I dunno I've been around 4chan for a fairly long time and I've figured my self callouse to the toxic nature of the site. I mean getting called nigger everyday can do that but I come to this board and gosh darnit the words here really sting
>>2330407 >I've figured my self callouse to the toxic nature of the site I think that's the only good thing about /ic. If you can post here and still keep doing your thing, nothing will ever be able to break you.
>>2330434 Very true. I've seen people lose their shit over irl critiques. Others seem shocked when I tell them that I post my work online only for strangers to tell me to kill myself. Only makes me stronger.
>>2330493 Post your work. If you're BBC, you're fucking stagnating. You suck at perspective, your lifted style is ugly, and you draw the same faces every fucking time. No one is trolling you (if you're BBC) you're just bad.
Because I actually give a shit about this board. I want people to actually get good. There's so many beginners here who can't take a critique, it's ridiculous. But if that's what it takes to weed out the weak, then so be it.
People need to learn how to not take critiques so personally, and to see through the shitposting.
>>2330506 Saying things like "head is too big" or "you need to work on your anatomy" has a lot a value and will make they improve, but I really can't see how things like "kill yourself, you piece of shit" will actually help anyone, in fact, that's closest definition of shitposting, it adds literally nothing.
Because artist tend to get bitter and jaded over time as their hopes and dreams are crushed. So when they're 2% better than someone they take it upon themselves to shit on the new person just like they were when they first started.
It's really just continuing the cycle of bitchiness by cynical, whiny artists, that don't actually care about being constructive or helping others... And the ones that do consider it more a crusade to get rid of "mediocre" artists.
>>2330394 Art is a very demanding profession to learn and the journey can be quite frustrating. Everyone who posts here, including me, has probably gotten really frustrated with their work at some point and came to /ic/ just to take out that frustration. It's easy to say this board is shit, everyone is an asshole yadda yadda, but in reality, it's quite normal for an anonymous board dedicated to a profession that is so competitive and taxing. Once artists find their own artistic voice and stop constantly comparing themselves to others, they tend to become much more chill.
I'd say the most angry and hostile artists are the ones who have left the beginner stage and just entered the intermediate stage. That's where the Dunning Kruger effect is at its strongest and all the elitism and false sense of superiority boils over all the time. We've all been there or will be there at one point, it's a natural process. The only permanent problem become the people who are permanently stuck in that phase because they gave up on art, but for whatever reason haven't given up on posting on /ic/.
>>2330394 Because they mistakenly think that being mean is a part of good critique. Being honest is what makes critique good, but recognizing how the individual functions is important as well. Ideally, you want to push whoever is being critiqued to be better, without totally discouraging them. It varies from person to person where the limit is.
>>2330574 I don't think that's the point of this thread, it's actually a question.
It doesn't matter if you care about those mean posts, the question is why so many posts are just empty insults instead of actual critiques, pointing out the problems and possibly a way to avoid them in the future?
>>2330626 >oh no anon told me im shit >motivation and optimism: gone There's a difference between being immune to psychological aggression and not giving a shit about a low effort reply. You'll get it once you start insulting people for no reason yourself. You seem to give these replies more thought than originally went into them.
>>2330601 The people that reply Darude - Sandstorm are the people that don't know the song you're asking for. Get what I mean? If people stopped posting "ur shit" there wouldn't be more good posts, there'd just be less posts.
>>2330626 Not him but anything negative said here doesn't carry much weight. It's the ideal place for people with mental issues to not needing to worry about the filter of moderators and and transparency of a name tag. The motivation behind a lot of the critique seen here is often questionable.
Actual good critique is done without the mental-case aggression and by people who can explain why they think something is bad and how it could be improved.
>>2330656 >people being rude/obnoxious for no reason whatsoever is not a mental issue.
I bet you are one of them since you felt offended. If you think people who actually come here to meet people to learn from will actually look at anything you have to say when you act like that then some sort of delusion must be in play. I can only conclude that it must be motivate by pleasing your own ego.
