So, technically, Jesus was a bastard, wasn't he?
Christ existed before the Incarnation, so no.
>>2496041
Bastard implies He was the product of an out-of-wedlock union, but He was the product of no union, so no.
>>2496076
Mary and the Holy Spirit dumbass.
How much land and what kind of facilities would an iron age village require to sustain its population?
Assume a population of roughly 200-300 people.
Include both hunting grounds and farm land, as well as things as quarries/trading routes, etc.
depends where the land is.
>>2496034
Assume temperate climates with enough rain throughout the year and snowy winters.
I guess choosing a LARP related image didn't help much...
What the hell were British soldiers doing during the Boston tea party? It had to took a bit of time to throw all the tea cargo to the water, and also, if mob really gathered at the shores it means whole town was probably aware of the current events. Redcoats could easily arrest the plotters, yet the failed to do so. Why?
For the same reason modern communist mobs can attack conservative citizens outside universities today.
Police hold back because their superiors don't want violent confrontations between soldiers and citizen mobs.
Its actually incredibly sad that the state of Democracy has fallen to such a degree that citizens are beaten by political mobs.
they were too busy bumming each other no doubt
>>2495880
the sons of liberty were no t a civilian mob
you putz
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_Wars
The Macedonians were defeated very easily by the Romans when you put things into perspective. Is this proof that they were only successful because of the cheap meme long spears gimmick? Is Alexander overrated?
>>2495753
Is this thread a joke. For fucks sake!
Alexander's enemies were unfamiliar to how to approach defeating the Macedonian phalangx while his Macedonian successors were unfamiliar with how to defeat the maniple.
Alexander never built the main concept of his army of that of a defensive one. In-fact, he was said to do shit like destroy defense dams on the Euphrates, despite owning the territory for a couple years already and them not being used against him, because he didn't like the idea of fighting defensively but always approach battles with an offensive or counter offensive mentality. The Macedonian Phalangx was heavily reliant on auxiliary to function, they needed to have a competent cavalry and or skirmisher forces to work, as-well as Hypaspists to defend it's flanks and to station at forts or garrisons in the places they conquered. If you broke through it on it's sides or back it would easily crumble. And it ultimately required a very experienced officer to co-ordinate the movement and formation of the forces.
The Roman maniple was far more expendable and versatile. They could bend when the situation called for it while the phalanx couldn't. They could fight offensively or defensively, and it was quite frankly more easier for the typical General in charge of a maniple to fully comprehend and know how to utilize the essential units in it, seeing how 3 out of the 4 (or 5, if you count the cavalry, but that wasn't as emphasized or crucial to it as a unit) were more identical with how to function together than a typical general in a Macedonian army would with his units (which phalangites, peltasts, and cavalry which compromised of them were very different specialties that it's hard to be an expert with knowing the capabilities of all of them).
Can you guys recommend me a good documentary about the cold war era from the U.S. point of view.
I'm a filthy european, and very interested in this subject. Doesn't matter if it's 10 hours long.
just Ken Burns
there is really no good documentary on the cold war as a whole, but Fog of War is pretty good.
theres also this. Kind of shitty, but its still alright
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hU3r4q5CV8
another good one about the Soviet-Afghan war and what led up to it is Bitter Lake
Metal Gear Solid 3.
Hello /his/, where would an uncultured pleabaian swine such as myself go to learn about philosophy? I know nothing about the works of classical philosophers and I'd love to learn more. I'd imagine I'd start with the Greeks?
>>2495690
books or the internet
>>2495692
Which books
>>2495704
Buy a second hand Intro to Philosophy textbook and work your way up from there.
Can someone give me a quick rundown on Kurds and why does Turks and Arabs want to get rid of them?
>>2495647
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=kurds
Because they were there.
>>2495634
Great emperor who unfairly gets blamed for the negative effects of the bubonic plague that fucked over the empire. Saying that he overextended the empire is just another way of saying that he somehow should have predicted that the plague would kill off some 30% of the empires manpower and make some of his conquests untenable.
A cuck
>>2495634
A big guy
>Then there was the farcical argument by Captain Cosbie that the men should all look similarly smart with new Spanish morions instead of the Italian form with high crest while - even more shocking - some were black while others were not. The pikemen, moreover, had not been supplied with peascod breastplates. So indignant was he that he had troops throw away their arm defences and only carry helmet and cuirass. Cosbie even moaned about the lack of stockings in Sussex.
Was it autism?
Francis Crosby had decades of combat experience, so I think he might know a little bit more about how soldiers should be equipped than some faggot with a history degree.
It was corruption, he wanted an excuse to buy helmets.
Wuz they Illyrians n shiet?
>>2495510
It's just a theory. There are others, but each one is weird and far fetched.
They take it too seriously.
>>2495510
kinda. they are more illyrian then their neighbors, but they arent 100% percent illyrian genetically. croats are the second most illyrian in their blood. what they do have is some of the illyrian language, even though the majority has changed over the centuries. they are a mix of illyrian, thracian, and minute amounts of greek, roman, and turk. but >>2495523 is right, even if they where 100% illyrian they should try to fix the country they have now instead of looking to the past
Probably.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU55Bxr7T6E
>>2495390
She meant she was litterally a child doing what her cool uncle told her to.
>the queen was litterally hitler youth!!!!
>disregard her military service once against nazi Germany years later once the war started
>>2495392
Well, what did the Queen Mother and Edward mean by this?
>>2495398
Edward the noted nazi sympathiser?
1 KB
1 KB GIF
>Be vikings
>Rule Russia, and with swedish leadership both expand the kievan rus and launch many successfull raids
>Stop being vikings
>Fight Denmark for independent controll of Sweden proper and Russia for controll of Finland
>Eventually win both of those, take controll of most of the baltic, and rise as a great power
>Win 30 years war
>Create the caroleans, one of the best armies in history
>Lose great power status along with continually more and more land, but being adaptable, switch to making huge scientific discoveries and inventions instead
Does Sweden have the greatest history of all the countries?
>>2495385
What can we say? Success breeds jealousy.
>>2495385
Can't forget about that t h i c c culinary tradition. Köttbullar, blodpudding, palt, kebab. It's just so good.
>Be vikings
>Rule Russia, and with swedish leadership both expand the kievan rus and launch many successfull raids
these two immediately disqualified Sweden from any possible nomination into great country status
We haven't had a Burgundy thread in a while.
>>2495292
Noone gives a shit about anything between around 500ad and 1750ad.
Savoy >>> Burgundy
I remember there were 4 biographies of burgundian rulers (including Charles the Bold). How well written are they? Are they more academic or accesible to a larger audience?
ITT: Heroes turned into villains.
I'll start with a classic example.
This is even better example.
Just making Iraq great.
Petain did literally nothing wrong. De Gaul was in the wrong in this case and proved it by not executing Petain. He knew in his heart he had fucked up and France still hasn't recovered.
i know almost nothing about history, but interested in learning about it and get an overview.
can you please recommend me the most valid sources to get me started?
thanks a lot /his/
>>2495135
>i know almost nothing about history
You'll feel right at home then.
>>2495140
kek
unironically, start here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_world
Then, when you are interested in learning more about a time period, ask for recommendations.