Opinions on Eddie Marbo?
>>3355262
He sacrificed his own right to land for the benefit of his people and AATSI.
Based.
>>3355287
I just realised I spelled his name wrong.
>>3355324
Yeah it's cool though dude.
SERIOUSLY What the FUCK was his problem?
>>3355222
More like what the fuck was people's problem with him
His father was basically an Emperor and he say that the sucessor his council chose for him wasn't fit so he decided to appoint his son
The council probably only elected Ali because he was a relative of the prophet, Yazid was in the right here. He gets slandered to much by shites and sunnis alike
Plus we have already seen that the Umayyads were more successful than Abassids could ever dream so he really was in the right
>>3355510
>yazid is better than the literal animorph champion of god
>>3355222
He literally did nothing wrong
Tell me about Eastern batallion.
Was it as comfy as it is depicted in the movie with barely any work and lots of food and playing soccer?
>typical aryan master race
>>3355172
>Was it as comfy as it is depicted in the movie with barely any work and lots of food and playing soccer?
That movie isn't a very accurate depiction of anything.
Leave Beira to me
Is the ultimate historical redpill that America beat the Vietcong-NVA, but lost the Vietnamese War?
historic bugs
Did the Allies lose against against the central powers because the germans got uppity and ended up nullifying the treaty of Versailles? No?
Therefore usa didn't lose the Vietnam war just because Saigon got invaded after they left. Deal with it.
>>3354971
bugs...easy on the revisionism
2 pronged thread
1- Is this book about the Mongols good? Its free for kindle
2- Was Teddy Roosevelt a good president? He wrote the forward
when did you realize hamilton was right?
Brilliant man but a little unhinged.
>>3354539
big government is the only solution
Who was in the right?
Didn't Washington do a whole bunch of shady political maneuvering against other black leaders?
Du Bois just wanted people to write poetry and shit.
>>3354419
Washington was willing to make blacks a permanent working class in an Apartheid system that was never going to honor it's promises of upholding a pro-american albeit black blue collar class instead of European immigrants.
Dubois recognized the futility of trying to uplift the poorest black underclass and instead focused on intergrity and increasing a black middle and upper class.
Both had fault, clear Dubois won because America never cared for the poorest black masses.
>>3354419
Also does anyone else notice talk of Dubois vs Washington posts and questions only occur during the school year and never the summer?
proof:
P1. Assume the laws of logic are true.
P2. All propositions are either true or false (Law of Excluded Middle, P1).
P3. The proposition “This proposition is false” is neither true nor false.
P4. There exists some proposition that is neither true nor false (P3, Existential Generalization)
P5. It is not the case that all propositions are either true or false (P4, Change Quantifier)
P6. It both is and is not the case that all propositions are either true or false (P2, P5 Conjunction).
C. Therefore the laws of logic are not true (1-6 Indirect Proof)
Logic BTFO
>>3354337
bump
>>3354337
reality isn't composed of platonic forms kiddo
>>3354337
> The proposition "This proposition is false."
Is not infact a proposition but a description of a proposition/a statement about one. An english teacher would tell you that you have not described the subject. What is the proposition you are talking about when you say it is false, what is "this proposition"? If you try to write it out, you will not be able to because you infact have no subject. So you are trying to apply logic to something that is incomplete and cannot make sense.
Its like saying "This thing is red. Prove that it isn't." We can't because you have not assigned a definition to "This thing."
Gay and handsome historical figure
>pic extremely related
>Historical figure has friendship with someone of the same gender
"THEY WERR TOTALLY GAY GUYS"
This unironically makes me hate fags.
>>3354093
>"When Philoxenus, his lieutenant on the sea-coast, wrote to him (Alexander) to know if he would buy two young boys, of great beauty, whom one Theodorus, a Tarentine, had to sell, he was so offended, that he often expostulated with his friends, what baseness Philoxenus had ever observed in him, that he should presume to make him such a reproachful offer."
from Plutarch's Life of Alexander
so how much liberty was there in medieval europe in terms of mocking the king? I've heard rumors before that anyone caught mocking the king would be thrown in the dungeon, but the court jester could just brutally trash them.
"Medieval Europe" comprises dozens of countries and hundreds of kings over a period of 1000 years, you're gonna have to be more specific
You know that country next to us that just fought the United States to a stalemate? Let's attack it. Yeah, they have a hardened combined arms military that draws on lessons learned from decades of fighting Japanese, French, and Americans. Not to worry, we have zealous light infantry that are experienced at massacring peasants.
...did he do anything wrong? Why did his empire fail so quickly?
>>3353507
>pol pot
>empire
Wut?
>>3353507
No
he good boy
dindunut
>>3353581
Angkor Wut??
>Petitioning the emperor to declare war no less than 30 times in the course of a year
What the fuck was his problem!?
>>3353484
he was a germanic
>>3353484
He was a white heterosexual christian male.
A lot of things, possibly including being a lovesick idiot.
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-scandalous-love-affair-started-world-war-i-10646
>The Chief of Staff of the Austro-Hungarian Army, the highest ranking soldier of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, responsible for the lives of millions of soldiers and the survival of one of the oldest European powers at that time, appeared to have an unusual priority--winning the heart of a woman, a married Italian aristocrat named Virginia (“Gina”) von Reininghaus, while the old world around him was plunging into the abyss. In the midst of the slaughter in Central Europe, a love-crazed and heartbroken Conrad, branded the ‘architect of the apocalypse’ by one biographer, still managed to compose one letter a day, often two or three, to his inamorata; between 1907 and 1915 he would end up composing more than 3,000 letters to her—some more than sixty pages in length. This tumultuous relationship played the most important role in Conrad’s life and may have vicariously contributed to his prewar obsession with launching a preventive war against Italy and Serbia. Indeed, it may have contributed to the outbreak of the First World War, given Austria’s pivotal role in the conflict.
this man saved USA from being an utter, impotent failure of a country. literally, if his opponents were allowed to have their way, usa would've been so weak and fragile.
prove me wrong, /his/
>>3353323
>sameposting this hard
kys
>>3353328
>can't prove me wrong
/his/ btfo, how will /his/ ever recover?