>A 15-year-old boy celebrated a video game touchdown by whipping out a gun, waving it around and then fatally shooting a friend in the face.
>Police said the shooter and the victim, identified as 16-year-old Denzel Nash, were playing Madden NFL inside an apartment on Miller Ave. in East New York, Brooklyn, on Thursday night.
>be underaged american
>play some video games
Is noone going to say anything about the hair
It's one of their new nigger trends. I've seen this shit before where they'll shave just 1 curved line through it and literally dye a full side of it blonde. It reminds me of those crazy colored wigs you see at sporting events, except their actually dumb enough to do it full time.
>>A 15-year-old boy celebrated a video game touchdown by whipping out a gun, waving it around and then fatally shooting a friend in the face.
yeah right... the nigger just got pissed off that he lost and shot his friend in the face.
You believe this shit? ayy lmao
>A 15-year-old boy
>whipping out a gun
Feel the Freedom!
No i mean it looks like what pharohs wear, ya know? Them 2k old egyptian kiangz and shiet
They weren't lying
>yeah right... the nigger just got pissed off that he lost and shot his friend in the face.
>You believe this shit? ayy lmao
No, he celebrated winning by playing with his gun, and accidentally shot his mate.
Cant you read?
Just think of something random, I am sure some american has been shot over it.
>forget to pay at a store
Almost guaranteed to have happened.
He is just cosplayer
I've done that a few times. Walk in, get my stuff, talk to the lady there and leave. Minute later realize I havent paid, go back and pay.
If I ever visit it will be to look at nature, not go to Brooklyn.
>be Texan normie
Why do nigs get so riled up over movies and video games and shit? Always shouting at the screen going crazy as fuck...now whipping out guns when they score a touchdown in madden? baha fucks sake. Easily excitable bunch they are.
New Yorker here(upstate not Jew York City)
I know the god forsaken gun laws of my state very well, and the teen would be committing a very, very big crime by having that handgun at 15 in an area where they basically don't give permits for them to anyone except former police.
New York city has different gun laws from the rest of the state and usually doesn't pass any gun laws at a state level because they can just legislate in the city rather than being dicks to us. The exception of this comes in to when the corrupt dumb cunt governor of New York broke laws to push through a retarded restricting bill in the middle of the night that will take forever to get rid of.
No you can just go to Tyronius's good friend Joey the Gun Dealer and get one in 25 minutes. New York State had pretty good laws until Cuomo ruined that with a clearly illegal procedure to go under everyone's noses.
No some states are different. New York requires 18 for guns, 21 for handguns. The differences between the city and state laws are mainly concerning pointless restricting bullshit like mag limits.
Nobody is stupid enough to believe that this would happen if we enacted greater gun control. Unless you are an island country, you will be able to get a gun illegally and easily.
If you didnt have such a huge surplus of guns due to them being easily obtainable legally, the cost and risk of obtaining one illegally would be much higher.
It would be worthwhile for many, many less people than it is today.
Whatever, 4chan isnt the place to argue this, because the moment someone makes a good point he will just get insulted, quoted with a fedora picture or straw manned by the masses.
At the end of the day, if you still think that having free gun ownership is good, that probably means you dont want to be convinced otherwise and either ignore or discard arguments you've met on the way here.
No. You have to be 21 to purchase, but you can 18 years old to own one in many states.
So, if you are a 19 year-old, you could not go into a gun store, fill out a 4473, and walk away with a handgun. However, if your fudd grandpa wanted to give you a 1911 handgun for Christmas because he thinks Jeff Cooper was right about everything, you can possess that pistol.
Then why is there in the US no correlation between per-capita gun ownership and gun violence, even when you include things under that umbrella that you really ought not like suicides?
I am extremely pro-gun for a couple of reasons primarily due to the concept of being able to protect yourself from tyranny (historically countries like Hungary in 1956 weren't able to protect themselves from this because the total number of armed men wasn't enough.) as well as personal experiences.
