Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1560. page

File: _DSC0098-2.jpg (267KB, 1280x771px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1280x771px

>>33541747
The only thing to do to a Jeep so it doesn't let you down is sell it.

>>33541761
OK then, so what did you do to your J80?

>>33541747
I don't buy a Jeep.

>>33509675
If we ever have to conduct operational operations in Italy, I could see it becoming useful

>>33509675
>what does /k/ think of multitopping?
You mean, like, doing it with more than one cuteboy at a time?

>>33509675
>what does /k/ think of multitopping?
They're the only kind of pizzas I'll buy.

>>33541704
The Irish

>>33541704
It was garbage.

>>33541704
Biggest one would probably be timing. US spent a ton of money on M16 adoption and improvements, then had a massive surplus of weapons and parts. Americans don't want them, 3rd worlders can buy surplus M16A1s, other nations have no need for a poverty rifle.

There's a reason so many "new" designs have a strong internal resemblance to the AR-18.

File: BarryCyborg.png (546KB, 834x779px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 834x779px

>>33509663

>if the Rooskies had the funds and desire to crank it up to eleven

It would look something like this.

>>33509663
I imagine it would just be direct upgrades of preexisting equipment, as that is what blatantly fits the Russian military ideology, but with elements from other nations for improvement on it. Taking what works from an AR platform or a G3/FAL mixed in with what makes the AK so damn good. This would probably end up as a sealed rifle with low tolerances kind of like a RK-95 or Galil with a dust cover and a rail system. Pistols would probably go the way of the Cz-75 and it's variants. Tanks would probably look like the tanks that Russia has today, as they take from design aspects from other country's tanks already. Same with aircraft. Rocket launchers would be an amalgamation of the later RPG designs, I think it would be coolest if it was a collapsing design with a targeting system.

They would keep the quality of mass production with all of this. The Russians have always believed the quality of quantity.

>>33509663
smedley butler succeeds
george s patron goes rouge and invades Berlin
operation unthinkable kicks off
there are too many things that did not happen part of why alt history is a waste of time

File: JY-26-radar counter stealth.jpg (51KB, 725x483px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 725x483px

>>33540671
>Another traditional limitation of VHF and UHF-band radars is that their pulse width is long and they have a low pulse repetition frequency [PRF]—which means such systems are poor at accurately determining range. As Mike Pietrucha, a former Air Force an electronic warfare officer who flew on the McDonnell Douglas F-4G Wild Weasel and Boeing F-15E Strike Eagle once described to me, a pulse width of twenty microseconds yields a pulse that is roughly 19,600 ft long—range resolution is half the length of that pulse. That means that range can’t be determined accurately within 10,000 feet. Furthermore, two targets near one another can’t be distinguished as separate contacts.

>Signal processing partially solved the range resolution problem as early as in the 1970s. The key is a process called frequency modulation on pulse, which is used to compress a radar pulse. The advantage of using pulse compression is that with a twenty-microsecond pulse, the range resolution is reduced to about 180 feet or so. There are also several other techniques that can be used to compress a radar pulse such as phase shift keying. Indeed, according to Pietrucha, the technology for pulse compression is decades old and was taught to Air Force electronic warfare officers during the 1980s. The computer processing power required for this is negligible by current standards, Pietrucha said.

File: F22 a kill.jpg (23KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 480x360px

>>33540673
>Engineers solved the problem of directional or azimuth resolution by using phased array radar designs, which dispensed with the need for a parabolic array. Unlike older mechanically scanned arrays, phased array radars steer their radar beams electronically. Such radars can generate multiple beams and can shape those beams for width, sweep rate and other characteristics. The necessary computing power to accomplish that task was available in the late 1970s for what eventually became the Navy’s Aegis combat system found on the Ticonderoga-class cruisers and Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. An active electronically scanned array is better still, being even more precise.

>With a missile warhead large enough, the range resolution does not have to be precise. For example, the now antiquated S-75 Dvina—known in NATO parlance as the SA-2 Guideline—has a 440-pound warhead with a lethal radius of more than 100 feet. Thus, a notional twenty-microsecond compressed pulse with a range resolution of 150 feet should have the range resolution to get the warhead close enough—according to Pietrucha’s theory.

>The directional and elevation resolution would have to be similar with an angular resolution of roughly 0.3 degrees for a target at thirty nautical miles because the launching radar is the only system guiding the SA-2. For example, a missile equipped with its own sensor—perhaps an infrared sensor with a scan volume of a cubic kilometer—would be an even more dangerous foe against an F-22 or F-35.

tl;dr

American stealth is easily defeated.

It was only a matter of time really. But then again, conventional wars are a thing of the past.

Did you enjoy losing the war? Did yoou enjoy soviets taking berlin? Why didnt you die you nazi faggot?

>>33539997

I hope the three hours have not passed already.

I offer three questions.
- what did he think, at the time, about the soldiers from other nations fighting at their side?
- What dental maintenance was available? Any company dentist, were they issued fluorite etc.
- What was inner discipline and justice like; not formal but keeping each other in check?

>>33540098
still 30 minutes

How many times has this shitty thread been reposted in the last 2 weeks?

Heinrich Severloh, Please do it again!

File: leet hax.gif (944KB, 360x240px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 360x240px

>>33539353

File: Danner TFX.jpg (179KB, 1155x1155px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1155x1155px

Danner.

File: Based.jpg (60KB, 500x369px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x369px

I think that the answer is obvious.

>>33509357
Jackboots are horrible for walking long distances. Unless you wear double socks or socks+footwraps and have them fitted by a cobbler.

>>33509160
Not a bad choice at all.

How much did she pay?

>>33509160

Just make sure you dont go play with a loaded gun. You wouldnt want to shoot yourself while cleaning.

Why dont you also buy a good gun and go shooting together.

>>33509189
Because he's 12 probably

>>33509096
B2 was created in 1980 on potao poputers.
30 years later here we are.
What do you think.

>>33509096
Yes

The breadbasket must stay out of Russian hands, even the leafs know this.

File: 1489498955062.jpg (96KB, 792x558px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 792x558px

>>33539089
>Canada is so poss poor that they sell their army for the valueless Zimkrainian dollar

Good

>>33538741

Well sure you could potentially make them that cheap but they'd be utter shit.

Because milling/stamping and demand with quality materials is better than pot metal shit that was used and abused by some snow/sand niggers... Plus import/funswitch bans make those not surface in the US.

Also, WASR is a decent cheap starter AK. It ain't a cheap hobby, so if you can, just buy it in pieces till you make the one you'd like.

>>33538741
Hello, fellow fitizen. :^)

>>33536742
I honestly hope so.

It's a situation that paints the AR is a great light to anybody remotely moderate. The only people who think this story is negative are 100% unsavable gun haters already.

>>33536742
No

This is like when i beat someones ass real hard at a video game
"Oh cry cry, whine whine, bitch bitch"
Clicks Ok button
Starts next game.

Literally the same shit.

No.

It was already settled in court and was decided the shooter was cleared of any illegal actions.

Why would I want an antiquated rifle chambered in an outdated cartridge? Why should I want a rifle with magazines that max out at 20 rounds? Why would I want a rifle that weighs more empty that my AR or AK weighs fully loaded? Why would I prefer to carry 3 20 round magazines instead of 6 30 round magazines at the same weight?

File: 1411008316565.jpg (66KB, 507x307px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 507x307px

>>33509088