Im on suicide watch. I think of what my life wouldve been like, with my 20 pound tank of a gun from vepr. Im so lost. What is there left for me...
Im sorry anon senpai
>>34329177
F
Anyway I really wish somebody would make a 7.62x54r sv-98.
I really wanted to make an SVD kind of clone from a vepr but I just don't see the point with 54r are being like 50 cents a round it's the same as 308.
>>34329177
Sorry to hear anon. It ok buddy
I'm doing a Fallout PnP campaign in which some of the characters will have park ranger rifles. Since this is Fallout, the guns need to be more powerful than normal to fit the outrageous setting, like with the 10mm and 14mm pistols present in Fallout. What would be a good upgrade to the Ruger M14 to give it bigger bang for its buck?
>>34328859
No idea, but that image is the truth
Enjoy the (you)
>>34328859
just use This Machine
>>34328859
Him, a better Mini 14 you say?
So /k/ recently I have been considering adding a world war era service rifle to my collection but I'm not really sure where to start, and what to look for.
Any tips and advice as far as ammo availability and pricing would be great.
>>34328758
fuck that get an M1903 A1.
>>34328762
fuck thats high
I was thinking something more like a mosin nagant that retails for like $350
>>34328790
>$350 for a mosin
You're late to the party for that one matey, just dont do it. They were superior buys when they were $90, hell even when they were $120 it was a good deal. Now you can buy a brand new bolt action for the price of a 100 year old milsurp peasant rifle.
So I just thought of something. If glocks can get past airport metal detectors due to their full polymer frame, wouldn't the bullets have to be made out of polymer also?
>>34328624
Just make all metal out of precious metals that are non ferrous. The end.
>>34328624
That is currently a technology being developed by glock.
>>34328624
Yes, they're Glockā¢ brand Glockmunitionā¢
How exactly do you fight with the bayonet on one of these, or is it meant purely so save bullets by stabbing the wounded?
>Bayonet on a bayonet
GEE BILLY
>>34328265
Stick em with the pointy end
>>34328303
This
Also make sure you have a round in the chamber incase it gets stuck in the enemy.
Discharge to disengage.
A sniper with Canada's elite special forces in Iraq has shattered the world record for the longest confirmed kill shot in military history at a staggering distance of 3,450 metres.
Sources say a member of Joint Task Force 2 killed an Islamic State insurgent with a McMillan TAC-50 sniper rifle while firing from a high-rise during an operation that took place within the last month in Iraq. It took under 10 seconds to hit the target.
"The shot in question actually disrupted a Daesh [Islamic State] attack on Iraqi security forces," said a military source, who stressed the operation fell within the strictures of the government's advise and assist mission. "Instead of dropping a bomb that could potentially kill civilians in the area, it is a very precise application of force and because it was so far way, the bad guys didn't have a clue what was happening."
The kill was independently verified by video camera and other data, The Globe and Mail has learned.
"Hard data on this. It isn't an opinion. It isn't an approximation. There is a second location with eyes on with all the right equipment to capture exactly what the shot was," another military source said.
A military insider told The Globe: "This is an incredible feat. It is a world record that might never be equalled."
The world record was previously held by British sniper Craig Harrison, who shot a Taliban gunner with a 338 Lapua Magnum rifle from 2,475 metres away in 2009.
Previously, Canadian Corporal Rob Furlong had set the world record in 2002 at 2,430 metres when he gunned down an Afghan insurgent carrying an RPK machine gun during Operation Anaconda.
>>34328224
>>34328238
Man, hockey sticks have come a long way so you he could make that SLAP shot.
>>34328238
>Instead of dropping a bomb
Translation: we asked the Americans to drop a bomb but they were busy so we improvised.
Great shot though.
What's /k/'s thought on the Russian military? Is their gear still shit?
they seem alright
>>34328284
>Tfw no matter how much money you have, you will never own a Val
>Gee Anon why don't you have an AR-15? They're practical, reliable, all-around good guns...and they only cost $450 for a working entry-level one!
Well, they're ugly as sin and look like plastic baby trash, but...