I would like to say artists in general are mostly obnoxious, pretentious cunts. Many artists, modern ones especially think their shit is ground-breaking and new, despite almost every style or form being done already. Another side as other anons have mentioned are trolls who don't even draw and just shitpost. Those kind of people need to leave, as they contribute nothing to beginners who need honest critique and good artists who want to improve.
There are ways to critique someone's work without sounding like a total dick, yet a majority of people here who critique, especially on the beginner thread, act like a bunch of pretentious dicks. It's discouraging for beginners. In all honesty, drawthreads on other boards like /tg/, /a/, or /h/ give more honest critique without being a bunch of dickfucks,
>>2330502 >>2330578 there's resources in plain sight (the sticky). if you're going to spend the time to find ic and post despite being utterly clueless, what's stopping you from educating yourself with easily accessible resources? they should learn loomis on their own, they don't need anon to tell them to read loomis or read the sticky when it's there in plain sight. people who don't want to help themselves are annoying in a "ugh eyeroll & ignore" kind of way but i guess you need idiots to maintain the status quo...
Other people may have already said this but /ic/ being mean is a good thing. The real world and much of nonanonymous online forums is actually a giant hugbox and echo chamber. Try taking an art class and see what I mean.
This isn't necessarily completely bad because hurting people's feelings isn't fun but you don't learn if people aren't critical. This is one of very few environments where you can get real opinions on what you do.
>>2330854 those shitposts waste everyone's time, including those who made them, you'd have more people posting on this board giving actual constructive crit if the board wasn't seen as a place filled with anger, but then again, that's mostly 4chan as a whole
>>2330948 stop trying to justify people's inability and/or refusal to communicate in a manner that doesn't come off as someone with severe socialization issues as if it should be everyone else's problem, it is theirs and theirs alone
>>2330526 >Saying things like "head is too big" or "you need to work on your anatomy" has a lot a value No theyre not How small is enough?what is the proportion? What value?not enough shading level variety? Colour didnt mix well? Without evidence and deeper explanation They are no better than "its good" "its bad"
>>2330501 This speaks to me Thanks anon! This is why i come here ive realised Sure i could have me ego continued to be stroked by my peers but i need someone to tell me in a Gordon ramsey like voice that i suck. So i can determined and gain approval (however superficial it may be) and be a better artist altogether
>>2330473 >they can feel good about it. false > But if you do have a good explanation on why /ic is so mean and always so angry and salty about everything, tell me, I would like to know your opinion. because of media, we hate normies, we hate people who think reaching a professional level requires talent and pass everything off because they dont have the will power.
Because honest words harm crybabies. If you're shit at drawing, then accept the harsh critique, improve, and there will be compliments and nice comments. If you don't improve then don't come here. This board is not for circlejerking or soft critique, anonimity makes sure that the critique given here is really fucking harsh. There are other places like Reddit, tumblr, etc. where you can post your art and only receive positive comments about it (because honest critique and not-nice comments will be silenced).
>people actually trying to justify the shitposting and pass it off as constructive
i'm not going to go and make any absolute claims. there are instances where people try to be helpful, and there are instances where people are just shitposting
i believe that shitposting comes from a place of insecurity that the shit posters try to project onto others to feel good about themselves.
nobody in the industry is going to be as cunty as the people on this board. those people want to be able to find a job after they're done their current one and if they're known for saying shit like kill yourself you're never going to make it they're going to have a much harder time finding a job
so no, meanness isn't productive. people respond better to positive than negative reinforcement. it doesn't help anyone, not even the shitposter. that person is just trying to make themselves feel better instead of owning up to their insecurities.
>>2331226 You shouldn't make a critique softer than plain honesty but many posters on /ic/ substitute spite for descriptive language. The general mentality is "if i don't understand what's wrong with X well enough to explain it I'll throw in a few shits/trash/retardeds and then call them a cry baby when they point out I haven't given them any usable information."
"This looks wrong to me. This is why I think it looks wrong to me" minus all the ass patting and shit talking would mean a world of difference beyond what either deviantart/tumblr or /ic/ provides.
