muslims of /int/, tell as about your childhood
were you abused like we see on the tv?
How was your father, did he sodomize you and your sister? Beat your mother maybe?
>you abused like we see on the tv
>How was your father, did he sodomize you and your sister
>Beat your mother maybe
Nah he was a good guy. He did not hit my sisters , my mother. He hit me once though but I deserved that ( crashed his car into a wall while I was 17 )
Only problem was that he used to come home drunk as fuck , he always tried to say something in drunkard languege and just pass out the second he stepped into house.
Meh , he was a good guy , may he find peace in the other world
>whenever a Moslem and/or turkroach replies to me
I'm calling you names because you're a dumbfuck hillbilly whose posting history demonstrates that you're not only a fascist, but have the IQ of a common squirrel.
You're also a Christian fundamentalist yourself, so I have trouble understanding why you're so against Islam when you believe in all of its basic principles. You're a right wing extremist, so is Islam. You believe in god, so does islam. You're a misogynistic anti-feminist, so is Islam, you believe in authoritarian government, so does islam, you believe in neoliberal capitalism, so does islam.
In fact, based on your posting history, I can't think of one possible political/religious position you have that distinguishes you from radical Islamism. I guess this is why you are so angry about it, as a Christofascist, you have identical belief to the Islamofascists, but you have a different religion so your only separation is to rely on bigoted rhetoric and racism.
Of course, as a high school drop out, you won't understand any of this. I mean, I'm writing comments at a 10th grade level here, that's the year you dropped out, so I can understand why you have such problems with basic reading comprehension, you know, seeing as how you are a functionally illiterate uneducated hillbilly slob.
>were you abused like we see on the tv
>How was your father, did he sodomize you and your sister
>Beat ye mum
Sometimes,very rarely, and he had the decency to do it when no one was around i guess :/
isn't greeks muslims and turks just in deniel ?
You think it's ok to stone death women that were raped?
Judging by your comments, i'm going to say that no. This makes you an apostate, since your holy book says that you HAVE to accept this, otherwise, you will be disrespecting your own god.
why do muslims go (seemingly) out of their way to be unnecessarily backward about everything?
its like you guys have the potential to be better than you are (you had the great islamic golden age and the ottoman empire ... as opposed to niggers who are just a lost cause no matter how much you try to help/influence them) but you cling to your astoundingly horrendous religious and cultural traditions that, while not the whole cause of your issues, is without a significant aspect of why you can't seem to get it together
Varoufakis what are doing in germany ?
The Holy Book does not require me to stone a woman in case of adultery , neither support it. The stoning is not a thing a muslim as I am would do , it's a cultural thing that was practiced by Bedouins.
>w-we discovered things, Anon!
>lol no, we just stole it from the Indians, Persians, and Greeks, then claimed we did it
>oh we also burnt 90% of knowledge books for being against Islam
>what is abrogation
You don't even know your dualistic political-religious system known as Islam.
>he actually believe this
not ALL of them were copied
we only translated them
I wish I had the rime to post genuine Islamic studies
but it's 2 AM and I have to get up early
I will respect your religion once your fellow muslims stop beheading people for their religions and cultures.
>Not all muslims
I don't care. Christianity was shit before it was neutered, do the same to your religion and people won't hate you.
"Not all Moslems" is just No-True Scotsman fallacy. And the Crusades were justified, they started as being a defensive move against Moslem invasion and jihad. And the Inquisition was not as bad as people claim it was. Only Islam has been the same bullshit for the past 1400 years.
its 11pm on a friday. I've had about 8 cans of cider. do you honestly expect me to read all that?
anyway, my point was that, even if the 'golden age' was wildly embellished (as ALL great intellectually/scientifically progressive periods in history are) their shitty religion/culture is why they're now so vastly derided as subhuman camel-jockeys today, and even the fucking cannibal tribes of the Papau New Guinea rainforests are seen as more advanced than them
Uzun zamandır buradaydım.
Sadece İslam'a olan ilgim son zamanlarda arttı.
