>Cntrl + F
>"CZ"
>No threads
>CZ General thread
Just picked this bad boy up yesterday for $600. CZ97B made in 2002 with around 400 rounds through it. Came with 5 magazines, box, papers, and wrench. How'd I do /k/?
also CZ general thread.
>>33685714
>gun has papers
pussy.
>>33685726
You fucking shit tier nigger. Papers generally means the factory target, instruction booklet, promo stuff, warranty card.
>>33685714
>How'd I do /k/?
Good I think. 97B is super neat; 10mm when?
What is the ultimate weaponized/guard dog breed?
>>33685100
/k/orgi
>>33685106
Why? You can't use it as guard dog or as attack dog.
>>33685100
for "guard dog", any mastiff breed bred to be pissed as fuck.
Presa Canario is a good start
Why or why not can mentally ill people can carry guns?
>>33684922
Define "mentally ill" first
>>33684923
something that affects the way you think, and the way you act. In this case ya'll know the story with stevie stephens
Is that the guy who livestreamed himself murdering somebody? Rarely have I seen an uglier, more unpleasant face.
Every conversion about hunting rifle cartridges:
>Use enough gun.
>You don't want to wound that poor animal.
>Is that even legal in this state?
>Might as well hunt with a 22 LR.
Every conversation about defensive handgun cartridges:
>Shot placement is everything.
>Stopping power is fuddlore.
>There's barely any difference.
>Need more capacity for multiple attackers
This sounds to me like the reverse of sound logic. We can make do with our 6mm rifles for hunting, but do we really want to bet our lives on weaker handgun rounds when even the best are not very good? Good shot placement is almost a given for the hunter, who has all day to steady his aim and who shouldn't even fire at all unless he's reasonably certain of a clean, ethical kill. The gunfighter, on the other hand, is in a race to shoot his enemy before his enemy shoots him.
>>33684507
Maybe bc there are wildly huge variables in rifle cartridge ballistics but much less so in short barreled handguns?
Probably why there is a shortage of anti tank pistols.
>>33684520
>wildly huge variables in rifle cartridge ballistics
Not for the civilian hunting market. People argue endlessly about "Is [insert cartridge] enough for [insert game animal]," but the animals seldom know the difference.
>>33684598
Holy fuck you are dumb.
>No big difference between 17hmr and 375h&h
They actually did it, the future is now.
I dont think that's an exoskeleton
US counterpart is still test stage,
>>33684209
That's a nigger with a backpack using a metal detector. Are you high?
So what drives the average /k/ommando in life?
Me:
>family
>love
>money
>guns
>making Liberals cry
>>33683892
Masturbation.
Sometimes my ego, sometimes my dick, sometimes both.
>>33683892
>to crush your enemies
>to see them driven before you
>to hear the lamentations of their women
gay socialist here
>flinging 7.62 at things
>drugs
>sex
>dank maymays
>czech steel
>milsurp
>DELTA OR NO DELTA, THATS A HOT WEAPON
Reminder that one of the rangers is doing prison time for raping his six year old daughter.
>that shot where you see rangers carry Pilla's dead body out of the humvee with his eyes open, looking up
>>33683778
>Ewan McGregor's character
GRIMESY
A while back I made a thread concerning that, some degenerate on here kept going on about "he's still a hero, he 'earned his stars'" or someshit, pretty much out of nowhere
even for 4chins that was an absurd thing to read
Several People made their own Estimates on how it would turn out and what the casualty rates will be. Which one is the most plausible?
In a letter to General Curtis LeMay when LeMay assumed command of the B-29 force on Guam, General Lauris Norstad told LeMay that if an invasion took place, it would cost the US "half a million" dead.
In May, Admiral Nimitz's staff estimated 49,000 U.S casualties in the first 30 days, including 5,000 at sea.
A study done by General MacArthur's staff in June estimated 23,000 US casualties in the first 30 days and 125,000 after 120 days. When these figures were questioned by General Marshall, MacArthur submitted a revised estimate of 105,000, in part by deducting wounded men able to return to duty.
In a conference with President Truman on June 18, Marshall, taking the Battle of Luzon as the best model for Olympic, thought the Americans would suffer 31,000 casualties in the first 30 days (and ultimately 20% of Japanese casualties, which implied a total of 70,000 casualties). Admiral Leahy, more impressed by the Battle of Okinawa, thought the American forces would suffer a 35% casualty rate (implying an ultimate toll of 268,000). Admiral King thought that casualties in the first 30 days would fall between Luzon and Okinawa, i.e., between 31,000 and 41,000. Of these estimates, only Nimitz's included losses of the forces at sea, though kamikazes had inflicted 1.78 fatalities per kamikaze pilot in the Battle of Okinawa, and troop transports off Kyūshū would have been much more exposed.
In July MacArthur's Intelligence Chief, Maj. Gen. Charles A. Willoughby, warned of between 210,000 and 280,000 battle casualties in the push to the "stop line" one-third of the way up Kyushu. Even when rounded down to a conservative 200,000, this figure implied a total of nearly 500,000 all-causes losses, of whom perhaps 50,000 might return to duty after light to moderate care.
>>33683487
The US Sixth Army, the formation tasked with carrying out the major land fighting on Kyushu, estimated a figure of 394,859 casualties serious enough to be permanently removed from unit roll calls during the first 120 days on Kyushu, barely enough to avoid outstripping the planned replacement stream.
Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson stated "We shall, in my opinion, have to go through an even more bitter finish fight than in Germany. We shall incur the losses incident to such a war and we shall leave the Japanese islands even more thoroughly destroyed than was the case with Germany." From D-Day to V-E day, the Western Allies alone suffered some 766,294 casualties
In the spring of 1945, the Army Service Forces under Lt. Gen. Brehon B. Somervell was working under a figure of "approximately" 720,000 for the projected replacements needed for "dead and evacuated wounded" through December 31, 1946. These figures are for Army and Army Air force personnel only and do not include replacements needed for the Navy and Marine Corps.
A study done for Secretary of War Henry Stimson's staff by William Shockley estimated that conquering Japan would cost 1.7–4 million American casualties, including 400,000–800,000 fatalities, and five to ten million Japanese fatalities. The key assumption was large-scale participation by civilians in the defense of Japan.
Outside the government, well-informed civilians were also making guesses. Kyle Palmer, the war correspondent for the Los Angeles Times, said half a million to a million Americans would die by the end of the war. Herbert Hoover, in memorandums submitted to Truman and Stimson, also estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000 fatalities, and those were believed to be conservative estimates; but it is not known if Hoover discussed these specific figures in his meetings with Truman. The chief of the Army Operations division thought them "entirely too high" under "our present plan of campaign."
It would depend a lot on Hirohito as well. Would he call for a surrender once he realized the US forces had invaded. Or would he call opon the Japanese to resist like Hitler did with the Germans.
>>33683518
>It would depend a lot on Hirohito as well.
Wasn't he a puppet leader? I thought he had no say besides being presented with maps and stuff
Why does the NRA seem to recieve so much flak in the gun community? I'd get it if it was your typical soccer mom, but I've had gun owners tell me they hate the NRA and yet they couldn't really give me a certain reason beyond a vague "They're too extreme". I know they supported gun control measures in the past but does anybody know why they would be disparaged nowadays?
pic unrelated
>>33682785
I don't like them because of the shit they send me.
>"HERE ARE THE TOP 10 GUNS HILLARY IS GOING TO BAN! BUY THEM NOW!!!1111!1!!!"
They can fuck themselves endlessly for shit like that. All I wanted was some insurance.
>>33682785
>Why does the NRA seem to recieve so much flak in the gun community?
Because they act like politicians when it comes to our rights and never get anything done
I can't speak for anyone else on /k/, but I'm not a big fan of the NRA these days because they seem less interested in firearms safety and marksmanship than they do in giving Wayne LaPierre a platform from which to run his stupid fucking mouth and make us all look bad.
Does North Korea have the training/weapons to withstand a conventional (non-nuclear) war for a extended period of time? How long would they last?
>>33682173
Two hours
North Korea will hold a conventional war for the length of time it takes for the Tomahawk Missiles to hit them, bout 30 mins
About as long as Saddam did.
Why do fudds have like 500 nearly identical chamberings for hunting deer? They all cost like $2 a round, are obscure as hell, and have a subsequently limited selection of loads/components.
What advantage do they even supposedly offer over each other? Is the deer really gonna give a fuck if you shoot it with a 7mm Weatherby Magnum, or a 7mm WSM?
Why not just use .308, .270, 30-30, .243, or 30-06, and be done with it?
Do fudds enjoy scouring every walmart in the tri-county area, trying to find a single $90 box of cartridges?
Its a art you would not understand
Do you have time to talk about the .257 Roberts, anon? You seem like a guy that would dig it.
Also, long and short actions made things a bit more complicated.
>>33681610
Oh gosh anon you're right. Everyone should shoot .223 and 9mm out of their tacticool glocks and ar15s at pieces of paper in preparation for the race war like you.
How are they just so incredibly good at dying? Show me a nation that can take 8.7 million military dead in a war and still win. Show me a nation that loses three men for every one they kill of the enemy yet still wins.
>>33681524
>good at dying
The total ratio of Soviet to Nazi military losses was 1.3:1
>>33681524
US casualties in Vietnam: About 58,000
VC/NVA casualties: About 1,000,000
I'm bad at math - what kind of ratio is that?
>>33681524
They mostly killed their own people
This guy just showed up at my house. He asked if he could borrow some ammo. He seemed so friendly and nice that I let him borrow 500 rounds. I wonder who he was.
>>33681488
Good post. Made me only semi-smile. No one can make me smile, except for my guns.
16 KB JPG
This guy just showed up at my house. He asked if he could borrow some ammo. He seemed so friendly and nice that I let him borrow 500 rounds. I wonder who he was.
>>33681488
What's the best way for me to CC? I've been told constantly anyone can conceal a Glock 19, but shit, I can't see any way I can do that. My plan was to carry a PPK in a holster or LCP in pocket, but fuck me if those aren't a pain to shoot.
I'm 5'10" at 130 pounds. The best way to describe me is "a skeleton". Advice?
gain some weight nigga
>inb4 i cant
EAT MORE FAGGOT
>>33681286
>5'10" at 130 pounds
Jesus Christ. Do you even remember the last time you ate?
>>33681286
Thin firearms. 1911 and Tokarev work surprisingly well.
I usually carry a P938
>6" 130 here
Post them
>>33681205
>>33681258
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT