>>54816739 /Int/ made me really self aware of my origins and I identify as finnic person conpletely detached of these germanic, slavic and other european "whites". I dont feel any solidarity towards these people and all the cuckolding threads make happy seeing some german american being hammered by a nigger. I look forward to the destroyal of "whites".
>>54816739 Personally it has made me despise racists even more. Until I came here, I thought racism is kinda just gut reaction to either an unknown quality or a bad experience with members of certain minority (like gypsies) tainting one's perception of the whole group. Maybe influencing rather than tainting, since some groups seem to really have culture that is supportive of such bad experiences. At any rate, since coming to /int/ I have learned that at least some racists are honest to God delusional violent hicks that are unironically convinced of their inherent superiority based on achievement of other people.
>>54817178 /int/ is the only place that spams cuck porn and refugee shit constantly. How does this make you people less racist? It's not delusional to acknowledge that whites are the only good people in the world and ever have been, it's delusional to think otherwise.
As a Californian, just being different made me racist. Since elementary school, Mexicans have made up about 90% of EVERY SINGLE FUCKING CLASS I'VE EVER BEEN TO HOLY SHIT I'm a college sophomore currently, and even now there are probably only about 5 whites in a class, total. That includes the groups /int/ calls ">white" like turks and shit too. Just feel completely alienated sometimes you know? It's like I'm the fucking immigrant.
>>54817178 >at least some racists Well, at least you're not a hypocrite. I grew up in the Greater Toronto Area, the most "diverse" place on earth. And it turns out, blacks *tend* to be retarded, arabs *tend* to marry their cousins, indians *tend* to smell bad and chinese *tend* to respect education. And at 30+ years of age I'm tired of *diversity.*
Other way around desu, I kind of appreciate Arabs, Turks, Brazilians, and other 3rd worlders a bit more because their posters here are genuinely great people. [Yes, I know of the English barrier fallacy, but still]
Actually I think much less of westerners now. Brits, Irish, Swedes, Poles, Canadians, Swiss, etc are all pathetic fucking people on /int/, can't say it doesn't affect my opinion of these countries a bit.
Props to the Germans and Americans for being such prominent posters on /int/ but still being cool.
>>54817306 I don't post infographics, but if you're calling anyone here pathetic let's remember we're on 4chan. I doubt you come here to learn about culture. I just hate non-white people and they vindicate me every step of the way.
This is also another reason why I hate non-whites. They all think like this, so why bother liking them or trying to get to know them as individuals? I make an effort now to make all of your days shittier when I can.
>>54817547 Most of us are. If you take a look at statistics about test scores, income, and crime rates, whites excel phenomenally over all other races, tied with Koreans. Hispanics and Blacks left in the dust of course. I don't know what it is with "progressives" and not being able to look at cold, hard facts that show that whites are aesthetically, statistically, and virtually more pleasant people to be around. There's a few exceptions with trailer park trash and whatnot but they're about 5% of us.
Yes it does. White people are the only actual individuals. A lot of them are condemning my racism in this thread. ALL non-whites have a chip on their shoulder against whites and want to see us beaten down because they are one giant group think collective of human garbage. It's blatantly obvious.
>>54817633 >White people can leave anytime they want. >Africa for Africans >Asia for Asians >America for Mexicans and Dindus >Europe for everybody Leave where? Europe is being flooded with apefricans and mudslimes.
>>54817680 Exactly, non-whites want to be around us so bad because we're the truly only altruistic race and they abuse this. They want to destroy white people because whites are individuals and better people.
>>54817680 Europe is your homeland no matter who lives there. White people were created there. I don't give a shit that Swedes and Germans are inviting a bunch of middle easterners there. Not my problem, it's yours.
>>54817687 You obviously don't like it here. I just don't get why so many white racists online get mad about non-whites and "threaten" them that they'll leave and yet never do it.
>>54817736 Exactly. If it wasn't for us they'd still be at their own throats all day every day. They should be happy we brought European ideals like democracy there in the first place instead of bitching about us not being grateful for having them. It's like being invited into someone's house, acting like a retard, and complaining when you get kicked out.
>>54817758 >You obviously don't like it here. I just don't get why so many white racists online get mad about non-whites and "threaten" them that they'll leave and yet never do it.
I like it here fine, I don't like the non-white hordes that have followed us here because they liked the idea of civilization than turned it into dog shit only to spite us for it. There is nowhere to move where non-whites won't follow.
>Same thing that was done to non-whites.
Witch is a cop out because you're using historical context to want to destroy us or see us brought down. This is why I hate you and I don't think other races will ever be compatible to ever live together. You're like leeches. When whites are no longer the top dog in the world, everything will go to shit.
>>54817820 >I like it here fine, I don't like the non-white hordes that have followed us here because they liked the idea of civilization than turned it into dog shit only to spite us for it. There is nowhere to move where non-whites won't follow. OK? I don't care. Do whatever you want them. I don't even live in Canada lol.
Historical context is bad because....... ???? >inb4 whitesplaining
>>54817860 >OK? I don't care. Do whatever you want them. I don't even live in Canada lol.
Okay. I still advocate for total segregation.
>Historical context is bad because....... ????