I would say though, if someone has been given a critique and continues to come back without making a solid attempt to address it, they should expect to be told a polite and respectful "fuck off".
>>2330496 >>2330434 I feel some kind of weird motivation whenever I see someone with a dedicated shitposter. That one guy who replies to every single one of their posts trying desperately to bring them down, like that 'you suck' guy on all of BBC's posts. I kind of want to gain that, but then again I know I wouldn't really want it, but maybe it would be just what I need to finally ween myself off of the sagging sour milk teat that is /ic/.
You get some good critiques, and I understand the idea that the anonymity means people don't need to worry about being nice, but people also try a lot harder to not be useless, irritating assholes when their reputation isn't on the line. This is also probably why so many people refuse to post their work after flinging shit - even if they're good, they know they don't want the way they behave on this board being tied to their actual persona.
>>2331716 The forms in that version of le firez face are a lot better than in the other versions, actually. I don't know why you keep bringing the guy up though. Just don't respond to him. What's so hard about that?
>>2331789 if it talks down or is unnecessarily nasty, I only take what they say with a grain of salt. Comments like 'this is terrible' are worthless so I ignore them.
If it's a harsh critique in that it's really tears apart the piece itself in a respectfully forward way, I adore it. It hurts, but I absolutely love it. Sugar coating can make the medicine go down easier, but it's not necessary. But there's a difference between not-sugar-coating something and being a self-jerking twat.
Learn to spot the shitposting and ignore them. Learn to spot the sincere crits and do your damnedest to understand what they're saying and seeing. A good crit can really help you progress, so treat it that way. Someone that actually knows their shit isn't going to say things like 'this is a mess' or meme at you (loomis/sticky/etc). They either won't waste their time or will be able to point out specific things to help.
If it offers guidance or insight, it's a gift. If it casts judgement, it's worthless. Experience will help you find the line.
What is needed is constructive critique but many of the "artists" here are too stupid to understand what that means and instead they just shitpost because that's what they always do elsewhere on 4chan (and beyond).
I think whiplash said it best. It's better to have a chair thrown at your face for a shitty performance than it is to be congratulated for it, and a person will improve in order to not be insulted. The whole goal is to get your skill up to a point where you will be complimented vs getting something thrown at you.
Of course if done wrong (shitposting etc.) it doesn't help. So remember, improve enough and you probs wont get shit on
>>2330394 IC doesn't sugarcoat it's posts. If You suck, they'Il make sure to get that message across. You want Your work to be praised no matter how shitty it is? Join LevelUp! on FB. It is more or less Deviant level shitty pieces and all of them get positive reviews. It is nothing but cancer over there. Long story shory like it here.
I like this place. I hate submitting my work in art classes, only to be told "its really good!!" when it's complete shit. Come to IC, post it, get ripped apart, but get provided a really good redline and crit.
Not to mention, random words of wisdom tend to appear in the beginner every now and then. As rare as it is, it's nice to read that one line a random anon said that changes your perspective on drawing in a positive way.
My only problem with this board is how everyone here is trying to find that secret formula in getting better. If people here do more drawing than shitposting, we'd definitely see a lot more improvement.
>>2330394 I come to /ic/ when I want someone to be brutally honest with my about my work. It's good this way because they don't know who you are and you don't know who they are. This way no one holds anything back, no sugar coating it, nothing. I come here when I want to get better, not for some people to kiss the ground I walk on.
The problem is a lot of people here confuse "brutal honesty" with "being a complete asshole and helping nobody". There's an abundance of people who really seem to think posts that shit on someone unconstructively is still helpful.
Let's not forget that many here aren't really that qualified to give critique beyond "I don't like it" but love to pretend otherwise. A classical example is the inability to view anything in context among many here. They will instead throw up absurd or irrelevant standards. I often get the impression that many here are below the age limit.
>>2332879 he was wasting image limit in draw threads with the SAME IMAGE making 1pixel change, writing paragraphs of excuses as to why he doesn't follow critique and simply read the macro image, sameface and stagnation.
