I'm wasting half the nuke but I genuinely believe this is the best answer. It covers West Africa and the core of the Mideast, so the two most problematic places in the world are gone.
I intentionally left Oman out. Oman's the only sane Mideastern country.
Besides that, there's just Abha, Jizan and western Yemen. They don't pose any harm as long as the kaaba is destroyed, and they can't get to Europe.
Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia are far better than West Africa.
I don't see how leaving West Africa out would be 10/10 lad
You fuckers don't understand how does perspective work.
it still makes sense if you adopt Italian right wingers' point of view: the Western world is all plagued by political correctness, Italy is backward but left wingers are changing it, so Russia is seen as the strongest fortress of conservatism and Putin as a model of politician
Lmao at all these niggers wanting to nuke the middle east and forget where most sand niggers are.
this is as close to what i wanted as I could get without altering the nuke
indians are destroying the planet with their polution and imigrating to everywhere
africans arent doing anything, they are starving and full of diseases, india have fucking 1/6 pop of the planet
That's true but India are having 2 children on average.
Sure that's way too much considering how large their population is but Nigerians are having 6.
I feel more of a hatred for those individual people than Indians.
If there was a button that got rid of all Indians I'd press it but Africa (as a group) is worse.
>thais deserve to die
I've seen a lot of Thais emigrating to Scandinavia as of late (quite randomly).
I've only met a few but they've all seemed rather nice.
Why don't you like them?
so nuke just nigeria lol. africans are living on their tribes hunting with spears while indians are doing this