Because you hate us for it and you only go back as far is comfortable. Do white people in Easter Europe move en masse to a host country like Mongolian and want to see their destruction simply because of past genocides and atrocities? Do people in the Balkans move to Turkey en mass and become ungrateful bottomfeeders and despise the Turks because of the Ottomons? No. Also because those countries are shit because they aren't full of white people.That's why you're ungrateful jhuman garbage.
>>54818140 >you're comparing ethnicities to races.
But Scandinavians are put into the umbrella of white people correct? Whites are your grievance and I'm sure you count Scandinavians who have no history of imperialism into non-white countries still under the group of despised white people. Eastern Europeans and people in the Balkans are white whereas Turks and Mongolians are non-whites. Arrange it into whites and non-whites if it makes more sense to you. It's still historical context of imperialism and the point is still completely valid.
>>54818374 So white people who move into brown or Asian countries should hate them for historical context while willingly moving to a brown or Asian majority country and they should seek to undermined and want to destroy them? Is this what you're saying?
>>54818470 When brown and Asian people tried their hand at imperialism and targeted white European countries, like the Ottomans and the mongols? What about the North African or moor conquests of Spain and Italy? Is that enough historical context to hate them? I thought that counted?
>>54818509 Turks are brown people in reality not multiracial, people in Anatolia have been brown since the Arab conquests. They aren't an amalgamation with nomadic asian tribes bullshit meme, they are brown people who have some white balkan/greek slave genes when they took many women as harems during the ottoman Empire. You're still ignoring my point.
>>54818547 Those weren't based on race like European colonization. The comparison is not the same. For the Muslims, it was based on race. I think you are sort of right on the case of the Mongols but I don't know much of their history. I don't think they specifically target Europeans because of their supposed inferiority like Europeans targeted many races.
>>54818625 Anatolians aren't that different from Greek people and Turks aren't homogenous people. They are multiracial if you consider west asians and asians as non-white
>>54818705 >Those weren't based on race like European colonization.
It never was for Europeans. It was simply for profit, not because they looked differently. First and foremost empires wanted to be successful. In fact, they looked at many places colonized as investments. The comparison is the same. In either case, Imperialism is only bad when white people did it though because it was more recent and they were better at it? The north African Muslims accounts of hatred for the blonde Vandals who occupied Pre-muslim Spain was blatantly known. I have a book I can find on here from the oldest latin document recording it. Do I have just cause now to hate every single brown person, no matter if they come from North Africa or the middle east? If I move there should I think I'm above them because of historical grievousness? Just own up to hating white people and this idea of "punching up" is because you feel inferior.
>>54816739 No but it has made me more patriotic I think.
After months of learning stuff I didn't know about France, be it history, geography, arts, the language or whatever in order to hold my ground better when '''''''debating"'"" on /int/, I've come to be even more interested in my country
I figured out the whole racism thing when I realized the only guys bullying people in school were Arabs (and gypsies). People kept trying to tell me "don't blame them they're like this because they were raised in a poor neighborhood" even though it's was a fucking village and the local Arabs had more money than pretty much everyone thanks to their traffic So one day I just though fuck that, I'm racist. Not racist like I won't answer to a black mother greeting me in the street, but racist enough to not fall on the cuck side
>>54818876 That's simply untrue. Europeans needed to see other people as inferior to justify their actions. The whole reason slavery was okay at that time was because Africans were not human according to Europeans.
It is absolutely true. Slavery was for profit. That's the whole fucking reason it exists. They absolutely did see them as non-human beings the same way the bantu saw other Africans as non-humans while auctioning them off to the slave galleys. To sell someone as a slave you kind of have to see them as inferior and to convince a population of that.
Also here, they even hate the Black Moroccans appearance and justify their barbarism towards them.
>>54819137 That profit was spread to other Europeans, not other races and Europeans made up racist crap to justify slavery.. Again, you equate ethnic-ethnic discrimination to race-ethnic discrimination and again I remind you that it is not comparable.
Your example says nothing of black moroccans unless you think berbers are black (they're not).
>>54819466 >Ethinicity: the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition. >Race: A race is a group of people thought to share certain distinctive physical characteristics, such as facial structure or skin color. Racial characteristics are thought to be biologically inherited (unlike ethnic characteristics, which are cultural)
Okay. Europeans are an amalgamation of ethnicities. The Brits taking slaves and making profit to the Spanish who wanted them wasn't a racial thing, it was a business for people who wanted slaves. Some slaves they thought due to racial sciences of the day were better for Manual labour. Literally every civilization that has practices slavery has done this. The Romans thought the Gauls were stronger and could last longer in mines and stone quarries. The Arabs thought the Greeks more intelligent etc.
>Again, you equate ethnic-ethnic discrimination to race-ethnic discrimination and again I remind you that it is not comparable.
These are completely comparable when you compare to ethnicities of Europe who are of the white Race that never engaged in any form of imperalism but you still blame them for White imperialism. If you're disregarding ethnicities, you can't blame someone from a polish background and use the umbrella "European imperialism". If I can't do that with north africans, Turks, or middle easterners and just call them Brown, you can't use blanket statements as just "Whites".
Also, you have to keep reading. It's in the book sent, not the wikipedia post.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.