Do you believe that theory that warm climate creates dumb and lazy people?
Absolutely yes, without doubt
During Summer in Australia you can easily notice a direct shift in people's mentality, crime rates rise and it's much harder to think straight and get work done
It was a known phenomenon for Englishman to return home from Africa completely mad in the old days
t. diaspora in warm climate
But also this.
Warm climate basically means you have an abundance of food and water, so people in warmer climates tend to be more outgoing and less reserved. They're also lazier.
Look at your own people (or yourself) and you will see this is not truth
A lot of this has to do with being unable to sleep properly because it is too hot
I can think just fine in an air conditioned office but I'm constantly tired in summer because I can't sleep
There are cultures that value education and achievements more and they create societies with more art, literature and science ie europe
If your theory was true Russia would be one enormous Nordic country filled with prosperity and hard working people
It's more or less true.
In Europe we have to deal with seasons and the rude winter where it is very cold and aren't many food. So we had to invent stuffs to shelter us, stock the food and foresee the future. So there was a natural selection of the most intelligent men.
Niggers have everything in Africa so they needn't to invent stuffs and live one day at a time.
>Poor punctuality is such a brake on Ivory Coast's economic development that the West African country has come up with a novel way to combat tardiness: win a house if you demonstrate you can turn up on time.
Backed by President Laurent Gbagbo and devised by a local public relations firm, "Punctuality Night" kicked off at eight o'clock sharp Saturday night, rewarding business people and civil servants for exceptional timekeeping.
Pitched with the slogan "'African time' is killing Africa, let's fight it," its organizers hope to heighten awareness of how missed appointments, meetings or even late buses cut productivity in a region where languid tardiness is the norm.
Legal adviser Narcisse Aka, winner of what the organizers hope will be an annual event, is so unusually good at being punctual that his colleagues call him "Mr White Man's Time."
All the ancient civilisations, e.g. Egypt, Sumer, Hittites, Greece, Carthage + Phoenicia & India were all in relatively warm climates, some of which were exceptionally hot, and some of which were tropical.
not necessarily warm climate, but climate where basic needs are available in abundance like africa, mediterranean, is not conducive to economic or scientific growth because no one cares about innovating or improving things
Not a chance.
In the US there's long been a belief that (comparing just Whites) Southerners are a more relaxed, less-rulebound people than the Yankees. This comes from the stereotype of the languid Southern gentleman who spends his days sipping bourbon compared with the uptight, hardworking Puritan townsman.
Not sure if this is born out by modern statistics but I wouldn't be surprised given the corruption and slow pace of social change in the South. We seem to simply move slower in all ways. That and the extra niggers.
Southern Chinese are known for their hardworking, especially the Teochew. Warm climate is tough on people. You get tired a lot faster, even sitting doing nothing you will still feel exhausted. After a hard work day you can't do anything but rest. Intelligent people stayed away from warm climate because of diseases and the heat makes it difficult to concentrate. That's why air-con is the greatest invention of human.
Hot humid weather makes people feel tired and sloopy.Imagine getting sweat from just walking a few hundred metres to class in the afternoon.
I'm jealous that temprate climate people who can walk all day and not sweat a shit.
good point. the suns lights and the environments that have high temperatures make people lazy and stupid of course. although it doesnt mean that its a bad place to live in. id rather live in such a place in south countries unless theres a problem of water crisis.
Civilization requires two things:
1. Competent people with relatively high average IQ (hence the alleles responsible for it since IQ is 70-80% genetic)
2. High and dense population
>1. Competent people with relatively high average IQ (hence the alleles responsible for it since IQ is 70-80% genetic)
You're literaly retarded
you only need leaders with high IQ the general population is not a necessity
Hot weather also boosts sex drive so we breed like fucking rabbits and molest anything that resembles a woman. It's fucking awful and no one is doing anything about it.
IQ test made by persons from different cultures are incapable to test intellegence of people from other cultures.
For example there is one 100%metallic thing in india that modern scientists cant explain how it was made
For example some people may see kosher tradition very odd though it has logics in it
IIRC their civilisation centres were rather North near Pakistan, where they get lots of droughts
There are IQ tests where 'culture' has no (or at least very close to no) influence. Also the Iron pillar of Delhi (I assume that's what you're referring to) is perfectly explainable.
Nah m8, these are excuses. They still could go nomad mode.
Btw, thse tropical areas have a lot of fucking dangerous animals. Why could not niggers into creating good houses and defences? This is not very comfortable to live without it.
I think it's partially bullshit, and only because recently the northern niggers are doing way better.
Look at the map in 1 AD.
All the kingdoms are in the south, while the north was known for semi-savages living in tribes and forests raiding and looting the civilised folk.
In fact, to show how ironic history is, later, some theologian said that the good lands and civilisation in the south was preordained by God to be given to good, southern christian folk, while the heathens were stuck with shitty land and crappy standards of living without civilisation.
Mud huts are simply enough if it never drops below 20 and there are no sandstorms (or storms in general which can't reach into dense jungle)
Dangerous animals can be kept at bay with a little campfire and simple weapons
I think earlier on, dry conditions were easier to overcome (invent irrigation and stockpiling) and you could harvest a lot more per area than further north, allowing for higher population densities, less time of the day wasted on the fields, both easing the formation of cities, non-farming jobs and time to develop/exchange mathematical, engineering, administrative and other advancements more easily
Cold is harder to overcome, takes much longer to selectively breed better crops, but eventually that and better farming methods, fertilisation etc happened
Wasn't it warmer in Roman times, cool around 500, and then again warm in the High Middle Ages? (After that there was the Little Ice Age 1400-1700ish)
Also maybe such descriptions were relative and in comparison to Bulgaria, Greece or whatever
Culturally, speaking yes, genetically speaking, no.
The only way you can explain the difference between Ireland's and Greece's GDP per capita is due to cultural reasons and geopolitical accidents, since Greece's average seems to be 99.6 and Ireland's 99.5 relative to a US white mean. With things like height we again see this narrow distribution of traits.
Yet we have countries with 2 - 3 times the GDP per capita when genetic factors vary at most to 1.08 times the lowest result between europeans, which apart from phenotype seem to be very genetically close to each other.
So in the end, yes, I think a warm climate creates a lesser people by creating a lesser culture.