Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 298. page

>>34821311
Even thought the gun offered pretty respectable armor penetration and was largely successful early in the war, as russian vehicles grew over the course of the war the pak 38 was no longer sufficent to defeat frontal armor on soviet some red army vehicles. Hence it was replaced (read as: supplemented) by the pak 40

File: Pak 43.jpg (351KB, 1471x753px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 1471x753px

>>34821345
How about the Pak 43? It seems too big to have been useful if Germany ever went on the offensive again.

>>34821377
You've just explained the entire WW2 towed AT gun problem: As guns got larger, they got inherently less mobile and more difficult to emplace. Not as bad in a defensive posture, but providing AT fires when on the offense becomes more challenging with large towed guns.

File: selfdefense.jpg (43KB, 680x381px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 680x381px

Wrong pic.

>>34821142
>barking
>not sqeeking

>>34821142
IT AINT ME

>>34821142
is that a famas, wtf

>>34821134

You mean like with 10,000 nuggets?

>Is it possible to defeat an enemy's SEAD attempts

Yes. It's literally Russia's whole air defense posture towards NATO. To have a really dense SAM network with a lot of redundancies in order to withstand any SEAD operations.

>>34821152

How often has it been tested?

File: 1501702126270.jpg (45KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 625x626px

>>34820929
>RIP whatever thread died for this
>F

>>34820929
Double stack mag too big for single stack magwell.

>>34820943
I have doubts

>>34820777

The coalition forces in desert storm would defeat any land army either before or since.

Army of Subutai

>enemy has no idea where you're coming from
>enemy is never where you're attacking
>enemy is absolutely scared shitless
>on the off chance the enemy can see you, they can't get close enough to hit you
>any enemy fortifications will be swamped by panicked refugees and then broken down by captured siege engineers

>>34820581
I have one of those, use it to store mags and mag pouches

File: paki.jpg (940KB, 2560x1536px) Image search: [Google]

940KB, 2560x1536px

i get paki ammo

i have a few ammo cans I picked up at the thrift store when I could still get in
use those to store boxed pistol ammo
the stuff i've bought from ammovalley comes loose in plastic mini-cans with handles, pretty neat
don't do rifles

File: $$itsnotthatfuckinghard.png (72KB, 205x326px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 205x326px

>>34820340

File: im a cunt.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

I have no idea why half my photos end up rotated after posting on basket weaving forums.

>>34820822
It's because you're taking the photograph with your phone, which stores rotation data in the attached EXIF fields. The Chan removed those metadata from displayed pictures after enough people doxed themselves.

Truthfully, if you're able to do two over/two under comfortably and with good consistent results, just go for it.

The Mediterranean draw is prevalent because it's what majority of people in modern organized competition uses. It's what olympic archers use, its what they're taught, and its what the high rankers ultmately teach.

>>34820321
do you ever tried using thumb draw?

>>34820321
personally this is the coolest grip I've ever seen: http://fox59.com/2017/08/07/the-armless-archer-takes-home-first-place-at-archery-championship-in-westfield/

>>34820027
>1992
slowpoke.jpg

sage

Still looks better than FN's attempts

File: 1501544416507.jpg (26KB, 215x365px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 215x365px

>>34819801
this could serve literally no other purpose than to spite gun owners

>>34819801
Da fuq is that?

>>34819752

>why buy parts kit?
1. because the only people that produce a commercial variant have QA departments run by shit flinging monkeys
2. because no-one produced a variant
3. because you enjoy learning how a firearm works and problem solving

>are they worth it for the satisfaction?
If you are skilled enough and have the resources (tools) to produce a functioning firearm yes

>are they for making illegal full giggle guns?
maybe, it depends on the intent of the builder. The problem is that any gun commercial or otherwise can be built into illegal funs with enough human ingenuity and determination.
>even if not full auto, how legal are they?
legal in most free states

>>34819752
They're not cheaper, but they're worth it if you love building shit.

Just know what you're getting into tool cost wise, and understand that you CAN jerry rig things, no matter how fucking much everyone else says you can't.

Just understand how the real thing works before you jerry rig it.

File: IMG_0022.jpg (169KB, 558x2536px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 558x2536px

>>34820175
Oh, also, be wary of the laws surrounding it.
922r is mostly ignored but CAN be used in court if you get caught, and DO. FUCKING. NOT. UNDER ANY FUCKING CIRCUMSTANCES BUILD YOUR SHIT FULL GIGGLE UNLESS YOU LIKE BEING GAGGED AND DRAGGED TO AN ATF PARTY VAN.
Remember you doggo!

And it'll fuck us all over with a new wave of panic about ghost guns and illegal automatic weaponry because someone filed down a firing pin (lolno)

File: What I got - what I'd grab in 15min - 2015.jpg (179KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 680x650px

yes, dear new-friend.
/k/ is well aware of Innawoods. It started as a literal /k/ommando game. Then the author got tired of the project and the assets were turned into this dressup doll app we now have.

>>34819836
Oh sorry I didn't know

File: 1371318512419.jpg (190KB, 685x989px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 685x989px

>>34820031
That's why people usually lurk moar.
Sometimes, however, little spoonfeeding is at place.

Christ. Didn't know about that.

nuclear accidents general?

File: 39c.jpg (82KB, 640x659px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x659px

>>34819405
>the fact that these subhumans posses the means to destroy all life on earth

File: 1499838044267.jpg (58KB, 564x564px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 564x564px

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/08/jeremy-s/gun-review-the-0-glock-glock-or-lone-wolf-limited-edition-2014/

pf940 v1 was a defective piece of shit. I heard pf940c v1 has similar problems, but didn't investigate too much since butthurt about the pf940. Unknown if pf940 v2 is better. If it is, maybe there'll be a pf940c v2.

>>34817987
You can buy a glock parts kit of gunbroker. They usually end up around $200-300. They're mostly police trade ins.