Why wasn't incest looked down upon back then?
When and why did people start looking down upon incest?
>>2862988
I don't have an answer, but it doesn't even have to be written down as an aberration for one to be repulsed by it
>>2863002
why are you repulsed by it? It doesn't harm anyone
I would say that no one deserves to be violently murdered
certainly not deposed monarchs that rather haplessly allowed themselves to fall into this state
Nicholas II for sure, he wasn't known as *bloody* for nothing.
Whether they deserved to lose their power, you could genuinely argue either way, and I'd understand wanting to oust the Tsar (even though I like the guy).
But their awful murder was crossing the line. I wish Britain would have been able to take them in as exiles, but the eternal Paddy made sure that wouldn't happen.
What are the most Triumphant moments for you in English (or British) history?
Of course there are events that are always more relevant in the epoch to which they belong than they might be to the present day, pick what you like!
Yes I know, it wasn't fair of me to include Agincourt in the OP, certainly, topping that is nigh impossible!
I don't know, it's so hard to choose between so many glorious moments like the evacuation at Dunkirk, the surrender of Singapore, the surrender of Suez, the surrender of Hong Kong...
Or maybe one of those five or six times they got conquered by some random French or Dutch people that were passing by.
>>2863112
i-i-it was a r-revolution, goddamnit it. and a glorious one
inb4 threads get deleted
>>2862792
jesus christ find an op image that doesnt set off my autism
>>2862792
Ban all roaches and catholicucks
Discuss
What never lived can't die.
>>2862640
isn't merkel a christian democrat ergo conservative?
>>2863354
This is the woman that destroyed the last pityful rests of last generation German Conservativism.
What does /his/ think about histories most famous larper, T. E. Lawrence
>>2862467
Faggot
Can't hate someone with such excellent taste in motorcycles
Also he gets muzzies AND isolationists nice and toasty so he's alright in my book
>>2862471
I ******************wonder********************** who this could be
What kind of undergarments did people wear in medieval times and before? Did they have any?
a fuckload of padding
>>2862429
Even the civilians ?
Western style underwear had their origins in what the Romans called braccae. We have very little archaeological evidence of them, being made of biodegradeable material, but we know they were a kind of light pair of trousers that barbarians fighting the Romans often wore.
>>2857376
>You realize that the duchies/regions of Alsace/Elsass and Lorraine/Lothringen predate any sort of French ownership of the territory correct? France didn't own Lothringen/Lorraine until 1766 or all of Elsass until 1803.
>France holding all of Elsass-Lothringen was pretty new when Germany (re)took them. We're talking less than a hundred years. Please don't post if you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.
My post specifically stated the period limit - "ever since Germany existed to contest it".
When was Germany created? When did the two duchies join France?
For as long as there has been a "Germany", France has held that land, and Germany has tried to take it away.
-----------
Had to reply, since I get autistic about this. Also you can talk about German-French border disputes, Alsace-Lorraine and such in this thread.
Nice spergout, time to be a hero mate
>>2862416
Hey, the archive functionality exists, linking old posts exists, why not use it?
The thread is more appropriate than half of the shit in the catalog, if nothing else it probably at least killed some neo-crusader pseud circlejerk.
>>2862405
Technically the French conquest of Alsace started in 1648 and ended in 1803. It wasn't one singular event. At first they seized the main cities but many patches of land remained German.
Before the Revolution the French parts of Alsace were relatively autonomous while having independent enclaves within it that were legally HRE.
Was Jesus Christ the most profound philosopher in human history? Let's set aside all the garbage about him being divine or a religious figure and focus solely on his teachings as per the Bible. No person in history has had such an acute insight into the nature of humanity. Jesus teachings cut straight to the heart of what it is to be human and live, reconciling the fact we desire ever more material things and yet they will never satisfy you. The knowledge of, and profound fear of death that people have. That hate begets hate and that love, forgiveness and tolerance are the only things that can guide humanity to a better future.
We've had hacks like Nietzsche, Stirner and Hume who have desperately tried to sweep these issues under the table. But only one man in all of history had a view of humanity so clear that we still talk about him today. Jesus Christ.
