Who were the most humane colonists in the New World? Or did everyone just rip natives off?
>>3186166
>humane colonists
This would usually be an oxymoron. However, the French were notorious for marrying natives for the sake of alliances along other things.
> The French were eager to explore North America but New France remained largely unpopulated. Due to the lack of women, intermarriages between French and Indians were frequent, giving rise to the Métis people. Relations between the French and Indians were usually peaceful. As the 19th-century historian Francis Parkman stated:
> "Spanish civilization crushed the Indian; English civilization scorned and neglected him; French civilization embraced and cherished him"
—Francis Parkman
Pic related is literally Frontenac participating in a tribal dance
>>3186166
The French. They were pretty decent to the Native Americans in comparison to their colonial counterparts. They were more interested in building one-sided trade relationships with North American tribes, rather then exterminating them. Plus the French stuck to their forts and cities so relations were relatively healthy.
Although, they could only afford to do this due the face they had slave labor in Haiti.
But by far, French were the most humane.
>>3186166
>>3186176
>To boost the French population, Cardinal Richelieu issued an act declaring that Indians converted to Catholicism were considered as "natural Frenchmen" by the Ordonnance of 1627:
> "The descendants of the French who are accustomed to this country [New France], together with all the Indians who will be brought to the knowledge of the faith and will profess it, shall be deemed and renowned natural Frenchmen, and as such may come to live in France when they want, and acquire, donate, and succeed and accept donations and legacies, just as true French subjects, without being required to take no letters of declaration of naturalization."[4]
> A literal German-killer, Protestant-aiding Roman Catholic cardinal declaring tolerance for native americans
When you watch Dunkirk, remember that it’s a whitewashed version which ignores the bravery of black and Muslim soldiers
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/dunkirk-france-1940-french-soldiers-algeria-commonwealth-white-wash-a7874501.html
Sorry racist, but white people arent even real
No, you are perpetuating white genocide by bringing up non-white participation when Dunkirk was an all white battle.
>>3186123
What about the Blacks in Wehrmacht and Waffen SS?
>Americans lost this
No, it was an overwhelming victory for the US. K/D ratio and every battle won. It has no bearing on the matter that NV broke the peace agreement later.
>>3186050
>No, it was an overwhelming victory for the US.
What does Clausewitz say?
> "War is the continuation of politics by other means."
What great political objective did throwing thousands of young men to their deaths fulfill?
>>3186075
>Clausewitz
Fuck that faggot Clausewitz. War is about glory and defeating the enemy. US won Vietnam hands down. This is why America is the greatest warrior nation in human history, it has won every war it has fought.
This place is pretty horrible tbqh
>>3186035
You just describes 90% of human interaction mate.
Oh nice that's the main goddess my family worships.
Good taste op.
Just leave then.
You don't argue to convince your adversary but to convince the audience/lurkers to your point of view.
I once read, that whenever civilization collapsed, its art and architecture reversed to its most primitive form of simple geometrical shapes. Is this true? Because that makes the modern age a bit disturbing.
ill give it a few bumps
Pic related is 102 years old. That collapse is taking its time.
>>3186018
Most of that modern age stuff started after WWI, created by people who experienced civilizations clash in the most miserable and awful war in the history of humanity. Their world was collapsing for them... well, the ones who got into modernism anyway.
It would have marked the beginning of the end had the World War trilogy ended hot instead of cold.
>ALWAYS collaborated with krauts when it came to eroding Europe (most notably with the 30 years' war and communism)
You tell me
>>3185936
No they killed dozens if not more with their useless wars wich they themselves started. Their kings were nothing more then homosexuals constantly having incest orgys and their population thinks a revolution means you have to cut off everyones head off until nobodys left.
If you wanna see a good guy look at Lichtenstein.
>>3185913
>Make Goys Revolution
>Cant control the shitty revolution and declare war on everyone
>Invades Spain causing that all his colonys chimout
>Now the half of america is a fucking piece of shit
Yeah, they're the good guys... fuck you.
