Historically speaking what was the worst mistake in history?
Unironically communism.
>>2564333
stabbing Julius
Empires.
Why do Christians / Muslims / Jews hate statues and photos and artwork so much?
Is it because of the Iconoclasm specifically ordered in the Second Commandment?
>Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
KJV Exodus 20:4
What is wrong with monotheists?
Is it fair to say that Christians are responsible for the ISIS atrocities against human history at Palmyra or is that going too far?
>>2563790
Shameless china slut samefag bump.
Jesus Christ, you're retarded. Sage and die, you meme-spouting retard.
>>2563790
Maybe. You know just maybe... worshipping statues are a pagan tradition and Abraham religions are against it.
Would you step into a Star Trek teleporter?
The teleporters in Star Trek work by scanning you, then disintegrating you, and then (or meanwhile?) creating a being based on the scan using completely different materia elsewhere.
Also, in a society where those "teleporters" existed and became commonly used, would it be morally permissible to demand of public officials such as politicians and police officers to use them to conduct their work more efficiently?
Would it be morally obligatory for them to use them?
And lastly, would the being popping out at the target destination be the "you" that has stepped into the teleporter on the ship?
>>2563777
>this old chestnut
Seriously, think of better threads and stop being lazy.
>>2563777
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/1
Did Zama actually happen?
>>2563615
Depends who you ask
Scipio Africanus beat the Carthaginians in Nova Cartago, Baecula, Ilipa, Utica, Campi Magni and Zama. Pretty impressive if one takes into account how the Italian campaign had unfolded from the beginning.
>>2565028
Is Scipio the stealth greatest general of antiquity? Greater than Alexander, even?
to perpetuate patriarchy
there is absolutely no evidence that on average men are stronger than women
WE WUZ KAWEENZ
>>2563136
yeah sure, that's why high school boys can't beat a profession women's soccer team. oh wait, they can.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/6072/australias-national-womens-soccer-team-lose-7-0-amanda-prestigiacomo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_humans
Anthropologist had a hard time differentiating between viking men and women because they both had masculine bodies
How were MENA people treated in Ancient Greece and Rome?
Carthage got carthaged
rest of north africa was the wheat supplier, local populace was either submitting or into banditry/piracy
>>2562625
They didn't exist as a category.
They were considered intelligent and civilized unlike snowniggers.
ITT: autists who changed the world
Post some random scandalous bits of history you've found.
From Herodotus' Histories book 2 (egypt) chapter 90, during a discussion on mummification
>Wives of notable men, and women of great beauty and reputation, are not at once given to the embalmers, but only after they have been dead for three or four days. This is done to deter the embalmers from having intercourse with the women. For it is said that one was caught having intercourse with the fresh corpse of a woman, and was denounced by his fellow-workman.
>>2559248
holy shit
>>2559248
>humanity is 200.000 years old
>oldest civilization is 8000 years old
Am I seriously supposed to believe that for 192.000 years humanity has done nothing but to hunt and pick berries?
>>2557021
The first great African civilizations popped up around the world hundreds of Thousands of years ago
>inb4 WE
fuck off /pol/
Have you tried teaching an ape how to use tools?
>>2557046
this, we had great kingdoms like Wewuz kingdom, Kang Empire and Sheet Conglomerate
Why did this small region produce 99% of human accomplishments?
>>2546480
good weather
>>2546499
nice meme
>>2546480
because it includes Italy
So we always hear that the Nazis/fascists were the aggressors in places like Weimar Germany and interwar Italy, before they took power, getting in streetbrawls with communists and the like. Is there literally any truth to them being aggressors? If anything it makes sense that communists would begin attacking them. Fascism appealed to nationalism and conservative social policy combined with socialism, while communism had the right economic policy but was insane and neurotic ideologically. Naturally this meant fascists were encroaching on what the communists viewed as their demographical base, and needed to try put down a growing rival.
>>2570504
and you extrapolated all of this without any reference to the historical literature. all to make the nazis look like the "good guys"
>>2570504
SA was literally created as a protection squad against aggressive commies who disrupted NS rallies.
>>2570504
Fascism is an inherently violent and anti rational ideology. It just so happens that the climates that fascist thrive in (economic hardship) is also the climate that communism thrives in and thus the two always come into conflict. In terms of ideological incompatibility, Fascism comes into conflict with just about every other ideology under the sun and therefore is both the instigator or the victim of violence depending on the historical circumstance.
What will post-capitalist society look like?
>>2570319
Primitive Communism.
>>2570319
After Primitive Communism comes Slavery. Doesn't that mean that after Communisms comes Advanced Slavery?
>>2570319
Take a look around you. If you live in Europe or America we are post-capitalist.
The last time social Darwinism was deeply imbedded in an industrial society was the mid-late nineteenth century, though others may disagree
>tfw want to be able to devote more time to reading my history books but college obligations keep me from doing so on any meaningful level
Anybody else know this feel? Sometimes I wish I was a NEET.
>>2570192
Dont worry, someday you will graduate and if you didn't study STEM, you can join all of us NEET-O-DADDY-Os
>>2570214
>tfw am studying STEM
>tfw in a growing field
I wish I could go back in time and just live as a humble scribe.
>>2570218
It's ok. You will never understand the euphoric joy of jobless, aimless, unrewarded philosophizing and endless masturbation sessions.
Enjoy your well paid work for the glory of (((The State))). When you see me shuffling down the sidewalk with a tattered volume of ancient gnostic wisdom uttering to myself and the birds and shouting profanity at the sacred sun, drive home in your convertible European sports car to your four bedroom house, kiss your beautiful wife and three kids and 2 dogs and know that you made the wrong choice.
Poor lad.
Mississippian here, born and raised all my life. Today I had a conversation with my father and I learned that a great deal of my family played a role in the American Civil War. Lately I have been thinking about the state of the American South today, how Mississippi is basically a wasteland. Mississippi is a state that lost a war, and when you visit MS you really get that feeling.
Anyway, does anyone have any good book recommendations on the antebellum South/Civil War? Something which can give me a more clear view of my ancestor's history. And preferably something which doesnt spend too much time on muh slaves. Yes slavery plaid a major role in the political tensions of the late 1800s, but I have had that shit pushed onto me for so fucking long. I want to read a book which balances the positive aspects of the south with the negative, because quite frankly I find antebellum culture to be beautiful.
>>2570111
Faulkner, Twain, Flannery O'Connor.
>I have had that shit pushed onto me for so fucking long.
Enslave shit get hit.
>>2570180
Im talking more non-fiction books, like history books? Thanks for the recommendations though, although those authors seem too obvious, why didnt I think of them?
>>2570193
considering slaves were central to the political and economic situation in the southern and national economy it cant be avoided really
Why do they call it "civil war" if the actions committed aren't actually civil?
>>2570082
Because it involves the people of a single nation/state or the citizens of a single political entity fracturing and fighting against each other, civil from the Latin civilis, meaning citizens.
THE TERM "CIVIL WAR" EVINCES A CHAUVINISTIC TRIBALISM, PRESUPPOSING AS THE ONLY CITIZENS THE PEOPLE OF ONE'S NATIONSTATE, TO THE EXCLUSION OF THE PEOPLE OF OTHER NATIONSTATE.
A BETTER TERM IS "INTERNECINE WAR".
>>2570105
>... TO THE EXCLUSION OF THE PEOPLE OF OTHER [NATIONSTATES].