>"North Europeans never built anything"
>Pic related is from 4800 BC
Hmmmmmm.
>>3318931
rocks, nice try snownigga
>>3318952
It deserves at least the labels "great" and "empire" if we are to apply today's standards.
>>3318952
Pro-tip: our current day time is closer to the ones on the right than they are to the OP image. The distance between the two is gigantic.
Who was in the wrong here?
Leave immigration to me
were they just roman larpers?
Was doing my ancestry and came across this in a military document can anyone read the top row I can clearly make out the name but not the rank. Also last collum is the regiment. Help is appreciated.
Will China be a benign hegemon?
>>3318926
No.
On the contrary: it won't do world police at all.
>>3318926
It won't be benign and it won't be a global hegemon. It will be a regional superpower that prioritizes its national interest (just like the US is now).
>>3318929
This.
China preferably wants to REEEEE and kick US and other superpowers away from it's sphere of influence of East and maybe the rest of Asia.
wtf I hate airborne operations now
Can anyone shed some light on the Western Roman rump states?
I know history isn't very well recorded during this time, but I've read a lot of conflicting information regarding this topic.
Pic related gives a general idea. The thing is, a lot of maps go from before Odoacer conquered Italy straight to the WRE vanishing.
I know the WRE survived in the Balkans where a reconquest was planned, but what about everything else?
Soissons seems to have a pretty clear beginning and end, but what about Africa? Was it really a united kingdom? A lot of maps show different areas too.
Russian and German are a mistake breed of human beings, they are direct descendants of Apes and Jews... they got their blonde hair and blue eyes from NEANDERTHALS(its a fact google that)... a horny cast out retarded Albino ape from africa was one day looking for a mate up north in North eastern Europe and ran on a Jewish Neanderthal in Western Europe on his way and starts Fucking... And they had an Albino Ape mixed Jewish Neanderthal baby and named him Germanius Russiana and moved somewhere near Finland/Poland and their descendants moved east and west which now forms Germany and Russia.
This thing was essentially the 1913 answer to the Action Max console. The page is from the July 26, 1913 issue of either "The Graphic" or "The Sphere."
Hello friends,
I need to write a paper on the United States' Foreign Relationship with the USSR/Russia from 1975-2015. I know next to nothing about this era. Could you help a brother out and give me a few good sources or share some information you know about this era? Thanks!
Can someone explain/red pill me on the cultural differences between these two places?
Also East India? I've googled it but East India looks like China to me
Originally posted in /int/, they told me /his/ will provide a much more educated explanation
East India = Tibeto Burman Hill tribes
North India = Aryan Persian influenced rape babies. Light skinned Literally the niggers of India where most street shitting occurs
South India = Dravidian Master race, with indigenous sea faring maritime Chola glorious ancestors. Dark skinned, literal best part of India by all objective measures. Also have communist state government which is the most developed state of India
https://itunes.apple.com/kr/podcast/the-industrial-revolution/id463700741?i=1000097068125&l=en&mt=2
>After 10 minutes Bragg is satisfied that the listening audience fully understands that Britain changed the world and we move safely on from ‘historical overview’ to our first GCSE question. This one’s easy. Best give this one to Hudson lest she start talking Welsh…
>Bragg: Pat, what were the 3 main causes of the Industrial Revolution?
>Hudson: We must get away from the idea that [the Industrial Revolution] was caused by a wave of gadgets or by a peculiar inventive ability of British science or scientists-
>Bragg: Why?? WHY?? You are not giving this fair due in my mind—Why must we get away from it? People invent stuff, they made things, this made things happen and you keep denying it. ... "Oh its all to do with the broad sweep of history”. Listen people invented things that hadn’t been there before which enabled things to happen that had not happened before.
>Hudson: Can I say that that really does characterise nationalistic accounts of the period with a peculiar sort of emphasis on British genius or...
Bragg: I didn’t say that!
Hudson: Or the superiority of the British as a race, this characterises some really almost racist accounts of the Industrial Revolution…
>Bragg: OH NO! COME ON—THAT’S RUBBISH!!
...
>Bragg: Hold on! When you start talking about my arguments as racist—that’s really not on.
Also lol at the guy comparing c.17th Britain to Japan in the Tokugawa Shogunate
Leftists are only interested in history because of their agendas. They don't see the industrial revolution as the most momentous event in history next to the development of agriculture, they see that it predominantly involves white males and fear racists might use it in theories of racial superiority therefore it must be downplayed and obfuscated as much as possible.
>>3318989
that's a grotesque strawman. one can acknowledge that white men created the foundations of the industrial revolution but still dismiss the notion that there's a "british genius", specially when critical british inventiveness declined as the 19th century wore on to be replaced by further and perhaps even more ingenious innovations by other whitebois
>>3318989
Wtf? That's a gross misunderstanding of what she was saying. She never denied how momentous an event it was
What went wrong?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1CyPjQQTAM
>>3318899
They lied? Marxist-leninism and socialism have a shaky foundation to begin with and there is no reason why an authoritarian state should actually give a shit about any of it beyond propaganda and appearances.
>>3318899
>what went wrong?
Pretty much everything from the very beginning.
>inb4 the tankie retard brigade joins the thread and starts talking about how the Berlin Wall was to "keep out fascism" and the /pol/tards start saying it was a bastion of German conservativism and Prussian values or whatever the fuck those absolute dipshits believe
>>3318962
>Pretty much everything from the very beginning.
Can I please get a quick rundown?
I recently read A Short History of Byzantium by John Julius Norwich, and I've always been interested in classic English poetry and philosophy. So what are some /his/ approved books on English history 100-1500 AD?