Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 871. page

>>2923276
Vanguardiam with third-worldist undertones.

>>2923276
Lenin and Mao were arguably more similar to each other than either were to Stalin. They both thought that the jump from agrarian feudalism to Marxist-Socialism was possible, whereas Stalin and Marx both believed that industrialization were required first.

Take a ball peen-hammer and smash yourself in the head a few times. When you're slurring your words and can no longer control your bowel movements, you're there.
This works the same with all Marxist ideology.

>>2923135
Neither. Fuck them both.

Henry II wanted to establish the makings of a secular government with his judicial reforms, which infringed on the Catholic Church's domains. This all gets traced back to Henry II's great-grandfather William the Bastard promising the Pope that he would make England a papal domain in exchange for his support. After the Conquest when the new Pope called William out on this, no shit the Norman bastard reneged on the deal as well as his anti-clerical spawn William Rufus.

Becket wasn't the Saxon hero of legend. He was a Norman that got uppity with his power and didn't give a rat's ass about the local peasantry.

If only Henry IV of the HRE had knights as loyal

>>2923135
>Who was in the right?
certainly not the turbulent priest

File: cry.jpg (161KB, 620x412px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 620x412px

>>2923039
avanti italia

CREDERE, OBBEDIRE, COMBATTERE

>>2923039
GIO-VI-NEZ-ZA!

File: Image 18.gif (406KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 320x240px

Trust in me, just in me
Shut your eyes and trust in me
You can sleep safe and sound
Knowing I am around
Slip into silent slumber
Sail on a silver mist
Slowly and surely your senses
Will cease to resist
Trust in me, just in me
Shut your eyes and trust in me

>>2922579
You have unhealthy obsession with snakes my dude

File: Mirth.jpg (638KB, 1088x932px) Image search: [Google]

638KB, 1088x932px

>>2922600
>>2922600
checked and keked

>>2922295
I like this post

>>2922295
You mean how tried and failed resulting in his people becoming the most loyal and integrated subjects of this imperial aggressor?

>>2923174
I thought that was the Serbians or moldavians

>>2922104
If someone isnt from ur race they were filthy barbarians

>>2922104
My impression is that Egypt was famous for its learning and the Bible mentions that Tyre was known for its craftsmen and Lebanon for its lumber.

>>2922145
Not true.

If someone was from a different race they were there to kill you and rape your women

>>2921898
>it's a non-conventional warfare is a bitch episode

if Israel was the genocidal state people claim it is it would have genocided itself out of this situation

>>2921948
It tried by pretending the Sabra and Shatila massacre wasn't happening under their noses.

File: German-Dutch_Friendship.jpg (864KB, 2784x1856px) Image search: [Google]

864KB, 2784x1856px

>>2921103
Rhine thread?

File: sprat.jpg (68KB, 831x440px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 831x440px

>>2921103
*teleports across you*

I assume you mean before it was influenced by other religions with strong anti-homosexuality sentiment. As Paganism constitutes extremely varied groups of people and mindsets, it might have been perfectly okay with groups who saw it as not their business who loved whom and why they did, as long as they otherwise contributed to the good of their group.

>>2920909
Homosexuality wasn't a meme until the 19th century, when people were such avid career memesters they realized they could live their whole lives as a meme.

Back in the day you just fucked boys in the ass, and if you let men fuck you in the ass than you're a woman and unworthy of respect.

Having gay sex was probably considered okay as long as it wasn't excessive but I think in nearly every culture around the globe men were expected to marry and have kids with women, thinking mostly of Greco-Roman culture.
Probably wasn't too different essentially everywhere else.

>>2920595
Which one was this again? Was this the Cataline conspiracy? I need some context OP.

>>2920595
Obviously Catalina and his fellow confirmed conspirators. They would've killed every senator who opposed them and toppled the Roman government in the worst way possible. Were it not for Cicero, Roman civilization wouldn't lasted and spread as much as it did and we would be living in a very very different and uncivilized world.

>>2921366
Yeah, its Catiline after Cicero's oration, left sitting alone by the other Senators.

Catiline was in the wrong morally and legally, but Cicero overstepped his rights in ordering the executions.

File: 1452015771976.jpg (15KB, 396x209px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 396x209px

>>2919840

They were always sour, but Hitler had to go and attack western Europe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_intervention_in_the_Russian_Civil_War

>>2919840
FDR was poisoned by British intelligence. FDR had a very close and friendly relationship with Stalin, which seriously disturbed Churchill's post war plans of Anglo world domination.

>>2919840
when the entirety of the western world attacked USSR?

>Yo himmler
>whaddup dude?
>we should invade poland and piss off all the allies, then let the japtards piss off america
>hell yeah dude
>we should invade russia too, fuck those weirdos
>hell yeah senpai

>>2919661
Thats pretty fucking metal tho

File: 1414433008418.gif (1MB, 396x216px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 396x216px

>>2919661
>yo Goebbels
>what
>the jews
>ahaha haha ha the jews haha

>>2919139
I can respect Jesus hippie turn the other cheek shit and I can respect Mohammed's spread the word of god through the sword

they go very well together

>>2919139
Cognitive dissonance.

You're a faggot by the way. Christ is opposite of dogma shit you think it is.

Why on earth would you think that. Mohammed goes against practically everything Jesus taught.

File: 1495139485851.jpg (316KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1366x768px

>>2918974
>PROS:
1. Delayed the rise of the Turks who were taking Byzantine territory.
2. Slowed the spread of Islam
3. Provided safer roads for christian pilgrims and traders
4. Put most of the Mediterranean under Christian powers
5. Saved the Byzantine Empire from destruction (until 4th crusade ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°) )

>CONS:
1. Most Europeans left after Jerusalem was captured, meaning that armies/garrisons were
next to empty
2. European tactics and armor were adopted by the Muslims which led to future Crusader defeats
3. Since European Crusaders took the land they captured and did not hand it over to Emperor Alexios I Komnenos, relations between the Byzantines and Europeans diminished.

File: indiana-jones-and-the-last-crusade.jpg (89KB, 912x388px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 912x388px

The crusader aesthetic is the most swagged out shit in military history, for one.

File: 13th Cent 7.jpg (92KB, 545x767px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 545x767px

>>2919679
It is. But the armor is so damn pleasing to look at tho.

Sin will overcome us if we slay such aggressors. Therefore it is not proper for us to kill the sons of Dhrtarastra and our friends. What should we gain, O Krsna, husband of the goddess of fortune, and how could we be happy by killing our own kinsmen?

PURPORT
According to Vedic injunctions there are six kinds of aggressors: 1) a poison giver, 2) one who sets fire to the house, 3) one who attacks with deadly weapons, 4) one who plunders riches, 5) one who occupies another's land, and 6) one who kidnaps a wife. Such aggressors are at once to be killed, and no sin is incurred by killing such aggressors. Such killing of aggressors is quite befitting for any ordinary man, but Arjuna was not an ordinary person. He was saintly by character, and therefore he wanted to deal with them in saintliness. This kind of saintliness, however, is not for a ksatriya. Although a responsible man in the administration of a state is required to be saintly, he should not be cowardly. For example, Lord Rama was so saintly that people were anxious to live in His kingdom, (Rama-rajya), but Lord Rama never showed any cowardice.

The Buddha predates the Bhagavad Gita by a hundred years. Buddhism was the response to the Vedas however.

>>2918575

Seems likely. The Buddha himself apparently didn't know about it, so it can't be as old as some of Hindus claim.