Would it be illegal to shoot child silhouette targets on private property?
>>34605647
Would it be illegal......on Private Property
Hardly anything is technically illegal on Private Property so long as you are the owner or have it cleared with the owner.
No, it would just be extremely edgy.
>>34605661
>have it cleared with the owner
"Mind if I shoot at some child silhouettes on your property? It's a joke man, it'll be funny."
Silent "flumph" at 2 AM and your brain turning to mush as a round penetrates your skull and exits via your eye socket.
Home invader read enough /k/ to prevent loud crash, got himself night goggles, a silencer, and methodically executed your dog and your entire family.
Wat do?
>>34605639
>Silencer
>Silent
he didnt read /k/ at all, it seems
i-i dind't get shot b-because i turned on my everything-proof force field before i went to sleep, TYLER!
>inb4 "i shot you with force field disabling bullets"
w-well you didn't know about m-my force field disabling bullet - disabling shield that i keep on my nightstand, TYLER!
ha! you can't damage me, T Y L E R!
Release the dead man's switch causing a shotgun to discharge into the 400 pounds of tannerite in my basement, killing the invader and ensuring nobody else gets to enjoy my shit.
Tin eye tuss?
Tin it is?
Tye nye tis?
What?
Depends on your accent I guess. I say it like "tin eye tiss".
>>34605611
tinny tuss
Is China the only country besides the US that has already mass equipped their planes with long range (200km+) BVRAAMs?
>tfw even their Flankers get the PL-15.
J-10C with PL-15 and PL-10 spotted few days ago.
>>34605587
PL-15 is an AMRAAM-C equivalent.
Replacing their previous AIM-120C5 class PL-12 and their Jewish Python-3s.
>*blocks your path*
How the fuck did NATO plan to face these things?
In 60's and 70's they were so fucking superior to anything West had, if you disregard early reliability problems.
How come NATO tank design ended up lagging so much behind Soviets until mid 80's?
>>34605445
Up until the 80s armor was lagging behind behind new at missiles and rockets. So it didn't really matter what tank you had, you were going to die if you were hit.
>>34605445
>How the fuck did NATO plan to face these things?
missile spam
>>34605445
ROCKET SPAM POWERS ACTIVATE!
Nukes, a lot of nukes.... A shit ton, from both sides
Ok so for educational purpose only I will make AP.
My question is since I know /k/ is pretty good at chemistry, they are some chemists lurking this board, I was wondering how do you stock the AP?
Let's say you make it Monday and want to use it wednesday or friday, where do you store safely without stabilizing it In plastic, can you store small ammounts in plastic bags?
Even if you play safe, there are still some risk.
reported this thread to the ATF
>>34605440
if you're asking these questions you obviously have no business fooling around wit AP
(for the record mixing it in Vaseline is your best bet)
You might be able to find a storage method mentioned in the appendix of a related paper.
Why did the allies not care about their soldiers and saw them as cannon fodder, while the Germans put extra much effort in crew survivability, quality, training and comfort
>>34605353
survivability maybe because of waning population that needed to stay alive to have a hope of winning the war
everything else is either german engineering or accidental
even then they didn't have nutty survivability, just cheap tanks to shoot at
>>34605353
fuck off nazi sympathizer, I bet you're a alt-reich fascist that supports trump too.
>>34605381
When I see these kind of kill ratios I see men who were willing to defend something until the utter end with incredible fanaticism and determination, and it can only be explained by the fact that they didn't do it because they hated what was in front of them, but because they loved what was behind them.
What's this little knob on the end of a cannon for?
>>34605149
inserting into anus
>>34605149
suckin dick
So you can pull it out your asshole
/k/ What happens if i cut open a blank put 4.5mm steel bb inside , seal it and shoot it out of a blank gun ?
>>34605111
9mm blank*
>>34605111
Do you have any dogs on premises?
Hey guys is this /euro general/?
Post you're .22s. Pistols and rifles, .22LR, 22 short and 22 long, but fuck .22 magnum. Not really, .22 magnum ok too, maybe. How many .22s do you own? Do you hunt or just plink? Here is my bone stock 10/22 with cheap Simmons 3-9x40. This is a 5 shot group with cheap Blazer bulk 40gr at 50 yards. What do you guys think? Can a stock Ruger American rimfire do better or is this as good as it gets with a stock barrel?
That's actually pretty damn impressive if your using bulk ammo.
I just got a Savage Mk I, the target version with a heavy barrel and peep sights. Excited to see how it performs
My grouping looks like that at 15 yards. Iron sights on a cheap savage.
What can I hunt with a .22 besides squirrels? I'm in W WA and all the unprotected squirrels live in cities.
I'll start
>SKS in real fuckin NATO
>Makarov in 9x19
>>34604928
Blackpowder semi autos
>>34604949
I think the chauchat was originally designed for a black powder round
>Mosin carbine in 7.62x39
>SKS in 5.45
/k/, need advise
>want to keep a handgun readily accessible (i.e. won't take ten minutes to unlock) in my bedroom in case of a break in
>want to store it safely and secure from use by others
How do you do both?
On a budget of $0
Bump god dammit
Don't let other people into your bedroom.
>>34604673
>On a budget of $0
Beat your kids or your wife everytime they try to touch your gun I guess.
They'll learn eventually.
Picked up an entrenching tool, trips names it.
the twinkster
>>34604567
McDiggerator.
>>34604567
Chinesium Dirt Porker
Battle puppers edition
old: >>34600011
>>34604502
Your pupper is fat
I prefer a nice parrot on the shoulder
>puppers
Are they just messing with us now?
This is absurd.
Springfield armory can't die fast enough
>>34604489
48.3% off, huh? good deal.
>>34604508
If you need a compact 9mm, a 9mm AR lower, and 3 fucked up AR lowers it's perfect!