Were there any historical events similar to this?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_kpEjrKqf3s
>>2444140
>you will never attend an ECW show
>tfw wrestling will never be edgy again
Srpski Film ?
thats why nobody likes serbia...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Dubravnica
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Plo%C4%8Dnik
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Gallipoli_(1312)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Bile%C4%87a
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tripolje
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kunovitsa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kru%C5%A1evac
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Leskovac
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Belgrade_(1456)
>>2444163
>tripolje
tripoli
>kunovitsa
kunovica
jebes wikipediju majku mu
>>2444134
Kaj je mislil povedati s tem?
I'll make up a concept right now called concept-1. Imagine I asked you what concept-1's true meaning was. Imagine I asked you what concept-1 said I should do when herding goats in Rwanda and I have a cold. And similarly for a hundred other situations. Imagine I claimed that the investigation to find the true definition of concept-1 would require many more years. You'd think I was stupid. Maybe you'd point out that I just invented the term, so I should just define concept-1. You'd say that the "solutions" to the scenarios would have to be arbitrarily defined.
Now imagine the same thing but instead of concept-1 we look at "morality". Why is the investigation taken any more seriously?
>>2444051
Because morality covers what happens when humans die. And don't get humans started on death.
>>2444051
>reads wikipedia article on Nietzsche once
bravo anon you've tackled the first five minutes of community college ethics 101
Can someone please explain why this is a deal at all - let alone a big one? All he did was cross a fucking river. Totally overrated and retarded.
t. mad Hessian
It was a daring surprise attack to stab their enemies in their sleep on Christmas morning, and it worked. The reason it's mythologized is mostly just because of that painting though.
How do people in history justify doing such awful things in such good peoples names?
>>2443895
I wouldn't really call Jesus a good person, he was a racist against non-Jews, thought the world was about to end, and said people should disown their family in order to follow him.
>>2443938
This, but the last part was metaphorical.
He didn't mean people should literally disown their family members, just that the kingdom should be of higher priority than familial ties.
Nothing is of greater importance than the reestablishment of the United monarchy, and the expulsion of filthy Gentiles.
Why is it that being an "intellectual" means you have to care a huge amount about politics, history, literature, and culture while reading and writing stupid, vague, fallacious articles and books about these topics that have laughably over defined and plain bullshitty theories and which are instantly forgotten even though they all aim to be a new Bible? Jesus fucking Christ, this is horrendous. And knowing absolutely nothing about science, maths, or anything practical is no hindrance at all.
I'm not annoyed that it exists. I'm annoyed and disappointed that so many allegedly smart people love worshiping this shit and claiming that you're an idiot if you don't worship harder than a religious person.
because if you didn't care then you wouldn't be an intellectual
>wow im so shocked ppl care about other ppl my stem degree will render me a codemonkey and i will never have to utter a word to them eventhough i am a human being too and secretly absolutely butthurt they dont take my uneducated ass seriously
>>2443875
but it isn't like that.
>mrw racist white people won't admit their ancestors were albino
looks like a noonga
stop stealing noonga history ya bleck cunt
>>2443268
Maybe albino Indians.
>>2443277
...Who migrated from Africa
Is this accurate?
>>2443261
If it was, history would be that chart.
no
>rome
>globalised trade
my oh my the american is strong in this one
>>2443533
>american
Italian.
http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/history.html
Hey guys. I need to finish something, and I would love it if you guys threw down some shit that happened in WW1, which would be considered important events.
I'm trying to look for Treaty of Versailles shit, but anything would do. Jotting shit down will also do. Thank you!
>>2443060
look up ludendorff
>>2443060
We won't do your hw for you, read Wikipedia you lazy kid
Tell me /his/, what is the number one thing that makes you upset and why is it corn?
*maize
>>2443053
t. Gaius Julius Caesar
>>2443053
Op faggotry
How effective was the Athenian Democracy?
>>2442683
shit
the masses ruin everything
>>2442683
muh socrates
What doees /his/ think of In Our Time?
Generally essential listening. Melvyn can be a tosspot sometimes and it is, of course, always way too short for a proper debate to kick off. It could do with being on for an hour or possibly twice a week as a two-parter.
>>2442471
he should do something about his asthma
otherwise pretty cool
SHOULD ONLY BE USED A RESOURCE FOR FINDING OUT ABOUT NEW THINGS AND VERY GENERAL INFORMATION.
IT IS OFTEN SHIT, TOO REDUCTIVE AND MELVYN SHOULD ALLOW GUESTS TO TRANSLATE THEIR IDEAS INSTEAD OF INTERRUPTING.
What is the connection between this pic..and the main theme of the post? :P
>>2442383
if the OP had studied the history of image boards he would have known they rarely stay on topic without clear direction. they did not, therefore history has repeated itself
What was his problem?
>>2442307
>slav
That's it.
>>2442307
Being fucking frog tier ugly
>>2442307
He wanted to marry his son to a princess but no monarch would let him because he was an elective king and didn't represent an established dynasty.
He saved Vienna and all he managed to squeeze out of it was a runt daughter of a duke. And he had to pay a ridiculous sum for even that.
He even had the son with him fighting at Vienna and introduced him to the Emperor when they met but Leopold completely ignored him, didn't even acknowledge his greeting.
How can anyone possibly defend Austrian Economics? Their epistemology is basically faith-based, since they believe evidence counts for nothing in economics, and since economic events have tons of variables, they can just prance around and say that things went according to their theory and you can't prove them wrong.
Do libertarians like them because being an Austrian doesn't actually take the effort of researching and shit?
Not all Austrians are praxeologists
My argument is that they definitely do empirically reason, just not intensely statistically.
Carl Menger must be read in order to grasp high levels of the logical formulations of Austrian, Neoclassical, and Keynesian schools. So he's pretty cool, I guess.