>europoors get so butthurt that they seek to undermine our democracy
Buckingham Palace released a statement from her Majesty, saying “Should Mr Trump be elected we will take back America by force and place it once again under colonial rule“.
The D.C. Brief reports:
The announcement has received mostly a positive response, but many critics have seen the Queen as merely taking advantage of the swell of anti-Trump feeling in the country after a petition calling for the banning of the real estate mogul from entering the UK received over 500,000 signatories.
In the mean-time the Queen has ordered the armed forces to start preparations for an invasion this November.
TIME TO BUCK UP LADS AND TAKE THE CASTLE.
>Andrew Jackson 2.0
He fucking wishes
The only splash he's gonna make is his turd hair-piece falling into the urinal while getting buttstuffed by Bernard Sandy
Trump is outrageous, and a nationalist, willing to take on a strong 'us v them' mindset.
So tell me, is trump a dangerous lunatic, or a feeble whiner? Y'all make it seem to say he's both.
For all the talk of banter, the second trump says anything they don't like they want to literally ban him from entering the country. I guess they can't handle opposing viewpoints.
He's a strong personality in the presence of spineless mutts.
Nothing more. Not dangerous nor feeble, just a brash smartass.
>Not realizing Banterlads aren't 1000000000% of the British population
>implying they can do anything about Trump before being absorbed by the global Caliphate that is Allah's SAW will
>“Should Mr Trump be elected we will take back America by force and place it once again under colonial rule“.
Hahaha what the fuck
England's just assmad they don't have lolis to sing of their freedom
>"The D.C. brief reports"
>Go to D.C. brief link
>It's a Tumblr page
>"Source: Conspiracy Club"
>Go to Conspiracy Club's homepage
>"Finally, The Real Proof That 2Pac Is Alive!"
Okay so Dailymedia allows user generated articles and one of you mongs made this then.
I think all the heritage fags deserve a clishee German heritage fag as their president.
A pseudo German will have the most powerfull army in the world again.
It's about time!
Vote for Trump.
I'm allready preproducing tons of popcorn.
>the "special relationship"
No such thing. This happened straight after WW2:
>Implementing the McMahon Act created a substantial rift between United States and Britain. The new control of "restricted data" prevented the United States' allies from receiving any information, despite the fact that the British and Canadian governments, before contributing technology and manpower to the Manhattan Project, had made agreements with the United States about the post-war sharing of nuclear technology. Those agreements had been formalized in the 1943 Quebec Agreement. In the case of the United Kingdom, these were developed further in the 1944 Hyde Park Agreement, which was signed by Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt.
the UK made a huge contribution to developing the Bomb, and the Americans took our help then told us to fuck off
signed agreements with the US President himself are worth precisely nothing
>Buckingham Palace released a statement from her Majesty, saying “Should Mr Trump be elected we will take back America by force and place it once again under colonial rule“.
>signed agreements with the US President himself are worth precisely nothing
It's not the presidents spirit it's the American spirit. Have you read what they did with the contratcs with the natives?
The special relationship has always been onesided
Whats pathetic is that your country is so filled with muslims and liberal cųcks that you started a petition that got half a million signatures over a meme candidate.
>b-b-but he RASSIS
Whose presidency would be most beneficial to Europe?
I'd say Hillary in the short run, but Sanders in the long term.
Sander's cut-backs on global US military presence will force the EU to focus on its own military.
I don't know what Trump's views are on Europe though.
/pol/has been insufferable for the last half a year
muriburgers spam with their retarded presidental elections threads rooting for their favorite and thinking anything will change like good goyim
Online petitions always have the biggest response to meme issues because of how the internet works. And there are 65 million people in the UK.
By the way, are you aware the clear majority of Americans don't like your hero Trump? People on here post the Republican polls as if they're a real indication of US support. They're not.
But if the EU has to focus on its own military wont that money have to come from somewhere? The way I see it, it could be done 4 ways:
>cut social welfare programs
What do you think the likely senario is, anon?
This is what the Americans currently wanking over Trump were doing a few years ago
>But if the EU has to focus on its own military wont that money have to come from somewhere?
It already does within NATO, redesignating troops doesn't cost much money. Plus if there was an integrated Euro force it would, at least on paper, save money due to having shorter supply chains (being Europe wide) and having less redundancy between countries, plus more focus on cross national systems should save.
we need it back!
Trump might have been a Hillary shill, if he wins the republican debate - Hillary gets rid of any serious opposition and wins.
You lot are exaggerating it all the time though. It's stupid. You say stuff like "the UK wants to ban trump" after a tiny fraction of the UK population signs a petition and the UK government explicitly says they don't want to ban Trump. In fact Cameron said we should invite him here
this, we need stronger, more integrated Europe
There's a theory that Trump just wants to destroy the Republican party, because that's what he is doing.
>huge parts of American cities are minoritized and no go zones
What? I can think of only two off of the top of my head: the south side of chicago, and South Central LA. Both of those cities are pretty shit though.
The fact of the matter is that blacks are poorer than whites, and tend to live in poorer areas. Theres also the problem of generational poverty various other aspects of black culture.
I don't think it's possible for countries to be friends, especially not the UK and US. The most likely winner of the US Presidency, Hillary Clinton, seems to hold our Prime Minister in contempt.
>David Cameron is “aristocratic, unsure, inexperienced, oblique and largely uncommitted”; Boris Johnson is “Tory clown prince”.
>That is, at least, according to emails released from a private system used by Hillary Clinton.
>the enemy of my enemy must be my friend
Looks like we're getting nice and comfy with France then.
I don't understand what you mean with that greentext. But yes, the US has always been closer to France, with a few exceptions.
The US and UK have more similar ideas about the economy, world trade, liberty etc. So it's been easy enough for the countries to tolerate each other. However there has always been plenty of distrust, dislike and arguments at the top.