Which Soviet Ruler would make the best president of United States? Which president would make a best Soviet Ruler?
>No Chernenko
>No Malenkov
fail
>>2984697
Not a Soviet ruler but if Putin was an American politician we would elect the shit out of him. Nixon would probably do well as Soviet premier, of the presidents who were around during and after the office's existence.
>>2984697
Gorbachev, because he was the best ruler the Soviet Union ever had.
Is time a social construct?
>>2984669
Yes.
>>2984669
"Time" isn't, our measurement of it is.
Decimal day soon.
>>2984669
Time is change, there was change before any life was on this planet, so no.
Through history, what are some of the worst examples of canon fodder troops? Like with a ridiculously high chance of being killed or wounded?
I'm thinking 16th-17th century pike formations must have been quite terrible. Never mind cavalry, when you have muskets and artillery shooting at you
Any others?
16th-16th century armies didn't actually fight that much, though. Military doctrine was to avoid decisive battles unless the odds were overwhelmingly in your favor, if possible. You'd spent most of your time marching around, or looting. Cavalry were mostly armed with guns and didn't like to charge strong infantry formations.
You'd be much more likely to die of disease, which hits all types of troops equally.
The obvious answer, though, is infantry in something like the American Civil War or World War 1, where casualty rates were atrocious.
>>2984568
Fair point, and i might have worded it poorly, but what i meant was a type of troop that was not necessarily seen as expendable, but still had a high chance of getting killed
Now in the cases you mentioned, it's certainly a case of modern weapons and outdated tactics, but are there other examples of troops that might have had been used in a tactically sound manner, but still were expected to suffer heavy losses
>>2984589
I would argue that the ACW was not a case of outdated tactics at all. Grant knew he had more than twice as many men as his opponent, so he purposely launched bloody assaults, knowing that he'd eventually be the only one left standing with an army (which he was).
Examples of individuals being revered as heroes or figures of respect among other cultures and peoples?
>dad hates America (Serb)
>his favorite movies are Westerns
>loves a lot of American shit
>loves guns
>drives a Ford
>smokes Marlboro
What's this called?
>>2984370
YES.
>>2984370
There's an island in the pacific that is obsessed with one of the English princes. Also NK really likes Elvis Presley because Kim Jong Il liked him.
Please not the whole 1521 written in books. Thanks
There was no history prior to the Spaniard arrival
>>2984300
simple really. bunch of people doing hoohas and shit
kapampangans were mercenaries and stuff
Ilocandia was china-malay hybrid recognized by the Ming
The bisaya were busy killing each other
Moros were sucking Bruneian dick
>>2984300
an ancient people primarily known for their conflict with the Israelites described in the Bible
Who was your favorite historical nation?
>ottoman empire
Why were the turks unable to keep that big Turkish part in Bulgaria?
>>2984165
population exchanges, although much of bulgaria is still Turkish
>>2984142
>nation
>ottoman empire
Why is Britain so good at dividing and conquering?
Example
>Ottoman Empire & the middle east
>India
>Egypt
>half of Africa
Subtopic: if the allies didnt break up the middle east and left the Turks to keep their empire as long as they play ball would there still be similar problems as we have today such as terror groups, war lords, and extremist relgious leaders? Or can the cold war share some of the blame.
what are your thoughts on these topics, OP
No, because Turkey would be a much more wealthy and powerful state with their Islam dominating the region instead of Wahabism/Salafism. There would be no Saudi Arabia, no extremist mosque funding etc.
I think the real question here is that if Britain is so good how the fuck does Ireland exist?
How did the British get so badly spanked by some uppity bog-dwellers?
Not only that, when they started to get ballsy again in your last bastion of Ireland-NI-when they rebelled and murdered their way across your country, how come you signed a deal which forever enshrined their cause as an integral and essential part of Northern Ireland?
You let Ireland secede, and then have essentially promised that Northern Ireland will eventually do the same by doing everything to protect nationalists and nothing to protect loyalists.
British Autism was the downfall of their Empire.
Who are some historical figures that did nothing wrong
>>2983217
He started a war he had zero chance of winning.
Imagine being a soviet soldier after winning the berlin battle. Imagine the joy of putting an end to the biggest war in mankind history and returning victorious from it to your homecountry
>>2986691
>and returning victorious from it to your homecountry
>Send to far east to beat Japs, because americans aperiantly did nothing for the past 5 years
>>2986691
They much have felt great after raping all of those German civilians
>>2986700
t. ignorant american
What should be a required reading list to comment on /his/?
Pic related.
>>2986521
This desu
>>2986521
I agree
Childhood is blaming Germany for WW1
Adolescence is shifting the blame to Austria-Hungary
Adulthood is realizing that it was Germany all along who turned a regional conflict into a world war
>>2986233
Please elaborate
I'm stuck at adolescence
>>2986348
July 28th - Austria declared war on Serbia July 28th
Russia began mobilization against Austria-Hungary and tells Germany this is against Austria-Hungary and not Germany
August 1st - Germany declares war on Russia
August 3rd - Germany declares war on France
August 4th - Germany invades Belgium and draws Britain into the war
August 6th - Austria-Hungary declares war on Russia
Without Germany's autism, it would've been a regional conflict.
>>2986369
>when you realize German autism is at least half the reason the 20th century sucked so bad
Who was the single greatest US President in US history?
>>2985955
Jackson.
Someone prove me wrong.
>>2985961
muh yooman rights
Calvin Coolidge.
Are turks pretty much arabs? Literally every turk i see looks like an arab. Why dont they look more asian like kazakh people?
>>2985907
Turks are mostly descendants of neolithic Anatolian farmers with a bit of admixture from all other peoples that at some point passed through or conquered that piece of land.
The level of Turkic admixture among the Turks is miniscule. Turks however are LARPers who somehow believe their direct ancestors came from Altai and chased away those smelly Byzantines.
>>2985907
Linguistically they are completely different, but genetically it's a really weird story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Turkish_people
"Several studies have concluded that the genetic haplogroups indigenous to Western Asia have the largest share in the gene pool of the present-day Turkish population.[2][2][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] "
What is your country historical mission?
>>2984685
America. Revisionism.
England.
Maintain the status quo
>>2984685
Italy.
Progress, culture and laws.
If Siberian-Americans didn't practice land ownership then how did the British take their land?
>>2984452
They didn't practice individual ownership but there were still territorial borders based on who worked said land.
>>2984475
>worked
>>2984452
Using your definitions Europe can be overrun by all populations because they derive from Africa.