Because the least accomplished people in the creative arts will be the most opinionated. Actually successful people are too busy doing the thing they're passionate about to bother for more than ten minutes on a board like this, while salty wanna-be iconoclast Internet Dudes will squat hours a day bitching to newcomers that don't live up to their standards.
/ic should learn that being nice doesn't mean lie and sugarcoat things, you can actually give some pretty harsh critique using proper language and common sense. Just make objective observations instead of abusing of adjectives.
>>2333328 Who said I never posted any art? We're all anonymous here but based in the kind of attitude you displayed, it's just more likely to assume that you wouldn't be willing to help, but it's impossible to know for sure.
Anonymity is basically an official license to be an asshole.
The thing about not having any kind of commitment or responsability in what you say is that, most of the time, you won't even be sincere, but just take this opportunity to say crap and see the world burn.
>>2334017 I can act how ever the fuck I want. When I have a name attached I have to restrain myself how I normally post because it would affect how people perceive me--the false me. Names are just 'nice guy' masks and any rude comments said with your name you're given the cold shoulder by your friends. Having anonymity is essential to truthfully say what you want to say it's not about being an ass.
I'm really tired of the current cycle of kids these days. The over emotional, no bully pls, crowd. It's a fucking disgrace to think that you'll ever create something worth a damn if you can't be told how it be. They really undermine art as a whole because they undermine the necessary skills it takes to create something good. And that's at least 80% of you fucking cowards.
>>2334104 Actually, it's about being objective in your critiques and bring insightful remarks, informations or discussions, instead of simply unleashing your primal rage instincts, that you seem to value much more.
>>2334130 This so much, I've given critique ranging from actual thought out elaborated explanations on why the drawing was objectively wrong to a complete impulsive snarky remark of "its shit" and no matter on which end it is, it always gets the "you're jelly" "post your work" or "keep being salty" response. It's like you people intentionally come to this board to get the negative feedback just to spout out your little buzzword responses.
If you're not ready to get the harsh critique then why come here? The board won't "improve" by whining about it.
>>2334174 Of course not, I was comparing the responses to one another. No matter what caliber of critique you give it's prone to get those responses.
The problem of this board isn't the "negativity" or the "bitterness" it's the people who can not divide the good critique from the bad. They always get too defensive (or atleast in most cases they do) and they'll try to justify their mistakes to death. It's frustrating writing a 3 paragraph critique just to receive "just post your work you salty jelly or your words have no merrit".
>>2334160 >vague insults are needed when an anon won't accept he's shit > won't accept
That implies a previous attempt to show that was made, but what usually happens is that /ic users are already set to shoot on sight, eliminating chances of a possible decent discussion that could be helpful for the posters and those just reading.
It's really sad to look a thread and just see: "it's shit", "blog?", "show your work", "fuck off"...
>>2334151 I've tried this. Giving redlines is one of the things that frustrate me the most.
>a beginner posts a drawing >give a redline explicitly describing all the problems with it >"yeah ok thx I got it" >it comes back with none of the approvements suggested
They do not learn, they will not follow your instrucions and they do not care about improving. The fad today seems to be to make a name for yourself on social media to gain an audience so that you can maintain an income from them. This in most cases takes over and they care more about their reputation/income rate rather than technical abilities.
>>2334191 Someone that comes here, asks for critique, manages to receive civilized critique and yet gets mad because they didn't hear what they wanted to hear, I would consider a useless poster searching for reassurance, not critiques.
I'm totally against sugarcoating, I'm just against counter-productive agression.
About your question, I fail to see the relevance to the subject. Anyway, it usually turns into an ego fight and I think it's better that you try to filter the anonymous critiques that seem more helpful for you.
A lot of people arguing here about whether /ic/ being mean is a good thing or not.
I'm OK at drawing. A handful of times I've gotten super abrasive negative criticism, its really ruined my day. I don't have the best mental health, so maybe I'm just a bit sensitive. But honestly, i'm much better at drawing because of it.
