How many refugees could a country the size of America realistically take in? Where in America would they go?
If they hadn't been tearing down buildings like mad in Detroit for the last few years?
There would be readily upgradable housing for over a million just in Michigan, about 850,000 of that just in Detroit proper.
More if they converted other buildings and lived in close quarters.
America could in theory take in billions of immigrants. In theory we could take in the whole world and have plenty room to spare. Put them in Wyoming. Then build a big wall around Wyoming and tell them "listen guys...you need to learn to get along with each other. No more fighting"
Peek at them every few years to see if they have managed to build a civilization there. When they do we can open up the wall again and allow them free travel and even trade.
America could take millions Tbh, there's plenty if space and resources. Alaska, Northern New England, and many midwestern states have shitloads of space.
If course what America CAN do is not at all rhe same thing as what they SHOULD do, which is probably take in 0 "refugees."
If you are a very charitable person, and really want to help actual refugees, America could fund better refugee camps, pay to relocate them elsewhere like anothwr country that gas space but not money, or fucking buy them tneir own island and build it up for them, or America could use the giant mitary to end the Syrian conflict for one side or the other.
The Netherlands produces enough food to sustain itself and some other countries, being the second agricultural exporter of the world.
We have 493 per square kilometer. So you'd need like 12170 square kilometer the house 6 billion people like we live here.
The USA is 9,8 million square km.
Republicans hate non-rich white people and are only a few steps away from genociding or expelling the rest.
Democrats dislike minorities, but not nearly as much as Republicans do, and appeal to them in the search for votes
Hillary is basically a white supremacist, she's just not as open as Trump is. Democrats only introduce legislation that benefits minorities, when they need minority votes.
Democratic legislation which is passed in hopes of advancing the living conditions of nonwhite Americans tends to be very reparative, giving them third-world style aid instead of actually attacking the structural problems which plague this country.
Bill Clinton, a Democrat, cut social welfare to an absurd degree, binding even more poor Americans - who are disproportionately black - into poverty.
>Bill Clinton, a Democrat, cut social welfare to an absurd degree, binding even more poor Americans - who are disproportionately black - into poverty.
I know, it was great.
If only he could run again instead of his criminal wife.
>implying he isn't complicit in all of her behavior
They're a political unit.
She selected dozens of his appointees during his administration.
Many of which had to be removed, made to resign and a handful that were criminally prosecuted.
>you are trying to create
I was just suggesting that it was 'possible' and that the violence assertion wasn't so far off base.
No brother, I would firmly be against ANY muslims or Africans (outside of fleeing white South Africans) of any kind coming here.
Muslims need to be confined to their zone as they represent a threat to all other cultures.
Personally, I'd rather see every last one that observes that death cult sterilized for the rest of humanity's protection.