and no i don't mean 223 im asking about exact 1:1 5.56 on civilian market
>>33567607
.223 has the exact outside dimensions of 5.56
>>33567607
Maybe I'm not understanding the question, but there are many ammo manufacturers that sell 5.56 to the civilian market.
Now they might not sell exclusively to civilians, but what does that matter?
>>33567615
So if i would buy for example Galil 5.56 i could load it with .223?
What kind of automatic guns are these, /k/?
and what about these semi-autos?
>>33567454
HK MP5A3
some more special police units also carried HK UMP9s
S&W Uzi .45 assault shotguns
What's the best general purpose SHTF gun?
Challenge mode: no SKS nor Mosin
>>33567077
Not too hard of a decision.
>>33567077
Why is that piece of bread bleeding?
>>33567103
6.5 Grendel vs 6.8SPC
which is "better" in terms of range, recoil, flatness and accuracy?
which one is more likely to be adopted by an army?
>>33566971
Fuck if I know. DEA uses 6.8 rifles to shoot through windshields. I've only seen 6.5 in target ARs.
Military isn't going to change shit until LSAT 6.5 pans out, and apparently that's basically .260/6.5CM
>>33566971
6.5 Grendel.
6.8 SPC is a meme-tier cartridge with worse ballistics than any decent .223.
6.5 Grendel.
6.8 has shit ballistics, all the added size and weight with none of the benefits.
Post your strap, Nias.
Trust no one, not even yourself
>>33566678
>>33566716
Step up yo game niggas
Y'all never stood a chance
Hypothetically, if WWII were to happen again (with the technology at that time) what should Adolf Hitler do to secure his domination of Europe and ultimately the word?
Not to attack 2 countries at once. Simple as that
>>33566486
if you want your jerk off waifu hitler to win
then he should fuck off with the invading of european countries with suicide pacts
then through destructive influence on socio-economic policy and corrosion of other countries political soverignty by proxy
the US will inevitably get into a fight with Japan, whether or not we bother making the bomb with no aggression against germany who was trying to make one, is unknown in this dumbass sam harris-tier hypothetical situation
>>33566486
Hitler did all right with the initial stages of the war, so that part I would keep intact..
First and foremost, keep the peace with Stalin.
Finish subjugation of Europe while building a fuckhuge Kriegsmarine force. Starve the UK into submission. Total blockade. Burn/ruin what crops they have. Insert commando teams to raid/disrupt power, supplies, communication, radio towers, etc.
Keep close contact with Japan, convince them NOT to do anything stupid that would give FDR cause for war. If this is NOT possible, pray that your newly reinforced Kriegsmarine forces can keep the US on their side of the Atlantic.
Invest heavily in R&D, get Nuclear capability as quickly as possible - build defenses in the event of Russian aggression, have them obviously be defensive in nature so Stalin doesn't get suspicious.
WIN the war in Africa. Rommel, fully supplied and given a free hand. Increase production of the Panzer IV and relegate the older Panzers to defensive duties only. Produce Tiger tanks ONLY good supplies of fuel are secured.
Alter combat doctrine to emphasize PRESERVATION OF OPERATIONAL FORCES. Germany cannot afford to lose good German soldiers. Take an approach more like the U.S. - combined arms, emphasis on Arty and fighter bombers to soften targets, avoid any battles you are likely to lose, etc.
Order the Luftwaffe to develop fighters/bombers with greater range.
Once the Nuclear Option is on the table, game over. Wipe Russia off the map, send the serfs back to the stone age (they just barely left it anyway, they'll be fine)
Tell Japan to go nuts securing whatever they want for their East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere and possibly give them the A-bomb. Nuke Sydney/Canberra to demonstrate Japanese capability.
USA sues for peace, makes noises about human rights but the warhawks won't want to risk war at such a disadvantage. Nuclear deterrence keeps all three empires from going to active war with each other.
Mine is the pictured Colt M1911, but I have yet to own one.
>>33566342
I don't get why everyone is so in love with the 1911 and it's grip, it feels very mediocre, the grip safety ruins the entire feel of it. Also the slide release is TINY.
Wide spur hammers are the fucking bomb though.
>>33566528
I like my Kimber Warrior and my Beretta 92G.
I like the 1911 for how it feels when you shoot it, it's kickback feels good, it just generally feels great. I agree with you on the grip, which is why I used a custom grip.
Why has no manufacturer made this yet /k/? It'd be perfect for cucked states.
>>33566211
Anything on a scary black gun will eventually get banned, the real solution is to prevent gun control legislation in the first place.
Haha this makes me happy! I hope it comes soon!
>>33566233
Not arguing with that, but with the laws of the past few years I find it weird that nobody's designed an AR-15 that takes stripper clips directly, instead of those dumb hinging designs.
It could be quite profitable in New York and similar states.
Only 23 Tomahawk missiles out of 59 reached Syrian airfield, Russian MoD says.
What a shit ratio.
B-but...
>MUH RUSSIAN NEWS SOURCE
>MUH TAX PAYER DOLLARYDOOS
>MUH NATIONAL PRIDE
Deal with it.
>>33566208
>Russian MOD
>believing anything homos say
sad
>>33566208
>Russian MoD says
That's as accurate as CNN and Baghdad Bob
If "true", the others were most likely tasked with elsewhere.
>>33566217
kek... at least they're on the ground, tyrone.
>>33566230
sure thing. whatever you say. as if Pentagon can be trusted. they even planted those fucking chemical weapons. they're neocon liars.
stay fucking mad. tomahawaks are clearly shit if they have less than 50% reliability percentage.
Are condor knives any good? I wanna get pic related because of the design on the blade but I want some background info
sure, who gives a shit
>>33566453
Just wanted some advice before I buy
Condor makes fine airsoft/milsim gear. take that for what you will.
LMAO
>>33565987
Do all russians fuck little boys?
>>33565987
59* and not even fully destroyed
Not sure why being a vatnik homo have to do with all this. If russian men have to take dick up their asses dont drag the rest of the world into the gay fantasy of russia
>Finally go get the eye exam I've been putting off for years
>As I figured my eyes are shit, turns out I have to wait a year before corrective surgery to make sure it's stabilized otherwise there'd be no point
>Have to spend a year wearing glasses (or preferably contacts so I don't look like a freak) at all times otherwise it could get worse
So I'm having a pretty fucking shit weak, tell me impaired eye anons, how do you deal with shooting with glasses/contacts/LES? Is it safe to shoot wearing contacts or would you recommend wearing glasses to the range?
>>33565948
Use bigger targets.
>>33565948
Are you fucking 12 years old to whine about glasses? Just put safety glasses over your prescription glasses and be done with it unless you do some really stupid shit. Or if you want it all high-speed-low-drag, there's ballistic goggles/glasses with corrective properties/inserts, too.
>>33565993
Ok, anon. Time for a physics lesson.
There is this thing call refraction, glass will bend light. You can put your finger on the other side of a glass of water to see this!
For those of us that learned to shoot without glasses, that shift fucks our aim.
That said. Try contacts OP, I can shoot just fine with them.
Or you cam take off your glasses before you shoot.
Is there any real reason why the Rhino 50DS would be a bad CCW?
>Lightweight
>.357 has better ballistics out of the longer barrel
>Fun and accurate
>Sexy future cyberpunk looks
>Inb4 SEAM
>SEAM
Cause it's fuck huge for a ccw? I'm not a small dude but I don't try to conceal my fnp 45 or 454. If you can do it without printing great.
>>33565952
Sorry for noob answer but I have never seen a rhino upclose. What seam?
Why don't manufacturers add bayonets to rocket launchers?
>>33565918
let me guess.... you are only pretending to be retarded?
>>33565918
They should add bayonets to the rockets.
>>33565918
Possibly because they are not 14 year olds posting on /k/.
Just a guess.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow5Ux17YKdM
What is wrong with those missiles ? The airbase looks kinda intact or is it a russian propaganda ?
>>33565880
Murican' junk technology
>>33565880
Why is the filename 'tomahawk missile"?
>>33565880
Looks like they lost the SU22 and MiG23 squadrons.