>>2334203 >I think it's better that you try to filter the anonymous critiques that seem more helpful for you. Completely agree. The question was relevant in the context of the responses that I usually get. >post your work or your words have no merrit Do you agree with this? Even if the critique given is elaborate and well thought out (and sometimes even objectively right), and the person critiqued asks you to post your own just to see if you are "good enough" to give such critique?
>>2330394 Because their work wasn't appreciated, so they put down others to make themselves feel better. Or just bored people shitposting because SJWs wont' let anyone have fun in the Western world anymore.
Even if I can not replicate the style or maybe not emulate the things I advice others to do, I can still understand the fundamentals and therefore give accroding pointers.
This "you need to prove your worth" thing needs to die out, not only because it's an endless piss fight, but because it leads nowhere. Either people will post their drawings and you'll have your remarks about them or they won't and you get overly defensive.
>>2334211 If you improved, it's more likely those critiques had some pretty useful remarks and that's a good critique.
If they were really just empty, mean posts, then they just worked as a motivational statement like "I need to get better since they said I suck", not as a guidance like, "ok, they said I should study this and that, now I know my weaknesses".
>>2330394 OP, I was asking myself the same thing the other day. For some reason I kept wanting to go back here though. I think the majority of people here are pretty blunt and don't sugarcoat shit like DA and the art subreddits do. All I see on Reddit Gets Drawn is circlejerking of shit art. Here at least, 1 out of 10 people will legitimately call you out on your weakness.
Drawthreads on /co/ aren't for progression, they're for quick doodles and instant satisfaction. Unless you're really terrible, no one is going to say anything about your art.
/ic/ is called "Art/Critique" for a reason. If you can't handle getting your ass blasted if you draw poorly, then you're better off not being here. That being said, /ic/ is nowhere near as angry as it used to be.
It's not so much that the board is mean per say, but rather the veteran posters here get frustrated. There will always be shitposters and trolls. They are in the minority here though. Some posters may resort to those kinds of tactics due to the ignorance of new posters and/or also as a pushback from the DeviantArt era of the internet.
/ic/ shares this same situation with a/. a/ feels that if they don't self-moderate then the board will fall into a state of disarray and the quality of the board will deteriorate. You will get endless threads asking for the same thing. Examples ranging from: - What anime should I watch? - What anime do you recommend that I watch next? - Naruto is awesome! Who is your favorite character? - Naruto and Sasuke are so strong who will win in a fight between them? - i just saw Attack on Titan. let's hook up. a/s/l. - Mymomsucks.Shewantsme2... - youranimesucks.com hates hentai whatdo?
It's clear that these kinds of threads are frowned upon as they caused problems in the past. So they self-moderate to destroy threads like these to make it clear that they aren't tolerated there. Trolling the OPs enforces that idea even more (more evident in recommendation threads). It's also to dissuade newbs from posting as it is evident that they did not take the time to lurk before posting. Lurking is a surefire way of learning the culture and rules of the community. (Personally, I might lurk for months at a time before I post anything, let alone start a thread.) Some people don't do that and they get punished for it. Example, if you check some reddit subforums you will see multiple threads of the same thing, because they want to be 'nice.'
This lowers the quality of the community as it's littered newbs and the quality of the discussion drops. a/ talks about the newest shows and various older shows quite frequently. There are shows, genres, and characters that get their own threads. Why should you ask what to watch when you can lurk on the board and see which titles are being discussed? There's also an entire board dedicated to camwhoring and hooking up, go there instead. There's already one Naruto thread going, no need for 10 of them at once. Also, why aren't you typing in a somewhat decent manner? Probably because you are too young or too much of a newb to be posting here.
Now in /ic/ there's an actual sticky all the way on the top left that explains all of the links that you need to use to get better at creating art. The posters here got together and took the time to put that together for those who need help. The problem is that the posters who come here don't really think that they need help and don't bother to read it or to familiarize themselves with the board culture and just post. It's frustrating to many here, because it's telltale sign that the person didn't bother to read it or to lurk before posting. So let's say that the person did create the thread dedicated to their one pic asking for help and critiques. If you read those threads the first posts are pretty helpful. You will get the one obligatory 'It's shit,' but the thread will start going downhill once the OP fights back against the initial helpful posts.
