How would you rate this Swedish anti-terror operator, /k/?
>>33565834
Ineffective
>>33565834
I'd rate him as shitting up /k/'s front page.
>>33565834
Not muslim enough.
>Compile videos, images, data of Airfield, Battle damgae and Russia/Syrian Responce
>Analyze them
>???????
>Profit
Russian Drone Footage of Aftermath
https://youtu.be/9olf277w4dM
>RT Footage
https://youtu.be/tLgil4UC1fo
>Aircraft before Strike
https://youtu.be/FaklRH9K9mU
>RI Video
https://youtu.be/oDPWg5DfmW4
>>33565200
>>33565200
>pound a bunch of sand in one-off attack against a shitty remote airbase 100% irrelevant to anything other than Assad's retarded revenge bombing of civilians in rebel areas
>Limousine liberals and Neo-Con retards laud you as a hero
>Russia pretends to get mad for a week, then back to business as usual
/thread
>>33565209
In light of the recent international confusion over whether or not Syria used chemical weapons, why isn't there a high Speed EOD SOF unit that isn't dedicated to being quickly inserted into hotzones where Chemical Weapons were believed to have been used to conduct battle damage assessments to figure out what happened?
>>33565066
Because then there would be no reason for ZOG controlled USA to destabilize Sandnigger countries.
Don't you see? We need to destabilize them for the sake of Israel and imported multiculturalism.
>>33565066
>hurr let's parachute US ground troops into contaminated areas under attack by chemical weapons in a hostile foreign country!!
Are you 5? Be honest.
Because who gives a fuck who was really at fault? Even if there was widely distributed video evidence of known rebels openly using Sarin on children, it would still be Assads fault because that is the most useful spin on the story.
Russia mad that America shot missiles into Syria. if a war occurred between Russia and America, what do you think would happen and how would draftees be? how would protests and draft dodgers be? I'm curious on all your thoughts as to what would happen
>>33564959
Nothing will happen? Why do you think something would?
slide thread
sage
>>33564959
>direct, open war being declared between 2 global nuclear powers
>in 2017
we get lesser people to fight them for us and vise versa
hey /k/ how do you damage a gun? i been thinking with all this gun prevention/restriction talk going on we could find a clever way to disable the gun rather than the shooter
shoot it
>>33564936
Long term
>fire steel case
>leaving bullets in chamber (wears out the chamber
>not wiping off oil after cleaning (leads to hydrostatic overpressure)
>shooting it (it does wear out the gun)
Short term
>break the gun
>mud test
>overpressure loads (see glocknade retard meme)
There is a lot more, but this is just to start the conversation
>>33564936
Put your finger in the barrel
Is the attack helicopter an outdated design?
Drones on the other hand
>carry more munitions
>have a higher altitude (less vulnerable)
>have a further range (less vulnerable)
>don't have squishy vulnerable humans inside that will die from any violent impact
>etc
Thoughts?
Also. Choppers float well within range of surface to air missiles.
>>33564913
>higher altitude (less vulnerable)
debatable.
Helicopters can fly very low, that is the only advantage I can think of for them.
>>33564913
>carry more munitions
While I'm sure there are a lot of fixed wing aircraft that carry more, but isn't the Apache the undisputed champ in carrying a shitton?
It's just a matter of time before we have drones based on the Apache, keeping the attack helicopter alive.
What's the most innocuous object you can carry in your pocket that you could take to work but could be potentially useful in a street self defense situation? Roll of quarters?
>>33564874
Leave those poor kids at your school alone.
>>33564874
A locking pocket knife that you use as a letter opener or box cutter at work.
>>33564874
Thick, steel-barrelled pen.
In some places, carrying a roll of coins is a misdemeanor due to people using them as weapons in street fights.
/Tactical light general/
I just got a Springfield RO Operator and I need a light for it. How does the Inforce Apl compare to the Streamlight Tlr-1? I want something that will hold up well, as this is gonna be my primary nightstand gun.
Bumping a good thread
>>33564559
I've got both (well the TLR-1 HL), INForce is fine, my two problems are - way too low lumens for my taste, the paddle system isn't all it's cracked up to be and is easier to accidentally activate.
batteries in the streamlight will last alot longer
I have both & the inforce has a constant drain on batteries
FUCK
Sorry I missed the last page, reposting.
