Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1090. page

>>34101663
I've seen em for 800 my dude

>>34101663

>scandium frame
>tacticool rail

You are paying too much no matter what you buy it for

I guess. S&W's website says the MSRP is $1329

It's aesthetic, I'll give it that.

I think theyll hit it big with the female market after an months

Never underestimate the ability of the female mind to match colors to her outfit

looks very spacey, like something an astronaut would carry in an ankle holster

If you're specifically looking for a government model clone, Inland Manufacturing makes a decent A1 model. The only difference is it has an added firing pin safety.

MSRP is around $780, but it's easy enough to get them around $650.

Auto Ordnance also makes a good quality and faithful clone for ~$600.

>>34100024
Any model would do, as long as it's cheap. I wasn't being humble when I said I was poor. I can't do 700 dollars man.

What is it?

a m1 garand. ww2

File: gary.jpg (34KB, 550x426px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 550x426px

This is a real weapon

Obviously the Allies

US has overwhelming air and naval superiority.

Also, Japan and France are most definitely joining the allies.

>>34098883
Nukes fall everybody dies.

>>34098362
They worked so I'd say yes.

Probably, they would be on Ian.com if they weren't any good.

>>34098373
Did the stick increase throwing distance enough to justify the extra bulk compared to a spherical grenade?

File: _20170529_093448.jpg (1MB, 3224x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3224x2160px

Depends how far you are shooting, what gun it's mounted on, how good or bad your eyes are, shooting environment (such as inside a range or outside shooting and climate) durability and battery life.
I have an EOTech on my ak, and it works just fine. However I basically only shoot indoors at a 100 yards max, and my eyeballs aren't too great. I've unintentionally dropped my whole optic rail on a cement floor and it stayed zeroed.

I'd say aimpoint is a pretty safe choice for red dots. If you have astigmatism holographic sights might appear fuzzy or "star bursty".

Also its best to throw more money at ammo, and use irons than getting a red dot.

File: _20170529_094627.jpg (2MB, 4670x2952px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4670x2952px

Also for MOA, 1 or 2 are probably the best but again like I said it depends on what you are doing. Scopes should be 1 moa or less if possible with 1/4 to 1/2 MOA adjustment knobs.
I really like my Redfield and they aren't too expensive.

>>34097631
Try holosun I have one on my ar and runs great

>>34096984
European women =/= American women

>>34096995
>European women =/= American women

All women are the same wherever you go.

>>34096995
American *culture* is a global phenomenon, all white women with Facebook and Netflix are now American women.
It's over, go home.

>>34096882
it didn't take a whole lot to be a general back then. Usually having lots of land or wealth guaranteed you the title.

I own land and a "house" at 26, and only have to work 3 days a week for Internet and rates.

26 kissless virgin here.

STOP REMINDING ME.

I could have been a man at arms or even a squire if I was in the medieval era.

>>34096350
gay

File: harrel-cc16.jpg (328KB, 691x496px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 691x496px

A complete fucking idiot with no actual real world experience or knowledge spewing trash logic that he thinks is right just because he came up with it. All while calling other people more knowledgeable and experienced than himself names while making a silly voice to try and make them sound stupid while himself credible. He doesn't even shoot his fancy expensive guns in the videos. Just stands in his garage with a shitty background talking about shit he knows nothing about..... Also clearing buckets. Look it up, dumbest shit I've ever seen. Ugly fat gay fuck. Look up Paul Harrel, actually been in some shootings and has good practical knowledge.

>>34096350
I came across him about 2 years ago, and his videos from around then, and earlier were fairly decent, so I subbed. Over at least the last year or so, his content went to shit. He no longer showed anything interesting, and all of his videos turned into clickbait and holier than thou ranting.

>>34092707
>>34092730
>what omosax is this.jpg

File: 20170527_132101.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

No poorfags allowed

full auto is a meme, a fun meme but a meme nonetheless

>>34091357
We should have the right, but it's worth mentioning the only thing it's good for is wasting ammo.

Get a slide fire and a hair trigger if you really need a way to inaccurately waste ammo.

>>34091357
Maybe you like wasting ammo or something. I can't really think of a good way to use full auto. Maybe it could scare off some critters? But then you'd best just shoot them on semi.

>>34084867

exactly as much as it would take to lift an equivalent weighted object with a non-axe pole.

No.

>>34084867
What is going on in that picture?

>>34084867
Yeah if your seven feet tall with muscles from the character the mountain from game of thrones then yeah as long as your doing that to someone who is five feet tall and skinny as an asian male.

Uh, fine? Approximately appropriate for a credible first strike posture.

Russia's is not automated, automated deterrence is an autistic meme. Conducting a nuclear war is not the thirty second countdown to Armageddon it is often implied to be, constant coordination, decision making and bargaining is required. Automating your deterrence is idiotic because when responding to a strong, successful and unanticipated first strike blindly retaliating is moronic. The enemy will trade every bomb you drop for five until you're forced to capitulate.

As for your tech question, improvements in fuzing on the US SLBM warheads has lead to a big increase in US counterforce capability compared to Russia who are still having major problems updating their ICBM / SLBM inventories.

http://thebulletin.org/how-us-nuclear-force-modernization-undermining-strategic-stability-burst-height-compensating-super10578

Improvements in warhead yield are politically pointless anyway, but guidance and fuzing improvements are a big deal. ICBMs historically have huge CEPs which limits their use as counter force assets and restricts SLBMs to counter value retaliation. However with the new fuzes and planned manouvering warheads the US can use them to attack military targets reliably while Russia can only realistically expect to hit CNC bunkers or reinforced Silos with air dropped or larger unitary ICBM warheads.

Effectively the US can realistically threaten to win the exchange, or will soon be able to, and in planning a response Russian decision makers would be faced with a choice of pointless revenge descending in to unfavourable tit for tat city trading or capitulation.

>>34078451

>Is it automated like Russia?

Russia's isn't, their missiles are probably require far more man hours to make launch-ready than ours too.

>>34078763
Oppenheimer, please just trip again. Yoi were the epitome of what a tripcode was for.

My opinion at least. Thanks for the info.

>>34100044
This site is 18+

>>34100044
installed a security camera
went to wal - mart
drove real fast
downed 3 beers before noon
ate a hearty BRUNCH!!!
mowed the lawn
finished a movie'
organized some work
did the dishes
cleaned the kitchen
drank some vodka
watching prison shoes

more to come

Trying to make new friends but everyone on k hates me.