>WTF ANON YOU CAN SPEND A FEW MORE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND GET WOOD FURNITURE OR STEEL OR WHATEVER ARE YOU AN AUTIST!?
Fine, I'll get an AR and maybe save up to make it not hideous, let me just order this M&P...
>ROFLMAO ANON! A cheap AR!? Fucking poorfag! Get that entry-level shit out of here, come back when you've spent thousands on pointless accessories, gucci shit, optics that cost more than a crate of milsurp, and matching tactical operator clothes!
>oh, also, don't try shooting through brush unless you pay more to chamber in a meatier caliber
So which is it? Is the AR an affordable rifle, or a tactical toy for rich NEETs only? Does this thing have any saving graces or is its omnipresence on every wall of every gun store in the USA the cancer killing firearms?
I want to like the AR, by the way, I really do.
buying an AR is like buying a PC
>>34327979
>Buying a jam-o-matic that fires rounds specifically designed to wound.
LMAOing @ your life
>>34327991
No matter what you do, some autistic nerd is gonna say you did it wrong.
So what's /k/ thoughts on bugout bags? I'm looking for a proper weapon to keep in or on my bag. Any ideas on what else to keep with the bag? I'm looking more for rifle caliber pistols like AR pistols but I'm flexible.
>>34327978
mk18 ish build
Glock 19. Yeah, you can put an SBR in your bag, but that means you don't have instant access to it unless you take it out and carry it. Not exactly concealable.
>>34327978
Why dont you own body armor, /k/?
Why dont you own night vision, /k/?
Why dont you own any NFA, /k/?
Why dont you own expensive optics, /k/?
Why dont you own any custom, semi custom or high end knives, /k/?
I own all of that but a high end knife
because i don't like spending lots of money on things i don't use very often
>>34327848
Own body armor
No NVG
Too poor for the nfa items I actually want
Make custom knives so I have about 30+
I'm moving to an apartment in Chicago. What should my defense loadout/strategy be? I'd like to keep it legal, so no salt rifles unfortunately.
>>34327764
What gun is he holding?
>>34327764
>what should my defense strategy be
Don't move to Chicago
>>34327764
whatever weapons you can get your hands on and get a bunch of sandbags stacked up 7 feet in a room to stop bullets, change the locks because they can be easily broken into and also dont trust niggers in general.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a32tk6LLCSg
This is a Russian Corvette with an A-190 100mm gun firing at more than 60-70 rounds per minute.
The inaccuracy aside, wouldn't the smoke get in the way of sensors? Would you even use it if it masks the sensors of other guns like CIWS in case you are firing at a missile coming at the ship?
Why not just buy Chinese?
>>34327619
CIWS sensors are mmW radar IIRC, they would see right through the smoke.
>>34327619
I guess the russians haven't developed smokeless powder, but in most cases the ship would be moving so you would build such a big cloud.
So why shouldn't we be building fleets of hydrofoil lightweight attack craft armed with these cannons and a reduced RCS?
Ballistic gel is not a flesh simulation. Anyone who has compared real gunshot wounds to gel tests knows this. The purpose of gel is to allow a consistent test medium for comparing different bullets.
>>34327580
> The purpose of gel is to allow a consistent test medium for comparing different bullets.
I've never heard it be suggested it's anything else by anyone of note
>>34327592
I hear people say all the time that if the bullet penetrates 18 inches of gel, it'll penetrate 18 inches of flesh. It's not true. Skin, bone, and dense muscle tissue are harder to penetrate than soft fatty tissue.
>>34327580
That makes perfect sense, but then my next question is why 12-18" penetration by the FBI. Why not 10"? Why not 20"? Clearly there's a ratio of some type going on there.
What went wrong?
>>34327569
Swing-wings were a mistake.
>>34327569
>nerfed to 1 per deck
>nerfed to only carry 2 1000kg bombs
why you gotta hurt me Eugen
>>34327596
6 1000kg*
New build. What are /k/ recomendation's for any optics/upgrades?
>>34327534
whats up with your toes
>>34327548
please be more specific with your questions. i do have more miles than most on my feet.
>>34327534
Just get a Truglo and save yourself a couple hundred bucks