Besides the tyranny aspect which I never use in most arguements because that just makes the opposing person go "Bro you don't trust the government its 2016 bro," the arguement for gun control is weak because it surprisingly doesn't work well at lowering actually overall deaths across all types of weapons. As an example, in Australia where they are weak cunts and actually managed to confiscate the people's guns, the overall murder rate didn't drop a single fucking bit. Criminals just got guns illegally or switched to stabbing people to death.
There are more arguements but I am tired and need to go somewhere
>At the end of the day, if you still think that having free gun ownership is good, that probably means you dont want to be convinced otherwise and either ignore or discard arguments you've met on the way here.
Keep your arguments, and we'll watch you getting raped and slaughtered from the safety of our country.
>It never stops being funny how retarded/ridiculous the USA is.
I would like to add that you don't need personal experiences to be pro-gun, most people don't and are still pro-gun (gun control is dead and will probably be removed in most states that have it)
Do you have a concept of self awareness? Because your shit country has way more violent crime per capita than even bulgaria. For all the whining about protetcshun americans do and laugh at europeans saying we'll get raped, the beautiful irony is that you are still more likely to get shot, beaten and raped than us.
>He doesn't know about Spain and how it's the norm to call black people niggers to their faces
The "statistics" you are quoting is niggers shooting each other (like OP story hello??)
For the whites in America, our murder rate is same as yours, very low, and I don't know anyone personally who has ever been murdered, or shot. (robbed yes, but unharmed)
WE DON'T GIVE A FUCK IF NIGGERS SHOOT EACH OTHER IT'S A SELF CORRECTING PROBLEM.
Go sob with your Eurobuddies about how much you care about niggers. Or just give them your country, oh yeah I forgot.
I am not him, but we are as as safe as you when you ignore black crime because they very rarely attack and kill anyone who isn't black. Overall the rate for the average non-gang member (so you can be a non-gang black) is around Canada's murder rate, as gang members rarely kill outside of other gangs in addition to race.
Can't you faggots see that if the other guy had been waving two guns around he would have accidentally shot his friend first and all this would have never happened?
More guns = Less gun-related violence.
The paper in question was not peer-reviewed, it didn't constitute a study, and it misrepresented separate research to draw shaky, unsupported conclusions.
It's a glorified blogpost.
Your evidence is a blog post that quotes other blog posts (badly) to make its point. It isnt peer reviewed, isnt well supported, and nobody pays attention to it other than americans that republish and copy-paste it everywhere.
No I was trying to say that statisitically, if you are not in a black gang you are just as likely to get shot as in Europe.
The little faggot in OP has it illegal for him to have that gun by the vast majority of everyone in the country. Nobody is arguing anything about the kid in OP besides the fact that he and is friend are stupid and it was illegal for them to have the gun in the first place.
You can't legislate away stupidity
>if you are not in a black gang you are just as likely to get shot as in Europe.
Now if you remove the "black gang" equivalent from the European side of the equation, you are back to being more likely to get shot in the USA.
>No I was trying to say that statisitically, if you are not in a black gang you are just as likely to get shot as in Europe.
Kek. Why are you Americanos always pretending like it's not mostly criminals that kill people in Europe as well? If you get to exclude black gangmembers, do we get to exclude North African gang members from the statistics as well? Because that would bring our murder rate down from 0.9/100k to like 0.5/100k or less.
Nigger you fail to comprehend the giant fallacy you are committing.
You have all of USA "getting shot" volume, and compare it to all of the Europe "getting shot" volume. USA's is much higher.
So you remove the biggest culprit from USA, and compare again. This time they are more or less equal. However you should've also removed the extreme cases from Europe's volume, to keep it fair.
Yes, there are ethnicities or places that are more likely to see you getting shot in Europe too. Remove them and we are back to USA being the king of getting shot.
