Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 17. page

Are Army Rangers AnCaps?

File: 1503626487831.jpg (51KB, 549x960px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 549x960px

>that color scheme
Fuck I lol'd

>>35175881
>that picture

Ranger School is just seeing if you can keep your wits about you and work as a team while you go with little sleep and little food for weeks.

File: IMG_20161208_151936965.jpg (63KB, 518x920px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 518x920px

Wish there were more accessories for 92s, only thing I've put on it is a metal guide rod.

>>35175531
Like what? I thought there were aftermarket parts for everything on the 92. I know WC makes bunch of them

You fag

>>35174318
What a soft looking E-6. He's like a big ol' teddy bear.

>tfw going to armorer school

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFff

Wolfenstein rtcw

>>35123539

Swat 4.

killing floor 2 is pretty cool

people used to use muskets in war. doesn't mean we should do that today, bro.

File: 1505405373888.jpg (297KB, 1280x1707px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1280x1707px

>>35174317
I'm talking as a caliber.
If .69 ball could be put in a reliably firing, self loading, modern firearm then it would be top tier.
These people try and say that .32 wont kill anyone reliably despite being used in both World Wars, WWII by Italians mainly but still.
I don't think a round that saw significant wartime is incapable of killing people reliably. A .69 ball would rip you open.

>>35174349

.25ACP saw significant use too, but it's a glorified .22LR.

You do whatever you want, but it's understandable that people want .380ACP or more for self-def. There's no real reason not to go higher than .32ACP.

HAHAHAHA


no

File: 1362812739328.jpg (44KB, 312x400px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 312x400px

>>35173682
No.

>>35173682
Thats not a c7

The Norks have us beat at participation trophies so fuck off. Also Mexico is the fattest. Suck a dick cunt.

File: Army_Service_Ribbon.png (6KB, 1024x279px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 1024x279px

>>35173135
They give you a rainbow flag for completing training.

>>35172003
Well it's stronger then 9mm and .45 auto in fps and energy.

You no guns faggot,

>>35172003
Yeah, unless you were born with boobs and a vagina.

>>35172025

It's just inefficient. A man doesn't have to compensate.

>>35170916
We have a HL2 thread up already Gabe.

But fine:

>Portal closed as per HL2:E2
>Go to Borealis to ensure Combine can't get teleportation back
>Fight to ensure the combine don't get infrastructure together to re-open portal
>fight until they collapse, with special focus on their advisors.
>accept transdimensional G-man help, since he clearly works for beings that want to fight the Combine

It's really pretty simple now that their main transport/communication hub is closed. But if that gate opens again, it's all over.

By depleting all of earth's resources and energy before they get here
Not so eager now, are we, space slugs?

File: image.jpg (42KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 600x400px

>>35170916
Unfreeze John Wayne

Russian navy.

>>35123468
Endor storm troopers were also pretty l33t. As well as the red guards.

File: 1488773216385.jpg (91KB, 459x612px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 459x612px

>>35123475

File: FFE3QYWIEO2WQ5C.MEDIUM.jpg (56KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 620x465px

>>35170894
Well its going to be 3d printing really soon. Bonus points because liberals think that criminals will ever learn to 3D print guns.

Not today ATF

File: RAF-T_001018-2-sm.jpg (559KB, 1772x1784px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 1772x1784px

Will bump with neat /k/ related images

>>35170364
Honestly? They are doing pretty much everything right as of now.

The have a conventional deterrent in the form of arty on/near the DMZ and now have boosted fission nuclear weapons with an ICBM platform. It's just a case of building a large arsenal of them (~300) and employing MIRV tech to overwhelm missile defence systems.

Doing this however will result in the end of NK, no ifs or buts, hence why it will not happen because dictators tend to like holding onto power.

>>35170409

But the goal here is to some how survive right? Wouldn't you be better off stopping the threats and starting a covert super weapons program? You need something that's powerful enough to destroy America in a single attack. Or something that's got deniability built in from the start. Bio-weapons designed to attack American agriculture destroying corn, wheat, staple crops.

>Invite the south to join me
>Sabotage middle eastern oil wells
>America goes into economic turmoil
>Create EMP sattelite to fry American tech
>Nuke the missippi
>Invade the Western States

>>35169451
Instead of spending the money on one, just spend the extra couple cents to fire the extra round or two it will take to get sighted it.

>>35169451
Only if you have a lot of guns in one caliber. I use the style that fits into the end of the barrel so I can zero optics/sights on multiple caliber firearms.

>>35169451
There are ones that are decent for $20-30. You don't need to spend $75+ on one. They are only good for getting you closer to a zero. I've seen people come to a range to zero in a new AR that they assembled and can't even get on the sighting paper to start to zero, so they just kinda guess where their shots were landing and make adjustments hoping to get on the zeroing target.

>mag conversion
Fuck outta here

File: 1497938733659.jpg (80KB, 679x803px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 679x803px

>>35169246
Why though?

>>35169282
You do know you have to insert a mag conversion into the magwell to get the 9mm mags to work?

>>35169318
I have enough 556 rifles. And I only like retro looking ARs so I have no interest in building something modern.

In the big picture, his life might be a little more valuable than an enlisted's, sure. In reality all lives are pretty much equal in an infantry platoon. It's not WWI where an officer was second to Jesus and and everyone under him was a mere peasant.

>is there ever a reason an Officer should be on the breaching team when going door to door?
He wouldn't do it for a couple of reasons; for one his riflemen would be far more rehearsed in this area than the officer himself. He wouldn't have had the speed or reaction time that his men would have built up training frequently for back in garrison. Second reason being is that his job is to command and delegate. Doing dirty work like that would be a waste of his job.

>>35168535
>Are Officer's lives more valuable than those of the Enlisted?
Yes you dumbass.

>>35168535
>>35168630
>Doing dirty work like that would be a waste of his job
This. It's not a question of his life being more valuable. It's that if he's doing his job right he's not pulling a trigger (99% of the time).