Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1475. page

>>2531849

Thats just ancap with the trappings of a bygone era.

Democratic-feudalistic minarchism is the best.

File: fb78fe7a7b457bccfafc6c1b6836ede8d9ad3b0b2a563a40515def1996de5bf5.jpg (44KB, 677x771px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 677x771px

>>2531849
>replacing spooks with an even bigger spooks
Ahahahahahaha. I don't think you know what real anarchy is

>anarchism
>feudalism
Pick one

>>2531785
Now that i think about it i never heard of Scandi Celts, but the main point of my question is about Germans and Slavs

>>2531789
Iirc Germans lived between the Rhine and the Vistula, and originated from Scandinavia

...this board was a mistake

>>2531781
Do you want me to be offended?

>>2531781
I'm rather glad because evolution shows us that humanity is not forever stuck being what it is right now.
Once the burgers start through with genetic engineering because they cant let the chinas keep attain a monopoly, the IQ of the new human+ could allow us some pretty neet insights. maybe even during our own lifetime

>>2531781
Nah, apes are pretty cool animals as far as I'm concerned.

>>2531699
>Is any historical figure safe?
Yes, liberals

>>2531699
>Hitler
>extremely successful

>>2531699
Alexander was a raging faggot with an insatiable appetite for penis.

File: artid111-etruscan-art-28-728.jpg (105KB, 728x410px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 728x410px

>>2531680
Right-wingers are completely torn on the issue.

The golden goose that is Bible thumping evangelicals who do the heavy lifting as voters all believe that it does.

The edgy contrarians on the fringes of right-wing culture are fine with it and wish that evangelicals would drop the issue so that it would be one less wedge issue keeping people from being more receptive to libertarian/alt-right principles.

>>2531680

>an ideology with actually slaves and child soldiers calling out anyone else

>>2531713
> everyone who disagrees with me is a communist

tl;dr they tried to suppress an anti-colonial revolt by indiscriminately killing Vietnamese people to fill quotas.

>>2531638
America or at least many of its people weren't committed to it.

>>2531638

Because they didn't have any real mission objectives. The war as a whole was one big military test. Using up the old weapons that have been sitting around for 20 years and testing out the new ones. The "containing communism" shit was just a front.

>>2531607

bumping

Pros:
You have a decent voice
Your mic is not shit (at least in episode zero)
You don't insert pandering memes into the episode, despite your profile information
Cons:
Couple of stutters here and there, or incomplete sentences

I like it anon

>>2531607
I'll give it a listen bro, cheers for the link

>to appreciate and fully understand the Torah and the Bible

What you're reading in English is the butchered and translated product, for hundreds of years at that. Nobody can deny that the original language of a literature piece is more authentic than a translation. What a dumb thread

>>2531536
> You don't need to read in the original language to appreciate and fully understand the Torah and the Bible
You actually do.

>>2531536
The fuck you smoking? The Torah is still read in ancient Hebrew.

looks like he really got dropped on his head after birth

no wonder he wore wigs all the time

>>2531523
What the fuck happened to his head

Would tut/10

its like ethnicity isnt strictly genetic and is based more on language that is imposed from the top and doesnt actually change the genetic composition of the people living there or something

It's a physical crossroads between three major sections of the world. There gonna be some demographic shifts over time.

>>2531495

Today's Anatolians have the same genes as the ancient Anatolians. They just speak an Asian language now and practice an Arabian religion.

>>2531472
Anglos aren't Germanic, they're barely even white and are some weird mixture of pre-Celtic shitskins, Celtiberians and Jews.

>>2531556
>Germans
>Germanic
Ok Mehmet

>>2531556
>Germanic people aren't Germanic because I say so

Retard

work makes free
they wanted to make them believe that after working very very very hard, one day they would have been free
sry for bad english

>>2531285
Note that I'm only somewhere around B1 in German, take this all with a grain of salt.
>arbeit
Simple enough word, means work in the context of labour, and work in general I guess.
>machen
More complex, but essentially it means 'cause', 'produce', 'make', as opposed to tun which just means 'do', as in what one does in general.
>frei
Free

Work causes/makes freedom. (it's translated as "Work will set you free" a lot but it's easier to understand a literal translation)

Possibly an ironic message (working one's self to death)

Or, if they work hard enough they will be freed.

Or, by working they will give up their old ways. A lot of survivors came out with much less mindless greed, from what I understand. As in, less wasteful. Like Great Depression survivors.

