why aren't you an archaeologist
Because cultural anthro is more fun
>>2527831
Today, I broke one of my plates trying to dry it because I'm a clumsy fuck. I would never be able to meticulously brush away dirt off of some artifact without smashing priceless historical stuff.
Because I am not autistic
I'm just wondering, if Germans actually conquered Moscow, how would they treat the Soviet government. And what would happen to Stalin? Would he be executed?
I would say Stalin would be executed and so would much of the government and military officials
>>2527697
>I'm just wondering, if Germans actually conquered Moscow, how would they treat the Soviet government
They woudln't even if Moscow fell unless omething seriously bizarre happened. Taking of a city, even a realatively smallish and undergarrisoned city a la Minsk, was the task of a week in optimal conditions. Moscow would have been enormously tougher to crack, and attempting to do so would have taken months at least.
So yes, while Stalin almost certainly would have been executed if the Germans got their hands on him, they have these things called trains that can get him to Kuybuyshev with the rest of the evacuated government should things get too hot.
Stalin's son Yakov was captured by the Germans as a Red Army soldier. He died in a concentration camp in 1943.
Is Islam just a syncretic union of Eastern Christianity and Semetic Paganism?
>monothesitic Abrahamic god
>still has Jinns,
>still has pilgrimages to mecca
>still has Arabic as dominant tongue
i'm Muslim myself, but I think i'm coming to a conclusion on this point.
It incorporates elements from both, but it's more than just a simple union of the two.
>>2527607
modern islam isn't but mecca is believed to be an old pagan site yes
>>2527607
Islam is reformist strict monotheist eastern Christianity without Greco-Roman Paganism which infects Christianity
>Semitic Paganism
Itself dilution from ancient Semitic Monotheism, which Christianity and Islam restore
EL / YAHWEH has always been the supreme god before Bal etc. appears and act as intermediary gods
What is /his/'s opinion of him? Let's try to avoid /pol/ and alt-right posting please and just focus on his philosophy and belief's.
I think he has many valid points in regard to gender pronouns, and his covering of Existentialism is fantastic.
https://youtu.be/w84uRYq0Uc8
Peterson thread?
>>2527519
"& Humanities" was a mistake.
>>2527530
Yes because circle jerking over Rome and Prussia was the right move. Not to mention that for a "History" board the main topics are usually Rome, France, and WW1&2
>>2527519
I like him. He has the best naturalistic theory of religion around, that's for sure.
How will you explain existance of this countries? Can somebody have information about pre ww2 period?
>>2527510
I'm presuming a good number of people can have information on the pre WWII period.
Why, you could be one of them!
first mention of lithuania is from 11 century and they have rich history of being junior partner in PLC
but i agree that the other two are non countries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_War_of_Independence
> I TRIED SO HARD
> AND GOT SO FAR
>>2527495
>>2527546
Carthago DELETE THIS
>>2528447
10/10
>God can do anything
>God can do things without trying
>God can destroy the universe without trying
>the universe is intact
Means we're here for a reason Helper
>god could make the universe perfect
>instead the universe is shit
Truely causes one to consider
>>2527491
>can can make perfect things only
>meaning we're leaving in the best of all possible worlds
You can thank me latter.
>The candidate for political office stood in a plaza, naked, bracing himself against the punches and kicks. The crowd roared, pulsing around him like a beating heart. People for whom he had risked his life in war after war hurled blows and insults from all directions. The candidate breathed deeply. Trained as a warrior, he knew he had to stay calm to reach the next phase of his candidacy.
>This ordeal, documented by a Spanish priest in the 1500s, was merely the beginning of the long process of joining the government of the Mesoamerican city of Tlaxcallan, built around 1250 C.E. in the hills surrounding the modern city of Tlaxcala, Mexico. After this trial ended, the candidate would enter the temple on the edge of the plaza and stay for up to 2 years, while priests drilled him in Tlaxcallan's moral and legal code. He would be starved, beaten with spiked whips when he fell asleep, and required to cut himself in bloodletting rituals. But when he walked out of the temple, he would be more than a warrior: He would be a member of Tlaxcallan's senate, one of the 100 or so men who made the city's most important military and economic decisions.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/03/it-wasnt-just-greece-archaeologists-find-early-democratic-societies-americas
>>2527351
So no one finds this interesting?
>>2527351
Jesus. Those guys were brutal. Can't blame the Spanish for killing them.
>>2527748
The other way around, the Spanish gave the Tlaxcalans privileges for helping them to kill the Aztecs.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but these were the 10 most important historical figures
10. Martin Luther King Jr.
9. Martin Luther
8. Albert Einstein
7. William Shakespere
6. George Washington
5. Abraham Lincoln
4. Adolf Hitler
3. Muhammed
2. Napolean Bonepart
1. Jesus
key word- important, not greatest
>>2527341
>10. Martin Luther King Jr.
The level of hagiography surrounding this man is amazing.
Homer? Cervantes? Dante?
>>2527341
Not one iota. I mean for starters, I'm assuming you're putting Jesus as #1 because of the development of Christianity and everything that comes with it. Except Jesus was a relatively minor figure, all things considered, in the rise of Christainity to world prominence. Paul has a MUCH bigger part, so by all rights should occupy a much larger role.
