Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 482. page

struggle, fallen fighters, etc.

File: Red_and_yellow.jpg (25KB, 500x497px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x497px

>>3175858
Don't forget the yellow for a winning combination

>>3175858
Because of the blood of the workers crushed by monarchism, feudalism and capitalism.

just /pol/ seapage

>>3175694
>Easy to access part of history
>Nazism appeals to people with "struggles"
>/pol/

It's simple really

>>3175694
Because, as JFK noted, Hitler was the most remarkable man of the 20th century. He had a cult of personality in life, and it somewhat remains after death.

Media saturation of Nazi imagery doesn't help.

>JESUS FUCKING CHRi-
>USSR

Payback's a bitch

Wait! I'm interested now(and I'm a complete ignorant): why are JP and RU there?

>>3172398
The Nazis killed more poeple than Japan and USSR.

"leaders" as a concept was invented at different times and different places for different reasons, but one example would be that with the advent of agriculture, some people just had more successful harvests and better access to arable land just sort of by chance. over time, they'd institutionalize their access to a river or something and make people acknowledge their rule to get food from their excess harvests, over time creating a labor force that could then build irrigation canals and further curry favor with others. over time, if they were not obeyed, they would assert their leadership by cutting off the canals and things. this is one example of thousands if not millions of leaders re-emerging in new contexts at new times of human history

>>3171916
Divine right

>>3171916

LEADERSHIP IS NOT SOMETHING ON WHICH PEOPLE FORMALLY AGREE; IT IS SOMETHING THAT OCCURS NATURALLY AMONG HUMANS, AND AMONG SOME ANIMALS.

LEADERSHIP IS NATURAL; IT IS THE AVERSION TOWARD LEADERSHIP THAT IS UNNATURAL.

File: IMG_0951.jpg (109KB, 800x506px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 800x506px

>>3171750
Why did Japan re-open their ports for trade? Did they fear the yankee warrior?

WHOSE FUCKING DUMBASS MOTHERFUCKING IDEA WAS IT TO MAKE BOHEMIA AND HUNGARY THE SAME COLORS IN THAT MAP
WHAT DENSE PIECE OF SHIT CARTOGRAPHER DOESN'T MAKE TWO ADJOINED NATIONS SEPARATE COLORS
>b-b-b-but the pink line around the HRE
MAN FUCK YOUR PINK LINE BULLSHIT THAT'S NO EXCUSE
THAT'S SOME CARTOGRAPHIC HORSESHIT RIGHT THERE
FUCK THIS SHITTY FUCKING MAP FUCK YOU OP FUCK YOUUUUUUU

>>3171822
This.
Also its similarly colored to Brandenberg which makes it worse.

Left: noble savage
Right: crusaders dindu nuffin

4chan is obsessed with Hitler for some stupid reason.

>>3171391
Contrarians and edgy fucks

I'm not 15 anymore

>>3170654
We like Italian fascism

File: Fascism_against_Nazism.png (3MB, 2276x1554px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2276x1554px

>>3170667
any arguments?
>>3170673
made a thread a few days ago that was full with poeple crying about their freedumbs

File: Busby_2015_admixture.png (685KB, 1024x742px) Image search: [Google]

685KB, 1024x742px

>>3169819

100%

>>3169819

Cause you are comparing them with Germanics who also have Mongol blood.

>>3169831

The Asiatic admixture in Scandinavians is older

File: rommel.jpg (23KB, 242x306px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 242x306px

He was alright and a decent enough guy, but the "le ebin Dessert fox" gets kinda old.

File: Patton.jpg (396KB, 1240x800px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1240x800px

Since we have those two, may as well finish off the trifecta

>>3169240
>>3169247
>>3169251

I think we've covered all the bases here.

File: Mao_Zedong.jpg (22KB, 242x350px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 242x350px

>>3169171

Also: Kim-Il-Sung, Stalin, Louis XIV, Columbus

File: FDR_in_1933.jpg (2MB, 2500x2942px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2500x2942px

>>3169171

>>3169178
And Obama, Bush, well literally any US president since Roosevelt

It was great. Definitely recommend going to see it in a theatre for the full experience.

>>3168014
It was shit. Wouldn't recommend it unless you watch it somewhere for free.

>>3168014
I'm in the middle of the fence with this one.

It's a good, well made film, but not a very entertaining movie. More like a documentary if anything.

America is where culture goes to die.

accelerating capital processes, all that's solid has melted into air, etc.

How do you define "culture" specifically?

File: 1500537230950.jpg (57KB, 498x498px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 498x498px

DO

People who virtue signal don't actually care.

>You are a potent mix of ideologically driven virtue signalers
Congratualtions, that's history in a nutshell!

Also, your meth head autiistic manchild of a leader lost get over it.

North Africans

>>3165675
Baetica

>>3165675
Gauls obviouxly


>All ages are most fit for military service, and the old man marches out on a campaign with a courage equal to that of the man in the prime of life; since his limbs are toughened by cold and constant toil, and he will make light of many formidable dangers. Nor does anyone of them, for dread of the service of Mars, cut off his thumb, as in Italy:93 there they call such men "murci," or cowards.

File: dr_monsanto.jpg (55KB, 720x549px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 720x549px

>>3164901
Yes.

Not /his/ related faggot. But yea, gmo hysteria is unfounded and retarded.

>>3164901

>Now that the dust has settled, can we finally agree that GMO's are the logical next step to selective breeding?

They have the potential to be, but right now they actually have a fairly poor track record and the claims of increased crop yields have been shown to not be backed up by the data in many cases; something even the relentlessly pro-multinational corporation NY-times has reluctantly admitted.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/business/gmo-promise-falls-short.html?mcubz=0

https://archive.is/4EBkk


>LONDON — The controversy over genetically modified crops has long focused on largely unsubstantiated fears that they are unsafe to eat.

>But an extensive examination by The New York Times indicates that the debate has missed a more basic problem — genetic modification in the United States and Canada has not accelerated increases in crop yields or led to an overall reduction in the use of chemical pesticides.


The vast majority of GMO's are just edited to withstand massive doses of herbicides and pesticides as a cost-cutting measure. Not only are these toxic and have been implicated in causing autism, cancer, degenerative disorders etc but there is often no real improvement to crop yields and the only practical effect is that the food is coated in toxins that consumers and people living near agricultural areas ingest and absorb.