyone who actually is upset with these people or thinks they are bad people are either liberals or cuckservatives.
Just because you believe that the second amendment is about target plinking and tactikool toys doesn't mean we all do.
Let me get this straight:
-Guy starts fire on his land
-Fire spreads to public land
-Police arrest him but decide they can't press charges
-Five years later, guy is arrested again and new charges are brought up
-The two people involved go to prison for 3 and 12 months, and serve their sentence
-After their release, someone attempts to get them sent back to prison for the same crime that they were previously punished for
-The person who filed the attempt to get the ranchers sent back to prison is a field manager for the BLM, and if the BLM is not paid 200k by the end of 2015 (for example, if some of the ranch's employees cannot work and generate revenue) they will seize the ranch. If the ranch is sold, the BLM is guaranteed the first offer of sale
Am I understanding this correctly?
The second amendment is intended to protect innocent civilians from an unjust government, not to stop a convicted criminal from being punished. The Founding Fathers would be ashamed.
more like "convicted of terrorism for starting a defensive fire that managed to defeat an entire wildfire caused by lightning on its own"
The "federal property" is illegal, was founded under false pretenses, is less effective at doing what it claims to do than private land is, and is run by abusive individuals.
Jesus Christ, the Cuckservatives and Liberals are out in full swing today.
It made news in Finland.
Headline implies ku klux klan might be behind all this. We sure need more gun control.
not him, im for these militias and these guys in oregon but... a group 150 able bodied men, some with guns, walking in a federal building is pretty spooky to your average liberal or no guns guy and even some gun owners
>Yet you let yourself believe that black riots based on feelings about a shooting still under investigation are just a peaceful march
There were people rioting just to take advantage AND there were people marching peacefully. Not one and the same. I don't support rioting in any situation.
>is a more worthy cause than government overreach.
I 100% believe that dealing with lack of police accountability is a more worthy cause than letting people get away with poaching and arson, yes.
I remember in new york, in like 2011 or something; a group of militiamen went to an empty armory and just stood around guarding it for a day. They were never seen or herd from again and I cannot find any articles.
Good luck militia bros.
You seem to be hopelessly confused.
They were convicted of crimes they did not commit, with sentences that are horribly abusive, even if they had committed the crime. On top of this, the land that was burned is illegally owned by the federal government, is owned/was founded under false pretense, and has been proven to be less effective at doing what it claims to do than private land is. This literally is an unjust government. If you disagree, you are probably a bootlicker liberal.
What we know about the facility:
>There were no "NO TRESPASSING" signs
>The doors were unlocked
>The computers were still on
>No hours of operation were posted
>The land and building is public property
>There is no armed standoff at this time, they are simply occupying the building owned by "We The People"
Even if they had maliciously set the land on fire, it still would not be a crime. The land that was burned was mostly their own, and some was adjacent "federal property wildlife refuge" that is illegal, founded under false pretense, and less effective at being a wildlife refuge than a private ranch is.
>Creating a suppression fire to stop a much larger, much more dangerous fire
>Succeeding in saving thousands of acres, your land, your home. Great success. Heroes of the area. Saviors of the wildlife refuge.
>Get arrested for "arson"
JIDF shill get out.
The demands of the people in Oregon are a lot more reasonable than the ones by the anti-police protesters. Especially since so many resources have already gone into each of those investigations just to further prove that yes, jayvon "murda whitey" tyreese was a hoodrat and yes it was a justified shooting.
Liberals are never going to stop asking for more from the police, even when proven wrong. They're already practically demanding the police turn over the officers involved for public execution.
when are you gonna save the day McNiggerator ?
So if I want to be a govt. paid shitposter is there a place I send a resume to? Do I need to know someone or join the Masons or something? Getting paid to shitpost and derail threads is literally my dream job.
If someone tries to arrest you just say the word and we'll get the militia to you to protect your second amendment rights. Because that's exactly what the second amendment pertains to.
Best response would be to treat them like trolls and completely ignore them. All problems will be solved and they will eventually leave with no violence and feel like massive retards for accomplishing nothing.
>shoot cat again and again until out of ammo
>walk up to it
>cat is not a dog
>continue clearing rooms
>see perp pointing his chopper at me
>aim at him center mass
>hit his dog
Just making shit up now? His own story was he did it to burn off "invasive plants: The real reason is they were hiding proof of their poaching
I bet you think Dorner will pop out of the woods and help too
>Starting the new year off with a happening
An election year too, this will be grand.
Fight the good fight /k/, ignore Soros posters, etc.
Is the business selling counterfeit drugs? Stolen merchandise?
Whatever, this kind of shit isn't worth my energy. People want to play soldier and defend a poacher/racist to provoke a confrontation with the Feds.
More power to them, but don't dress these assholes up as patriots.
But they are the evidence supports me lol
>not a hillbilly
>not the real bigot here
Like i said 0/10 nice try bud
what has he done to anyone else.
