Considering getting a P320. Can /k/ tell me what I think of them before I do though? Besides the drop test issue which was allegedly fixed is this a good gun for the price?
If you do but it, make sure you get a lanyard
>>35131634
One of the best OOTB trigger you'll find on a plastic pistol, contested only by the Walther PPQ. The caliber x-change shtick is a meme. If you're buying new, and the trigger looks like your pic (and mine) it's a pre-upgrade chassis.
>>35131668
>The caliber x-change shtick is a meme
Only because they broke it by not officially supporting converting the .45 ACP model to any other cartridge (or even having two separate models in the first place) and then raising the price of the X-Change kits by 150 bucks one night.
I'm new to body armor and want to pick up level 4. I came across Spartan armor online and was surprised to find that they sell a package consisting of a plate carrier front back and side plates for $200. Anyone have experience with this armor? Ant input would be super helpful
https://www.spartanarmorsystems.com/ar500-omega-body-armor-and-spartan-shooters-cut-plate-carrier-package-special/
This thread is madness!
A lot heavier than it needs to be. Go for something lighter and cheaper.
>>35131522
That armor is only lvl 3
Is this deep enough to bury my ammo can? How deep should you typically go? The top is about 6" below the surface
>>35131426
Bury it 6' deep, it's what I do and I've never had a problem
Sure. From whatever paranoid delusion your burying it from sure 6" is great
>>35131426
If you live outside the feel south you want to bury it at least 3 feet deep so the frost doesn't damage whatever is inside.
>>35131450
Dude you're on /k/
I think i'm going to buy an M1A Scout Squad as a jack-of-all-trades type rifle.
What do you think /k/?
>>35131425
It's a terrible choice, but if you want one get one.
>>35131425
I think you have every right to waste your own money on an M1A.
>>35131434
>Not trading in your Good Boy points at the gun store.
Hey /k/ what's a real life fun that an ayyy would be caught with, real sleek stuff that reminds you of space age tech
>>35131385
g11
>>35131385
P90
>>35131385
>>35131421
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucOPmeLC83g
>brand new ruger mk. 4 model is actually affordable
first the SR9E and now this
how does ruger do it lads
>>35131305
cheap chinese pot metal construction
>>35131305
I got two ruger american rimfires for $200 each and they're fantastic for the price.
But the front sight fell off of my $170 10/22.
Takedown models have been good @ 269.
Shit tier castings and lack of QC.
Has anyone ever held/shot/owned one?
Thoughts/opinions?
>>35131204
No but I've never heard anything bad about them. Baseless or otherwise.
>>35131217
Good to know, thanks. That's what I've been seeing as well on reddit and other hunting forums.
>>35131204
I held one at the LGS. It's light as fuuuuuuuck. Would not want to shoot .30-06 through it. Counter guy said he hit himself in the nose because of the recoil. The bolt is unearthly smooth, and synthetic is totally adequate as a SHTF/solo marksman's battle rifle imo.
Would buy, but I don't know shit about scopes and I'm set on a G3 clone anyway.
Should I be honest about my interest in guns with a girl I might have a chance with? She's not very political and I've never heard her talk about gun rights before but I live in a leftist area so statistically it would probably make her uncomfortable. On the other hand I don't see the point in trying with her if I can't be honest. Should I just come clean to her?
>do it pussy
>>35131078
this aint /r9k/, it's /k/
show pic of girl
Hey /k/ I know in this thread there's at least one marine here. I'll be going to MCT and I was wondering how it'll be like. Any advice would be good thanks.
your MREs consist of Crayola Crayons and Elmers Glue and your platoon will have the collective IQ of a low fat yogurt, sember fi debildawg
Hi develdog. Does your head look like an Easter egg yet?
Can anyone ident this gun?
> pic related.
>>35130906
It's a C93.
>>35130924
Real help please.
>>35131012
It looks a lot like a 1911, from what we can see of it.
Somebody talk me out of buying a sub 2000
If you buy this you will look like a school shooter
>>35130795
>Kel Tec
done and done
get a CX4 instead
>>35130795
An AR-15 and a trench coat will get you a higher score.
What does /k/ have against this man?
>>35130713
who is he?
>>35130750
Tim Harmsen from Military Arms Channel
>>35130713
So I just won a WWI Mauser C96. What did I get myself into?
>>35130677
>What did I get myself into?
Me saging this shit thread.
>>35130690
So I take it you don't like discussing old german weapons? That's a shame.
>>35130677
How exactly did you win this? It looks like something off google images
How viable do you think it would have been to draw 1941 USSR forces into a giant encirclement in Poland?
It's well-agreed that the USSR army was unable to conduct effective offensive operations in the early part of the war, so it seems to make sense to bait them into an attack. A rush to Moscow is also known to be out of the question, so speed is not quite as important.
1. Position Axis forces around the defensible river/mountain areas on the flanks that jut into USSR territory. Have central Axis forces fall back into Poland to the more defensible Carpathians and rivers, drawing in USSR forces.
2. USSR forces have accumulated in an area the size of Poland, with an additional secondary pocket in southern Ukraine. Advance mobile elements into the steppes, roughly along the border of the Dnieper.
3. We have now presumably encircled a massive part of the USSR army at a much lesser cost than if they were attacked on their home soil and have mobile elements in place ready to destroy rear-echelon forces.
Not as fast as the original plan I think, but certainly seems to be more manpower/resource-efficient. No significant manpower or industry is lost by giving up land in occupied Poland either.
Thoughts?
>>35130393
At the eve of operation barbarossa the russians were completely unprepared, a russian offensive most likely wouldn't arrive in months and by that time russians are now prepared for counterattack and suprise spearheads because of reconnisance.
>>35130393
/his/
>>35130507
British/French/Belgian forces had plenty of time to prepare and they still fell. Nobody could predict an encirclement of this size, it would be completely unprecedented.
USSR forces would certainly be more prepared, but I think the Winter War demonstrates how weak they were on the offensive at this stage. I don't think the USSR would be able to able to prevent German forces gaining local superiority in the East, nor would they be able to break through in the West. The main worry would be maintaining that encirclement, but USSR counterattacks are still not effective at this stage.
You are an officer in the SS Polizei Division; what do you choose to be your sidearm?
Hi-point c9
>>35130387
The only acceptable answer
The better Luger, duh.