Learn to argue.
Fair enough. However, cross referencing UCR violent crime data with gun ownership rates does not show strong correlations.
I have personally generated such a graph, and I am not the only person to have done so. I understand if you feel skeptical and arguing in bad faith, but I am not to the best of my ability.
Part of the information in these graphs is given to you by organization that dont want you to see a correlation. Illegal guns arent shown also. And different states have different rules on how gun crime is reported or handles to be presented in such statistics.
I'll stop arguing, I never should've started, people on 4chan are just unfit for such conversations. If you do want the truth, its not hard to find on your own.
I am not removing the biggest culprit. If you are in a black gang, you are as likely to get murdered as in an African country, if you are literally anywhere but that, and being in a gang is completely a choice, you are as likely to be shot in Europe. I am not removing it, I am simply trying to show that the statistic showed isn't the one that affects 99% of the population
Nobody is in damage control, nobody has definitively lost yet
99% of the population is more likely to get shot in USA than in EU. Both places have extremes. The American extremes are worse, and the American general case is worse.
Stop comparing America minus the extreme, to EU with its extreme still there.
That's not how the UCR works. It is collected to a single standard by the FBI, and non-uniform reporting does get thrown out.
>illegal guns aren't shown
Because the argument has always been about to what extent legal gun ownership should be restricted
You are implying I'm bantering,im stating a fact and your reply proves my statement.
Chill senpai is the internet.
If legal gun ownership creates a surplus of guns, and normalizes gun ownership, this makes it easier, cheaper, less risky and overall more convenient to illegally get a gun.
Getting a gun illegally in USA is easier than in UK, for example. So yes, it does matter. You bred a culture that normalizes gun ownership, and trivializes illegal gun purchases.
>you are as likely to be shot in Europe
But you´re not. Unless you´ve got some proofs to back your bold statement up?
>I am simply trying to show that the statistic showed isn't the one that affects 99% of the population
But aren't those statistics about 100% of the population?
>People non-ironically being against the right to bear arms
I'm not. I conceded on the study thing if you bother to read the post chain. This is a different line of argumentation regarding violent crime and gun ownership started with the post about UCR data.
You are more retarded than the gang members if you think Europe's extreme is as bad as the American gangs. I am not removing America's extreme because its the extreme. I am removing it because they do not attack normal people. The only people they kill are other gang members, as they surprisingly have brains large enough to realize that they will get fucked by police if they go out of their areas to attack anybody but other gangs. That is why I'm saying to take it out, because it simply does not apply to normal people. I'm sure you have gangs that do the same, but they do not commit mass murder on the scale of the American ones.
>Not being responsible for your own safety
>M-my society is p-perfect nobody commits c-crimes
Getting illegal guns in Europe isn't that hard m8, especially not if you're involved with criminals... Ironically, I think there are more full-auto AK pattern rifles and RPGs around on the streets of Europe than in the US.. T-thanks Yugoslavia...
>news report related
>8th of Februari, an 'Anti Tank grenade' (likely RPG) struck a trailer at a trailer park
>The owner/inhabitant is a known criminal, connected to a biker gang (the brother of a President)
>I am removing it because they do not attack normal people. The only people they kill are other gang members
Literally 75% of murders in Europe fall under that description too m8...
>pic of trailer (for some reason nobody bothered to took a decent pic showing the full extent of damage)
>Why would I go out of my way to identify with a dangerous culture that shares none of my values
Say what you will but these people have clearly integrated well.
That's just their nature, they are impulsive and get caught in the moment. It's why they get violent so easily too, it's just like some switch goes off in their head and they go berserk
If there's a group that is totally over represented in something, how is that not a legitimate point
>niggers are happy and carefree by nature
>they enjoy music and noisy games
>they have low work morale
>selfish and unreliable
>childish mentality and sudden outbursts of violence
Which part isn't true
The real question is, is it safer to pay him in cash or guns?