You're the one making prejudice assumptions about him simply because he's white.
I mean I know it's trollposting but some people actually think like this.
One of my friends who went to college for sociology was trying to explain to me how black people cannot be racist, but we kept running into problems until he realized his college degree literally meant nothing.
Agreed. Now is not the time to be a cuck and allow the abuse of power. These soft types that are shilling for the government are cut from the same fabric as those who allowed the 86 machinegun ban, the removal of firearm rights in the UK and the draconian laws in Australia.
Evil prevails when good men do nothing.
Hasn't seen his racist tirade on youtube and/or probably agrees with him because this is 4chan and /k/ and you are probably retard hillbilly racists yourselves
not sure what you mean by this. Racist against whites? im guessing because BLM isnt on the list but its the fucking SPLC so i dont give a fuck about what they think. I dont think theres any racism tho
literally whose racist tirade, give me a source or something. Anything. And your pic is half right, I am a faggot.
inb4 you scream about some gay shit to me further proving your backwards liberal train of thought
Back to reddit, libcuck.
This. So much this. The dark times of rooftop voting may be upon us within as few as 10 years.
Fuck it, spend some time around the old MoM folks then tell me they're not backwoods racists.
Maybe they're not, maybe this is a completely different group of people that live in Idaho/Eastern Oregon/Montana that hate the government but if you can find a single black militia man in this group I'll eat my hat.
>The Moorish Science Temple of America 1928
>Ya, so many people are going to join up and abandon their comfy lives to fight for some pissed of ranchers.
150+ people already have, and if things go the way the Bundy ranch did, more and more will flock to them.
You forgot kill plenty of Germans And Japs.
Just cut off their supply to pic related, and they will leave in peace.
get a load of this cuck
"lets let muslims storm our buildings too"
its a shame how he has such a glorious last name
>Society has the right to defend itself against those who seek to tear it apart to impose their will on the majority.
Said the white cop shooting the black protesters in the 80's.
Majority rule is tyranny. That is why the USA is a republic.
(aa) The Harney Basin (were the Hammond ranch is established) was settled in the 1870's- The valley was settled by multiple ranchers and was known to have run over 300,000 head of cattle- These ranchers developed a state of the art irrigated system to water the meadows, and it soon became a favorite stopping place for migrating birds on their annual trek north-
(ab) ln 1908 President Theodore Roosevelt, in a political scheme, create an ‘Indian reservation” around the Malheur, Mud & Harney Lakes and declared it “as a preserve and breeding ground for native birds”. Later this ‘Indian reservation” (without Indians) became the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge-
(a) ln 1964 the Hammonds purchased their ranch in the Harney Basin- The purchase included approximately 6000 acres of private property, 4 grazing rights on public land, a small ranch house and 3 water rights. The ranch is around 53 miles South of Burns, Oregon-
(a1) By the 1970's nearly all the ranches adjacent to the Blitzen Valley were purchased by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and added to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge- The refuge covers over 187,000 acres and stretches over 45 miles long and 37 miles wide- The expansion of the refuge grew and surrounds to the Hammond's ranch- Being approached many times by the FWS, the Hammonds refused to sell- Other ranchers also choose not to sell-
Holy shit, I'm really waiting for a pronunciation of Trump on the subject.
>people think they intentionally burned the grass to hide evidence of poaching
>they think ranchers don't know that bones don't burn
Rumor = dispelled
Well, what is the grievance of the Muslims? Maybe the people occupying the federal building now are Muslims. White people can be Muslims. And they're only worried about rancher rights and the potential abuse of the system to prosecute people. They may have overreacted a bit, but there's no reason to escalate things.
Guy's a dork.
well /k/, whats the difference?
i was paraphrasing
150+ people isn't enough to fight the government. Given their gear, structure, and members, these guys would get slaughtered in battle.
I think that while there are a few fanatics in the group who really are willing to go down fighting, most of them are there to make a point rather than create some sort of war.
Because his sons are the spokesmen for these gaggle of retards, and said retards were emboldened after they were hoodwinked into defending that asshole from the big bad BLM.
>post yfw the ATF busts into your house but your dogs have already been moved to a safe location
They're not using violence or intimidation. Any police force in the country could wipe them into a red smear in about 30 minutes.
Pussy liberal faggot, here. There's a difference between rational and irrational political slant. Let's not demonize one another.
>Just exactly who "authorizes" violence?
Who do you think
Mcnig is a high profile trip fag who was at bundy ranch. These people are not racist they believe the law applies to everyone.
Disagreeing with black lives matter doesn't make you racist
>Sitting in a building
Show me footage of them aiming guns at cops, first. I hate conservatives as much as I hate liberals, you shitter.
>organized militia of 150 armed men occupy government building is not violent
Aka the bundy ranch again consulting with Cliven Bundy.