Then there's the fact that many of the people listed are in there when far greater figures existed. You have literally nobody from the Roman civilization, despite the profound impact it had on the world. You have none of the explorers or patrons of explorers of the Age of Sail and all the discovery and trade and literally world-shattering consequences that had. You serioulsy want to imply that a figure of African-American race relations had world prominence? Moreso than someone like Prince Henry the Navigator? Why is Einstein and his work on photovoltaics and relativity more important than say Newton, whose work on physics has affected everything from that point onward, or to the sort of scientist/philosophers like Bacon or Empiricus whose work led us to having the scientific method at all?
Your list is utter, utter shit, even in terms of importance.
Are there any historical figures who got through major controversies and became great afterwards? Asking for a friend.
>>2527186
Trump.
>>2527186
Nigga got purged twice
Admiral Rickover
Thoughts on "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" by Yuval Noah Harari?
A lot of sources online says it's fairly accurate, while others say it's popsci shit. I've read the first 20 pages or so and it's really interesting, although the author is a little pretentious and overly confident about some ideas.
How accurate is it? Anyone read it?
>>2527183
Here's a scholarly review from the Journal of Chemical Education;
>I spent much of my early life (when I was not feeding my Tamagotchi) in perennial wait for the next installment of Jean Auel’s Earth’s Children series, so I was eager to read Yval Noah Harari’s Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. I looked forward to a description of the crucial shifts that occurred to bring Homo sapiens from hunter-gatherers to today’s city dwellers, grounded in up-to-date research. It also had great reviews, a 4.5-star rating and it was on Amazon’s Best Book of the Month list when I selected it. The first part of the book did not disappoint; I was captivated by the descriptions of how early humans interacted with prehistoric Earth. Harari describes how humans gained dominion over other species, ascribing this achievement to the “cognitive revolution”. The second part of the book describes the “agricultural revolution”, as humans abandoned their nomadic lifestyles and settled into farming communities. This was followed by the “scientific revolution”.
>In the first part, Harari presents conflicting theories and weighs in with his own voice as to which seems best supported by the available evidence. Each chapter ends with questions and cliffhangers, spurring the reader forward into the next. As the human story progresses, there are fewer citations and more statements that left me scratching my head. For example, Harari describes China as accepting the culture of “former Western overlords”. Another story Harari relates is about Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin carrying a Native American tribal message with them to the moon. A quick Google search revealed this account was first relayed by Johnny Carson in his Tonight Show monologue.
>>2527240
>Later in the book, he contrasted the ancient remedy for chapped hands rubbing them with olive oil to the modern solution that the scientific revolution has provided us, listing the chemical names for the ingredients in hand cream. However, the first five ingredients listed after water are present in olive oil! This type of rhetoric only serves to promote chemophobia and mistrust of science, and seems more appropriate for a blog touting the latest “natural” remedy for measles.
>After reviewing our progress in the context of these revolutions, Hariri offers his comments on whether we, as individuals, are happier since they have occurred, and makes predictions about how science and technology will propel the continued evolution of Homo sapiens. However, the undocumented claims and nonsequiturs of Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind interrupted my journey through the text like speed bumps in a residential neighborhood. I reached the end, but because Hariri had lost nearly all credibility at that point, his conclusions bounced off me like a stone off a windshield.
>be emperor
>start war with the sea
>it ends in a draw
how can you be that awesome?
>>2527061
Neptune btfo
You're like a little baby, watch this
>be the king of kings
>the sea destroys your bridge
>get the sea lashed and chained
>it doesn't destroy your bridges anymore
Why couldn't they just get along? (minus Panama)
They share the same heritage - post Spanish colony with mixed population of Amerindians and Europeans, speak the same language, are tiny on their own, whoile together they could be slightly less irrelevant
for latin america, the 20th century was the century of strongmen politicians. for that kind of polity, you need to create enemies everywhere to unite your people.
all of those countries had foreign powers intervene in their affairs throughout the entirety of their history -- not too easy to be stable when people with x10 your economy are destabilising you on purpose.
finally, after being corporate proxies for their entire history, they settled into the great gig of being cold war proxy war hosts.
now the area is garbage (which the exception of panama, a US puppet, and Costa Rica)
>>2526871
EL SALVADOR WON THAT FUCKING SOCCER GAME
I've seen these ring looking things on a good chunk of ww2 era German aircraft and I'm curious about their purpose, is it for early forms of radar? I can't think of any other purpose for them but I haven't found any evidence.
(forgot to mention, it's right on top of the engine on this 162)
They would pierce a Jew's nose with it and drag them along on flights as a sort of cruel reference to the "free air" joke. This was before they decided the bear and eagle were much more efficient.
>>2526823
10 hours of searching with google
Was this the greatest man to have ever lived?
>>2526692
>A loser
>A manlet
I don't think so
>>2526699
that's not Julius (I fucked your wives, I fucked your sons, I crossed the rucking Rubicon) Caesar
crucified the pirates
rekt and pillaged the gauls
ended the corrupt and effete republic
just like our current God Emperor will end the democratic and judiciary rot