>>53907365 Maybe. It have already done that in 2014, the prime minister ever promised an re-election... But the government did an agreement with M/KD/FP/C so it didn't happened. But that agreement fell last year.
>>53907522 There's a difference between having a centre-left and centre-right party and literally having a centrist party. On what ideology do you even base your decisions on? In our two large parties, the members range from centre right to far right in the liberals, and from centre left to extreme left in Labor. But I can't imagine how individual members of a centre party can vary.
SD better be all about sending them back to their countries of origin instead of trying to get the nordics to "share the load". Im fucking sick and tired of getting freeloaders from Sweden, I mean fuck, we never expected having problems with our western borders, the real threat was supposed to be in the east.
Only during certain debates, since nothing is really decided there. More serious debates has more attendance of course... not even sure what this one was actually about, probably some specific budget issue. SD does this though, they bring the heat about immigration at every turn since all things are affected by these insane policies.
In theory, but the liberals and socialists will never agree enough to do so. They may want to, but they can't, and they would loose all support for the next election even if they did somehow manage it. If SD becomes the biggest party, they get "first dibs" as it were on forming a government, they will then need to negotiate to get their cabinet approved. If they managed to achieve majority it wouldn't be an issue, obviously, but even if it's going well now I doubt they'd manage it by the 2018 election.
This of course means that they need to become larger than the largest coalition though.
>We took in 100k bosnians in the 90's and the media focus did indeed end and we did indeed deal with it beautifully
Yes, and now we're taking that in EVERY YEAR, and they're not Bosnians. Bosnians are European, most of them secular, the integration issue is nowhere near as bad as it is with the mudshits. Take your head out of that sandpit you call your ass and accept reality.
>>53908693 Yes it would. S and M are not that different and could work together if the situation was dire enough.
>>53908809 Never say never. If they're forced to, they will eventually do it, because working with SD is not an option. That'd be even worse and they'd lose so much face if they did that. Stubbornly refusing for so many years and then giving up all integrity and dignity just to gain power? They'd have a huge rebellion in their ranks. Their reputation would be destroyed.
Just as it will be if they form a cross-block government. That's the beauty of this situation, they're fucked no matter what. The only thing that will happen if SD does not form a government in 2018 is that it becomes all but guaranteed for 2022.
Of course, the sooner the better, parliament is doing severe damage every day they remain in power, we can ill afford another 4 years with them.
>>53908603 Looks like the cucknoids are in some rough shit. At any rate, SD getting in the parliment and even having a "winning minority" (against all others who'd be willing to blanda up to not let them run the country) is not exactly equal with Sweden going NO.
>>53908627 I know they kept the FN out. What I don't know is if FN was able to capitalise on it, like Swedes imply SD did.
>How much does handing out citizenships like candy require?
That is handled by the judiciary, government are not allowed to influence or interfere with the judiciary and regulations on this are very strict and closely monitored. They would first need to change that rule in that case, for how to do that, refer to my previous post.
You really don't want to face the reality of an unkucked Sweden so you'd have to give up your main play for your pathetic inferiority complex, it seems.
>>53908984 If SD doesn't get to rule in 2018, there will be civil war. imagine this summer with the same amount of refugees but more. I don't even think we can hold out until 2018 actually if this continues.
>>53907272 >Just imagine it, every party not SD in government. I'm pretty sure we will get stuff like this too. the same way where the French socialists decided to not race...because of FN... They rig the system to prevent democracy.
The Swede is resilient, as evidenced by the fact that the country is doing great still, in pure numbers despite all the bullshit. We're basically the equivalent of a college kid who gets preggers and has 12 kids, and everyone is like "surely this person has fucked their future, no way they can finish school and get a high paying career" but then we go ahead and do it anyway. That doesn't change the fact that it would have been even better without this uncesseary hurdle.
And yes, I compared Sweden to a college octomum slut, I can do that without being a kuck because I'm a grill etc (don't hit on me silly boys)
>>53909043 >You really don't want to face the reality of an unkucked Sweden so you'd have to give up your main play for your pathetic inferiority complex, it seems. Can't I be pessimistic without an inferiority complex? Our new government is probs more cucked than your's.
They kicked out everybody with balls in the party and now they're trying their hardest to become accepted. They're basically the same as M now when they have moved right on the immigration question. The group leader of SD in the parlament is busy participating on svt shows where he lived with a Somali girl so they could learn to understand each other than actually talking about the refugee crisis.
I can see them getting into the government somewhere around 2022 or maybe even 2018 as a coaliation and nothing happens, then their support goes down but they're happy since they were allowed to become a normal party.
>>53909036 >I know they kept the FN out. What I don't know is if FN was able to capitalise on it, like Swedes imply SD did.
No mater what. the most important thing once we have more reasonable Governments is to not return into looking for enemy nations in Europe. The political right in Europe has to stand together undiveded. Other than that the united left will break one government for an other.
>>53908984 >Just as it will be if they form a cross-block government. It's nowhere near as bad, at least they'd be taking responsibility to make sure the country remains stable. You see this right? If they work with SD they'd lose all credibility. That's much much worse
>That's the beauty of this situation, they're fucked no matter what. Only true if SD gets massive tho
>The only thing that will happen if SD does not form a government in 2018 is that it becomes all but guaranteed for 2022. Eh no. Unless they get a majority, which will never happen, it's not possible.
>>53909085 >If SD doesn't get to rule in 2018, there will be civil war. Sensible Lel
>imagine this summer with the same amount of refugees but more. Won't happen, we're already full, we can't take that much more refugees. Just yesterday there was a news item about Austria turning back refugees that said they want to go to Sweden.
>Won't happen, we're already full, we can't take that much more refugees. Just yesterday there was a news item about Austria turning back refugees that said they want to go to Sweden.
This. Once they realize the free ride is full and coming here won't be any better than staying in the camps close to home (even worse 2bh, since our tent camps are in the fucking tundra) they'll stop coming. The word is already spreading and the numbers are falling.
>>53909190 >no, the 90s was a very dire time for Sweden and that's the reason our economy is so stable now You are talking financial terms. Back then there was better infra per capita, better resource availability and, I think, more industry.
>>53909296 >>53909369 "We are full" won't stop them, stop being a gullible swede. There are plenty of interviews with "refugees" who say that it doesn't matter if it's full, they are coming anyway. You guys don't understand the arab mentality.
>>53909285 Why are you so hell-bent on painting us an enemy, Germany? Other than that, isn't it what the "unity in diversity" catch phrase (should) really mean?
>>53909393 Having an enemy (or adversary as it implies a less hostile relationship) is not exactly exclusive or even that bad. Being compared to someone makes you (or your whole nation/society) strive for improvement. Or whatever. Also, commies/libshits/cultural marxists tend to find (or more accurately: create) enemies within - "cis white man" for example.
>>53909857 Yeah. Like I don't read/watch her shit because give zero fucks about gaming """"""""""""""journalism"""""""""""""" but I'm a fan of anita just because A) she is the the fucking undisputed grand master at making /r9k/ redpill types rage, and B) she's qt as fuck.
>>53910241 What would Germany gain in waging a war against Poland? They already pretty much own most of our industry, going full Prussian Nobles would not exactly benefit them, no? Some, minor, border clashes between poorer sides in the South - a big maybe, but even though it feels like too much of a stretch to me.
But hey, Germany taking their chance with partitioning Poland together with some one special alongside...
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.