>2017
>still using the M*rcator projection as the world map
how can society advances when we still lie about the earth /his/?
>>3185903
Mercator is literally the best system for navigation though.
t. Worked as a navigator
>>3185903
What do you think we should use then?
> Iceland not with Europe
> Britain not in the middle
Who would you rather save, /his/? Anne Frank or Sophie Scholl?
>>3185895
None, id safe the tzars daughters from the bolshevicks.
>>3185895
Sophie Scholl is a tranny
>>3185895
Whoever of them who gives me the succ
No edgelord shit, I mean real eye openers
Taoist philosophy is the biggest red pill I've ever come across
Daoism is indeed the right direction to be truly redpilled, eventually you will know the Dao generates laws in the universe we all know Legalism is the true redpill.
Hinduism, especially Shaivism.
Making your own philosophy and living by your own principles are the biggest "red pills" out there. Everything else is worthless. You can start by doing what you would normally do privately in the public.
What is your favourite order of holy knights, and why?
I know very little, but on aesthetics alone I like the Teutonic order
Templars. Too bad they got shut down. They would have been a force for good in Europe.
>>3185637
I like the Spanish Knight Orders, they were the defenders of Christianity in Spain and the hammer of the muslims for hundreds of years. Santiago is my prefered, tought the Avis or calatrava were badass too.
>>3185707
>You will never charge with your Fraters in close order vs an horde of muslims to defend your faith, your king and your country.
How old is the Basque nation?
>>3185620
Depends of how do you define nation. As a separete group in the Iberian different peoples, pretty old (Pre-Roman), Hannibal used Basque mercs, along Cantabrians and Asturians for example.
>>3185651
nation = group of people that shares a national identity
>>3185620
There is no basque nation.
If you are asking since when is the bong-backed basque bourgeoisie fanning nationalistic lies, that would be the 1890s.
How did black Americans go from having to work for no pay(sans room and board) to getting paid without having to work(welfare).
I myself am a grown black man who will never HAVE to work a day in his life. How do you guys do it? Rely on a job, and work all the time.
There's no way I could live like that.
niggers
>>3185224
Drugs
>>3185224
Were Evola and Guenon (and related philosophers) just robots (/r9k/ I mean) from the pre-digital era?
Srlsy it's all
>NORMIES REEEE
>MODERN SOCIETY IS SHIT
> WE WERE BETTER IN THE MIDDLE AGES WITH THE CHURCH AS PRIESTLY CASTE
>WHAT? NO, THAT CHURCH WAS SOLAR UNLIKE THE MODERN ONE
>ROASTIES REEE
>MUH HYPERBOREANS
>MUH KALI YUGA
>REEEE
Or what?
>>3185040
Well they aren't wrong
Define robots? Both had wide social circles and sexual relationships. Guenon was married twice with kids, was involved with a ton of organizations, and had people constantly writing him letters and trying to visit him.
>>3185131
Doesn't means he wasn't autistic or butthurt
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/08/greeks-really-do-have-near-mythical-origins-ancient-dna-reveals
Polfags lose again.
So Greeks have always been brown, and all the ancient and medieval writings describing them as blonde haired and blue eyed are just bullshit?
I could buy that, it could just have been that they weren't actually white but just paler compared to Levantines, Persians, Arabs, etc, but wouldn't then the blonde hair and blue eyes be considered undesirable because they were the features of northern snownigger barbarians? Much in the same way large dicks were seen as bestial?
>the ancient and medieval writings describing them as blonde haired and blue eyed are just bullshit?
Citation needed.
>>3184923
Light hair and light eyes are not that uncommon in the Mediterranean.
Mesoamerica Thread: Classic Maya edition
Murals of Bonampak:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDudtA1nVa4
Maya Kings and Queens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zw5fo9q9-YY
Mayapan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCp-WqrwuXY
Feel free to contribute other Meso civs btw
Does anybody have the desuarchive link for the past few ones?
Here's a fresh spicy meme
>>3185225
do we not have a purepechan wojak/pepe?