You often get Irishmen like pic related, (robert sheehan) who is of full Irish ancestry. He looks the same ethnicity as his Algerian Girlfriend. He even did an DNA test to see if he had foreign ancestry, 100% Irish. Explain this.
>lemme compare a swarthy by Irish standards to the most Europeanized looking whore from MENA I find, this will prove to all the stormfags that the peoples of Ireland and MENA are indistinguishable
back to /int/ kid
also stop trying to be accepted as White it is creepy
>>3319356
>potato niggers
>>3319356
Celts were swarthy. And still are.
Are many of the concepts enshrined in western liberalism (things like free speech, democracy, 'do what you want so long as it doesn't harm others') bad memes? I don't mean memes in the internet sense, I mean in the traditional sense. Ideas that can easily and effectively transmit to others.
Most of these things seem more able to cannibalize themselves and less capable of proselytizing themselves than memes such as religion, which tend to enshrine certain beliefs and discourage questioning them. Say what you will about religions like Islam, when you enshrine that a certain set of rules is protected by a divine figure and harshly punish apostasy you can prevent people from questioning / rejecting it, even in the face of rational argument. Whereas concepts like free speech, by their nature, permit contrary ideas to survive and sometimes thrive, to the point where they can grow in strength and then abolish it (whether it's something like fascism, theocracy, etc). It seems clear enough that the ideal that rational ideas will ultimately prevail is giving the average individual's reasoning skills too much credit, especially as we learn more and more how easily manipulated populations can be. Democracies can potentially elect authoritarians, those who ignore the behavior of others so long as it doesn't affect them can allow certain ideologies to grow under their noses, etc.
Are all these ideals destined to fail in the long run, or do they have the capacity to spread to a degree that outdoes their flaws?
should have just blamed the jews
Yes, they're all stupid memes
Your thinking seem to revolve around free speech. I think it's an absolutely necessary mechanism for a society to prosper. I also think that these ideals are destined to fail in the short run, if ever, and prosper in the long run. But your question is so vast I don't know what to latch on to or where to begin.
In the run up to the first opium war did China have any idea how dangerous the European powers were?
>>3307441
nope, at that time the Qing were too full of themselves
I'm getting more interested in Portugal, what can /his/ tell me about its history like significant moments and people
This is everything you need to know about colonial policy in the Estado Novo
shit country
abaixo do douro tudo mouro
>>3319346
This converts the Nestorian.
wut? didnt you know joan of arc was magical girl?
England did good by burning her then.
>>3307309
and bomber harris was the reincarnation of King Arthur yea
Could one of you gents care to explain what made the Tercio such an effective formation?
Also OP formations for their time period thread i guess :)
Isn't it obvious?
You have a giant pike block ringed with gunmen and, sometimes, swordsmen. The only way to really deal with a pike block is to engage it with another pike block unless you can blast it to shit with massed field artillery - something which wouldn't really be possible until the end of the Tercio's period. If the enemy sends cavalry, they'll just get stuck on your pikes; if the enemy sends regular infantry, they'll get stuck on your pikes and blasted to shit by the gunmen; and if the enemy sends in their own pikes, your pikes will keep them at bay while your gunmen blast them to shit.
Alatriste's depiction of the battle of Rocroi is pretty decent.
https://youtu.be/CTYuYxmICGo?t=40s
>>3307369
Cool video anon, thanks !
dude let's all like share lmao
lmao
Hate to ask but I'm struggling with an essay to do with the first 4 major crusades and whether religion was the prime motivation for them. Not asking for an essay to be written for me but just any knowledge anyone has would be helpful.
>>3307208
Whether religion was the prime motivation for the calling of the crusades, or for the crusaders themselves?
Religion was used as motivation to convince people to crusade. It was not the motivation that stated them.
How do civilizations and peoples fall? How is it that the descendants of the pharaohs in Egypt were working the cotton fields in the American South?
sage this thread
>>3319331
at first I wanted to say something
then I read the OP
saged
>>3319329
degeneration
>Josef Mengele was alive during the same time the vietnam war and the moon landings were happening
>>3319293
HOW IS THAT WEIRD, ACCORDING TO YOU?
HERE ARE TWO ACTUALLY "WEIRD" FACTS:
— THERE ARE PERSONS WHO BELIEVE THAT UNITEDSTATES DID NOT LOSE THE VIETNAM WAR.
— MOST PERSONS BELIEVE THAT HUMANS HAVE "LANDED ON THE MOON".
>>3319293
How is it weird that a person born in 1911 would be alive during those events?
>>3319299
haha spic
>This Guy Walks Into The Club and Slaps Your Girl
What do you do anon?
>>3307111
He just straight up slaps her? Let it be. He's both a tard and my social better.
Historically speaking, what makes it to where Germans are so crazy? They seem pretty bipolar politically compared to anglos and even scandinavians So what makes German culture the way it is?
>>3319248
What a retarded thread...
For as much as you fucks hate Germans it sure seems like you can never stop talking about them.
>>3319372
true
ITT /b/-tier kingdoms and states
>>3307095
modern capitalism
>Acceding to the throne in 1888, he dismissed the Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, in 1890 and launched Germany on a bellicose "New Course" in foreign affairs that culminated in his support for Austria-Hungary in the crisis of July 1914 that led in a matter of days to the First World War. Bombastic and impetuous, he sometimes made tactless pronouncements on sensitive topics without consulting his ministers, culminating in a disastrous Daily Telegraph interview in 1908 that cost him most of his influence. His leading generals, Paul von Hindenburg and Erich Ludendorff, dictated policy during the First World War with little regard for the civilian government. An ineffective war-time leader, he lost the support of the army, abdicated in November 1918, and fled to exile in the Netherlands.
Is this an entirely objective assessment of Willy?
ww1 was started because of his mommy issues. Really makes you think.
>>3319235
The alliance between France and Russia in response to Bismarck's "muh priority alliance with Austria" was inevitable. Plus UK was going to be against Germany the moment the German Empire cucked the Brits in industrial output and economic power, which coincidentially happened in the early 1900s. Murica being the land of the jew, the home of the bank tycoons was inevitably going to side with the Brits.
Tbh I don't see any way around it to have Germany in a winning scenario after Bismarck enrolled Germany in a game it couldn't possibly win.
Well, yes, succesful Schlieffen Plan and capture of Paris. Other than that for Germany... either get fucked or become somebodys cucked bitch.
>>3319752
>Murica being the land of the jew
is this a ironic statement
"Jesus was a Liberal/Socialist/Communist/Capitalist"
Jesus is a socialist commie pinko
>>3306946
"Hitler was a Rothschild-Wallstreet puppet"
>>3306946
>implies he's unhappy with a certain claim
>doesn't refute it
you're the reason this board needs janitors.