I have found myself drawn to Christianity lately. Like not just being cultural Christian or an admirer of the story, but believing in the whole thing.
I feel like the man in G. K. Chesterton's metaphor that walked all over the world only to come back home again..
Christianity is the most potent religion on the planet. Jesus Christ was an insignificant man in life that died brutally on the edges of an empire, yet he is the most recognized and everlasting figure in the history of the world.
There is a durability in the Christian vision and an allure to the man, no doubt about that
>>2862390
Not that I disagree but I'd like to keep religion and arguments about Christianity out of this if possible and just focus solely on the philosophy of Jesus Christ as a person.
>>2862391
Sorry. I do think he has unique insight into love. There is something he said that has always stuck with me, even in my most edgy atheist days. He remarked that merely loving others who love you is not a virtue, for even the most wicked among us do the same (paraphrasing).
It is true, isn't it? Most people in our prisons, guilty of the most heinous crimes, retain friendships with their fellow kind and a love for their mother at the very least.
What would China be like if Mao and co. didn't take control, and someone like Chiang Kai-shek took control instead?
Would China be more or less the same, like a giant Taiwan, or completely different?
>>2862362
I saw the same question three days ago.
>>2862362
It would be worse, KMT was corrupt
>>2862370
I'd believe it, but I don't come around much.
Anybody have The Gulag Archipelago download?
Please
>>2861925
I bet your local library has a copy faggot
>>2861977
We don't have those where I'm from
In antiquity the Eastern Roman Empire was far more productive and wealthy than the Western Empire. Nowadays though, aside from a select few oil kingdoms, the countries making up the former Eastern empire is far behind the former Western empire. When did this reversal happen and why?
>>2861845
The Turks ran it into the ground trying to conquer all of Europe.
>>2861845
Probably there were also some environmental changes, some caused by natural climate change and others by human activity... after all, Egypt isn't exactly a breadbasket of the entire Mediterranean anymore.
>>2861845
something something european enlightenment
Anybody know where I can get an extremely in depth look and analysis on the Soviet Union, and Stalins actual personality?
Also, who are some of the most important/notable associates of Stalin?
Stephen Kotkin.
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=CB123EEE591D9D517013BF2464994C90
>>2861843
Thank you comrade
>>2861843
How do I use this again? I'm not quite familiar with this.
The NSDAP had plans to relocate the Jews to Madagascar in 1938 instead of Palestine. The Zionist already had plans to relocate Jews in Palestine through the Balfour Declaration in 1917.
The UN is created after WW2 in 1945
The UN recognizes Israel as the legitimate Jewish State three years later.
Is this what World War II was about? It was deciding where the Jews would relocate? Had the Jews agreed with the Germans, would the middle east be a lot peaceful than it is now?
>>2861641
Loved to see the niggers in Madagascar culturally enrich kikes.
Of the 5 bloodiest wars in the ME since Israel was established, none have involved Israel
Israel being responsible for arabs murdering each other is hilarious /pol/ damage control
>>2861641
they had talked about madagascar but they never put it into action. it was just an extension of the original thinking pre-wwii that they needed to encourage jews to leave germany. this had some success but older jews and the poor weren't eager to start a new life somewhere else or didn't have the means to. eventually I suppose they decided with the jews already rounded up in ghettos in Poland that it would be simpler to send them somewhere nearby for extermination rather than the logistics nightmere that transporting millions of jews to africa would be.
What has caused Western societies to generally stray from and abolish capital punishment?
>>2861509
communist plot to undermine the West
They are afraid of wrongly executing someone that doesn't deserve it.
the meme has spread through western culture that vengeance is not justice, and in fact undermines justice. And capital punishment is blatantly nothing more than a spiteful revenge killing, a government sanctioned murder of someone particularly disliked. Nothing can be learned from it, nothing can be gained. There is no positive aspect. The only argument in favor of it is a cold spartan one - that we should just kill undesirables because it's cheaper than paying for them for the rest of their lives - that leaves a bad taste in the mouth of most essentially liberal westerners.