Why do stormniggers flock to the most simplistic "explanation" when asked about any historical incident?
>"Carthaginians lost because they were brown berber subhumans fighting against superior white europeans"
>"detroit was ruined because niggers"
>"third world countries are poor because they're shitskins"
>>3204731
They're very stupid. They can only grasp simple ideas, and usually only one of those at a time.
>>3204731
That's not exclusive to stormniggers. An easy explanation makes it easier to tell yourself you're an expert on the subject. And defending an easy yet shitty explanations gives you a a bigger ego boost compared to the amount of work you have to put in than what a proper explanation would do.
>>3204731
Because Occam's razor.
And because its true. Why else can't you prove them wrong.
>detroit was ruined because niggers
Pretty much undeniable. Genes are the best explanation.
Please, please try your hardest to explain why muh based blacks aren't the main cause of Detroit. Every single living organisms is influenced by genes, except for humans because we're special.
>third world countries are poor because they're shitskin
Also undeniable. Genetic explanation are 100x more effective then any retarded /his/ explanation that can easily be proven wrong by other examples. Wow, who knew the genes of a population can affect a country. Moreover, genetic explanations are not what I would call simple.
Why are historians such gene deniers.
>You have to kill to live
Justify this.
In a human society you don't, except maybe wars but even those aren't life and death situations anymore
There's not point justifying it for animals
>>3204329
What isn't just about that? It makes perfect sense that some organisms would subsist on other organisms. Animal meat goes into other animals and turns into their own animal meat which goes into other animals after another predator kills the first predator or a scavenger eats the carcass of the first predator and life continues cycling on instead of just stalling out in one generation.
That's how it is. You don't have to justify it. What's your alternative? Nothingness? There's nothing else in existence but nature.
anyone recognize this item? it's part of an old mosaic on a rathaus in Austria.
>>3204024
>>3204032
what a...lamentable response
>>3204024
early 19th century faux heraldry
Do you believe the illuminati has run the world since 1760?
>>3203438
Sure anon, it's the (((illuminati))), heh heh heh
>>3203440
what do you say about the satanic child sacrificial ring?
Once America falls what will be the next civilization to take the mantle of Rome.
>>3203397
China.
>>3203397
Brazil
It appears that China will be the next world power, which is interesting because they do not have a culture based on European principles. With the death of America might come the death of the Roman Legacy (which is overrated anyway).
Any WW2 anons want to talk about some of the battles from ww2, with a focus on some of the more obscure or less know battles
There was a big evacuation at Dunkirk, you probably haven't heard about it
Let's talk about the obscure battle of Dunkirk in which bongs got saved by frogs
Are there any real life equivalents of Markarth? (city built by an advanced civilisation that dissapeared and got replaced with an inferior one)
>>3196962
Istanbul
>>3196962
Rome
>>3196962
Indus valley civilization cities
So lets do this! (wanna see how you see asian countires
>>3194964
wtf did Cyprus ever do to you?
how
stop worshiping vishnu
>>3189827
But isn't vishnu also worrshipped in shaivism, and shiva in vaishnavism? They just have different roles or whatever?
>>3189827
Even Shiva is a great Vaishnava devotee
>>3189987
Shaivism and Vaishnavism specifically places one personality above the other. In Vaishnavism for example, Shiva is considered a manifestation of Visnu or Krishna, but Krishna/Visnu is considered the original form of god. Visa versa in Shaivism. It's like how butter is nothing more than milk, but it is not milk.
>>3190052
Yeah both are full of shit, only Jesus is Lord
Anyone here knowledgeable on medieval crafts guilds? Let's say hypothetically I wanted to start a modern day guild for meme-production. What are some essential elements of medieval craftsmen guilds that I would need to incorporate and how would they fit into a meme guild? Obviously we'd have to stick to traditional platforms like photoshop and ms-paint (only proven initiates can use paint?), but what are some interesting aspects of guilds that I should know about? also the idea of a meme-craft guild is my intellectual property now, pls no steal
>>3208821
> a modern day guild for meme-production
oof
>>3208821
I like this idea, it's fucking gay, but I like it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9Dj6QUl1j0
why isn't venezuela true socialism?
what is real socialism/communism?
Not that I want to be that guy because I don't like socialism, but in regards to the "it hasn't been tried", socialism/communism has been tried, but that missed the point because it's not supposed to be "tried". Marx believed that socialism would just be the natural evolution of capitalism one day due to automation just like capitalism was the evolution of feudalsim. But people aren't patient, they don't want to wait they want it NOW so they try to force it.
Was he seen as a traitor by an average french?
>>3208768
I feel like it might depend on region to region.
>>3208768
French here, it depend a lot, he still the WW1 hero, but he is also the collabo guy.
So, we try to not think too much about him, we talk about the vichy gouvnement but not so much about him in particular.
Why he surrender so easy on wwII and fight so hard on wwI?
Who's the Eminem of history?
>>3208744
someone who larps as a non-european? Hayreddin Barbarossa. kings of sicily. wallace fard muhammad
>>3208744
Eminem I would say.
Look
If you had
One shot
Or one opportunity
To seize everything you ever wanted
In one moment
Would you capture
Or just let it slip?
>Could Zeus/Jupiter defeat the Fire Giant, Jormungandr and Fenrir?
Well, could he? I think that him, Mars/Ares and Minverva/Athena could BTFO all of them alone.
What do you think?
>could brown, weak Mediterranean god defeat tall muscly Nordic god
oh man what a difficult question you've posed, OP
>>3208533
If you read the Iliad, Ares and Athena actually get beaten and even wounded pretty easily by the Trojan/Greek heroes on the battlefield.
Sounds like a job for Horus