>Queen Rania of Jordan has published a riposte to a controversial Charlie Hebdo cartoon linking the drowned Syrian child Alan Kurdi with migrants accused of sex attacks in Germany.
>The French satirical magazine's cartoon shows a man chasing a woman and says Alan would have grown up into a "groper in Germany".
>It was widely accused of racism.
>But Queen Rania posted a cartoon by Jordanian cartoonist Osama Hajjaj on social media showing Alan as a doctor.
>Queen Rania responds to the Charlie Hebdo cartoonImage copyrightQueen Rania/Twitter
"Alan could've been a doctor, a teacher, a loving parent," she wrote.
Is Charlie Hebdo getting gud?
Foreigners should know that Charlie Hebdo DOES NOT represent freedom of speech in France. It's the worst centre-left pro-government bitches.
Philippe Val (don't mistake for PM Manuel Valls) was the editor in chief. One cartoonist draw a cartoon making fun of the Jews. Val fired him. Sarkozy was so pleased with this that he rewarded Val by naming him head of the biggest public radio France Inter (an equivalent of NPR)
So there's actually nothing courageous about CH, they're actually the biggest opportunists you can think of.
With this new drawing, I wonder if they're getting gud, or if they keep on waging a sort of anti-muslim vendetta.
Nobody outside of France cared about that newspaper before they got killed, now the whole world will go muh feelings at their cartoons, most of the time because they don't even get the point
>before the refugee wave
>the socialists and pro-refugee lobby stated that 70-80% of the refugees were highly skilled engineers and doctors
>the refugees start moving in
>turns out they are all illiterate rapists
""""queen"""" Raina sure showed us.
fug, girl I used to be friends with getting quoted by the BBC...
tfw weird feeling
Obviously, you are born in a first world country with wealth passed down to you from your first world parents so if you fuck up its your fault. Meanwhile they come from a shithole with nothing. Who needs more help?
How much more money is Charlie Hebdo making now compared to before the attack?
CH just shows us what the european normies now sees the arabic men as : a buch of filthy monkey like rapists.
It's fair and square, they have a REAL rape culture, and now they're looked down and avoided.
They deserve it.
I don't really get this, aren't they mocking the reaction of the public/media to the attacks and if anything showing support to the refugees? People seem to forget Charlie Hebdo are Marxist liberals.
>Does the French center-left usually bait muzzies
No, not really.
ofc the center-left PS party (ruling now) is after the arab and black votes.
But there's a difference between making fun of the arabs, and making fun of religion (mohammed).
All I'm saying is that Charlie Hebdo
- are very old people
- are not widely read : nobody reads this
- are not courageous or shocking : very close ties both with left governments and right-wing governments (Val appointed by Sarkozy)
- are friends with the political/journalistic high intelligentsia
They have ansolutely no ties with anti-immigration movements, like the FN. They're the exact opposite of this.
Their only agenda is being anti-religion (anti-muslim, anti-catholic (they don't say nothing about Jews because they have no balls))
>each generations parents try to enable their children a better life and work hard for it
>it results in modern countries with social security and adequate wealth for most
>"hurr you are privileged, gibmedats!"
Fuck off, savage.
They are pretty courageous if you ask me.
Even after half their staff got murdered, they still continue to trigger the entire world, meanwhile the rest of Western media doesn't even have the balls to talk about Muslim immgration and it's consequences at all.
maybe, but they used to be of all creeds.
then some people like Cavanna (among the founders) were pushed out. He was a true anarchist, not good with money.
I kind of discovered him through the famous french TV interview of Charles Bukowski in classic literary program "Apostrophes", where the host Pivot had made an evening about "marginaux" (people on the margins, like Buk and Cavanna)
University is also free in Brasil, however it is sustained by taxes.
I'm assuming is the same in France from what you are saying, my first point is probably what the other french guy was implying. Nothing is really free in capitalist country
>I deserve that privilege
>because my parents worked for it
>my parents worked
No Pierre, you do not deserve what others have worked for, unless you accept that others also deserve access to the privileges that others have worked for, afterall, isn't that what society is? You can't have your cake and eat it too, if you want to deny people state assistance then perhaps we should instigate a 100% inheritance tax as that would only be fair, no?
Parent's aren't "others", pajeet. The point of our society is to better the lives of our children. OURS, not some mudslime who drowned his kids because he wanted better dental healthcare.
You don't deserve shit for swimming across the mediterranean to my country. MY people worked for MY well-being, just liked I will work for my and my compatriots childrens.
Accepting all those refugees and giving them the same rights and benefits as people who have been living in this country for 2000 years is a betrayal.
>They are pretty courageous if you ask me.
It's a big misunderstanding, if you ask me.
They're literally old anarchists from the XXth century.
Basically attention whoring with this latest drawing (which is nice, though)
But they actually hate the FN.
