Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 824. page

>>34345537
you think this warranted a thread?

File: .. maximum rustle.jpg (25KB, 900x506px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 900x506px

>>34345537
How are your jimmies OP?

This is why you are supposed to beat your sons, /k/. Otherwise they grow up into OP and make shit "MFW" threads.

Are you a fuck up who thinks the army will fix your problems? If yes, join, if not, don't

File: 1488985898187.jpg (96KB, 750x898px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 750x898px

>I think the military will change my personality and my fucked up testosterone levels

Your diet is fucked
Your exercise routine is fucked or non-existant.
Your body is fucked (skinnyfat or fat, fat contains aromatase which converts testosterone into estrogen resulting in a fucked mood and fucked personality)

That's how you fix yourself. Otherwise you'll just end up some quitter whino enlisted who now wears a uniform instead of normal clothers. The military is not there to fix you. You fix you.

>>34345406
Being a fatty boom boom turns my testosterone into girl hormones?

Jesus that explains some things

It does look like an MG-42.
As to how it got there one can only imagine, theese groups hog all the guns they can get.

you guys know many forces around the world used modernized mg42?

its called an mg3

>>34345350
No I don't that's why I asked. Does it use the same bullets? Was that an mg3 and if so how do these get these guns?

File: 1980s Berlin Cold War Pat McNamara.jpg (385KB, 1242x1868px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 1242x1868px

Was the 1980s as cool as everyone makes it to be?

Please /k/. There has to be one /k/ommando who experienced the 1980s as it should have been experience.

No personal experience except I remember my dad buying an AR-15 in the early 80's. Pre-ban Colt with old school aluminum mags. We lived in the suburbs and it was going to defend us from the hordes of irradiated "city-dwellers" coming for us after a nuclear exchange with the soviets.

This is cool tho:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAejENocQB0

>>34345021
>When is it time to sit back and say, "Okay, this is too fucked up to do, and will probably effect my mental health in an extremely negative way"

When

>Injecting them with different chemicals and stuff is what I heard, all the way up to antifreeze in the eyes etc....

Happens

>>34345021
That's pretty messed up.
Just brain them with a pellet gun or something in the trap. Or drown or whatever.

>>34345021
Go and investigate to see what he actually doing instead of listening to rumors like /pol/ or women.
If he actually doing the stuff, report him anonymously because that shit leads serial killers.

File: 20170623_174914.jpg (904KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

904KB, 2560x1440px

Here's a picture from the top to show just how far out it goes compared to the rest of the dust cover

that is 100% normal for ribbed dustcover. dont like it replace it with a smooth one

>>34344992
Who the fuck thought it was a good idea to make such a shitty design? And where can I buy a smooth one?

>>34344963
Why are you asking a question when you have already justified it. In addition to shtf the another reason to by the shit is cool factor which is why you own a G43. Also refrain from gun control baiting

>>34344963
If you don't want a long gun why even create the thread?

>>34344963
>When would I ever need a long gun besides "muh SHTF" when I don't hunt?
when you need to shoot something father than 50meters away without being hickok45

File: CRKT M-16_01KS.jpg (5KB, 295x147px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 295x147px

Can anyone who owns a CRKT M-16 tell me if they prefer a steel or Zytel handle?

>>34345487
I have one with the steel handle. It's a decent knife for the money and the heat treat is pretty good. Only downside is that the blade does need touching up pretty frequently.

File: 419671.jpg (152KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1200x1200px

>>34345487
>>34346381

Own an M16-02Z with a zytel handle, pretty solid. Isn't loose in my hand, if that's what you're asking. Comes pretty sharp from the factory, easy to get to super sharp.

sad bump because nobody likes my very carefully-written and supremely interesting thread :(

>Impossible mode: No dragon dildos or sexual bodily fluids of ANY KIND, from ANY ANIMAL

You know /k/ too well.

Probably never. Shaped explosives are still explosives. Its the same reason (smart) people dont detonate Claymores while standing right behind them, just because the primary force and shrapnel is directed in a particular direction doesn't mean that there isn't substantial blast in all other directions. The last thing you want is to strap a bunch if mini ones to your chest.

1. Look at some cheaper sigs first and if you don't like those look at glawks.
2. I personally learned via exposure and friends. Other people learn by watching a zillion youtube videos. Some learn by browsing gun forums. I 'unno, whatever happens to fall into your lap. Yeah you can go to gun safety and gun basics courses if you want, and those will teach you, but they cost cash.
3. Youtube videos should generally be avoided for learning about firearm basics. Some channels are good, some are bad, not worth the risk though. Honestly, as long as you're not clinically retard and have even a modem of common sense you'll be fine.

>>34344731
Thanks for the response.

One thing I forgot to include in the OP, is there a qualitative difference between the performance of a revolver or modern handgun for the purpose laid out above?

Went to work.
Slept at work.
Bid on guns.
18 hours left on one, hope I get it.

File: 1495493821846.png (2MB, 1150x1150px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1150x1150px

>>34344433
>plinking

eww, might as well have tossed the live cartridges into the berm.

File: hatcher.jpg (44KB, 242x302px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 242x302px

>>34344775
>not practicing shooting so you can be a proficient marksman
>not handloading
>not shooting anything you can get your hands on.

File: 1395273677203.jpg (606KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 1600x1200px

I don't own nor do I know lots about revolvers.
I feel like I'm missing out.

File: smith617.jpg (73KB, 800x535px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 800x535px

>>34315810
Get a S&W 617, they're great and you probably already have a ton of .22LR around anyway so you wouldn't have to stock another caliber while you indulge your curiosity.

>world of tanks presents
ugh

I totally appreciate they're making a lot of things possible that wouldn't be otherwise

but their game and userbase is cancer

>>34344394
I don't see war thunder stepping up to do cool stuff like this.

>>34344240
Nah, just how you properly get laughed at by the entirety of the internet.

>>34344240
Ahahahaha

>>34344240
Is that the Danny phantom kid?

File: disappoint.jpg (16KB, 249x254px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 249x254px

Hmm what's more accurate, a .22lr, or a necked down .22 mag?

>>34344161
About the same, probably.

>>34344161
17hmr