>Greatest warrior culture
Why is /his/ so retarded?
OP's question is meme shit of some /pol/ retard. Anons question is better.
>how would society be different if animals and humans could communicate
we can communicate, but animals are driven by instinct not by reason. I mean humans are too but we are sophisticated enough to adjust the nature to fit our needs, animals though are not.
Goths indeed, but not the barbaric nomads, nor the faggy swedes, but their uplifted, imperial catholic descendants
>Huskarls existed in northern Europe and in Saxon Britain as well, and by the time of Harold Godwinson of England, the Huskarls had been expanded beyond a warband and into a professional military core numbering about 3,000. They were the backbone of his army that met the invasion force of William the Conqueror in 1066 and their numbers were backed by the levied ''Fyrd'' troops. After Harold's death in battle, his Huskarls fought to the last man to keep true their oath.
Can you imagine a man so based that even after his lord died, and he knew the battle was lost, he was still standing there swinging his 6 foot long axe because he held true to an oath he swore (to a guy who is now dead)? Kind of impressive.
Pardon me, are you suggesting some no name heretic is the true succesor of the goths?
>Tercio is 2outdated4swedes
that might've been true of the imperial army, but each time the spaniards and swedes battled directly the spaniards purged their heretic asses, and it was France the one to actually cause Spain's military decline, not a bunch of edgy snow heretics trying to build an "empire".
>OP's question is meme shit of some /pol/ retard
>Asks a comparative question about Goths versus other warrior cultures
>Anons question is better
>Some lunatic nonsense that is to provide the backstory for some furry's wet dream
Yeah no get the fuck out. We discuss history here, not the horribly thought-out plot to some man-dog romance novel.
>be cucked by romans
>be cucked by germanic tribes
>be cucked by franks
>be cucked by english
>be cucked by french
Viking was a job NOT a people, and exploration parties equipped for survey's weren't going to be able to effectively combat natives in number, and on their homeland.
How fucking dumb and uninformed can one person be?
>exploration parties equipped for survey's weren't going to be able to effectively combat natives in number, and on their homeland.
the spaniards, portuguese, englishmen and dutch literally did that u petty northern pirate
why do you dumb shits try and make Vikings out to represent the Norse, when they weren't even warriors? they were raiders (and settlers, explorers, tradesmen, and even kings). the huscarls are what deserves the warrior status.
fact checked myself real quick, and i remember that housecarls were only troops in England, elsewhere they were mostly bodyguards.
yet still, i read that vikings were raiders and traders, not warriors.