/ic/ won't admit it, but this is a surefire way to trigger the posters on this sub-board. The reason for this is, because during the early to late 2000s Deviantart was the biggest art community on the internet. Lots of people could post art and comment on others art. Problems arose when people who were commenting with legit constructive critiques were getting attacked by not only the artist, but the fans of the artist, too. Soon after deviantart became a hugbox and echo chamber. Even a lot of popular artists weren't improving, more evident with self-proclaimed 'anime/manga artists.' This is because, most of the people posting there were young. They were children, teens, and very young adults. There was a huge lack immaturity there. It affected the quality of the community as well as the real lack of moderation to deal with that.
The admin response was to just make it an option to accept crits or not. Not wanting to accept crits means that you are not looking to really get better. You aren't serious about your art. This is one of the biggest reasons Deviantart fell out of favor with professionals. It's why ConceptArt and Behance came to be. Even for as hugboxy as Tumblr can get at times you will see all the notes BEFORE you can see all the comments. Also, commenting on Tumblr is a slight bit of a pain in the ass so many people just don't really do it unless they are really driven to do so.
Anons here don't want /ic/ to become that shithole that DeviantArt became (yet still suffers from the stigma of being associated with 4chan so they can't get to status of even Reddit, Conceptart.org and the ilk) so it seems that they have taken the completely opposite attitude: to be harsh as a way of being more 'real.' A place where your ass won't be kissed. By doing this you will either: Leave or try to get better. It also makes the praise that you do get that much better, because you will feel that you will have, truly, earned it rather than just expecting it.
/ic/ understands that asskissing doesn't help you get better. For example, if everyone got an A or 100 in your grammar class even though some people had incorrect answers and lackluster work what good does that do for you, as a person? If you are getting praised for wrong answers and shoddy work how will you improve as a person? Would you? If everyone doing worse than you and getting praised you will begin to falter in your own work, because it's discouraging.
Unfortunately, this does attract some trolls and genuinely miserable people, because they think that just because other people are doing it that it's ok to do it too. They think that they are in the company of peers not realizing the psychology and history behind these tactics. This is also not to say that some people aren't just frustrated with their own lack of progress in their own art and careers and using this as a way of taking out that frustrations. This also isn't to say that the posters here all know what they are talking about either, but there are a lot of people here of all different skill levels. Attacking someone trying to help you, even if they are not completely right is surefire way to prove that you are still a entitled 'newb' that needs to learn to be humbled.
By being humbled and recognizing that your art isn't the greatest in the world is the true way of beginning your journey to becoming a better artist. /ic/ just wants to help.
>>2334953 would you please stop samefagging. I can tell from the poster count. and if you can't explain something simply you either don't know what you're talking about, or a windbag. intelligent people know how to summarize and get to the point with a lot less. If you're writing that much, you are 9/10 a dullard and you don't even realize, which is usual for morons.
how about for the new year we just stop shitposting? no being assholes just for the sake of it no "no you!" arguments if newfags dont know what they're doing just tell them to read the fuckin sticky and leave it at that; no more
>>2335290 The problem is that some posters here are so terrible posters that even when they in their delusions mean well others still register their posts as shitposts. With anonymity it is impossible for us to filter out shitposting.
>Only constructive criticism will be accepted. Rude or offensive comments will result in a ban.
is this rule simply not enforced? I've seen plenty of 'critiques' that are rude and/or offensive and not helpful in the least
I dont think critique has to be sugarcoated if that's not your style but if it simply falls into the vein of "this is awful" without providing specifics or suggestions to help the artist, it's not allowed (or at least according to the rules)
it's a whole different story if the artist refuses listen to critique or if you're calling someone out on shitty comments and behavior (not their art)
>>2335407 This rule can't be enforced, there's too much bait with drawings worse than what a 5-years-old child could do and there's too much art too shit to criticize.
