I see there is so much anti-german on this thread. My english isn't perfect but allow me to explain.
When you say we germans are barbarians and savges its true. Yes we are barbarian because we can see through false limit and restraint on our life we dont necessarily need to live under false morality.
Want to live wihout the christian religion? No problem we do it god is dead.
Want to party and dance and create the music ? No problem we do it like savage make music with machines electronic because we not hold back by tradition music instruments
Want to take the druk? We do and we party like savage
Want to walk around without the clothes? Go nude like we do? No problem its just nature we are at home in nature.
Need the land? Want there to be more german more industry, money and power in the world? We take, no problem.
We are not afraid to use war to reach our ends, we don't let go of our grudges till we punish our enemy like savage, like barbarian
We love just being in the nature, we love the beer to drink, we also take the drug but we also work hard live discipline life do everything thoroughly and efficient
We love the sport, good at it too.
We are free and wild but we are disciplined and noble too. We adventure the world, go all the way to australia outback not worry about border or limit, like we always have. Goth even went to africa. We are everywhere in world being polite and nice to you even though not smiling like fag, but also take the druk and party and if we want to be fag we can do too
>>2540234
The main reason why people dislike Germany is because the German """race""" is literally worse than niggers. It's nothing personal, because Germans aren't people.
Germans are subhuman
>>2540234
>t. Ahmed
We were so close in restoring the Roman Empire..... Why is fate so cruel?
WE
>>2540188
>Turks
>Roman
Pick both
What do you guys think about Luther?
>>2540145
The very definition of "did nothing wrong".
He should have designed a re-Unification program as part of his rebellion.
While he objectively succeeded in getting the Papal authority to reform under better practices he also sired over 9000 spin-offs and heresies.
Christiandom has been in a state of decline ever since with the Catholic Church mainly spreading the word through missionary work.
Tldr: He didn't have a viable strategy going forward
>>2540145
They should have cut his cock and balls off and made him eat them, then raped his anus with a pitchfork and then made him admit he was in league with Satan and then slowly burned him to death on a small fire.
Operation Typhoon was a mistake. Hitler should have spent autumn 1941 stabilising the Leningrad-Rostov line and let the red army bleed themselves in pointless attacks while he spent his energy reinforcing.
In 1942 instead of going for the south, he should have gone all out on Moscow, pulling every western division available, and attacked Moscow from the 3 fronts, north, west, and south.
The Russians would have never let Moscow fall easily, they would have committed every last reserve they have. Hitler could draw out all the red army reserves into a battle of annihilation, using superior tactics to destroy them like had done at Kiev.
With Moscow gone, soviet leadership would cease to function, he could then push the leningrad Rostov line eastwards effectively cutting off the Volga from both sides and encircling Stalingrad. The route from the heals would be cut off and all the Caucasus oil would be his. Russia would then be willing to discuss peace terms.
what he should have done is encircle and starve every city to death to preserve his soldiers and equipment
just like at leningrad
>going toe to toe in urban fighting with soviets
read more books
>>2539971
And if the Red Army is not colossally retarded and does not keep making pointless attacks that don't work?
>>2540093
Tell me again how successful the siege of Leningrad was successful
*gets teleported behind while praying*
he was a weak pussy
>>2540231
fucking how do you figure, he was one of the most successful military leaders in Europe at the time
>>2539961
*sucks on nipples*
why did medieval European art take such a nose dive in quality?
Firstly, much of what gets called "bad" is little more than doodlings in manuscripts. Secondly, we see a stylistic move away from realistic to representational. See the way that hands are generally sculpted in more elegant elongate forms over more squat realistic forms, something which clearly demonstrates a stylistic choice. In many areas of Europe there would have been a disruption of arts infrastructure with the ebb of the Roman Empire, that said what survives is heavily skewed towards manuscript drawings which are not representative of the whole.
>>2539954
This 2bh
Anyone up for another Enver thread?
>>2539900
No, I prefer Nicky over that scoundrel any day.
>>2539918
Genuinely or for the memes?
