what are some /his/ approved books on world war 2
>>3328844
>his
>read books
>>3328844
Antony Beevor's "Stalingrad" and "Berlin Downfall 1945" were very good
>>3328895
>Anglos
Seriously now
Question to /his/ bros, how did Byzantine Iconoclasm finally ended? I have no idea how Orthodox church operates
>>3328828
white men
>>3328828
back to >>>/vg/188084516
La Plata
In our University, Archaeology students have to go through one year of Latin and one year of Ancient Greek.
For the next two years of their Bachelor's degree they focus on different subjects instead.
But it sounds tremendously stupid to have them just learn the basics of each language, and for what exactly?
Is there something to it I am missing out, or is it really that simple and stupid?
>>3328759
What university?
Also i don't think you realize how much it would take to learn perfectly both Latin and Ancient Greek.
>>3328774
It's the biggest university in Bulgaria, Sofia.
I do understand the material for First-Year latin students, and I honestly don't think they'll ever use it for anything of importance.
>>3328784
Well the basic courses in ancient languages are meant to provide you with just that - the basics.
Later on when they specialize in a certain field and progress further in their education they'll most likely have to further their studies in languages, usually on MA or PhD courses.
Why did we stop fighting communism after the fall of the Soviet Union? Why did we allow communism to grow in our universities? We spent decades dropping bombs on communists and trying to remove them from our society, but today no one gives a single fuck that people are flying hammer and sickle flags in our streets.
>>3328748
Remove jews and you remove communists, simple as that.
>>3328748
The best way to support liberty and conservative ideals is to let people see a glimpse of the alternative.
One of the main reasons I think socialist Sanders lost was because of what state socialist Venezuela is in.
Same reason I think we need to let anti fa burn everyone up. Best way to help our cause is to just let the left be there left.
>>3328748
>but today no one gives a single fuck that people are flying hammer and sickle flags in our streets.
Because daddy Marx was right and he's coming to rape you American faggots in the ass.
Is an imageboard an inherently bad format to discuss history and the humanities?
If so, what about it is it that makes discussion so bad?
What can be done by the users to improve it?
What can be done by the administration to improve it?
>>3328684
If we actually had fucking mods it wouldn't be so bad.
>>3328684
no, it's only good when autism isn't involved.
>>3328684
It's still faster than your average forum.
Reminder that hedonism is the only valid philosophy for anyone that isn't a beta male.
>>3328592
>this was written by a beta
>>3328592
The only argument against hedonism is it doesn't better society.
What happens when I don't give a fuck about society and would be happy in the woods, though?
>>3328699
Then you'll become a woman.
Which God is objectively the best. Please provide proper reasoning and evidence. This includes polytheistic and theistic gods.
>>3328587
The Trickster. He's everywhere and smarter than everyone.
>objectively
>the best
>>>>/v/
>>3328587
Yahweh, Lord of Hosts was pretty strong. He created the Jewish master race, carried out ethnic genocide to give them a homeland, made all other gods irrelevant and didn't afraid of nothing.
Did any ancient civilizations besides Rome organize their standing army into permanent formations like the legions? It seems like Rome is the only power which organized troops on that basis until you get into the era of pike & shot.
By permanent formations, I don't mean identical to Rome's force structure, but a system of permanent divisions like "I Legion, II Legion, III Legion" as opposed to forming up armies on an ad-hoc basis. I know powers like Persia and China had large and well-organized standing armies, but I don't see much reference to a divisional structure. Did they have one?
>>3328494
>Did they have one?
Yes
>>3328500
How was it structured?
>>3328494
China did not have permanent standing armies.
Why did US perform so poorly in Korea?
>>3328477
Seems pretty fair to me and I am not even American.
>>3328477
the west fought with their hands tied behind their back due to politics
they all made budgets cuts to their military after ww2 as well
>>3328487
>the west fought with their hands tied behind their back due to politics
You obviously know fuck all about what you're talking about.
What is the best /his/ video game and why is it darklands?
