Anywhere I can download some histories to read offline? I wanted to learn more about other histories but don't have access to internet often, wasn't sure where else to post
Sup /his/
I'd like to know, in your perspective, how these two terms are related with historical text itself and in wich cases are against it.
Let's see.
Why should we listen to these fat fucking sick alcoholic drug addicted mad "intellectuals"?
Most of them are hardly in the state to be telling others how to live their life. Most of these guys were mental, if their thinking worked to give them a better life then they wouldn't be like that.
>blocks your path
>contributes to your gene pool
>>3317859
NO, UNITEDSTATES DID.
>>3317859
Yes, the gooks took us over and we speak gook speak now, eat dogs, and shit in a hole.
>>3317879
>wars are only lost through conquest
Considering we failed our political objectives I consider that a yes OP
Tell me about Macau, are they fated to remain a giant casino?
>there are people who still fall for the democracy meme
What would have happened if Amerindians were never colonized by Europeans, but only influenced by them? Would they have developed modern societies and become civilized?
Post stories of great Aztec/Tlaxcaltec/Acaxee/Tarascan men.
Why is it so remarkable they exist, and how do the frogs manage to do it?
Have there been any historically-documented cases of people shitting themselves as a means of resistance/defiance? I feel like it would be a surprisingly effective tactic.
Guys, help
>most people at my work refers to Robert E Lee as "that racist fuckhead"
>everyone keeps going on about how the Confederacy was all about "SLAVES SLAVES SLAVES"
>I do my best to tell them that it was more than that, but to no avail
What do I do? I'm just a lad who cares about people getting their history right.
>>3317828
get your GED and try to qualify for jobs outside the fast food industry?
>>3317828
I can help
step 1: Realize you're incorrect
>caring about normie opinions when cnn can change their entire worldview in a day
Don't waste your time m8
Historically, how did religion work in China? What was the relationship between Buddhism, worship of native Chinese deities, Taoism, Confucian thought, and the emperor? Let's say during the Qing period just as an example.
I feel (uneducated as fuck opinion) that religion during the Qing was mostly defined by the importation of Christianity, and the subsequent backlash leading to the Taiping revolt. Maybe Qing isn't the best example as a model for Chinese historical dynamics of religion's relation to the state. One thing I do recall though is that Buddhism used to be persecuted as a foreign religion just like Christianity is today
Depended on if a religion was the one favored by the court. Daoism, Buddhism, Confucianism, and Christianity (during Matteo Ricci and then the subsequent backlash) would lead to an heavy investment in the religion within China. For example Wu Zetian spent quite mightly on great works of Buddhism within China. Buddhism and Christanity where also a special case, in that they spread based upon conflict since they were a unitarian religion. If the people and therefore the state were having a hard time the surge of Buddhism and later Christianity were an expected byproduct.
>>3317717
China wasn't religious per say. It was more spiritualist? There was no formal religion or religion head, but there were competing ideologies with political implications. Taoism, Buddhism, and Confucian all waxed and waned, sometimes quite violently purged. I would say the most enduring part of Chinese religion was ancestor veneration and belief (like Shinto and most pagans) in a variety of supernatural entities comprising heaven, rather than one pantheon of gods. These types of belief structures are very fluid, because it's easy to acknowledge more or other gods, and there's no need to impose the belief structure on localized regions, they just worship more minor supernatural entities in the endless sea of them.
To my knowledge Taoism fell off from official court religion by the Tang and never really recovered. Buddhism was extensively used as tax evasion and got violently purged at one point and didn't really recover. Christianity would be a big big deal when it started spreading, culminating in the Taiping Rebellion during the Qing. It also didn't recover after they had thoroughly stabbed most of its adherents. Confucianism therefore won the test of time until Mao's cultural revolution attempted to purge ancestor veneration and it's archaic social structures.
Let's play a game /his/
Let's say important events counting down, at a max of 25 years at a time. Let's see how far back we can go.
Example, I say 2017, you can say something within the last 25 years and so on and so on.
>2017
USA backs out from the Paris Agreement
>2016
America elects a fascist cretin with the IQ of a rodent to the highest office of government.
>2011
American and French cowards stage a violent coup against Muammar Gaddafi, destabilizing the entire region and fucking up Libya
Let's at least pass the 25 year barrier
>1986
Baby Doc exiles himself to France after revolts in Haiti.
>from the Father through the Son is the same as from the Father and the Son as one basis of existence
No. Not anymore than the Son being begotten of the Father and coming to us by conception of the Spirit means the Spirit and Father are one basis of the Son's existence
>>3313471
>>3317614
Criticized for replacing the pope with the bible.....
Still pondering how that could be construed as anything but a good move.
>>3317640
Because the Bible is not intended as a substitute for the Spirit of Truth, and produces a relativist cacophony of countless sects without him. Since the Pope is a substitute for the Spirit of Truth, replacing him with another substitute doesn't actually fix the problem of not having the Spirit of Truth
>>3317659
>Since the Pope is a substitute for the Spirit of Truth
Yes, I suppose if your a lost soul, bereft of the Holy Spirit by choice, a child molester is your next best option.