>PALESTINA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oliOWcS8254
Palästinalied https://youtu.be/isxvXITTLLY
What if the 1991 attempted coup d'etat in the Soviet Union had succeeded?
>>3347245
Then perhaps we would be living in a timeline where the USSR collapsed in 1991.
Oh wait.
soviets/east slavs were always whores for the west. trying to copy and imitate the west and prove itself to be a better cocksucker than the west. see french ballet as a perfect example of them riding western cock.
the soviet leadership were all on americas dick. they craved everything about burger phallus. the rightful inferiority complex led to the destruction of ussr.
if the coup had succeeded, ussr would still be copying and riding burger dick like the whore it always was.
>>3347464
why is humor funny?
because it makes me laugh :)
Diffusion of otherwise anxious situations. Sorta like nature's way of relieving stress.
>Look at the old man, he fell down.
AHAHAHAHAHA
vs
HOLY SHIT, HE'S HURT.
>I'm acting like a clown
AHAAHAHAHAHA
vs
Who is this strange man in strange costume? Is he a threat?
Let's have a thread about historical conspiracy theories.
I'll start.
In the Vatican library there are historical texts that are not being made public because they show that Jews paid the church to keep the ban for christians to take interests alive. The Jews do this so they have a monopoly in that business and can take high interest rates.
Now you.
>>3347114
Is there any evidence at all for that or is it just a rumour?
>>3347615
Well the jews exist don't they
>The Jewish nigger Lassalle who, I’m glad to say, is leaving at the end of this week, has happily lost another 5,000 talers in an ill-judged speculation. The chap would sooner throw money down the drain than lend it to a ‘friend’, even though his interest and capital were guaranteed. In this he bases himself on the view that he ought to live the life of a Jewish baron, or Jew created a baron (no doubt by the countess). Just imagine!
>As a profound secret, he told me and my wife that he had advised Garibaldi not to make Rome the target of his attack but instead proceed to Naples, there set himself up as dictator (without affronting Victor Emmanuel), and call out the people’s army for a campaign against Austria. Lassalle had him conjure 300,000 men out of thin air — with whom, of course, the Piedmontese army joined forces. And then, in accordance with a plan approved, so he says, by Mr Rüstow, a detached corps was to make, or rather set sail, for the Adriatic coast (Dalmatia) and incite Hungary to revolt, while, heedless of the Quadrilateral, the main body of the army under Garibaldi marched from Padua to Vienna, where the population instantly rebelled. All over in 6 weeks. The fulcrum of the action — Lassalle’s political influence, or his pen, in Berlin. And Rüstow at the head of a corps of German volunteers attached to Garibaldi. Bonaparte, on the other hand, was paralysed by this Lassallean coup d’éclat.
>He introduced himself to these people as the ‘representative of the German revolutionary working class’ and assumed they knew (to use his own words) that his (Izzy’s) ‘pamphlet on the Italian war’ had prevented Prussia’s intervention and, in fact, that he had controlled ‘the history of the past three years’. Lassalle was absolutely furious with me and my wife for poking fun at his plans, quizzing him as ‘an enlightened Bonapartist’, etc. He shouted, blustered, flung himself about and finally got it fixed in his mind that I was too ‘abstract’ to understand politics.
>It is now quite plain to me — as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify — that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a nigger). Now, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow’s importunity is also nigger-like.
>If, by the by, Mr Rüstow was responsible for thinking up the march from Padua to Vienna, I should say that he also has a screw loose.
>Salut.
>Your
>K. M.
>Palestine
>Independant nation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oliOWcS8254
>>3347112
Hitler pooped his pants!!!!!!!
Why does no one care???????
Got any UK government conspiracies?
That whole "paedophile ring in the top layers of media, government and the military who have been raping and murdering kids for decades and covering it up" thing is the go-to one.
One of the supposed victims is in court right now for allegedly wasting police time.
Oh yeah and that "having spies in every part of every Irish republican group, some who were in positions where they could prevent attacks without blowing their cover, but were allowed/ordered to let them happened anyway" one.
/tg/ here and i had a few questions regarding economy during and around the fuedal era and onwards.
How did the economy of towns during the medieval era - early renaissance era work?
What would cause a town to be poor or rich? How much did the ruling nobility control a towns wealth? If a town was poor and desistute filled with sick and those with no prospects how could a town or city rebound from that? How did trade between towns in the same kingdom work? What about between different kingdom's. How important was actual money over bartering
>>3347015
Feudal era encompasses way to much time and as a concept its ill developed. Certain parts of Europe were never Feudal to begin with.
Tthe laws of the market as we know them today largely functioned the same back then. When Adam Smith penned down his wealth of nations the economy functioned quite similar to how it had done five hundred years earlier, though people were richer.
Many towns had a high degree of autonomy and could set policy.
In practice this led to cities competing with each other with mercantilism legislation. High import duties on knives on Florence while those from our own city are not taxed or taxed lowly.