>>33564546
Do you have tl;dr?
>>33564584
Not OP but last page, "Conclusion," I'm not going to type it out.
>>33564584
The conclusion is at the bottom
tl;dr - gel is accurate
Yay, another middle east war! we better help (((them))) edition
old thread >>33560457
>>33564464
>The main goal here is stability.
oh right, like how iraq is stable and the beacon of light in the middle east.
>>33564465
>>33564434
>>33564444
Fine, let them do as they please, I'm sure they can figure it out in a couple years.
Glad the hole isn't on our end of the boat, amirite?
Why is the resident retarded spic having a meltdown? I'm trying to be productive here at work and he's distracting me.
Guns that are comfy, not to hold, but just comfy in their existence
Hawken Rifle
>Livin' inna Mountain
>Skinnin' deer
>Bettin' on forgettin' all the trouble that you knew
Tusken raiders exist
>Livin' inna Mountain
>Skinnin' jawa
>UUUUURRRR URRRR URR UR UR
Fuck what anyone says these look comfy as fuck. They look like they would be used by a special team of men deployed only to fight lovecraftian abominations should they ever arise.
I want one so badly.
>>33566813
>Barely even sentient, basically a very dangerous vermin
>Murder everyone they come across in an autistic rage
>Somehow slaughtering a village of them is a bad thing
I just bought 720 rounds of mauser ammo and my bolt won't lock because the round is too big.
This is exactly what I bought
What kind of rifle? There are 7mm Mausers and 8mm Mausers. It's a different caliber...
Is there anyway of getting this ammo to cycle, and if not. Is there any other options for Mauser ammo.
>>33563578
Its 8mm mauser, the picture is the exact ammo I bought.
>>33563553
You should have read the description before buying
Alright, completely different question regarding the attacks.
So reportedly 59 missiles were launched between two Arleigh Burke class DDs.
That means that each was loaded with roughly 30 TLAMs each or 37.5% of both of their 80 cell magazines were nothing but TLAMs.
Is this a "normal" magazine load, or just something for vessels forward deployed to hot spots? Is there even such a thing as a normal or 'standard' loadout?
>>33563471
I have no idea, I don't even own guns.
>>33563478
>every post on /k/
>>33563471
Those VLS cells hold a shitload of different things. ASROC, Harpoon, RIM-66, SM-3, etc.
They've probably got a little of everything loaded for any occasion.
Why the fuck intermediates take so damn long to be developed?
After WW1 the writing was already on the wall regarding the future of small arms. Armies had long ago ditched volley sights and stuff, it must've been abundantly clear that shooting would only be done against small targets within visual range, and that hitting the enemy at extended range was nigh impossible without a telescopic sights.
When we consider that making a sufficiently sturdy automatic weapon of acceptable weight also is easier with an intermediate, it seems ridiculous that nobody did it before the 40's.
As a side note, how the fuck did the US come to the conclusion that they did developing the .30 Carbine? Why the FUCK is it round-nosed?
The armies of ww2 were glutted on outdated but relevant equipment, and the interwar period held back development.
>>33563423
the only thing that really developed during the interwar period for most major countries was planes and tanks
>>33563400
I mean seriously, imagine if they lengthened the case and gave it a spitzer bullet. We'd have .300 Memeout over 50 years earlier, albeit it would've been a larger and heavier round.
Or they could've had a longer case and a slightly smaller caliber spitzer bullet. That would've weighed less than 1940's memeout and extended the range and lethality by a pretty huge margin compared to the .30 Carbine we got.
Either way, a slightly more powerful round in a slightly heavier rifle, and the Garand would've been a rare sight by Okinawa.
So are the russians mad?
Whats the body count/damages?
Did isis runamuck on the syrians after the strike?
Was it a bad move for the u.s.?
>>33563255
TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP
WE LOVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT, DONT WE FOLKS?
>>33563264
Whats your take friendo?
>>33563255
Former /k/ommando here, this is so funny watching Assad crash and burn, but seriously we can't let the American people possess assault weapons.