How do you criticize something that has no positive points? How do you criticize something so flawed that it needs you to give a free class on how to draw instead of just a tip? The board is small, new people generally try to do the good old critique, only to be hit time and time again by baits and shit people who didn't even bother to read the sticky, after a couple of those you just turn the "i don't a give a fuck" buttom on.
If your art has nothing of value, nothing to be improve upon, you should be thankful for getting a "this is awful", at least now you can move on.
Art is an individual's attempt which the critics here do not recognise as fitting to their standards. Standards which many great artist could be brought out to display the breaking these absurd ideas. Somehow these artists were successful having lived through the braying of the idiots determined in their defeat.
And their lives were probably as horrendous as their biographies make out.
People expect to be pleased by art but must take the artist on their own terms who worked through appalling circumstances and slender means to create.
It's a thankless and miserable situation that perhaps only the apotheosis resolves.
>>2334795 Pretty good posts mane. I think it's also true that people here are even more defensive/sensitive about their own disciplines than on other boards. Too many people seeing their art as themselves, they can take it pretty personally if someone gives them a bad crit, or tells them their favourite artist is shit.
>tfw when gay >tfw when parent died when little >tfw when manlet >tfw animator You'd think my skin would be thick like a brick, but I'm like anyone else. But, instead of reacting, I just say "OK" and try to rethink it and see if I can find educational value from their statement.
>>2330530 >That's where the Dunning Kruger effect is at its strongest and all the elitism and false sense of superiority boils over all the time. When I began getting good at animation, I used to get slightly upset when I turned on the TV and saw a TV commercial with a cartoon that was poorly done, and how I could've done better and how my cartoon wiener is so much bigger harder and shinier. I never said anything, or ever criticized someone else's new animation, but I did mentally and kept it to myself.
>>2338523 >why are you worried about being a manlet if your gay? I'm not worried about it, just thought it'd be funny to call myself a manley. I was picked on for being short in middle school, though. But I had a big penis so I never really cared.
>>2339074 "Read Loomis" doesn't actually mean read _just Loomis. It means consult the resources in the sticky. Loomis happens to have pretty good books on construction, perspective, anatomy and illustration, so he's recommended here a lot. But the point is not to get a person to read Loomis specifically, it's to get them to wake the fuck up and start using the resources that this board has to offer, rather than ask for a cheap hack to draw anime\an owl\tumblr style\whatever. Seeing "Go read Loomis" as an indication of a "Loomis cult" is not really getting the point, in my opinion. Everybody gets that Loomis isn't the only or the greatest artist in the world. Telling somebody to "read Loomis" is a lazy answer to a lazy request from a lazy person who didn't care to read the rules\sticky before posting.
>>2330530 So what you're saying is that intermediate artists are the most obnoxious, with beginners and experts being the most chill. That would explain why so many internet art circles are just circle jerking nonsense and generally hostile to people outside of their group and don't subscribe to the way they think.
I have a big dilemma regarding arts, be it fine arts or music
Do people actually realize when their work is shit?
Maybe I'm completely blunt and honest to myself, but no one can say things about my work that will make me feel bad, because I've already recognized most mistakes I made. I don't think anyone can say harsher things about my work than myself
But then I see lots of people here who post their works with palettes all over the place, deformed faces, poor traces, unnecessary effects, shameless photobashing... can't they realize that something as simple as that hurts your work? Or is it that they've deluded themselves into thinking that it's not that bad? Maybe they think they can't do better? If so, why ask for a critique?
I don't know /ic/. Anyways I'm not harsh with people here because I don't know them so I don't know if they're in the middle of a process or stagnating for years. On the other hand in person I can't stop myself from being vocal about anything, because, as I say, most of the stuff you see is shit, and I can't believe people aren't aiming to do anything better than shit, or spectators are content watching, buying and expecting shit
I come here BECAUSE you all are brutal. Tired of deviantart, tumblr people not being helpful. Sure, most assholes here aren't helpful but they at least do ground most people's egos/perception of their ability.
>>2339156 >Do people actually realize when their work is shit? I guess some do, some don't and some do but don't want to acknowledge their own shortcomings.
