Discuss battles that countires in the Anglosphere participated in, whether they won or lost.
Alt-right btfo
>>3346439
Am I supposed to be impressed?
>>3346441
Considering how low the bar is set, probably.
> Mbanza Loango economy was based on slavery
how will liberals even recover
Would it be accurate to say that the American Civil War was about slavery for the South but about states' rights for the North?
>>3346098
A more important question would be, How long until the next Civil War breaks out between the left and alt right?
It was about slavery for the South and preserving the union for the North.
The vast majority of the North didn't care how negroes were treated as long as the country stayed together, which is why the North was willing to give up on reconstruction and leave Jim Crow alone until the 50s.
>Artorius will return from Avalon and drive the heathens from Prydein in your lifetime
feels good man
Does anyone have any pictures and/or information about japanese civilians in ww2 (before they were bombed to hell). For some reason I can't really picture what the look/situation for the average middle/high class japanese people in a big city would live life in say, 1942. The magazines and media, clothes, streets and stores. Outlook on the war and the world etc. I can only really picture (or find pictures in google) of some suicidal "peasants" or stuff like that when the US troops started getting really close to main islands or a photo from a plane of a destoryed tokyo.
Sorry if I am having a hard time explaining what I mean
https://www.pomona.edu/news/2016/02/10-fresh-look-lives-japanese-during-world-war-ii
https://kansaspress.ku.edu/978-0-7006-2190-3.html
I found this now, though. But would appreciate any pictures or information
How come Jesus is always depicted with long hair when the Bible says that it's a shame?
>Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
1 Corinthians 11:14
Probably just Europeans making him look more European, since long hair is a cold adaptation that europeans developed (or curly/ no hair is a warmth adaptation that Europeans did not develope, either way)
>>3345676
Probably Hellenistic influence. His depiction looks more like a Greek philosopher or deity or something. In Middle Ages Europe, long hair on men the norm and fashionable.
The historical Jesus probably had short hair like any other 1st century Jew would have had.
>>3345676
Because Christians are stupid. Jesus was from Nazareth, and often called a Nazarene. If you squint really hard, that looks a bit like Nazirite, which was an oath that some Hebrews took to not touch grapes/wine/other grape products, stay away from dead bodies, and not cut their hair. Of course, there's no evidence that Jesus ever swore a Nazirite oath, and even if he did; they're often temporary, with permanent Nazirites like Samuel and Sampson being the exception, rather than the rule, since Jesus drinks wine and touches dead bodies without seeming fussed about it.
But that won't stop more than a few people insisting that Jesus was a Nazirite.
The Titans did nothing wrong
*eats babies*
So what coat of arms are here besides Austria, the eagle on the right is HRE eagle but what is it paralleled with
>>3345550
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_and_coats_of_arms_of_the_Austrian_states
>>3345658
Thanks anon
>tfw you'll be able to eat the rich in your life time
Feels good man
>>3345536
youre gonna have to eat something
>>3347418
top kek commies BTFO will they EVER recover?
>>3345536
>communism
>food
LMAO
>>3345523
REKT XD
Would the Axis have fared better or worse than the Allies did in an Operation Neptune style offensive?
worse due to not having control of the seas or air. The initial landing troops would be cut off from the sea by the Royal Navy and then pushed into the sea by better supplied troops with armour in Britain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea_Lion_(wargame)
>>3345511
Considering they lacked any sort of landing craft at all no. For Sea Lion they planned on using towed river barges and underwater tanks to land on the beaches and unless they can then quickly secure a port they have no way to supply the landed troops
>>3346787
b-but I thought the nazi's were an unstoppable super army?
Explain him to me.
>>3345470
>old becomes new
this really activated my melanin production
It's something poltards post everytime they want to jerk each other off.
What would have happened in the parallel timeline where Ross Perot got elected in 1992?
>>3345436
He was basically an earlier Trumpian populist.
nothing
the same people would rule the US
Kirkegaard : Do you agree with this statement?
>Christian dogma, according to Kierkegaard, embodies paradoxes which are offensive to reason. The central paradox is the assertion that the eternal, infinite, transcendent God simultaneously became incarnated as a temporal, finite, human being (Jesus). There are two possible attitudes we can adopt to this assertion, viz. we can have faith, or we can take offense. What we cannot do, according to Kierkegaard, is believe by virtue of reason. If we choose faith we must suspend our reason in order to believe in something higher than reason. In fact we must believe by virtue of the absurd.
Fichte argues here for the conclusion that "The human being (like all finite beings in general) becomes a human being only among human beings...if there are to be human beings at all, there must be more than one...."
What did he mean by this?
>>3345169
He means that humanity is a spook.
>>3345169
Man is a social animal. You know, what the Greeks were saying almost a three-thousand years beforehand.