My advice would be to start with The Cambridge Economic History of Europe from the Decline of the Roman Empire.
The subject is really to big to write a 4chan answer about so feel free to ask more specific questions.
>>3347015
In the 1930's, in a small town/village in southern Jutland in Denmark, my great-grandfather would trade dried peat (for fuel) for half a pig and other foodstuffs with other people in the town/village
Bartering didn't rreally truly end until industrialization and the modern age was in full effect
>>3347015
>How did the economy of towns during the medieval era - early renaissance era work?
How did an entire economy work? This is a bit of a broad question. The laws of supply and demand explain most activities that were repeated. Around 90% of the population were farmers so we can surmise that all but the largest cities would be rurally oriented.
http://faculty.goucher.edu/eng240/medieval_prices.html
>What would cause a town to be poor or rich?
Trade. Before the renaissance the only places in the world that had a GDP per capita higher than $1000 were trade centers.
>How much did the ruling nobility control a towns wealth?
Minor nobility and merchants owned a lot of property and had political influence. As the medieval era progressed, authority gradually shifted from local earls and barons to a complex legal system.
>If a town was poor and desistute filled with sick and those with no prospects how could a town or city rebound from that?
The destitute would have to be sent to the countryside where food is cheaper and join the cohort of landless peasants. The town could try to restore order and open up trade and try to attract resources, though this would take time.
>How did trade between towns in the same kingdom work?
There were few restrictions. If a trade was large enough there might be frictions. I found this interesting example.
http://users.trytel.com/tristan/towns/ipswic11.html#p03
>More intractable was the threat to Ipswich's commerce from Harwich...
>How important was actual money over bartering
Bartering seems to be limited to the very poor where for whatever reason it is easier for them to transfer a commodity they produce like butter rather than sell it themselves. There are few cases where the currency has collapsed and the wealthy are reduced to barter.
https://soundcloud.com/geetanjali-onlinemusicschool/acoustic-picking-18
Hello and welcome to the History of Rome.
Wasn't that a Garageband sample though
Redpill me on Akhzivland. Why does it exist?
Why the fuck does Aerica exist?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerican_Empire
post old memes
inb4 pompeiiana
>>3346933
>pregnant Anne Frank will never stumble onto a pair of drunk 101st Airborne troopers spraypainting Kilroys on the wall of her Annex and wonder "what the fuck are these autistic Americans doing?"
>>3346964
we were the most autistic out of all the allied troops
*steps off Train*
>>3346827
Lenin: "This will do"
>>3346827
This could have actually lead to an Axis Victory had it been done sooner.
>>3348205
1. Never use "Allies" and "Axis" when talking about WW1. The correct terminology is "Entente" and "Central Powers."
2. I doubt it. Sending Lenin to Moscow with funding was Ludendorff's opportunistic way of taking advantage of Russia's political vulnerability after the abdication of the Czar. Sending Lenin in earlier, before the Czar abdicates, wouldn't have had the same result, because the Czar would have just had Lenin arrested if he were still in power when Lenin arrived.
General military tradition thread, can be ancient or modern
I noticed recently that despite how modern and evolved we are, we still have interesting military traditions and ceremonials just like the Romans or any of the like would have, for example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_UmfyiCsoY
Nearly every society in pre-modern times has hated bourgeois merchants, from China to Rome. Even states and societies that relied heavily on trade to enrich themselves (such as Venice and the Arab rulers in Syria) tended to create trade aristocracies that functioned, in practice, much like the guilds. However, nowadays, trade is generally a valued part of the economy and many economic historians point to the change in attitudes towards trade as one of the important developments that led to the creation of the modern economy.
My question is, how did this cultural shift come about? I don't want /pol/ BS about Jews. Why did monarchs and aristocrats, who generally viewed trade as a non-noble activity, suddenly change their ideas? Did the English Revolution and Dutch Republic really change everything?
>>3346723
>Nearly every society in pre-modern times has hated bourgeois merchants
Prove the Phoenicians did
>>3346723
Marginalist Revolution. It took a long time to develop the idea, and it still hasn't completely caught on with everyone, that there's no such thing as an intrinsic value to a commodity, good, or service.
>ancient mode of thought.
We have a ton of softwood lumber. It is worth X. If you can buy and sell and trade said lumber to make a profit, you must have tricked someone else to make it. You are dishonest.
>modern/marginalist mode of thought.
You have a ton of softwood lumber. It has no fixed value. You try to find the person to whom it has the greatest subjective value. By doing so, you have created aggregate wealth, same as any laborer. You are an honest and valued member of the community.
>>3346745
>nearly
also they probably had a merchant aristocracy
Good leaders born in the wrong era.
>>3346617
He was an enlightened monarch during the enlightment. It was literally his rightest era
1. Have you ever converted religion?
2. What religion did you convert to?
3. Why did you convert?