>>2539920
For the memes.
Why did Xerxes retreat such a large portion of his forces after the defeat at Salamis? He still had another 400 ships and could've easily starved out the Athenians with a blockade, but it's like he gave up. I can understand we he personally left for Asia but his strategy seems unbelievably retarded
>>2539825
if you have soldiers across the hellespont you have to send food to feed them
>>2539825
they gave up, more or less
after salamis the phoenicians just kinda sailed home, and without them the persian fleet would be easy pickings
ALSO xerxes claimed victory because he technically accomplished what he set out to do, which was raze athens
>>2539825
Why could the Greeks not simply eat Salamis?
Was Stalin actually a decent person, despite genociding millions of his own people?
He apparently had a great (and sometimes very dark) sense of humour and was even kinda playful and jokey. I think it was FDR or De Gaulle who called him Uncle Joe.
>>2539698
>food shortages
>drought
I blame God.
>>2539698
>genociding
>millions
>of his own
If Hitler had captured Moscow in 1941, would Stalin have been killed
>>2539683
what if he escapes before the possible german encirclement
>>2539686
But Stalin refused to leave Moscow and dug in, just like hitler
No way he'd have got more attention by keeping him alive like a trophy. Maybe a public execution if he was his grandpappy tier like Wilhelm Bismarck f3 etc
So, it's been two and a half decades.
Was ending Apartheid a successful venture or not?
Just chime right in guys
No one has an opinion on Apartheid?
>>2539742
surprising since this board is more or less a /pol/ colony.
anyways, to the matter at hand: define successful first.
Who is the best leader ever?
Can be from any era and doesn't necessarily have to be a formal leader, just a person of great influence
LYCURGUS
>>2539541
deep down in your heart you know its true
>>2539550
Shouldn't have tried for a gold backed dinar. What a stupid mistake
Was it autism?
Why do you need that many nukes? 100 are enough for the fucking apocalypse.
>100 are enough for the fucking apocalypse.
no it isnt
>>2539531
It is enough to turn the most populated areas of the enemy into ash. You are talking bullshit.
probably not. a single modern nuke wouldnt even completely destroy london or NYC
Why Europeans make "fuck (to have sex)" bad mouth?
Is fuck more dirty than shit or poop for the western culture?
>>2539484
Not sure if it's a backronym, but I've heard it can refer to "fornication under the crown king," meaning it would imply sexual acts preformed outside of the purpose of procreation. Not saying someone's guilty for enjoying sex, just sex that can't result in children or sex outside of marriage.
what country are you from, my man? Korea?
Also it has to do with the religious differences of a largely Christian Europe that saw any sex outside of marriage as sinful (as well as some kinds of sex even WITHIN marriage)
Bodily functions on the other hand are dirty, but not "sinful."
the words "shit" and "piss" are at comparable levels of vulgarity to "fuck" though, and none of them are as bad as something 'dirty' AND 'sinful' like "motherfucker" "goatfucker" etc.
>>2539491
No, it's "Fornication Under Consent of the King"
Allegedly it was an order given in medieval France during times where the population was too low.
hi, I'm having trouble understanding whose side Italy was on during ww2.
so this book I'm reading says that in 1943, Italy joined the allied forces, right, but I had always assumed that Italy was with Axis, all throughout that war. why did Italy start fighting Germany? was this a result of discontent with Mussolini's rule?
>>2539450
On 24 July 1943, soon after the start of the Allied invasion of Italy, the Grand Council of Fascism voted against him, and the King had him arrested the following day. On 12 September 1943, Mussolini was rescued from prison in the Gran Sasso raid by German special forces.
>>2539450
>Mussolini declared war on Allies.
>Allies kicked Italy's shit in; invade Italy.
>King and other Fascists decide to cut losses.
>Kick Mussolini out; make peace with Allies.
>Germany would have none of it; occupy much of Italy.
okay, then my next question is, how did that happen, Italy joining the allies. did they actually start fighting Germany, or was it more or less Italy giving whatever resources it had (including land), to the Allies?