>Creepy gothic atmosphere
>Set in a pretty underutilized time period and setting in history (at least where games are concerned)
>Deep CRPG mechanics
>Can help teach you about the >Holy >Roman >Empire
looks pretty comfy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUzx5rxJ8Ec
shame I don't have hours to spend
>>3328284
>mount & blade warband - 1257AD mod
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zm5hQh3Uptw
alternatively
>mount & blade warband - viking conquest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEOUjTnH_ks&t=25
1257AD has a map that spans all of europe, north africa, anatolia and the levant accurate to 1257 AD, while viking conquest has a map that spans the british isles and northern france
Obviously my game, based on the true story of Theseus. Still in development; here's an old beta release from not too long ago.
http://keksociety.com/Theseus/Theseus.exe
13TH CENTURY: MONGOLS
14TH CENTURY: OH SHIT BLACK DEATH
15TH CENTURY: TURKROACHS
16TH CENTURY: SPANISH
17TH CENTURY: DUTCH
18TH CENTURY: FRENCH
19TH CENTURY: BONG
20TH CENTURY: AMERIPIG
21ST CENTURY: CHINKS
RUSSIANS, GERMANS, PORTUGUESE, SWEDES, ITALIANS, ARABS, GAYREEKS, ITALIANS, JAPANESE - GET FUCKED
>>3328277
4TH CENTURY BC
GREEKS
3TH CENTURY BC: GREEKS
2TH CENTURY BC: ITALIANS
1TH CENTURY BC: ITALIANS
1ST CENTURY AD: ITALIANS
2ND CENTURY AD: ITALIANS
3RD CENTURY AD: ITALIANS
4TH CENTURY AD: ITALIANS
5TH CENTURY AD: ITALIAIANS
turkey didn't really dominate much of the world
>>3328277
You could make an argument for the Ming being the most powerful in the 14th century, but they were faggots and I don't want to give the Chinkboos here any satisfaction
*creates everything ever*
Nuttn' personnal
>>3328265
OP, what country are you from and how stupid are you to know nothing about babylonia or the abbasid caliphate?
>Sicily
>creating anything
Maybe in the last 500 years or so but before that fuck no
>>3328282
What?
Sicily created Archimedes, one of the greatest minds to grace the world
They also have literally more Greek temples than Mainland Greece and Syracuse was bigger than Athens, they also created Hellenistic poets and other important figures
How do I cope with the bullshit that permeates everything in modern society?
People tell you that you should read shitloads of boring as fuck novels. I see novels as entertainment, not some tool for gaining "profound philosophical and psychological insights". You can make infinitely many unfalsifiable extrapolations by using anything. People, usually charlatanic academics or pseudointellectuals, choose pompous books for this purpose to try and deter questioning of their pathetic "wisdom". Or if the books aren't used to promote"insights" they are used as alleged evidence of good taste or intellect. And not only are you pressured to pretend to like boring as fuck classic books, it is looked down upon to just go and read them. You have to pretend to have almost randomly come across them. Of course this propaganda tactic is to promote the false idea that the pseudo intellectuals' judgement was not influence by other pseudointellectuals.
Similarly with philosophy. I clearly see that there are infinitely many possible philosophical axioms. Everything from there is pretty fucking trivial. And no, I don't put science on a pedestal separate from Hegelian bullshit or anything like that. I see that science is part of philosophy. The promotion of certain parts of philosophy is based solely on arbitrary fashions.
You don't actually know anything, do you?
/r9k/? who let you out of your hole?
>>3328220
Disgusting
what's the comfiest period in colonial history and why is it the Puritan settlement in new england?
>>3328156
Are you fucking high?
Enjoy being a subsistence farmer with an ugly wife, four kids, no booze, no theatre, no music that isn't hymns about how awful hell's going to be, all sorts of horrific diseases, Indian attacks etc.
Puritans were Christian Wahhabis, dude.
I keep seeing traitors and neo-Nazis making reference to a group called the Focus who allegedly had Winston Churchill in their pocket before the war. I can't find any reference to them anywhere other than on pro-Nazi sites however. Is there any actual evidence that the Focus existed or is it purely a neo-Nazi fabrication?
What even would be the point of having Churchill in your pocket prewar?
>>3328146
Clearly some kind of bizarre fabrication.
>>3328146
It's likely nonsense.