>what is abrogation
The term is called " tafsir " in Islamic Philosophy. It centers around the some provisions that had a lack of understandabilty in the Holy Book or the Sünnet. Several philosophers have their own tafsirs and statements about those uncertain provisions , leading to clash of ideas within the Islamic community.
Still the stoning of women that has commited adultery was a thing long before the Islam ( I'm not legimatizing it by saying so , I also think it is wrong ). What you have just brought up just adds another to my point.
Maybe a tiny minority maybe a big community of people from a certain culture. Generelasing total of 1.5 billion people because of the acts of some others that belong to a certain culture is not very smart I mind you
I know that there's muslims that doesn't believe this kind of shit. But you are aware that your country has the most "moderate" muslims in the world right? It's easier to find people with some decency
You might want watch this. It's a bit long.
Moderate Moslems don't exist, they only appear to be peaceful because their presence is not significant enough to start attacking the kufar and practicing jihad in foreign lands.
I'd assume Catholicism because it is organized behind an obvious head and is easier to attack that way. Either that or they just see all different denominations simply as "Christianity."
two Fs, kuffar
>Either that or they just see all different denominations simply as "Christianity.
basically this. but culturally and theologically, orthodox christianity is closer to Islam than other sects (today) so people might consider them closer to themselves
cümlelerin anlamsız cringeanon, neden diretiyorsun? ingilizce yaz işte :D
Declaring someone a "radical muslim" on their comments as " in some sitiations " is not really convinient to be honest. Also the supporting living in Sharia does not make you an extremist ( I'm not supporting it , I live in a country where all religions are tolarated as it should be ), the Sharia is not about jihading or killing innocent ( the term may differ under some occasions , the judging is really poor in Sharia ruled countries). It's about the way that people of certain cultures live.
As the Portoguese friend stated , tafsir is an important factor in the way to state the individuals beliefs and ideologies.
As we are in a century of bloodshed and war , many of the countries that the man in the video stated were the ones that took the painfull baiting of this century. This does not justify the suicide bombing incidents but it does bring a question into mind that if the one is willing to sacrifice (!) himself for the people of his ideas as using the method to get rid of great number of threats with low number of the innocent death.
All those important matters and the question " What is radical islam and how many muslims are actually radical muslims ? " is not one that can be answered in a 6 minute video. I expected a greater effort but still I am glad to hear one's voice to state the opposite. Thank you.
First of all , what is "moderate muslims " ? Is it not prejudice to blame the one that is moderate as if he was a snake to bite his victim in his weakest time ?
That's a solid answer. Thanks for sharing your vision on the matter.
For the record, i also think that overgeneralized his video calling everyone "radical". Fundamentalist would be more appropriate and "friendly" word, to say so, even if most of these people are not.
But now my question is: Can people that holds at least one extreme view of Qu'ran live in peace for generations with a way different culture?
It depends on what you consider the " extreme view ". As if one is humble of his religion and respecting the others , there is no reason that they could not.
But if the " extreme view " is the way of intolerance and proudness , it would surely lead to clashes among the two that has different belief and customs.
One must choose the way to love the human being , for he is created by the God that the Muslim believes in his heart.
>that must be why kneeling and touching your forehead to the ground in orthodox church feels so wrong.
tbqh i came here for the memes but now feel sorry for the domestic abuse my kmsu suffers.
Nope. We have two rules because the Quran says let unbelievers that are at peace with you live their lives peacefully. Shariaa laws are more strict to Muslims. The Jizya you often hear about is basically tax in lieu of serving in the army for non muslims since serving in the army was compulsory for Muslims. Those non muslims who served in the army like during the Syrian conquests did not have to pay it. I won't pretend current Islamic govs are perfect. For example, the prophet forbade spying into people's houses, hence Internet spying ala NSA is haram. That stoning law? For it to happen, the accuser must bring with him FOUR witnessess of uncontested faith and piety. If he cannot, HE will be punished by 80 lashes and his testimony will forever be rejected in any future court proceedings whatsoever. Historically, there were very few stonings during the Prophets time and even the four Caliphs. The shit you see now in ISIS, Saudi etc are due to the Arabs reverting to their Jahilliyah state.