>I don't think anyone can say harsher things about my work than myself I'd say that's a good thing, being your own biggest critic drives you to improve yourself and become better and better. On the other hand you shouldn't be too harsh, acknowledge the things you did good (or well?)
>>2339156 My biggest problem with music is that my playing is shit but I dont know how to improve. I guess a bunch of artists such as myself stay in this mediocre bubble and we dont know how to get out of it, we just keep going.
>>2330434 that's actually kinda the reason why I act like a dick on this site. I'm not one of the dedicated shitposters you would recognize, but I'm especially harsh here simply because that's why I came to this site in the first place. This was the only website I knew of that didn't shower every autist's coldsteel the hedgehog with likes and compliments, and sometimes it even went so far as to provide useful critique. believe me when I tell you that if I saw your chickenscratch SU fanart in real life I would put on a fake smile and tell you to keep it up, but in an anonymous environment I would shit all over it. If you wan't people to act like they like your art, you can post it literally anywhere else.
>>2341038 same for me. I like honest, straight-forward crits, and I like being straight-forward with people and not worrying about whether it's 'nice' or padded enough to prevent a shitfest. I do my best to be as helpful as possible, but any other site, I'll spend 10 times as long working on a reply and end up feeling like my point didn't actually go through, and there's always the risk that someone is going to flip their shit and cause some kind of social-wankfest you have to wade through. Stresses me out, so I don't even try anymore.
I like the honesty. I just wish more anons would provide something more then 'X looks like shit'. That's not a crit you unhelpful fuck. A good crit offers some kind of suggestion or explains their perspective so the artist can better understand where they're fucking up and how to fix it. Most people can tell their shits fucked up, you're not helping.
90% of this board are unemployed NEETs that didn't tell their parents that they were kicked from studies 2 years ago. All of those are on suicide watch and drawing jolly loomis is the only thing preventing them from suicide.
Other 10% are guys who are oblivious to anything, but came to kek at poor bastards.
>>2330394 Be less critical. Some of the people who call themselves "antisocial," tend to constantly criticize both themselves and those around them. They avoid social interaction because they are on the one hand afraid of being judged by others, and on the other hand (ironically) themselves extremely judgmental toward others. In order to become a more social person, it is important to accept that everybody, no matter how they may seem on the outside, has both positive and negative qualities.
>>2341175 >I like being straight-forward with people and not worrying about whether it's 'nice' or padded enough to prevent a shitfestc Agreeing with you here. There's a whole different world between 'that elbow looks like shit' and 'read loomis and kill yourself'.
I don't think anyone wants it to become a hugbox, honest and straight crit is why we're anonymous here, but it's gone too far into the realm of being a total asshole without including crit. I've been spending less and less time here.
>>2341377 >how this makes you feel? It's no secret that people are shit and that their bad qualities most often outway their good. So because of that, I don't want to be around others, and because of that, I don't want others to be around me.
>>2341377 I was very antisocial in my early youth. I will support this person's post by saying he analyzed my immature self pretty spot on.... Not that it was my fault, because my father died from brain cancer when I was little, and as a result the trauma made me feel this way. Talk therapy and medication (cannabis) fixed me up. I don't take the medicine anymore.
>>2341408 My daily practice: drawing faces, bodies, and land scapes: My career: animation.
I agree with you. People who think JUST being able to do life drawing are a boregasm. It's nothing social to see. Sure, I can draw someone's face with a pencil and make it look photograph tier, but literally nobody gives a fuck. The universe is expanding, and we're all gonna die anyway.. That's why I animate funny cartoons. So let's see some action, jack! Do something creative. If I see art, I better be doing at least one of the following: >laughing >crying >scared >sexuality excited Or >enlightened
>>2341038 so you're saying you can't tell the hedgehog-drawing autistic 12 year olds that their art is bad without getting all anal and aggressive about it, sound to me like you just want to vent your insecurities on them. People tend to listen more to advice when they think you actually care about helping them and not trying to pick a keyboard fight.
Thread replies: 239 Thread images: 19
Thread DB ID: 389479
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.