Or maybe this will give rise to a far-left anti-immigration movement?
Or they just became the voice of the french jews.
I dislike muslim mass immigration. The jew agenda against muslims is a completely different agenda.
Anyway, if you guys want to have an enlightened opinion about this paper, just learn french and buy it.
it's free (you just have to pay social security), but you still have to pay the rent, the bills and the food.
If we had a government-backed loan system like in the US, all would be good.
I for one rage because rent to pay, no mom and dad, and desperate to finish my studies, but can't, even with a student job.
She's Queen of a country that borders Syria but thinks refugees should be welcomed Carte Blanche far away in Europe. Maybe her country should take in amd support all of these future doctors.
Nah, he would have been a bro tier secular respectable middle class citizen who pays his taxes and goes to church every Sunday, unlike T*rks who still commit honor killings and support ISIS and shit.
>Parent's aren't "others", pajeet.
I think they are, and unless you unfortunately got stuck half way out of your mother's vagina and no-one cared enough to pull you all the way out (which thinking about it, is probably 100% true) and had to grow up using her identity, I think law regards them as other people as well.
"Everything for me and nothing for you, regardless of whether I actually achieved anything for it, because I'm from THIS country" is not a political stance that I think you ought to be bragging about having, because really, it's only based on your own pathetic logical fallacies and demonstrates what a toxic person you really are.
>we should give everything, not to our sons and brothers in blood, but to some muslim who blew himself up and killed a hundred of your own co-citizens
If you really think this then you either are a muslim or you have a single digit IQ.
>Philippe de Villiers
Everyone in France pretends they're "gaullists".
But the real new De Gaulle, Philippe de fucking Villiers, from one of the greatest military families (brother is head of Armies), everyone pushed him out. Fucking fake gaullists.
>it works horrible for them
But here, it would be nice, as studying is much cheaper. Damn, I just need 8000€ to finish a Master Pro.
Meanwhile, billions goes for the boat people...
*This* is Charlie.
(guy on the left was a Charlie journalist (who left since))
literally the face of far-left hypocrisy
Ironic considering you're the one who's babbling on about blood. Can you honestly not understand the concept of giving people a fair chance at life is not giving them everything?
Yeah, fuck them. Pretty much everyone pretending to be a Gaulist is just doing it for the free votes.
I fucking love Villiers though. He's not in the political game because it's absolutely corrupted and immoral, and he's right, but that also makes him impossible to become president, which is a real shame.
>But here, it would be nice, as studying is much cheaper. Damn, I just need 8000€ to finish a Master Pro.
>Meanwhile, billions goes for the boat people...
It's probably cheaper because of that. Yes it's giving free money to refugees, but it's a small price to pay in the end, and doesn't hurt to at least have them educated so the minor percentage of them who are good have a chance to prove it.
Which is why I'm trying to un-dead them, paquito my friend.
Our country cannot pay for the entire world to come here. If we do, we'll end up with millions of strangers who can vote and decide what the country does, and more of them will come seeing we welcome them, and in the end we will end up just like the country they left, only sinking ourselves too in the process.
They won't get a fair chance in life because their ancestors did not give them one. It's not their fault, but not ours either, and we shouldn't pay the price for it. If arabs are to stop being third world, then they must restore their country and grow, which is what we should help them do, instead of what we are doing now.
>unless you accept that others also deserve access to the privileges that others have worked for
That only works when your tax money end up helping people you actually want to take care of. Your own people. I don't care if a negro or a north african live a shitty life in my country, nobody invited them and nobody wants them.
People usually empathize with victims of terrorist attacks.
Also I'm pretty sure everyone in the world learned about CH during the attacks. Nobody cared before, and for a reason.
They were, and are, a piece of shit leftist journal.
You talk about paying for immigrants but how much do you think your country actually spends on it? You do realise that in the current economic system, population growth is the fastest way to make it appear that the economy is growing right? this in turn increases investor confidence and markets pick up. There is no doubt at all that at the moment, the mass migrations out of the middle east is keeping large portions of the western economy from grinding to a fucking stand-still.
I am not arguing that this is a good thing, but you cannot have the current western economic system and at the same time have a country that denies migration. I would propose that rather than barring migrants from the west (which will never happen) and instead revolutionise our economies which are obviously not even functioning as intended. This realistically, either turns into true capitalism (in which case 100% inheritance taxes WOULD be appropriate) or into something that focuses on long term sustainability.
>University is free in Brasil
>this entire fucking post
Also to further answer, yes, I know we don't spend much on it. But that's spending money on something that is detrimental to our country and people.
If the only way for our economy to not crumble is mass importation of other populations, then it is better we let it crumble and rebuild it rather than keep it like that for another few decades, because it will be impossible to rebuild it when we also have problems immigration causes, such as overpopulation, identity crisis, loss of national identity, analphabetism, etc.