Arbeit meanings:
[1] selbstgewählte, bewusste, schöpferische Handlung
[2] ausführende, zweckgerichtete Tätigkeit
[3] Tätigkeit, die erledigt wird, um Geld zu verdienen
[4] Verhältnis, bei dem man eine Tätigkeit gegen Geld verrichtet
[5] kurz für: Klassenarbeit, eine schriftliche Prüfung in der Schule
[6] Volkswirtschaft: einer der drei Produktionsfaktoren
[7] Physik: Energie, die durch Kraft über einen Weg auf einen Körper übertragen wird
[8] etwas, das Anstrengung, Mühe kostet
[9] Ergebnis einer Tätigkeit; Produkt, Werk
[10] Ort, an dem die Tätigkeit gegen Geld verrichtet wird

machen:
Bedeutungen:
[1] in einen bestimmten Zustand versetzen
[2] umgangssprachlich: herstellen, produzieren, anfertigen
[3] machen, dass: veranlassen
[a] früher auch mit Infinitiv
[4] umgangssprachlich: tun, tätigen, handeln, ausführen, erledigen
[5] euphemistisch für:
[a] koten
[b] urinieren
[6] regional für einfüllen, auffüllen
[7] ostmitteldeutsch, mit Hilfsverb „sein“: den Wohnort wechseln, vom Wohnort wegziehen
[8] umgangssprachlich; es machen: koitieren, Sex haben
[9] verursachen, hervorrufen
[10] durch geschäftliche Tätigkeiten verdienen
[11] umgangssprachlich, mit „sich“: eine meist positive Entwicklung nehmen; sich aufwärts entwickeln, wachsen
[12] salopp: eine bestimmte Rolle übernehmen
[13] umgangssprachlich, abwertend: etwas oder jemanden mimen, eine bestimmte Haltung nach außen hin einnehmen
[14] mit „sich“: sich in eine bestimmte Umgebung gut einfügen, gut irgendwohin passen
[15] umgangssprachlich auch mit in etwas: sich auf einem bestimmten Geschäftsfeld betätigen
[16] umgangssprachlich: eine bestimmte Summe Geldes betragen
[17] bei mathematischen Operationen (insbesondere bei Addition, Multiplikation und Subtraktion, Division): ergeben
[18] den nachfolgend umschriebenen Laut von sich geben
[19] regional: gehen
[20] beginnen

>>2531268
>So, /His/ did the Jews in Israel, prior to the Roman conquests, have their own nobility

Yes.

> if so, what was its role?

Pretty much the same as in other places. They were often the wealthy landowners and rentiers. Hell, you even had them after the Roman conquest, although they declined in importance; for instance, the Mishnah, one of the books of the Talmud, was compiled by "Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi", with Nasi being one of the titles they had back then. (Modern Hebrew is president, biblical era Hebrew is often rendered as prince, but it's not prince in the usual European mold, he wasn't related to the monarchical dynasty; he was a tribal leader.)

>>2531286

So, it sounds less of a nobility in the hereditary sense, and more like a status conferred through a title because of a person's own personal qualities? Would you say Jews, at the time, were more egalitarian?

>>2531325

>o, it sounds less of a nobility in the hereditary sense, and more like a status conferred through a title because of a person's own personal qualities?

No, not at all, it was most definitely hereditary. It's more like, as was often the case in Europe and other places, it's the nobility who has the leisure time and access to education to go on and do stuff beyond farming and herding sheep.

> Would you say Jews, at the time, were more egalitarian?

Than whom? I'm not hugely up on the history of things like egalitarianism and social mores in the classical era near east. I know there was some degree of social mobility, mostly if you were bright and could become a prominent rabbi, but other than that, there doesn't seem to be much. And of course, things like the priesthood was completely hereditary.

File: nordcuck.jpg (432KB, 1400x1630px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1400x1630px

>>2531220

>>2531220
Why do you think Nordics looked like that

File: Hugo_van_der_Goes_-_Portinari_Triptych_(detail)_-_WGA9706.jpg (120KB, 800x1028px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 800x1028px

Why did nordics depict themselves as ugly cucks when todays nodics look like.... oh wait

Genghis Khan Gere to cuck your shit

>No puede
That's awfully polite

File: Trotscuck.png (103KB, 763x768px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 763x768px

>>2531159
Comrade Stalin here keeping your country safe from the west and alive economically. Also probably the only guy to have people in the west, the soviet bloc, and the asian theatre collectively shitting their pants about what he may do.