Quick question does he know what /k/ is? Surely some militia guys asked around or even recognized it by being /k/ommandos.
Do you think a couple /k/omrades showed up to the standoff or later?
>occupy empty building
>belligerently ignoring McNiggerator's posts for the purpose of disinformation
>Sitting in a building
I'm sure people would say the same if an armed commie wibe group occupied a federal building.
Its from SPLC, so its unsourced bullshit. They change definitions every time they do this survey to fit their agenda. The FBI stopped using them as a source because they're so shit.
Pretty much. A small fire will start and the doors will be locked/jammed. The report will state that the militiamen started it by mistake and that the doors being jammed was also their fault, more edgy news outlets will laugh at the irony and we'll move on.
They didn't shoot anyone innocent or threaten to do so. You're making the mistake of treating federal agents as if they're innocent, nonviolent and not capable of defending themselves.
look @ his last name guys :))
>Occupy government building
And that's what I don't understand. That's the most retarded thing they could do.
At least if they were staying on their own property (a la Ruby Ridge), they would be entirely on the defense and far more sympathetic by the public.
okay, youre right
>armed with weapon made to kill
their intent is clear, they call themselve "militia"... how is this peaceful? im not saying theyre wrong in standing up against tyranny but theyre definitely not peaceful
He doesn't. To them it's just a forum I browse to help spread info from the source.
I wore my /k/ patch to hopefully meet someone from here, but that was back when I liked you guys a little more. I did meet someone from the board of our unwanted cousin who are most definitely in this thread since they can't stop spilling over though. As far as someone from /k/, there were a few that I knew of after the whole ordeal when they posted here.
No, I'm just a dude doing what little I can.
We need to start a PDF with these people's names,locations,picture of possible and reason for logging their names (Statist,Antigun,Pro Jihadist Invasion).
We can call it "Grimoire of True Names"
You can be humble, but you cant pick your destiny mate.
Leaders dont make movements, movements make leaders; We live in a glorious time. Blessed with Freedom and Liberty all because of our 2A rights.
Shits tits man. I cant wait to meet you
youre right, i dont think theyll fire first but good luck convincing the general public let alone other countries. And btw i support these militias and im in canada, god bless
You just live in one where they're already gone
>I wore my /k/ patch to hopefully meet someone from here, but that was back when I liked you guys a little more.
;_; what did we do wrong McNig-sempai?
Was this before or after you found out half of us are armchair generals or liberal trolls. Or when 4 chucklefucks shot up those dindus and made /k/ look like domestic terrorists.
Did the BLM set up designated first ammendment zones yet? I hope they do it's always good to know big brother is looking out for us.
I fucking saw you on the interview.
You called out the traitors, you said what everyone thinks, yet never declares.
The time is rapidly approaching when We will need to rise up. When I look to my left and right I need to know that I have stood on the right side of history.
You will be there.
All of this unhappiness
Don't be this mad simply because my rights are protected, and my populace is sane enough to continue having their right to firearms
sure is great being master race
The whole thing looks like airsoft. The stock, the cheap ass vest, the cheap ass Condor gloves, and the fucking radio, too. Like if some shit really went down, the US law enforcement and military won't just shit down the channels that his Chinese radio runs on. Come on, bro.
lol, it's definitely looking the other way around from my perspective right now.
That immediate situation would be funny as hell. These guys would try pushing orders along and would have it all be jammed up or the Feds would just listen in. That's assuming their radios don't get messed with by terrain and that they'd have a repeater set up.
Except the shooting were justified. Too bad black lives only matter when white cops kill them. What about the ridiculous amount of black on black crime in the hood?
>Over step of the law
Yeah, the government overstepped it
>conservicucks occupying a place that doesnt belong to them
>shill for private property
These guys arent militiamen or any other shit. This isnt the happening. You understand that the goal of these people is not to bring freedom or fight tyranny right? They simply wish to use authority to impose their beliefs like all other groups. Even if they were to bring some kind of "conservative revolution" the material base that issued forth the need to defend ourselves from the government persists.
Fight the good fight /k/omrades
>this public land is better under the care of the government in the name of countless swarths of city dwelling liberals (probably going to be sold cheap to blm bureaucrats) rather than ranchers who acquired the rights legally and use it to contribute sustenance to society
Idk man soviets
The ranchers should be able to own the land they work on, but not the way they do now. Abolish private property my man and kill any government official that tries to say otherwise and steal the land from the working people
Property is a spook
Liberty is impossible as long as the state exists, to curtail any freedom is to destroy it all. The only way to liberate is to up automation and abolish the state
All land is unfairly taken comrade
>I dont like something so its fake
I'll tell you what, I'll observe the dialectical state of the world we live in and you live in a world where the state isnt exploitative and the free market brings equality
Of course its idealism its a propaganda made by the soviets but it still looks rad