Is this the only Nietzschean superman in history?

File: Gabriele d'Annunzio.jpg (82KB, 401x561px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 401x561px

No, he was the only true Nietzschean superman.

That would be Rasputin.

>>533038
Not at all. When Nietzsche spoke of the Übermensch he though of Alcibiades, Caesar, Cesare Borgia and Napoléon.

Any drug lord is a Nietzschean Übermensch. Specially if they don't get caught.

>tfw was Nietzschean before Nietzsche

>>533113
That's cesare borgia

>>533128
He probably means that borgia isn't the ONLY uber driver

>>533061
With a cock like that

File: reddit_infographic.jpg (36KB, 368x424px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 368x424px

>>533128
No, it's obviously Jesus (I'm joking). In fact I was saying he isn't the sole Übermensch according to Nietzsche. Just as >>533133 points out.

No, he wasn't a superman at all. He was the definitive man of his times. A superman is not a man of his times, he is a man of the future who destroys his own laws to make room for the new laws. Napoleon and Mohammed were supermen. Hitler, if he had been successful, would have been a superman.

This guy was definitely one for a time >>533061

I think the only non-violent superman in history is Jesus Christ, but he seldom gets mention as one.

>>533534
You might also think that perhaps Lenin qualifies, but he does not, he did not create the values he imposed, Marx did.

>>533113
He also thought Goethe was Ubermensch.

>>533061
>cucked by Mussolini: the author

>>533584
>implying it wasn't the opposite
It was his influence that turned Mussolini from a confused socialist into a macho fascist

>>533598
yes I am implying it. Mussolini never was a confused socialist.
Everything D'Annunzio desired, Mussolini achieved.

>>533564
I can see that. I guess he had some kind of renaissance man in my mind which Goethe certainly was (not from someone being active in the time period but in a polymath kind of way, I'm sure you get it).